Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-47-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-47-2023
Model description paper
 | 
03 Jan 2023
Model description paper |  | 03 Jan 2023

ICLASS 1.1, a variational Inverse modelling framework for the Chemistry Land-surface Atmosphere Soil Slab model: description, validation, and application

Peter J. M. Bosman and Maarten C. Krol

Related authors

Combined assimilation of NOAA surface and MIPAS satellite observations to constrain the global budget of carbonyl sulfide
Jin Ma, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Norbert Glatthor, Stephen A. Montzka, Marc von Hobe, Thomas Röckmann, and Maarten C. Krol
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 6047–6070, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6047-2024, 2024
Short summary
Estimating NOx emissions of stack plumes using a high-resolution atmospheric chemistry model and satellite-derived NO2 columns
Maarten Krol, Bart van Stratum, Isidora Anglou, and Klaas Folkert Boersma
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2519,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2519, 2024
Short summary
A light-weight NO2 to NOx conversion model for quantifying NOx emissions of point sources from NO2 satellite observations
Sandro Meier, Erik Koene, Maarten Krol, Dominik Brunner, Alexander Damm, and Gerrit Kuhlmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-159,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-159, 2024
Short summary
What chemical species are responsible for new particle formation and growth in the Netherlands? A hybrid positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis using aerosol composition (ACSM) and size (SMPS)
Farhan R. Nursanto, Roy Meinen, Rupert Holzinger, Maarten C. Krol, Xinya Liu, Ulrike Dusek, Bas Henzing, and Juliane L. Fry
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10015–10034, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10015-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10015-2023, 2023
Short summary
Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide inferred from tower and mobile atmospheric observations in the Netherlands
Alessandro Zanchetta, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Steven van Heuven, Andrea Scifo, Hubertus A. Scheeren, Ivan Mammarella, Ute Karstens, Jin Ma, Maarten Krol, and Huilin Chen
Biogeosciences, 20, 3539–3553, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3539-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Implementation of a Simple Actuator Disk for Large-Eddy Simulation in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF-SADLES v1.2) for wind turbine wake simulation
Hai Bui, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabi, and Mohammadreza Mohammadpour-Penchah
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4447–4465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4447-2024, 2024
Short summary
WRF-PDAF v1.0: implementation and application of an online localized ensemble data assimilation framework
Changliang Shao and Lars Nerger
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4433–4445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation and evaluation of diabatic advection in the Lagrangian transport model MPTRAC 2.6
Jan Clemens, Lars Hoffmann, Bärbel Vogel, Sabine Grießbach, and Nicole Thomas
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4467–4493, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4467-2024, 2024
Short summary
An improved and extended parameterization of the CO2 15 µm cooling in the middle and upper atmosphere (CO2_cool_fort-1.0)
Manuel López-Puertas, Federico Fabiano, Victor Fomichev, Bernd Funke, and Daniel R. Marsh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4401–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4401-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a multiphase chemical mechanism to improve secondary organic aerosol formation in CAABA/MECCA (version 4.7.0)
Felix Wieser, Rolf Sander, Changmin Cho, Hendrik Fuchs, Thorsten Hohaus, Anna Novelli, Ralf Tillmann, and Domenico Taraborrelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4311–4330, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4311-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4311-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barbaro, E., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J., Ouwersloot, H. G., Schröter, J. S., Donovan, D. P., and Krol, M. C.: Aerosols in the convective boundary layer: Shortwave radiation effects on the coupled land-atmosphere system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 5845–5863, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021237, 2014. a
Bastrikov, V., MacBean, N., Bacour, C., Santaren, D., Kuppel, S., and Peylin, P.: Land surface model parameter optimisation using in situ flux data: comparison of gradient-based versus random search algorithms (a case study using ORCHIDEE v1.9.5.2), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4739–4754, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4739-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Bergamaschi, P., Frankenberg, C., Meirink, J. F., Krol, M., Villani, M. G., Houweling, S., Dentener, F., Dlugokencky, E. J., Miller, J. B., Gatti, L. V., Engel, A., and Levin, I.: Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012287, 2009. a
Bosman, P. and Krol, M.: PBosmanatm/ICLASS: ICLASS v1.1, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7239147, 2022. a
Bosveld, F., Van Meijgaard, E., Moors, E., and Werner, C.: Interpretation of flux observations along the Cabauw 200 m meteorological tower, in: 16th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence 6.18, 1–4, Portland, USA, https://ams.confex.com/ams/BLTAIRSE/webprogram/Paper78632.html (last access: 9 December 2022), 2004. a
Download
Short summary
We describe an inverse modelling framework constructed around a simple model for the atmospheric boundary layer. This framework can be fed with various observation types to study the boundary layer and land–atmosphere exchange. With this framework, it is possible to estimate model parameters and the associated uncertainties. Some of these parameters are difficult to obtain directly by observations. An example application for a grassland in the Netherlands is included.