Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-493-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-493-2022
Model description paper
 | 
21 Jan 2022
Model description paper |  | 21 Jan 2022

Parameterization of the collision–coalescence process using series of basis functions: COLNETv1.0.0 model development using a machine learning approach

Camilo Fernando Rodríguez Genó and Léster Alfonso

Related authors

The impact of fluctuations and correlations in droplet growth by collision–coalescence revisited – Part 2: Observational evidence of gel formation in warm clouds
Lester Alfonso, Graciela B. Raga, and Darrel Baumgardner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 14917–14932, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14917-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14917-2019, 2019
Short summary
The impact of fluctuations and correlations in droplet growth by collision–coalescence revisited – Part 1: Numerical calculation of post-gel droplet size distribution
Lester Alfonso and Graciela B. Raga
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6895–6905, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017, 2017
Short summary
An algorithm for the numerical solution of the multivariate master equation for stochastic coalescence
L. Alfonso
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12315–12326, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12315-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12315-2015, 2015
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Exploring the footprint representation of microwave radiance observations in an Arctic limited-area data assimilation system
Máté Mile, Stephanie Guedj, and Roger Randriamampianina
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6571–6587, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6571-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Analysis of model error in forecast errors of extended atmospheric Lorenz 05 systems and the ECMWF system
Hynek Bednář and Holger Kantz
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6489–6511, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6489-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6489-2024, 2024
Short summary
Description and validation of Vehicular Emissions from Road Traffic (VERT) 1.0, an R-based framework for estimating road transport emissions from traffic flows
Giorgio Veratti, Alessandro Bigi, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6465–6487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024, 2024
Short summary
AeroMix v1.0.1: a Python package for modeling aerosol optical properties and mixing states
Sam P. Raj, Puna Ram Sinha, Rohit Srivastava, Srinivas Bikkina, and Damu Bala Subrahamanyam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6379–6399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6379-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6379-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of ITCZ width on global climate: ITCZ-MIP
Angeline G. Pendergrass, Michael P. Byrne, Oliver Watt-Meyer, Penelope Maher, and Mark J. Webb
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6365–6378, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alfonso, L. and Zamora, J. M.: A two-moment machine learning parameterization of the autoconversion process, Atmos. Res., 249, 105269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105269, 2021. 
Alfonso, L., Raga, G. B., and Baumgardner, D.: The validity of the kinetic collection equation revisited, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 969–982, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-969-2008, 2008. 
Alfonso, L., Raga, G., and Baumgardner, D.: A Monte Carlo framework to simulate multicomponent droplet growth by stochastic coalescence, in: Applications of Monte Carlo Method in Science and Engineering, edited by: Mordechai, S., InTech., https://doi.org/10.5772/14522, 2011. 
Barros, A. P., Prat, O. P., Shrestha, P., Testik, F. Y., and Bliven, L. F.: Revisiting Low and List (1982): Evaluation of raindrop collision parameterizations using laboratory observations and modeling, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 2983–2993, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2630.1, 2008. 
Berry, E. X.: Cloud droplet growth by collection, J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 688–701, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0688:CDGBC>2.0.CO;2, 1967. 
Download
Short summary
The representation of the collision–coalescence process in models of different scales has been a great source of uncertainty for many years. The aim of this paper is to show that machine learning techniques can be a useful tool in order to incorporate this process by emulating the explicit treatment of microphysics. Our results show that the machine learning parameterization mimics the evolution of actual droplet size distributions very well.