Articles | Volume 16, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6029-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6029-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
27 Oct 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 27 Oct 2023

A standardized methodology for the validation of air quality forecast applications (F-MQO): lessons learnt from its application across Europe

Lina Vitali, Kees Cuvelier, Antonio Piersanti, Alexandra Monteiro, Mario Adani, Roberta Amorati, Agnieszka Bartocha, Alessandro D'Ausilio, Paweł Durka, Carla Gama, Giulia Giovannini, Stijn Janssen, Tomasz Przybyła, Michele Stortini, Stijn Vranckx, and Philippe Thunis

Related authors

Measured and modelled air quality trends in Italy over the period 2003–2010
Ilaria D'Elia, Gino Briganti, Lina Vitali, Antonio Piersanti, Gaia Righini, Massimo D'Isidoro, Andrea Cappelletti, Mihaela Mircea, Mario Adani, Gabriele Zanini, and Luisella Ciancarella
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10825–10849, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10825-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10825-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of air quality forecasting system FORAIR_IT over Europe and Italy at high resolution for year 2017
Mario Adani, Guido Guarnieri, Lina Vitali, Luisella Ciancarella, Ilaria D'Elia, Mihaela Mircea, Maurizio Gualtieri, Andrea Cappelletti, Massimo D'Isidoro, Gino Briganti, Antonio Piersanti, Milena Stracquadanio, Gaia Righini, Felicita Russo, Giuseppe Cremona, Maria Gabriella Villani, and Gabriele Zanini
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-54,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-54, 2020
Publication in GMD not foreseen
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Emission ensemble approach to improve the development of multi-scale emission inventories
Philippe Thunis, Jeroen Kuenen, Enrico Pisoni, Bertrand Bessagnet, Manjola Banja, Lech Gawuc, Karol Szymankiewicz, Diego Guizardi, Monica Crippa, Susana Lopez-Aparicio, Marc Guevara, Alexander De Meij, Sabine Schindlbacher, and Alain Clappier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3631–3643, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3631-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3631-2024, 2024
Short summary
What is the relative impact of nudging and online coupling on meteorological variables, pollutant concentrations and aerosol optical properties?
Laurent Menut, Bertrand Bessagnet, Arineh Cholakian, Guillaume Siour, Sylvain Mailler, and Romain Pennel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3645–3665, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3645-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3645-2024, 2024
Short summary
Diagnosing drivers of PM2.5 simulation biases in China from meteorology, chemical composition, and emission sources using an efficient machine learning method
Shuai Wang, Mengyuan Zhang, Yueqi Gao, Peng Wang, Qingyan Fu, and Hongliang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3617–3629, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Validation and analysis of the Polair3D v1.11 chemical transport model over Quebec
Shoma Yamanouchi, Shayamilla Mahagammulla Gamage, Sara Torbatian, Jad Zalzal, Laura Minet, Audrey Smargiassi, Ying Liu, Ling Liu, Forood Azargoshasbi, Jinwoong Kim, Youngseob Kim, Daniel Yazgi, and Marianne Hatzopoulou
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3579–3597, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3579-2024, 2024
Short summary
Assimilation of GNSS tropospheric gradients into the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.4.1
Rohith Thundathil, Florian Zus, Galina Dick, and Jens Wickert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3599–3616, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3599-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3599-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Adani, M., Piersanti, A., Ciancarella, L., D'Isidoro, M., Villani, M. G., and Vitali, L.: Preliminary Tests on the Sensitivity of the FORAIR_IT Air Quality Forecasting System to Different Meteorological Drivers, Atmosphere, 11, 574, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060574, 2020. 
Adani, M., D'Isidoro, M., Mircea, M., Guarnieri, G., Vitali, L., D'Elia, I., Ciancarella, L., Gualtieri, M., Briganti, G., Cappelletti, A., Piersanti, A., Stracquadanio, M., Righini, G., Russo, F., Cremona, G., Villani, M. G., and Zanini, G.: Evaluation of air quality forecasting system FORAIR-IT over Europe and Italy at high resolution for year 2017, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 13, 101456, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101456, 2022. 
Agarwal, S., Sharma, S., R., S., Rahman, M. H., Vranckx, S., Maiheu, B., Blyth, L., Janssen, S., Gargava, P., Shukla, V. K., and Batra, S.: Air quality forecasting using artificial neural networks with real time dynamic error correction in highly polluted regions, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139454, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139454, 2020. 
Alfaro, S. C. and Gomes, L.: Modeling mineral aerosol production by wind erosion: Emission intensities and aerosol size distributions in source areas, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 18075–18084, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900339, 2001. 
Bai, L., Wang, J., Ma, X., and Lu, H.: Air Pollution Forecasts: An Overview, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. He., 15, 780, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040780, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
Air quality forecasting models play a key role in fostering short-term measures aimed at reducing human exposure to air pollution. Together with this role comes the need for a thorough assessment of the model performances to build confidence in models’ capabilities, in particular when model applications support policymaking. In this paper, we propose an evaluation methodology and test it on several domains across Europe, highlighting its strengths and room for improvement.