Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-673-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-673-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
21 Feb 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 21 Feb 2020

An evaluation of clouds and radiation in a large-scale atmospheric model using a cloud vertical structure classification

Dongmin Lee, Lazaros Oreopoulos, and Nayeong Cho

Related authors

Contrasting the co-variability of daytime cloud and precipitation over tropical land and ocean
Daeho Jin, Lazaros Oreopoulos, Dongmin Lee, Nayeong Cho, and Jackson Tan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3065–3082, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3065-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3065-2018, 2018
Short summary
Modeling the influences of aerosols on pre-monsoon circulation and rainfall over Southeast Asia
D. Lee, Y. C. Sud, L. Oreopoulos, K.-M. Kim, W. K. Lau, and I.-S. Kang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6853–6866, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6853-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6853-2014, 2014
A novel method for estimating shortwave direct radiative effect of above-cloud aerosols using CALIOP and MODIS data
Z. Zhang, K. Meyer, S. Platnick, L. Oreopoulos, D. Lee, and H. Yu
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1777–1789, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1777-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1777-2014, 2014
Intercomparison of shortwave radiative transfer schemes in global aerosol modeling: results from the AeroCom Radiative Transfer Experiment
C. A. Randles, S. Kinne, G. Myhre, M. Schulz, P. Stier, J. Fischer, L. Doppler, E. Highwood, C. Ryder, B. Harris, J. Huttunen, Y. Ma, R. T. Pinker, B. Mayer, D. Neubauer, R. Hitzenberger, L. Oreopoulos, D. Lee, G. Pitari, G. Di Genova, J. Quaas, F. G. Rose, S. Kato, S. T. Rumbold, I. Vardavas, N. Hatzianastassiou, C. Matsoukas, H. Yu, F. Zhang, H. Zhang, and P. Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2347–2379, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2347-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2347-2013, 2013
Performance of McRAS-AC in the GEOS-5 AGCM: aerosol-cloud-microphysics, precipitation, cloud radiative effects, and circulation
Y. C. Sud, D. Lee, L. Oreopoulos, D. Barahona, A. Nenes, and M. J. Suarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 57–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-57-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-57-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Accelerating models for multiphase chemical kinetics through machine learning with polynomial chaos expansion and neural networks
Thomas Berkemeier, Matteo Krüger, Aryeh Feinberg, Marcel Müller, Ulrich Pöschl, and Ulrich K. Krieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2037–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, 2023
Short summary
A machine learning emulator for Lagrangian particle dispersion model footprints: a case study using NAME
Elena Fillola, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Alistair Manning, Simon O'Doherty, and Matt Rigby
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1997–2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary
Improving the representation of shallow cumulus convection with the simplified-higher-order-closure–mass-flux (SHOC+MF v1.0) approach
Maria J. Chinita, Mikael Witte, Marcin J. Kurowski, Joao Teixeira, Kay Suselj, Georgios Matheou, and Peter Bogenschutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1909-2023, 2023
Short summary
ISAT v2.0: an integrated tool for nested-domain configurations and model-ready emission inventories for WRF-AQM
Kun Wang, Chao Gao, Kai Wu, Kaiyun Liu, Haofan Wang, Mo Dan, Xiaohui Ji, and Qingqing Tong
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1961–1973, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1961-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimation of CH4 emission based on an advanced 4D-LETKF assimilation system
Jagat S. H. Bisht, Prabir K. Patra, Masayuki Takigawa, Takashi Sekiya, Yugo Kanaya, Naoko Saitoh, and Kazuyuki Miyazaki
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1823–1838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1823-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Barker, H.: Overlap of fractional cloud for radiation calculations in GCMs: A global analysis using CloudSat and CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00A01, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009677, 2008. 
Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J., Klein, S., Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J., Pincus, R., and John, V.: COSP Satellite simulation software for model assessment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1023–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. 
Chou, M., Suarez, M., Ho, C., Yan, M., and Lee, K.: Parameterizations for cloud overlapping and shortwave single-scattering properties for use in general circulation and cloud ensemble models, J. Climate, 11, 202–214, 1998. 
Dolinar, E., Dong, X., Xi, B., Jiang, J., and Su, H.: Evaluation of CMIP5 simulated clouds and TOA radiation budgets using NASA satellite observations, Clim. Dynam., 44, 2229–2247, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2158-9, 2015. 
Geleyn, J. F. and Hollingsworth, A.: An economical analytical method for the computation of the interaction between scattering and line absorption of radiation, Contrib. Atmos. Phys., 52, 1–16, 1979. 
Download
Short summary
We apply a cloud classification method based on cloud vertical structure (CVS) from active sensors to evaluate cloudiness in NASA’s GEOS-5 model. We assess the model CVS classes compared to observations and evaluate the simulated cloud radiative effect and its contributions. We apply an analysis framework whereby the source of the model radiative effect errors is traced back to either errors in the nature of the simulated CVS classes or in the frequency at which they are produced by the model.