Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Jun 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Jun 2022

Simulated microphysical properties of winter storms from bulk-type microphysics schemes and their evaluation in the Weather Research and Forecasting (v4.1.3) model during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign

Jeong-Su Ko, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, Gregory Thompson, and Alexis Berne

Viewed

Total article views: 2,027 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,534 449 44 2,027 21 23
  • HTML: 1,534
  • PDF: 449
  • XML: 44
  • Total: 2,027
  • BibTeX: 21
  • EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,027 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,903 with geography defined and 124 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Mar 2024
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of the four microphysics parameterizations, the WDM6, WDM7, Thompson, and Morrison schemes, in simulating snowfall events during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign. Eight snowfall events are selected and classified into three categories (cold-low, warm-low, and air–sea interaction cases). The evaluation focuses on the simulated hydrometeors, microphysics budgets, wind fields, and precipitation using the measurement data.