Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Jun 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Jun 2022

Simulated microphysical properties of winter storms from bulk-type microphysics schemes and their evaluation in the Weather Research and Forecasting (v4.1.3) model during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign

Jeong-Su Ko, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, Gregory Thompson, and Alexis Berne

Viewed

Total article views: 2,535 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,908 550 77 2,535 59 58
  • HTML: 1,908
  • PDF: 550
  • XML: 77
  • Total: 2,535
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 58
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jan 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jan 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,535 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,402 with geography defined and 133 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 12 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of the four microphysics parameterizations, the WDM6, WDM7, Thompson, and Morrison schemes, in simulating snowfall events during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign. Eight snowfall events are selected and classified into three categories (cold-low, warm-low, and air–sea interaction cases). The evaluation focuses on the simulated hydrometeors, microphysics budgets, wind fields, and precipitation using the measurement data.
Read more
Share
Special issue
Winter weather research in complex terrain during ICE-POP...