Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Jun 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Jun 2022

Simulated microphysical properties of winter storms from bulk-type microphysics schemes and their evaluation in the Weather Research and Forecasting (v4.1.3) model during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign

Jeong-Su Ko, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, Gregory Thompson, and Alexis Berne

Related authors

Observations from a 94-GHz spectral polarimetric vertically-pointing radar at Villum research station during the CLAVIER Clean Cloud campaign
Romanos Foskinis, Anne-Claire Billault-Roux, Henrik Skov, Lise Lotte Sørensen, Sven-Erik Gryning, Athanasios Nenes, and Alexis Berne
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-549,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-549, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Implementation of the Generalized Double-Moment scaling Normalization method for raindrop size distribution in a WRF 4.3.1 bulk-type cloud microphysics scheme: a case study over the Korean Peninsula
Joonghyun Jo, Kyo Sun Lim, Sun-Young Park, Juhee Kwon, Wonbae Bang, HyangSuk Park, Jae-Young Byon, and Gyuwon Lee
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8149–8166, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8149-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8149-2026, 2026
Short summary
The role of secondary ice production in shaping the microphysical evolution of orographic clouds: A RAMS-ICLAMS modeling study
Ioannis Chaniotis, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Romanos Foskinis, Marilena Gidarakou, Maria Gini, Platon Patlakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Alexandros Papagiannis, Elissavet Bossioli, Nicole Clerx, Alexis Berne, Helena Flocas, and Athanasios Nenes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4645,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4645, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Implementation of predicted rime mass in the bin microphysics scheme DESCAM 3D: evaluation for an idealized squall line system and a heavy snowfall event during ICE-POP 2018
Pierre Grzegorczyk, Wolfram Wobrock, Antoine Canzi, Frédéric Tridon, Sun-Young Park, Gyuwon Lee, Kwonil Kim, Kyo-Sun Lim, and Céline Planche
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 8025–8051, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8025-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-8025-2026, 2026
Short summary
Linking cloud hydrometeor growth and surface precipitation to synoptic forcing at Dumont d’Urville, East Antarctica
A. V. Sreenath, Peter T. May, Steven Siems, Heather Corden, and Alexis Berne
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4159,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4159, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary

Cited articles

Alcott, T. I. and Steenburgh, W. J.: Orographic influences on a Great Salt Lake–effect snowstorm, Mon. Weather Rev., 141, 2432–2450, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-12-00328.1, 2013. 
Atlas, D., Srivastava, R. C., and Sekhon, R. S.: Doppler radar characteristics of precipitation at vertical incidence, Rev. Geophys., 11, 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG011i001p00001, 1973. 
Bae, S. Y., Hong, S. Y., and Tao, W. K.: Development of a single-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic hail for the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 233–245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-018-0066-3, 2019. 
Bao, J.-W., Michelson, S. A., and Grell, E. D.: Microphysical process comparison of three microphysics parameterization schemes in the WRF model for an idealized squall-line case study, Mon. Weather Rev., 147, 3093–3120, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0249.1, 2019. 
Besic, N., Gehring, J., Praz, C., Figueras i Ventura, J., Grazioli, J., Gabella, M., Germann, U., and Berne, A.: Unraveling hydrometeor mixtures in polarimetric radar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4847–4866, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4847-2018, 2018. 
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of the four microphysics parameterizations, the WDM6, WDM7, Thompson, and Morrison schemes, in simulating snowfall events during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign. Eight snowfall events are selected and classified into three categories (cold-low, warm-low, and air–sea interaction cases). The evaluation focuses on the simulated hydrometeors, microphysics budgets, wind fields, and precipitation using the measurement data.
Share