Articles | Volume 13, issue 12
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5973–6009, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5973-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5973–6009, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5973-2020
Model description paper
01 Dec 2020
Model description paper | 01 Dec 2020

Energy, water and carbon exchanges in managed forest ecosystems: description, sensitivity analysis and evaluation of the INRAE GO+ model, version 3.0

Virginie Moreaux et al.

Related authors

Surface Urban Energy and Water Balance Scheme (v2020a) in vegetated areas: parameter derivation and performance evaluation using FLUXNET2015 dataset
Hamidreza Omidvar, Ting Sun, Sue Grimmond, Dave Bilesbach, Andrew Black, Jiquan Chen, Zexia Duan, Zhiqiu Gao, Hiroki Iwata, and Joseph P. McFadden
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3041–3078, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3041-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3041-2022, 2022
Short summary
Physiological and climate controls on foliar mercury uptake by European tree species
Lena Wohlgemuth, Pasi Rautio, Bernd Ahrends, Alexander Russ, Lars Vesterdal, Peter Waldner, Volkmar Timmermann, Nadine Eickenscheidt, Alfred Fürst, Martin Greve, Peter Roskams, Anne Thimonier, Manuel Nicolas, Anna Kowalska, Morten Ingerslev, Päivi Merilä, Sue Benham, Carmen Iacoban, Günter Hoch, Christine Alewell, and Martin Jiskra
Biogeosciences, 19, 1335–1353, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1335-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1335-2022, 2022
Short summary
Biogeochemical and biophysical responses to episodes of wildfire smoke from natural ecosystems in southwestern British Columbia, Canada
Sung-Ching Lee, Sara H. Knox, Ian McKendry, and T. Andrew Black
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2333–2349, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2333-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2333-2022, 2022
Short summary
Options to correct local turbulent flux measurements for large-scale fluxes using an approach based on large-eddy simulation
Matthias Mauder, Andreas Ibrom, Luise Wanner, Frederik De Roo, Peter Brugger, Ralf Kiese, and Kim Pilegaard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7835–7850, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, 2021
Short summary
Relative humidity gradients as a key constraint on terrestrial water and energy fluxes
Yeonuk Kim, Monica Garcia, Laura Morillas, Ulrich Weber, T. Andrew Black, and Mark S. Johnson
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5175–5191, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5175-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5175-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
KGML-ag: a modeling framework of knowledge-guided machine learning to simulate agroecosystems: a case study of estimating N2O emission using data from mesocosm experiments
Licheng Liu, Shaoming Xu, Jinyun Tang, Kaiyu Guan, Timothy J. Griffis, Matthew D. Erickson, Alexander L. Frie, Xiaowei Jia, Taegon Kim, Lee T. Miller, Bin Peng, Shaowei Wu, Yufeng Yang, Wang Zhou, Vipin Kumar, and Zhenong Jin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2839–2858, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2839-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2839-2022, 2022
Short summary
Assessing methane emissions for northern peatlands in ORCHIDEE-PEAT revision 7020
Elodie Salmon, Fabrice Jégou, Bertrand Guenet, Line Jourdain, Chunjing Qiu, Vladislav Bastrikov, Christophe Guimbaud, Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Peylin, Sébastien Gogo, Fatima Laggoun-Défarge, Mika Aurela, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Jiquan Chen, Bogdan H. Chojnicki, Housen Chu, Colin W. Edgar, Eugenie S. Euskirchen, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Krzysztof Fortuniak, David Holl, Janina Klatt, Olaf Kolle, Natalia Kowalska, Lars Kutzbach, Annalea Lohila, Lutz Merbold, Włodzimierz Pawlak, Torsten Sachs, and Klaudia Ziemblińska
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2813–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, 2022
Short summary
A dynamic local-scale vegetation model for lycopsids (LYCOm v1.0)
Suman Halder, Susanne K. M. Arens, Kai Jensen, Tais W. Dahl, and Philipp Porada
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2325–2343, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Soil-related developments of the Biome-BGCMuSo v6.2 terrestrial ecosystem model
Dóra Hidy, Zoltán Barcza, Roland Hollós, Laura Dobor, Tamás Ács, Dóra Zacháry, Tibor Filep, László Pásztor, Dóra Incze, Márton Dencső, Eszter Tóth, Katarína Merganičová, Peter Thornton, Steven Running, and Nándor Fodor
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2157–2181, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2157-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2157-2022, 2022
Short summary
Global evaluation of the Ecosystem Demography model (ED v3.0)
Lei Ma, George Hurtt, Lesley Ott, Ritvik Sahajpal, Justin Fisk, Rachel Lamb, Hao Tang, Steve Flanagan, Louise Chini, Abhishek Chatterjee, and Joseph Sullivan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1971–1994, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1971-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Achat, D. L., Fortin, M., Landmann, G., Ringeval, B., and Augusto, L.: Forest soil carbon is threatened by intensive biomass harvesting, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 15991, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15991, 2015. 
Achat, D. L., Martel, S., Picart, D., Moisy, C., Augusto, L., Bakker, M. R., and Loustau, D.: Modelling the nutrient cost of biomass harvesting under different silvicultural and climate scenarios in production forests, Forest Ecol. Manag., 429, 642–653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.047, 2018. 
Ahlswede, B. J. and Thomas, R. Q.: Community earth system model simulations reveal the relative importance of afforestation and forest management to surface temperature in Eastern North America, Forests, 8, 499, https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120499, 2017. 
Arrouays, D. and Pelissier, P.: Changes in carbon storage in temperate humic loamy soils after forest clearing and continuous corn cropping in France, Plant Soil, 160, 215–223, 1994. 
Atkin, O. K. and Tjoelker, M. G.: Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature, Trends Plant Sci., 8, 343–351, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00136-5, 2003. 
Download
Short summary
The model GO+ describes the functioning of managed forests based upon biophysical and biogeochemical processes. It accounts for the impacts of forest operations on energy, water and carbon exchanges within the soil–vegetation–atmosphere continuum. It includes versatile descriptions of management operations. Its sensitivity and uncertainty are detailed and predictions are compared with observations about mass and energy exchanges, hydrological data, and tree growth variables from different sites.