Articles | Volume 16, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4405-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4405-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
02 Aug 2023
Development and technical paper |
| 02 Aug 2023
| 02 Aug 2023
A Python library for computing individual and merged non-CO2 algorithmic climate change functions: CLIMaCCF V1.0
Simone Dietmüller
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Sigrun Matthes
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Katrin Dahlmann
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Hiroshi Yamashita
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Abolfazl Simorgh
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
Manuel Soler
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
Florian Linke
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Air Space Transportation Systems, Hamburg, Germany
Institute of Air Transport Systems, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Hamburg, Germany
Benjamin Lührs
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Air Space Transportation Systems, Hamburg, Germany
Maximilian M. Meuser
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Air Space Transportation Systems, Hamburg, Germany
Institute of Air Transport Systems, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Hamburg, Germany
Christian Weder
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Air Space Transportation Systems, Hamburg, Germany
Volker Grewe
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Feijia Yin
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Federica Castino
Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
Related authors
Sean Davis, William Ball, Yue Jia, Gabriel Chiodo, Justin Alsing, James Keeble, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Carlo Arosio, Ewa Bednarz, Andreas Chrysanthou, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Robert Damadeo, Sandip Dhomse, Mohamadou Diallo, Simone Dietmuller, Roland Eichinger, Stacey Frith, Birgit Hassler, Michaela Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Natalya Kramarova, Diego Loyola, Eliane Maillard Barras, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, David Plummer, Robert Portmann, Karen Rosenlof, Alexei Rozanov, Viktoria Sofieva, Johannes Staehelin, Timofei Sukhodolov, Kleareti Tourpali, Ronald Van der A, H. J. Ray Wang, Krzysztof Wargan, Shingo Watanabe, Mark Weber, Jeannette Wild, Yousuke Yamashita, and Jerry Ziemke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how tropical ozone levels have changed since 2000 in chemistry climate models and satellite observations to determine how well they agree with one another, and to see if current trends can help predict future levels. At some, satellite records disagree significantly on the magnitude of ozone changes. The study shows a connection between recent ozone trends and future ozone levels, suggesting that satellite measurements could help constrain future ozone changes.
Sigrun Matthes, Klaus Gierens, Björn Beckmann, Luca Bugliaro, Simone Dietmüller, Christine Frömming, Maleen Hanst, Sina Hofer, Julian Jene, Simon Kirschler, Carmen G. Köhler, Alexander Lau, Ralph Leemüller, Aline Liedtke, Max Mendiguchia Meuser, Patrick Peter, Vanessa Santos Gabriel, Ines Köhler, Gerd Saueressig, Linda Schlemmer, Jonas Sperling, Swen Schlobach, Ralph Schultz, Kristina von Sack, and Nathalie Waltenberg
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-3, 2026
Preprint under review for JECATS
Short summary
Short summary
Operational strategies such as eco-efficient flight routing have potential to reduce aviation’s climate effect. A collaborative workflow integrating aviation weather forecasting, flight planning, air traffic control, and climate benefit assessment was developed and tested in D-KULT. Innovative developments demonstrate substantial progress on how to identify alternative trajectories but also highlight remaining challenges, including uncertainties in weather forecast and non-CO2 climate effects.
Federica Castino, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Hiroshi Yamashita, Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Sabine Baumann, Manuel Soler, Abolfazl Simorgh, Maximilian Mendiguchia Meuser, Florian Linke, and Benjamin Lührs
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4031–4052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce SolFinder 1.0, a decision-making tool to select trade-offs between different objective functions for optimal aircraft trajectories, including fuel use, flight time, NOx emissions, contrail distance, and climate impact. The module is included in the AirTraf 3.0 submodel and uses weather conditions simulated by the EMAC atmospheric model. This paper focuses on the ability of SolFinder to identify eco-efficient trajectories, reducing a flight's climate impact at limited cost penalties.
Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Katrin Dahlmann, Christine Frömming, Patrick Peter, Hiroshi Yamashita, Volker Grewe, Feijia Yin, and Federica Castino
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-92, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-92, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Aviation aims to reduce its climate effect by identifying alternative climate-optimized aircraft trajectories. Such routing strategies requires a dedicated meteorological service in order to inform on regions of the atmosphere where aviation non-CO2 emissions have a large climate effect, e.g. by contrail formation or nitrogen-oxide (NOx)-induced ozone formation. This study presents calibration factors for individual non-CO2 effects by comparing with the climate response model AirClim.
Abolfazl Simorgh, Manuel Soler, Daniel González-Arribas, Florian Linke, Benjamin Lührs, Maximilian M. Meuser, Simone Dietmüller, Sigrun Matthes, Hiroshi Yamashita, Feijia Yin, Federica Castino, Volker Grewe, and Sabine Baumann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3723–3748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper addresses the robust climate optimal trajectory planning problem under uncertain meteorological conditions within the structured airspace. Based on the optimization methodology, a Python library has been developed, which can be accessed using the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7121862. The developed tool is capable of providing robust trajectories taking into account all probable realizations of meteorological conditions provided by an EPS computationally very fast.
Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Federica Castino, Pratik Rao, Sigrun Matthes, Katrin Dahlmann, Simone Dietmüller, Christine Frömming, Hiroshi Yamashita, Patrick Peter, Emma Klingaman, Keith P. Shine, Benjamin Lührs, and Florian Linke
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3313–3334, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3313-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3313-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a newly developed submodel ACCF V1.0 based on the MESSy 2.53.0 infrastructure. The ACCF V1.0 is based on the prototype algorithmic climate change functions (aCCFs) v1.0 to enable climate-optimized flight trajectories. One highlight of this paper is that we describe a consistent full set of aCCFs formulas with respect to fuel scenario and metrics. We demonstrate the usage of the ACCF submodel using AirTraf V2.0 to optimize trajectories for cost and climate impact.
Simone Dietmüller, Hella Garny, Roland Eichinger, and William T. Ball
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6811–6837, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021, 2021
Mattia Righi, Simone Ehrenberger, Sabine Brinkop, Johannes Hendricks, Jens Hellekes, Paweł Banyś, Isheeka Dasgupta, Patrick Draheim, Annika Fitz, Manuel Löber, Thomas Pregger, Yvonne Scholz, Angelika Schulz, Birgit Suhr, Nina Thomsen, Christian Martin Weder, Peter Berster, Maximilian Clococeanu, Marc Gelhausen, Alexander Lau, Florian Linke, Sigrun Matthes, and Zarah Lea Zengerling
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 1619–1664, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-1619-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-1619-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The ELK (EmissionsLandKarte) emission inventory provides global emissions for the three transport sectors (land transport, shipping and aviation) and transport-related emissions for the energy sector (oil refineries). It features a detailed resolution of the emissions in different subsectors, transport-specific quantities like non-exhaust emissions, and aviation-specific parameters. The inventory is complemented with uncertainty scores and validated against well-established global inventories.
Sean Davis, William Ball, Yue Jia, Gabriel Chiodo, Justin Alsing, James Keeble, Hideharu Akiyoshi, Carlo Arosio, Ewa Bednarz, Andreas Chrysanthou, Melanie Coldewey-Egbers, Robert Damadeo, Sandip Dhomse, Mohamadou Diallo, Simone Dietmuller, Roland Eichinger, Stacey Frith, Birgit Hassler, Michaela Hegglin, Daan Hubert, Patrick Jöckel, Béatrice Josse, Natalya Kramarova, Diego Loyola, Eliane Maillard Barras, Marion Marchand, Olaf Morgenstern, David Plummer, Robert Portmann, Karen Rosenlof, Alexei Rozanov, Viktoria Sofieva, Johannes Staehelin, Timofei Sukhodolov, Kleareti Tourpali, Ronald Van der A, H. J. Ray Wang, Krzysztof Wargan, Shingo Watanabe, Mark Weber, Jeannette Wild, Yousuke Yamashita, and Jerry Ziemke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-532, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how tropical ozone levels have changed since 2000 in chemistry climate models and satellite observations to determine how well they agree with one another, and to see if current trends can help predict future levels. At some, satellite records disagree significantly on the magnitude of ozone changes. The study shows a connection between recent ozone trends and future ozone levels, suggesting that satellite measurements could help constrain future ozone changes.
Sigrun Matthes, Klaus Gierens, Björn Beckmann, Luca Bugliaro, Simone Dietmüller, Christine Frömming, Maleen Hanst, Sina Hofer, Julian Jene, Simon Kirschler, Carmen G. Köhler, Alexander Lau, Ralph Leemüller, Aline Liedtke, Max Mendiguchia Meuser, Patrick Peter, Vanessa Santos Gabriel, Ines Köhler, Gerd Saueressig, Linda Schlemmer, Jonas Sperling, Swen Schlobach, Ralph Schultz, Kristina von Sack, and Nathalie Waltenberg
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-3, https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-3, 2026
Preprint under review for JECATS
Short summary
Short summary
Operational strategies such as eco-efficient flight routing have potential to reduce aviation’s climate effect. A collaborative workflow integrating aviation weather forecasting, flight planning, air traffic control, and climate benefit assessment was developed and tested in D-KULT. Innovative developments demonstrate substantial progress on how to identify alternative trajectories but also highlight remaining challenges, including uncertainties in weather forecast and non-CO2 climate effects.
Volker Grewe, Simon Blakey, Florian Linke, Sigrun Matthes, Jan Middel, Radu Mirea, Ayce Celikel, David Raper, Feijia Yin, and Xin Zhao
J. Env. Com. Air Transp. Sys., 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-1-1-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-1-1-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Journal of Environmentally Compatible Air Transport System (JECATS) is a not-for-profit international scientific journal dedicated to aspects of the air transport system with a focus on the environmental implications. JECATS combines areas of aerospace engineering, fuels, environmental analysis, climate change, economics, aviation climate mitigation, circularity and policy analysis. It includes aviation transport-related aspects and environmental effects from local to global scales.
Zosia Staniaszek, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Yann Cohen, Agnieszka Skowron, Sigrun Matthes, Robin Thor, and Marianne T. Lund
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5914, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5914, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
NOx emissions from aircraft affect the climate indirectly, by changing greenhouse gas concentrations. We explore whether the NOx emissions from aviation would have a different effect in different potential future climate states, i.e. a high pollution and low pollution case. The three models we use disagree on how this background state alters the climate effects of the NOx emissions. This shows the continuing need to improve our understanding of non-CO2 aviation impacts.
Monica Sharma, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Anja Schmidt, Daniel Sauer, and Volker Grewe
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 8485–8510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8485-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8485-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A plume model is developed to simulate aerosol microphysics in a dispersing aircraft plume, including interactions between ice crystals and aerosols in vortex regime. Compared to an instantaneous dispersion approach, the plume approach estimates 15 % lower aviation aerosol number concentrations, due to more efficient coagulation at plume scale. The model is sensitive to background conditions and initialization parameters, such as ice crystal number concentration and fuel sulfur content.
Hannes Bruder, Robin Niclas Thor, Malte Niklaß, Katrin Dahlmann, Roland Eichinger, Florian Linke, Volker Grewe, Simon Unterstrasser, and Sigrun Matthes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4700, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4700, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We develop an easy-to-use tool to estimate the per-flight climate effect of CO2 and non-CO2 emissions, based only on aircraft size as well as origin and destination airports. The implemented model results from a comparison of Multiple and Symbolic Regression approaches and exhibits a mean relative error of 21 % with respect to climate response model results. The simplified method is designed for climate footprint assessment and covers jet-powered passenger aircraft with over 20 seats.
Jin Maruhashi, Mattia Righi, Monica Sharma, Johannes Hendricks, Patrick Jöckel, Volker Grewe, and Irene C. Dedoussi
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4204, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4204, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol-cloud interactions remain a large source of uncertainty in assessing aviation’s climate impact. We develop, evaluate and present AIRTRAC v2.0 within the EMAC modeling framework, which enables tracking of aviation-emitted SO2 and H2SO4 as they are chemically transformed into sulfate aerosols and transported in the atmosphere. The development allows the identification of atmospheric regions with elevated potential for aerosol–cloud interactions due to sulfur emissions from aircraft.
Amin Jafarimoghaddam and Manuel Soler
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4155, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4155, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a new multi-physics Eulerian framework for long-term contrail simulations, integrating underexplored or previously neglected factors, including spatiotemporal wind variability; nonlinear diffusion coefficients accounting for potential diffusion-blocking mechanisms; a novel multiphase theoretical model for the bulk settling velocity of ice particles; and ice-crystal habit dynamics.
Yann Cohen, Didier Hauglustaine, Zosia Staniaszek, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Irene Dedoussi, Sigrun Matthes, Flávio Quadros, Mattia Righi, Agnieszka Skowron, and Robin Thor
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4273, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4273, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Non-CO2 effects from aviation on climate show large uncertainties. Among them, this study investigates the present-day impact of nitrogen oxides (through ozone and methane) and aerosols produced by aviation on atmospheric composition and therefore on climate, using a global-model intercomparison. Our results show a good consistency between the models for gaseous chemistry, but they also highlight the need for more accurate comparisons and further model development for aerosol parameterization.
Katarina Grubbe Hildebrandt, Federica Castino, Vincent Meijer, and Feijia Yin
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3048, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the regional and seasonal variability in the prediction of ice supersaturated region (ISSRS) in the ERA5 reanalysis using in situ measurements. ERA5 shows better ability to predict ISSRs in the extratropics, compared to the tropics, and in colder seasons, such as extratropical winter. While ERA5 generally underestimates the ISSR occurrence, we find an overestimation in tropical regions in seasons associated larger weather variability, such as South Asia in June, July and August.
Patrick Peter, Sigrun Matthes, Christine Frömming, Patrick Jöckel, Luca Bugliaro, Andreas Giez, Martina Krämer, and Volker Grewe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5911–5934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5911-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5911-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study examines how well the global climate model EMAC (ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry) predicts contrail formation by analysing temperature and humidity – two key factors for contrail development and persistence. The model underestimates temperature, leading to an overprediction of contrail formation and larger ice-supersaturated regions. Adjusting the model improves temperature accuracy but adds uncertainties. Better predictions of contrail formation areas can help optimise flight tracks to reduce aviation's climate effect.
Yann Cohen, Didier Hauglustaine, Nicolas Bellouin, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Sigrun Matthes, Agnieszka Skowron, Robin Thor, Ulrich Bundke, Andreas Petzold, Susanne Rohs, Valérie Thouret, Andreas Zahn, and Helmut Ziereis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5793–5836, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5793-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5793-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The chemical composition of the atmosphere near the tropopause is a key parameter for evaluating the climate impact of subsonic aviation pollutants. This study uses in situ data collected aboard passenger aircraft to assess the ability of four chemistry–climate models to reproduce (bi-)decadal climatologies of ozone, carbon monoxide, water vapour, and reactive nitrogen in this region. The models reproduce the very distinct ozone seasonality in the upper troposphere and in the lower stratosphere well.
Liam Megill and Volker Grewe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4131–4149, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4131-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4131-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses ERA5 data to better understand the relative importance of the factors limiting persistent contrail formation. We develop climatological relationships to estimate potential persistent contrail formation for existing as well as future aircraft and propulsion system designs. We identify latitudes and pressure levels where the introduction of novel aircraft designs would result in significant changes in potential persistent contrail formation compared to existing conventional aircraft.
Jurriaan A. van 't Hoff, Didier Hauglustaine, Johannes Pletzer, Agnieszka Skowron, Volker Grewe, Sigrun Matthes, Maximilian M. Meuser, Robin N. Thor, and Irene C. Dedoussi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2515–2550, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2515-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2515-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Civil supersonic aircraft may return in the near future, and their emissions could lead to atmospheric changes which are detrimental to public health and the climate. We use four atmospheric chemistry models and show that emissions from a future supersonic aircraft fleet increase stratospheric nitrogen and water vapor levels, while depleting the global ozone column and leading to increases in radiative forcing. Their impacts can be reduced by reducing NOx emissions or the cruise altitude.
Markus Kilian, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, Astrid Kerkweg, Mariano Mertens, Andreas Zahn, and Helmut Ziereis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13503–13523, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13503-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13503-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic emissions are a major source of precursors of tropospheric ozone. As ozone formation is highly non-linear, we apply a global–regional chemistry–climate model with a source attribution method (tagging) to quantify the contribution of anthropogenic emissions to ozone. Our analysis shows that the contribution of European anthropogenic emissions largely increases during large ozone periods, indicating that emissions from these sectors drive ozone values.
Mariano Mertens, Sabine Brinkop, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Johannes Hendricks, Patrick Jöckel, Anna Lanteri, Sigrun Matthes, Vanessa S. Rieger, Mattia Righi, and Robin N. Thor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 12079–12106, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12079-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-12079-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We quantified the contributions of land transport, shipping, and aviation emissions to tropospheric ozone; its radiative forcing; and the reductions of the methane lifetime using chemistry-climate model simulations. The contributions were analysed for the conditions of 2015 and for three projections for the year 2050. The results highlight the challenges of mitigating ozone formed by emissions of the transport sector, caused by the non-linearitiy of the ozone chemistry and the long lifetime.
Federica Castino, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Hiroshi Yamashita, Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Sabine Baumann, Manuel Soler, Abolfazl Simorgh, Maximilian Mendiguchia Meuser, Florian Linke, and Benjamin Lührs
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4031–4052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce SolFinder 1.0, a decision-making tool to select trade-offs between different objective functions for optimal aircraft trajectories, including fuel use, flight time, NOx emissions, contrail distance, and climate impact. The module is included in the AirTraf 3.0 submodel and uses weather conditions simulated by the EMAC atmospheric model. This paper focuses on the ability of SolFinder to identify eco-efficient trajectories, reducing a flight's climate impact at limited cost penalties.
Johannes Pletzer and Volker Grewe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1743–1775, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1743-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1743-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Very fast aircraft can travel at 30–40 km altitude and are designed to use liquid hydrogen as fuel instead of kerosene. Depending on their flight altitude, the impact of these aircraft on the atmosphere and climate can change very much. Our results show that a variation inflight latitude can have a considerably higher change in impact compared to a variation in flight altitude. Atmospheric air transport and polar stratospheric clouds play an important role in hypersonic aircraft emissions.
Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Katrin Dahlmann, Christine Frömming, Patrick Peter, Hiroshi Yamashita, Volker Grewe, Feijia Yin, and Federica Castino
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-92, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-92, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Aviation aims to reduce its climate effect by identifying alternative climate-optimized aircraft trajectories. Such routing strategies requires a dedicated meteorological service in order to inform on regions of the atmosphere where aviation non-CO2 emissions have a large climate effect, e.g. by contrail formation or nitrogen-oxide (NOx)-induced ozone formation. This study presents calibration factors for individual non-CO2 effects by comparing with the climate response model AirClim.
Elena De La Torre Castro, Tina Jurkat-Witschas, Armin Afchine, Volker Grewe, Valerian Hahn, Simon Kirschler, Martina Krämer, Johannes Lucke, Nicole Spelten, Heini Wernli, Martin Zöger, and Christiane Voigt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13167–13189, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13167-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show the differences in the microphysical properties between high-latitude (HL) cirrus and mid-latitude (ML) cirrus over the Arctic, North Atlantic, and central Europe during summer. The in situ measurements are combined with backward trajectories to investigate the influence of the region on cloud formation. We show that HL cirrus are characterized by a lower concentration of larger ice crystals when compared to ML cirrus.
Abolfazl Simorgh, Manuel Soler, Daniel González-Arribas, Florian Linke, Benjamin Lührs, Maximilian M. Meuser, Simone Dietmüller, Sigrun Matthes, Hiroshi Yamashita, Feijia Yin, Federica Castino, Volker Grewe, and Sabine Baumann
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3723–3748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3723-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3723-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper addresses the robust climate optimal trajectory planning problem under uncertain meteorological conditions within the structured airspace. Based on the optimization methodology, a Python library has been developed, which can be accessed using the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7121862. The developed tool is capable of providing robust trajectories taking into account all probable realizations of meteorological conditions provided by an EPS computationally very fast.
Robin N. Thor, Malte Niklaß, Katrin Dahlmann, Florian Linke, Volker Grewe, and Sigrun Matthes
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-126, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-126, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a simplied method to estimate the climate effects of single flights through CO2 and non-CO2 effects, exclusively based on the aircraft seat category as well as the origin and destination airports. The derived climate effect functions exhibit a mean relative error of only 15 % with respect to results from a climate response model. The method is designed for climate footprint assessments and covers most commerical airlines with seat capacities starting from 101 passengers.
Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Federica Castino, Pratik Rao, Sigrun Matthes, Katrin Dahlmann, Simone Dietmüller, Christine Frömming, Hiroshi Yamashita, Patrick Peter, Emma Klingaman, Keith P. Shine, Benjamin Lührs, and Florian Linke
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3313–3334, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3313-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3313-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a newly developed submodel ACCF V1.0 based on the MESSy 2.53.0 infrastructure. The ACCF V1.0 is based on the prototype algorithmic climate change functions (aCCFs) v1.0 to enable climate-optimized flight trajectories. One highlight of this paper is that we describe a consistent full set of aCCFs formulas with respect to fuel scenario and metrics. We demonstrate the usage of the ACCF submodel using AirTraf V2.0 to optimize trajectories for cost and climate impact.
Robin N. Thor, Mariano Mertens, Sigrun Matthes, Mattia Righi, Johannes Hendricks, Sabine Brinkop, Phoebe Graf, Volker Grewe, Patrick Jöckel, and Steven Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1459–1466, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1459-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We report on an inconsistency in the latitudinal distribution of aviation emissions between two versions of a data product which is widely used by researchers. From the available documentation, we do not expect such an inconsistency. We run a chemistry–climate model to compute the effect of the inconsistency in emissions on atmospheric chemistry and radiation and find that the radiative forcing associated with aviation ozone is 7.6 % higher when using the less recent version of the data.
Johannes Pletzer, Didier Hauglustaine, Yann Cohen, Patrick Jöckel, and Volker Grewe
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14323–14354, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14323-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Very fast aircraft can travel long distances in extremely short times and can fly at high altitudes (15 to 35 km). These aircraft emit water vapour, nitrogen oxides, and hydrogen. Water vapour emissions remain for months to several years at these altitudes and have an important impact on temperature. We investigate two aircraft fleets flying at 26 and 35 km. Ozone is depleted more, and the water vapour perturbation and temperature change are larger for the aircraft flying at 35 km.
Jin Maruhashi, Volker Grewe, Christine Frömming, Patrick Jöckel, and Irene C. Dedoussi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14253–14282, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14253-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14253-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aviation NOx emissions lead to the formation of ozone in the atmosphere in the short term, which has a climate warming effect. This study uses global-scale simulations to characterize the transport patterns between NOx emissions at an altitude of ~ 10.4 km and the resulting ozone. Results show a strong spatial and temporal dependence of NOx in disturbing atmospheric O3 concentrations, with the location that is most impacted in terms of warming not necessarily coinciding with the emission region.
Etienne Terrenoire, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Yann Cohen, Anne Cozic, Richard Valorso, Franck Lefèvre, and Sigrun Matthes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11987–12023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11987-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11987-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aviation NOx emissions not only have an impact on global climate by changing ozone and methane levels in the atmosphere, but also contribute to the deterioration of local air quality. The LMDZ-INCA global model is applied to re-evaluate the impact of aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on climate. We investigate the impact of present-day and future (2050) aircraft emissions on atmospheric composition and the associated radiative forcings of climate for ozone, methane and aerosol direct forcings.
Vanessa Simone Rieger and Volker Grewe
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5883–5903, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5883-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5883-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Road traffic emissions of nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds and carbon monoxide produce ozone in the troposphere and thus influence Earth's climate. To assess the ozone response to a broad range of mitigation strategies for road traffic, we developed a new chemistry–climate response model called TransClim. It is based on lookup tables containing climate–response relations and thus is able to quickly determine the climate response of a mitigation option.
Christine Frömming, Volker Grewe, Sabine Brinkop, Patrick Jöckel, Amund S. Haslerud, Simon Rosanka, Jesper van Manen, and Sigrun Matthes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9151–9172, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9151-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9151-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The influence of weather situations on non-CO2 aviation climate impact is investigated to identify systematic weather-related sensitivities. If aircraft avoid the most sensitive areas, climate impact might be reduced. Enhanced significance is found for emission in relation to high-pressure systems, jet stream, polar night, and tropopause altitude. The results represent a comprehensive data set for studies aiming at weather-dependent flight trajectory optimization to reduce total climate impact.
Simone Dietmüller, Hella Garny, Roland Eichinger, and William T. Ball
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6811–6837, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6811-2021, 2021
Cited articles
Castino, F., Yin, F., Grewe, V., Soler, M., Simorgh, A., Yamashita, H.,
Matthes, S., Baumann, S., Dietmüller, S., Linke, F., and Lührs, B.: Seasonal
Variability of Aircraft Trajectories reducing NOx-climate Impacts under a
Multitude of Weather Patterns, in: 11th SESAR Innovation Days, online, 7–9 December 2021, https://pure.tudelft.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/113785893/SIDs_2021_paper_81.pdf (last access: 3 March 2022), 2021. a, b
Cess, R., Potter, G., Blanchet, J., Boer, G., Ghan, S., Kiehl, J., Letreut, H.,
Li, Z., Liang, X., Mitchell, J., Morcrette, J., Randall, D., Riches, M.,
Roeckner, E., Schlese, U., Slingo, A., Taylor, K., Washington, W.,
Wetherrald, R., and Yagi, I.: Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as
produced by 14 atmospheric general-circulation models, Science, 245,
513–516, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4917.513, 1989. a
Deuber, O., Sigrun, M., Robert, S., Michael, P., and Ling, L.: A physical
metric-based framework for evaluating the climate trade-off between CO2 and
contrails – The case of lowering aircraft flight trajectories, Environ.
Sci. Policy, 25, 176–185, 2013. a
Dietmüller, S.: dlr-pa/climaccf: Dataset update for GMDD, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6977272, 2022. a, b
DuBois, D. and Paynter, G. C.: “Fuel Flow Method2” for Estimating Aircraft
Emissions, SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1987, SAE Transactions, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1987, 2006. a
Forster, P. D. F., Freckleton, R., and Shine, K.: On aspects of the concept of
radiative forcing, Clim. Dynam., 13, 547–560, 1997. a
Frömming, C., Grewe, V., Brinkop, S., Jöckel, P., Haslerud, A. S., Rosanka, S., van Manen, J., and Matthes, S.: Influence of weather situation on non-CO2 aviation climate effects: the REACT4C climate change functions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9151–9172, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9151-2021, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Gierens, K., Matthes, S., and Rohs, S.: How well can persistent contrails be
predicted?, Aerospace, 7, 169, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7120169, 2020. a
Graver, B. and Rutherford, D.: Transatlantic airline fuel efficiency ranking,
2016, International Council on Clean Transportation, http://www.theicct.org/transpacific-airline-fuel-efficiency-ranking-2016 (last access: 6 May 2022), 2018. a
Grewe, V. and Stenke, A.: AirClim: an efficient tool for climate evaluation of aircraft technology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4621–4639, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4621-2008, 2008. a
Grewe, V., Frömming, C., Matthes, S., Brinkop, S., Ponater, M., Dietmüller, S., Jöckel, P., Garny, H., Tsati, E., Dahlmann, K., Søvde, O. A., Fuglestvedt, J., Berntsen, T. K., Shine, K. P., Irvine, E. A., Champougny, T., and Hullah, P.: Aircraft routing with minimal climate impact: the REACT4C climate cost function modelling approach (V1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 175–201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-175-2014, 2014. a, b
Grewe, V., Matthes, S., and Dahlmann, K.: The contribution of aviation NOx
emissions to climate change: are we ignoring methodological flaws?,
Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 121003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5dd7, 2019. a
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Nazarenko, L., Lacis, A., Schmidt, G.,
Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, M., Bauer, S., Bell, N., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Del Genio, A., Faluvegi, G., Fleming, E. and Friend, A. and Hall, T. and Jackman, C. and Kelley, M. and Kiang, N. and Koch, D. and Lean, J. and Lerner, J. and Lo, K. and Menon, S. and and Miller, R. and Minnis, P. and Novakov, T. and Oinas, V. and Perlwitz, Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun, S., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D., Wielicki, B., Wong, T., Yao, M., and Zhang, S.: Efficacy of climate
forcings, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005776, 2005. a, b, c
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6, 2023. a
Irvine, E. A., Hoskins, B. J., Shine, K. P., Lunnon, R. W., and Froemming, C.:
Characterizing North Atlantic weather patterns for climate-optimal aircraft
routing, Meteorol. Appl., 20, 80–93, 2013. a
Jelinek, F.: The Advanced Emission Model (AEM3)-Validation Report, Ratio, 306,
1–13, https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/library/016a_AEM_Validation.pdf (last access: 6 May 2022), 2004. a
Jöckel, P., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Kunze, M., Kirner, O., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Brinkop, S., Cai, D. S., Dyroff, C., Eckstein, J., Frank, F., Garny, H., Gottschaldt, K.-D., Graf, P., Grewe, V., Kerkweg, A., Kern, B., Matthes, S., Mertens, M., Meul, S., Neumaier, M., Nützel, M., Oberländer-Hayn, S., Ruhnke, R., Runde, T., Sander, R., Scharffe, D., and Zahn, A.: Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1153–1200, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016, 2016. a
Joshi, M., Shine, K., Ponater, M., and Stuber, N.: A comparison of climate
response to different radiative forcings in the general circulation models:
toward an improved metric of climate change, Clim. Dynam., 20, 843–854,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0305-9, 2003. a
Kärcher, B.: Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus, Nat.
Commun., 9, 1824, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0, 2018. a
Lee, D. S., Fahey, D., Skowron, A., Allen, M., Burkhardt, U., Chen, Q.,
Doherty, S., Freeman, S., Forster, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gettelman, A., De León, R. R., Lim, L. L., Lund, M. T., Millar, R. J., Owen, B., Penner, J. E., Pitari, G., Prather, M. J., Sausen, R., and Wilcox, L. J.: The
contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to
2018, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834, 2021. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Linke, F., Grewe, V., and Gollnick, V.: The implications of intermediate stop
operations on aviation emissions and climate, Meteorol. Z.,
26, 697–709, 2017. a
Lührs, B., Linke, F., Matthes, S., Grewe, V., and Yin, F.: Climate impact
mitigation potential of European air traffic in a weather situation with
strong contrail formation, Aerospace, 8, 50, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020050, 2021. a
Marenco, A., Thouret, V., Nédélec, P., Smit, H., Helten, M., Kley, D.,
Karcher, F., Simon, P., Law, K., Pyle, J., Poschmann, P., Von Wrede, R., Hume, C., and Cook, T.: Measurement of ozone and
water vapor by Airbus in-service aircraft: The MOZAIC airborne program, An
overview, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103,
25631–25642, 1998. a
Matthes, S., Grewe, V., Dahlmann, K., Frömming, C., Irvine, E., Lim, L.,
Linke, F., Lührs, B., Owen, B., Shine, K., Stromatas, S., Yamashita, H., and Yin, F.: A concept for
multi-criteria environmental assessment of aircraft trajectories, Aerospace,
4, 42, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace4030042, 2017. a, b
Matthes, S., Lührs, B., Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Linke, F., Yin, F.,
Klingaman, E., and Shine, K. P.: Climate-optimized trajectories and robust
mitigation potential: Flying ATM4E, Aerospace, 7, 156, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7110156, 2020. a
Matthes, S., Dahlmann, K., Dietmüller, S., Yamashita, H., Grewe, V., Soler,
M., Simorgh, A., González Arriba, D., Linke, F., Lührs, B., Meuser,
Maximilian, C. F., and Yin, F.: Concept for identifying robust eco-efficient
aircraft trajectories: methodological concept of climate-optimized aircraft
trajectories in FlyATM4E, Meteorol. Z., submitted,
2023a. a
Nuic, A. and Mouillet, V.: User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Family 4, Eurocontrol. ECC Technical/Scientific Report No. 12/11/22‐58, 2012. a
Penner, J. E., Lister, D., Griggs, D. J., Dokken, D. J., and McFarland, M.:
Aviation and the global atmosphere: a special report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/av-en-1.pdf (last access: 22 July 2022), 1999. a
Petzold, A., Neis, P., Rütimann, M., Rohs, S., Berkes, F., Smit, H. G. J., Krämer, M., Spelten, N., Spichtinger, P., Nédélec, P., and Wahner, A.: Ice-supersaturated air masses in the northern mid-latitudes from regular in situ observations by passenger aircraft: vertical distribution, seasonality and tropospheric fingerprint, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8157–8179, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8157-2020, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Ponater, M.: Distinctive efficacies of the components contributing to total aviation climate impact, in: 2nd International Conference on Transport, Atmosphere and Climate (TAC-2), 22–25 June 2009, Aachen, Germany and Maastricht, the Netherlands, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt,227–232, ISSN 1434-8454,
2010. a
Ponater, M., Marquart, S., Sausen, R., and Schumann, U.: On contrail climate
sensitivity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L10706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022580, 2005. a, b, c
Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., and Wang, P. K.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 28,
381–382, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829808965531, 1998. a
Rao, P., Yin, F., Grewe, V., Yamashita, H., Jöckel, P., Matthes, S.,
Mertens, M., and Frömming, C.: Case Study for Testing the Validity of NOx-Ozone Algorithmic Climate Change Functions for Optimising Flight
Trajectories, Aerospace, 9, 231, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9050231, 2022. a
Rap, A., Forster, P. M., Haywood, J. M., Jones, A., and Boucher, O.: Estimating
the climate impact of linear contrails using the UK Met Office climate model,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L20703, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045161, 2010. a, b, c
Richardson, T., Forster, P., Smith, C., Maycock, A., Wood, T., Andrews, T.,
Boucher, O., Faluvegi, G., Fläschner, D., Hodnebrog, Ø., Kasoar, M., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.‐F., Mülmenstädt, J., Myhre, G., Olivié, D., Portmann, R. W., Samset, B. H., Shawki, D., Shindell, D., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Voulgarakis, A., and Watson‐Parris, D.:
Efficacy of climate forcings in PDRMIP models, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 12824–12844, 2019. a
Rieger, V. S., Dietmüller, S., and Ponater, M.: Can feedback analysis be
used to uncover the physical origin of climate sensitivity and efficacy
differences?, Clim. Dynam., 49, 2831–2844, 2017. a
Simorgh, A., Soler, M., González-Arribas, D., Matthes, S., Grewe, V.,
Dietmüller, S., Baumann, S., Yamashita, H., Yin, F., Castino, F., Linke,
F., Lührs, B., and Meuser, M. M.: A Comprehensive Survey on Recent
Climate Optimal Aircraft Trajectory Planning, Aerospace, 9, 146, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9030146, 2022. a, b
Stevenson, D. S., Doherty, R. M., Sanderson, M. G., Collins, W. J., Johnson,
C. E., and Derwent, R. G.: Radiative forcing from aircraft NOx emissions:
Mechanisms and seasonal dependence, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D17307,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004759, 2004. a, b
Stuber, N., Ponater, M., and Sausen, R.: Why radiative forcing might fail as a
predictor of climate change, Clim. Dynam., 24, 497–510, 2005. a
Terrenoire, E., Hauglustaine, D. A., Cohen, Y., Cozic, A., Valorso, R., Lefèvre, F., and Matthes, S.: Impact of present and future aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on atmospheric composition and associated direct radiative forcing of climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11987–12023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11987-2022, 2022. a
Yamashita, H., Yin, F., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Matthes, S., Kern, B., Dahlmann, K., and Frömming, C.: Newly developed aircraft routing options for air traffic simulation in the chemistry–climate model EMAC 2.53: AirTraf 2.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 4869–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4869-2020, 2020. a, b
Yamashita, H., Yin, F., Grewe, V., Jöckel, P., Matthes, S., Kern, B.,
Dahlmann, K., and Frömming, C.: Analysis of aircraft routing strategies
for north atlantic flights by using airtraf 2.0, Aerospace, 8, 33, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020033, 2021. a
Yin, F., Grewe, V., Castino, F., Rao, P., Matthes, S., Dahlmann, K., Dietmüller, S., Frömming, C., Yamashita, H., Peter, P., Klingaman, E., Shine, K. P., Lührs, B., and Linke, F.: Predicting the climate impact of aviation for en-route emissions: the algorithmic climate change function submodel ACCF 1.0 of EMAC 2.53, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3313–3334, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3313-2023, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w
Short summary
Climate-optimized aircraft trajectories avoid atmospheric regions with a large climate impact due to aviation emissions. This requires spatially and temporally resolved information on aviation's climate impact. We propose using algorithmic climate change functions (aCCFs) for CO2 and non-CO2 effects (ozone, methane, water vapor, contrail cirrus). Merged aCCFs combine individual aCCFs by assuming aircraft-specific parameters and climate metrics. Technically this is done with a Python library.
Climate-optimized aircraft trajectories avoid atmospheric regions with a large climate impact...
