Buizza, R., Tribbia, J., Molteni, F., and Palmer, T.: Computation of optimal
unstable structures for a numerical weather prediction model, Tellus A, 45,
388–407,
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1993.t01-4-00005.x, 1993. 
a
Buizza, R., Milleer, M., and Palmer, T. N.: Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2887–2908,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712556006, 1999. 
a
Candiani, G., Carnevale, C., Finzi, G., Pisoni, E., and Volta, M.: A comparison of reanalysis techniques: Applying optimal interpolation and Ensemble Kalman
Filtering to improve air quality monitoring at mesoscale, Sci.
Total Environ., 458-460, 7–14,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.089, 2013. 
a
Cohn, S. E. and Todling, R.: Approximate Data Assimilation Schemes for Stable
and Unstable Dynamics, J. Met. Soc. Jpn., 74, 63–75, 1996. a
Elbern, H., Strunk, A., Schmidt, H., and Talagrand, O.: Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749–3769,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3749-2007, 2007. 
a,
b,
c,
d
Emili, E., Gürol, S., and Cariolle, D.: Accounting for model error in air quality forecasts: an application of 4DEnVar to the assimilation of atmospheric composition using QG-Chem 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3933–3959,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3933-2016, 2016. 
a,
b
Galin, M. B.: Study of the Low-Frequency Variability of the Atmospheric General Circulation with the Use of Time-Dependent Empirical Orthogonal Functions, Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 43, 15–23,
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433807010021,
2007. 
a
Gaubert, B., Coman, A., Foret, G., Meleux, F., Ung, A., Rouil, L., Ionescu, A., Candau, Y., and Beekmann, M.: Regional scale ozone data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter and the CHIMERE chemical transport model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 283–302,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-283-2014, 2014. 
a
Geiger, H., Barnes, I., Bejan, I., Benter, T., and Spittler, M.: The
tropospheric degradation of isoprene: An updated module for the regional
atmospheric chemistry mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 37, 1503–1519,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01047-6, 2003. 
a
Goris, N. and Elbern, H.: Singular vector-based targeted observations of chemical constituents: description and first application of the EURAD-IM-SVA v1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3929–3945,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3929-2015, 2015. 
a
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions o
f Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012, 2012. 
a,
b,
c
Guilloteau, C., Mamalakis, A., Vulis, L., Le, P. V. V., Georgiou, T. T., and
Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: Rotated Spectral Principal Component Analysis (rsPCA)
for Identifying Dynamical Modes of Variability in Climate Systems, J. Cimate, 34, 715–736,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0266.1, 2021. 
a
Hanea, R., Velders, G., and Heemink, A.: Data assimilation of ground-level
ozone in Europe with a Kalman filter and chemistry transport model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D10302,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004283,
2004. 
a
Hanea, R. G. and Velders, G. J. M.: A hybrid Kalman filter algorithm for
large-scale atmospheric chemistry data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 140–151,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3269.1, 2007. 
a
Hanna, S. R., Chang, J. C., and Fernau, M. E.: Monte carlo estimates of
uncertainties in predictions by a photochemical grid model (UAM-IV) due to
uncertainties in input variables, Atmos. Environ., 32, 3619–3628,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00419-6, 1998. 
a,
b
Hannachi, A., Jolliffe, I. T., and Stephenson, D. B.: Empirical orthogonal
functions and related techniques in atmospheric science: A review,
Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1119–1152,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1499, 2007. 
a
Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H., and Mitchell, H. L.: A System Simulation Approach to Ensemble Prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1225–1242,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<1225:ASSATE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. 
a,
b
Karhunen, K.: Ãœber lineare methoden in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung,
Annales Academiae Scientarum Fennicae, 37, 3–79, 1947. a
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. C., and Yang, C.: ARPACK Users Guide: Solution of Large Scale Eigenvalue Problems by Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods, available at:
https://www.caam.rice.edu/software/ARPACK/UG/ug.html (last access: 9 August 2021),
1997. 
a,
b
Leutbecher, M., Lock, S.-J., Ollinaho, P., Lang, S. T. K., Balsamo, G.,
Bechtold, P., Bonavita, M., Christensen, H. M., Diamantakis, M., Dutra, E.,
English, S., Fisher, M., Forbes, R. M., Goddard, J., Haiden, T., Hogan,
R. J., Juricke, S., Lawrence, H., MacLeod, D., Magnusson, L., Malardel, S.,
Massart, S., Sandu, I., Smolarkiewicz, P. K., Subramanian, A., Vitart, F.,
Wedi, N., and Weisheimer, A.: Stochastic representations of model
uncertainties at ECMWF: state of the art and future vision, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2315–2339,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3094,
2017. 
a
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Zhou, W., and Chen, W.: Three Eurasian teleconnection
patterns: spatial structures, temporal variability, and associated winter
climate anomalies, Clim. Dynam., 42, 2817–2839,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2163-z, 2014. 
a
Lock, S.-J., Lang, S. T. K., Leutbecher, M., Hogan, R. J., and Vitart, F.:
Treatment of model uncertainty from radiation by the Stochastically Perturbed
Parametrization Tendencies (SPPT) scheme and associated revisions in the
ECMWF ensembles, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145,
75–89,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3570, 2019. 
a
Loéve, M.: Fonctions aleatoires du second ordre, Processus Stochastiques et
Mouvement Brownien, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 42th edn., 1948. a
McKeen, S., Chung, S. H., Wilczak, J., Grell, G., Djalalova, I., Peckham, S.,
Gong, W., Bouchet, V., Moffet, R., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., Mathur, R.,
and Yu, S.: Evaluation of several PM2.5 forecast models using data collected
during the ICARTT/NEAQS 2004 field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D10S20,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007608, 2007. 
a
Pöschl, U., Kuhlmann, R., Poisson, N., and Crutzen, P.: Development and
Intercomparison of Condensed Isoprene Oxidation Mechanisms for Global
Atmospheric Modeling, J. Atmos. Chem., 37, 29–52,
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006391009798, 2000. 
a
Schutgens, N. A. J., Miyoshi, T., Takemura, T., and Nakajima, T.: Applying an ensemble Kalman filter to the assimilation of AERONET observations in a global aerosol transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2561–2576,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2561-2010, 2010. 
a
Shutts, G.: A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble
prediction systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
131, 3079–3102,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.106, 2005. 
a
Siripatana, A., Mayo, T., Knio, O., Dawson, C., Le Maitre, O., and Hoteit, I.: Ensemble Kalman filter inference of spatially-varying Manning's n
coefficients in the coastal ocean, J. Hydrol., 562,
664–684,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.021, 2018. 
a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Barker, D. M., Duda,
M. G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., and Powers, J. G.: A Description of the
Advanced Research WRF Version 3, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Boulder, Colorado, USA, NCAR technical note, 2008. a
Sorensen, D.: Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi/Lanczos Methods for Large Scale
Eigenvalue Calculations, in: Parallel Numerical Algorithms, ICASE/LaRC
Interdisciplinary Series in Science and Engineering, edited by: Keyes, D.,
Sameh, A., and Venkatakrishnan, V., vol 4., Springer, Dordrecht, 1997. a
Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E.: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: The generation of
perturbations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 74,
2317–2330, 1993. a
Vautard, R., Blond, N., Schmidt, H., Derognat, C., and Beekmann, M.:
Multi-model ensemble ozone forecasts over Europe: analysis of uncertainty,
Mesoscale Transport of Air Pollution, OA15. EGS XXXVI General Assembly, Nice, France, European Geophysical Society, 25–30 March 2001, 26 pp.,
2001. a
Vogel, A. and Elbern, H.: Identifying forecast uncertainties for biogenic gases in
the Po Valley related to model configuration in EURAD-IM during PEGASOS 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4039–4057,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4039-2021, 2021a. 
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j
Xian, P., Reid, J. S., Hyer, E. J., Sampson, C. R., Rubin, J. I., Ades, M.,
Asencio, N., Basart, S., Benedetti, A., Bhattacharjee, P. S., Brooks, M. E.,
Colarco, P. R., da Silva, A. M., Eck, T. F., Guth, J., Jorba, O., Kouznetsov,
R., Kipling, Z., Sofiev, M., Perez Garcia-Pando, C., Pradhan, Y., Tanaka, T.,
Wang, J., Westphal, D. L., Yumimoto, K., and Zhang, J.: Current state of the
global operational aerosol multi-model ensemble: An update from the
International Cooperative for Aerosol Prediction (ICAP), Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 145, 176–209,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3497, 2019.
 
a
Xiu, D.: Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method
Approach, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2010. a
Zhang, Y., Bocquet, M., Mallet, V., Seigneur, C., and Baklanov, A.: Real-time
air quality forecasting, part I: History, techniques, and current status,
Atmos. Environ., 60, 632 – 655,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.031, 2012a. 
a
Zhang, Y., Bocquet, M., Mallet, V., Seigneur, C., and Baklanov, A.: Real-time
air quality forecasting, part II: State of the science, current research
needs, and future prospects, Atmos. Environ., 60, 656–676,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.041, 2012b. 
a
