Articles | Volume 15, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4529-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Jun 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Jun 2022

Simulated microphysical properties of winter storms from bulk-type microphysics schemes and their evaluation in the Weather Research and Forecasting (v4.1.3) model during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign

Jeong-Su Ko, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, Gregory Thompson, and Alexis Berne

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2021-417', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Mar 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Kyo-Sun Lim, 17 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2021-417', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Mar 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Kyo-Sun Lim on behalf of the Authors (20 Apr 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (24 Apr 2022) by Jinkyu Hong
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (05 May 2022)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (11 May 2022)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (15 May 2022) by Jinkyu Hong
AR by Kyo-Sun Lim on behalf of the Authors (16 May 2022)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (18 May 2022) by Jinkyu Hong
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of the four microphysics parameterizations, the WDM6, WDM7, Thompson, and Morrison schemes, in simulating snowfall events during the ICE-POP 2018 field campaign. Eight snowfall events are selected and classified into three categories (cold-low, warm-low, and air–sea interaction cases). The evaluation focuses on the simulated hydrometeors, microphysics budgets, wind fields, and precipitation using the measurement data.