Articles | Volume 13, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4107-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4107-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Predicting the morphology of ice particles in deep convection using the super-droplet method: development and evaluation of SCALE-SDM 0.2.5-2.2.0, -2.2.1, and -2.2.2
Shin-ichiro Shima
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Graduate School of Simulation Studies, University of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan
RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Japan
Yousuke Sato
Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Kobe, Japan
Akihiro Hashimoto
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Ryohei Misumi
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
Related authors
Ruyi Zhang, Limin Zhou, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Huawei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6761–6774, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Solar activity weakly ionises Earth's atmosphere, charging cloud droplets. Electro-coalescence is when oppositely charged droplets stick together. We introduce an analytical expression of electro-coalescence probability and use it in a warm-cumulus-cloud simulation. Results show that charge cases increase rain and droplet size, with the new method outperforming older ones. The new method requires longer computation time, but its impact on rain justifies inclusion in meteorology models.
Chongzhi Yin, Shin-ichiro Shima, Lulin Xue, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5167–5189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate numerical convergence properties of a particle-based numerical cloud microphysics model (SDM) and a double-moment bulk scheme for simulating a marine stratocumulus case, compare their results with model intercomparison project results, and present possible explanations for the different results of the SDM and the bulk scheme. Aerosol processes can be accurately simulated using SDM, and this may be an important factor affecting the behavior and morphology of marine stratocumulus.
Toshiki Matsushima, Seiya Nishizawa, and Shin-ichiro Shima
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6211–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A particle-based cloud model was developed for meter- to submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations. Our new cloud model's computational performance is superior to a bin method and comparable to a two-moment bulk method. A highlight of this study is the 2 m resolution shallow cloud simulations over an area covering ∼10 km2. This model allows for studying turbulence and cloud physics at spatial scales that overlap with those covered by direct numerical simulations and field studies.
Mizuo Kajino, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Naga Oshima, Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Yasumichi Tanaka, Joseph Ching, Akihiro Hashimoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masaaki Ikegami, Akane Kamada, Makoto Miyashita, Yayoi Inomata, Shin-ichiro Shima, Pradeep Khatri, Atsushi Shimizu, Hitoshi Irie, Kouji Adachi, Yuji Zaizen, Yasuhito Igarashi, Hiromasa Ueda, Takashi Maki, and Masao Mikami
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2235–2264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares performance of aerosol representation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency's regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology–chemistry model (NHM-Chem). It indicates separate treatment of sea salt and dust in coarse mode and that of light-absorptive and non-absorptive particles in fine mode could provide accurate assessments on aerosol feedback processes.
Mizuo Kajino, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Naga Oshima, Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Yasumichi Tanaka, Joseph Ching, Akihiro Hashimoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masaaki Ikegami, Akane Kamada, Makoto Miyashita, Yayoi Inomata, Shin-ichiro Shima, Kouji Adachi, Yuji Zaizen, Yasuhito Igarashi, Hiromasa Ueda, Takashi Maki, and Masao Mikami
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-128, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-128, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Hazuki Arakida, Takemasa Miyoshi, Takeshi Ise, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Shunji Kotsuki
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 24, 553–567, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-553-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-553-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This is the first study assimilating the satellite-based leaf area index observations every 4 days into a numerical model simulating the growth and death of individual plants. The newly developed data assimilation system successfully reduced the uncertainties of the model parameters related to phenology and carbon dynamics. It also provides better estimates of the present vegetation structure which can be used as the initial states for the simulation of the future vegetation change.
Sylwester Arabas and Shin-ichiro Shima
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 24, 535–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-535-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-535-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper bridges cloud/aerosol modelling with bifurcation analysis. It identifies two nonlinear peculiarities in the differential equations describing formation of atmospheric clouds through vapour condensation on a population of aerosol particles. A key finding of the paper is an analytic estimate for the timescale of the process. The study emerged from discussions on the causes of hysteretic behaviour of the system that we observed in the results of numerical simulations.
Ruyi Zhang, Limin Zhou, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Huawei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6761–6774, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Solar activity weakly ionises Earth's atmosphere, charging cloud droplets. Electro-coalescence is when oppositely charged droplets stick together. We introduce an analytical expression of electro-coalescence probability and use it in a warm-cumulus-cloud simulation. Results show that charge cases increase rain and droplet size, with the new method outperforming older ones. The new method requires longer computation time, but its impact on rain justifies inclusion in meteorology models.
Chongzhi Yin, Shin-ichiro Shima, Lulin Xue, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5167–5189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate numerical convergence properties of a particle-based numerical cloud microphysics model (SDM) and a double-moment bulk scheme for simulating a marine stratocumulus case, compare their results with model intercomparison project results, and present possible explanations for the different results of the SDM and the bulk scheme. Aerosol processes can be accurately simulated using SDM, and this may be an important factor affecting the behavior and morphology of marine stratocumulus.
Toshiki Matsushima, Seiya Nishizawa, and Shin-ichiro Shima
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6211–6245, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A particle-based cloud model was developed for meter- to submeter-scale resolution in cloud simulations. Our new cloud model's computational performance is superior to a bin method and comparable to a two-moment bulk method. A highlight of this study is the 2 m resolution shallow cloud simulations over an area covering ∼10 km2. This model allows for studying turbulence and cloud physics at spatial scales that overlap with those covered by direct numerical simulations and field studies.
Mizuo Kajino, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Naga Oshima, Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Yasumichi Tanaka, Joseph Ching, Akihiro Hashimoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masaaki Ikegami, Akane Kamada, Makoto Miyashita, Yayoi Inomata, Shin-ichiro Shima, Pradeep Khatri, Atsushi Shimizu, Hitoshi Irie, Kouji Adachi, Yuji Zaizen, Yasuhito Igarashi, Hiromasa Ueda, Takashi Maki, and Masao Mikami
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2235–2264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares performance of aerosol representation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency's regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology–chemistry model (NHM-Chem). It indicates separate treatment of sea salt and dust in coarse mode and that of light-absorptive and non-absorptive particles in fine mode could provide accurate assessments on aerosol feedback processes.
Xavier Fettweis, Stefan Hofer, Uta Krebs-Kanzow, Charles Amory, Teruo Aoki, Constantijn J. Berends, Andreas Born, Jason E. Box, Alison Delhasse, Koji Fujita, Paul Gierz, Heiko Goelzer, Edward Hanna, Akihiro Hashimoto, Philippe Huybrechts, Marie-Luise Kapsch, Michalea D. King, Christoph Kittel, Charlotte Lang, Peter L. Langen, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Glen E. Liston, Gerrit Lohmann, Sebastian H. Mernild, Uwe Mikolajewicz, Kameswarrao Modali, Ruth H. Mottram, Masashi Niwano, Brice Noël, Jonathan C. Ryan, Amy Smith, Jan Streffing, Marco Tedesco, Willem Jan van de Berg, Michiel van den Broeke, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Leo van Kampenhout, David Wilton, Bert Wouters, Florian Ziemen, and Tobias Zolles
The Cryosphere, 14, 3935–3958, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3935-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-3935-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated simulated Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass balance from 5 kinds of models. While the most complex (but expensive to compute) models remain the best, the faster/simpler models also compare reliably with observations and have biases of the same order as the regional models. Discrepancies in the trend over 2000–2012, however, suggest that large uncertainties remain in the modelled future SMB changes as they are highly impacted by the meltwater runoff biases over the current climate.
Daisuke Goto, Yousuke Sato, Hisashi Yashiro, Kentaroh Suzuki, Eiji Oikawa, Rei Kudo, Takashi M. Nagao, and Teruyuki Nakajima
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 3731–3768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3731-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We executed a global aerosol model over 3 years with the finest grid size in the world. The results elucidated that global annual averages of parameters associated with the aerosols were generally comparable to those obtained from a low-resolution model (LRM), but spatiotemporal variabilities of the aerosol components and their associated parameters provided better results closer to the observations than those from the LRM. This study clarified the advantages of the high-resolution model.
Satoru Yamaguchi, Masaaki Ishizaka, Hiroki Motoyoshi, Sent Nakai, Vincent Vionnet, Teruo Aoki, Katsuya Yamashita, Akihiro Hashimoto, and Akihiro Hachikubo
The Cryosphere, 13, 2713–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2713-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The specific surface area (SSA) of solid precipitation particles (PPs) includes detailed information of PP. This work is based on field measurement of SSA of PPs in Nagaoka, the city with the heaviest snowfall in Japan. The values of SSA strongly depend on wind speed (WS) and wet-bulb temperature (Tw) on the ground. An equation to empirically estimate the SSA of fresh PPs with WS and Tw was established and the equation successfully reproduced the fluctuation of SSA in Nagaoka.
Mizuo Kajino, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Naga Oshima, Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Yasumichi Tanaka, Joseph Ching, Akihiro Hashimoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masaaki Ikegami, Akane Kamada, Makoto Miyashita, Yayoi Inomata, Shin-ichiro Shima, Kouji Adachi, Yuji Zaizen, Yasuhito Igarashi, Hiromasa Ueda, Takashi Maki, and Masao Mikami
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-128, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2018-128, 2018
Revised manuscript not accepted
Masashi Niwano, Teruo Aoki, Akihiro Hashimoto, Sumito Matoba, Satoru Yamaguchi, Tomonori Tanikawa, Koji Fujita, Akane Tsushima, Yoshinori Iizuka, Rigen Shimada, and Masahiro Hori
The Cryosphere, 12, 635–655, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-635-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-635-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We present a high-resolution regional climate model called NHM–SMAP applied to the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS). The model forced by JRA-55 reanalysis is evaluated using in situ data from automated weather stations, stake measurements,
and ice core obtained from 2011 to 2014. By utilizing the model, we highlight that the choice of calculation schemes for vertical water movement in snow and firn has an effect of up to 200 Gt/year in the yearly accumulated GrIS-wide surface mass balance estimates.
Hazuki Arakida, Takemasa Miyoshi, Takeshi Ise, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Shunji Kotsuki
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 24, 553–567, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-553-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-553-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
This is the first study assimilating the satellite-based leaf area index observations every 4 days into a numerical model simulating the growth and death of individual plants. The newly developed data assimilation system successfully reduced the uncertainties of the model parameters related to phenology and carbon dynamics. It also provides better estimates of the present vegetation structure which can be used as the initial states for the simulation of the future vegetation change.
Sylwester Arabas and Shin-ichiro Shima
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 24, 535–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-535-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-535-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The paper bridges cloud/aerosol modelling with bifurcation analysis. It identifies two nonlinear peculiarities in the differential equations describing formation of atmospheric clouds through vapour condensation on a population of aerosol particles. A key finding of the paper is an analytic estimate for the timescale of the process. The study emerged from discussions on the causes of hysteretic behaviour of the system that we observed in the results of numerical simulations.
Related subject area
Atmospheric sciences
Valid time shifting ensemble Kalman filter (VTS-EnKF) for dust storm forecasting
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Development of the MPAS-CMAQ coupled system (V1.0) for multiscale global air quality modeling
Assessment of object-based indices to identify convective organization
The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0
NEIVAv1.0: Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi et al. (2011) version 1.0
FLEXPART version 11: improved accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility
Challenges of high-fidelity air quality modeling in urban environments – PALM sensitivity study during stable conditions
Air quality modeling intercomparison and multiscale ensemble chain for Latin America
Recommended coupling to global meteorological fields for long-term tracer simulations with WRF-GHG
Selecting CMIP6 global climate models (GCMs) for Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) dynamical downscaling over Southeast Asia using a standardised benchmarking framework
Improved definition of prior uncertainties in CO2 and CO fossil fuel fluxes and its impact on multi-species inversion with GEOS-Chem (v12.5)
RASCAL v1.0: an open-source tool for climatological time series reconstruction and extension
Introducing graupel density prediction in Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) double-moment 6-class (WDM6) microphysics and evaluation of the modified scheme during the ICE-POP field campaign
Enabling high-performance cloud computing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) version 5.3.3: performance evaluation and benefits for the user community
Atmospheric-river-induced precipitation in California as simulated by the regionally refined Simple Convective Resolving E3SM Atmosphere Model (SCREAM) Version 0
Recent improvements and maximum covariance analysis of aerosol and cloud properties in the EC-Earth3-AerChem model
GPU-HADVPPM4HIP V1.0: using the heterogeneous-compute interface for portability (HIP) to speed up the piecewise parabolic method in the CAMx (v6.10) air quality model on China's domestic GPU-like accelerator
Preliminary evaluation of the effect of electro-coalescence with conducting sphere approximation on the formation of warm cumulus clouds using SCALE-SDM version 0.2.5–2.3.0
Exploring the footprint representation of microwave radiance observations in an Arctic limited-area data assimilation system
Orbital-Radar v1.0.0: A tool to transform suborbital radar observations to synthetic EarthCARE cloud radar data
Analysis of model error in forecast errors of extended atmospheric Lorenz 05 systems and the ECMWF system
Description and validation of Vehicular Emissions from Road Traffic (VERT) 1.0, an R-based framework for estimating road transport emissions from traffic flows
AeroMix v1.0.1: a Python package for modeling aerosol optical properties and mixing states
Impact of ITCZ width on global climate: ITCZ-MIP
Deep-learning-driven simulations of boundary layer clouds over the Southern Great Plains
Mixed-precision computing in the GRIST dynamical core for weather and climate modelling
A conservative immersed boundary method for the multi-physics urban large-eddy simulation model uDALES v2.0
RCEMIP-II: mock-Walker simulations as phase II of the radiative–convective equilibrium model intercomparison project
Objective identification of meteorological fronts and climatologies from ERA-Interim and ERA5
TAMS: a tracking, classifying, and variable-assigning algorithm for mesoscale convective systems in simulated and satellite-derived datasets
Development of the adjoint of the unified tropospheric–stratospheric chemistry extension (UCX) in GEOS-Chem adjoint v36
New explicit formulae for the settling speed of prolate spheroids in the atmosphere: theoretical background and implementation in AerSett v2.0.2
ZJU-AERO V0.5: an Accurate and Efficient Radar Operator designed for CMA-GFS/MESO with the capability to simulate non-spherical hydrometeors
The Year of Polar Prediction site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
Evaluating CHASER V4.0 global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations using satellite, aircraft, and ground-based remote-sensing observations
Global variable-resolution simulations of extreme precipitation over Henan, China, in 2021 with MPAS-Atmosphere v7.3
The CHIMERE chemistry-transport model v2023r1
tobac v1.5: introducing fast 3D tracking, splits and mergers, and other enhancements for identifying and analysing meteorological phenomena
Merged Observatory Data Files (MODFs): an integrated observational data product supporting process-oriented investigations and diagnostics
Simulation of marine stratocumulus using the super-droplet method: numerical convergence and comparison to a double-moment bulk scheme using SCALE-SDM 5.2.6-2.3.1
Modeling of PAHs From Global to Regional Scales: Model Development and Investigation of Health Risks from 2013 to 2018 in China
WRF-Comfort: simulating microscale variability in outdoor heat stress at the city scale with a mesoscale model
Representing effects of surface heterogeneity in a multi-plume eddy diffusivity mass flux boundary layer parameterization
Can TROPOMI NO2 satellite data be used to track the drop in and resurgence of NOx emissions in Germany between 2019–2021 using the multi-source plume method (MSPM)?
A spatiotemporally separated framework for reconstructing the sources of atmospheric radionuclide releases
Mijie Pang, Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Huiya Jiang, Wei Han, Batjargal Buyantogtokh, Ji Xia, Li Fang, Jiandong Li, Hai Xiang Lin, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8223–8242, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8223-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) improves dust storm forecasts but faces challenges with position errors. The valid time shifting EnKF (VTS-EnKF) addresses this by adjusting for position errors, enhancing accuracy in forecasting dust storms, as proven in tests on 2021 events, even with smaller ensembles and time intervals.
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Inadequate representation of surface–atmosphere interaction processes is a major source of uncertainty in numerical weather prediction models. Here, an effort has been made to improve the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.2.2 by introducing a unique theoretical framework under convective conditions. In addition, to enhance the potential applicability of the WRF modeling system, various commonly used similarity functions under convective conditions have also been installed.
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Supercooled liquid clouds (liquid clouds colder than 0°C) are common at higher latitudes (especially over the Southern Ocean) and are critical for constraining climate projections. We compare a single-column version of a weather model to observations with two different cloud schemes and find that both the dynamical environment and atmospheric aerosols are important for reproducing observations.
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the CESM's aerosol schemes, focusing on dust, marine aerosol emissions, and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) . Dust emission modifications make deflation areas more continuous, improving results in North America and the sub-Arctic. Humidity correction to sea-salt emissions has a minor effect. Introducing marine organic aerosol emissions, coupled with ocean biogeochemical processes, and adding aqueous reactions for SOA formation advance the CESM's aerosol modelling results.
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a climate intervention technique to potentially cool the climate. Climate models used to gauge regional climate impacts associated with MCB often assume large areas of the ocean are uniformly perturbed. However, a more realistic representation of MCB application would require information about how an injected particle plume spreads. This work aims to develop such a plume-spreading model.
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Data-driven models are becoming a viable alternative to physics-based models for weather forecasting up to 15 d into the future. However, it is unclear whether they are as reliable as physics-based models when forecasting weather extremes. We evaluate their performance in forecasting near-surface cold, hot, and windy extremes globally. We find that data-driven models can compete with physics-based models and that the choice of the best model mainly depends on the region and type of extreme.
David C. Wong, Jeff Willison, Jonathan E. Pleim, Golam Sarwar, James Beidler, Russ Bullock, Jerold A. Herwehe, Rob Gilliam, Daiwen Kang, Christian Hogrefe, George Pouliot, and Hosein Foroutan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7855–7866, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7855-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This work describe how we linked the meteorological Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (MPAS-A) with the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) air quality model to form a coupled modelling system. This could be used to study air quality or climate and air quality interaction at a global scale. This new model scales well in high-performance computing environments and performs well with respect to ground surface networks in terms of ozone and PM2.5.
Giulio Mandorli and Claudia J. Stubenrauch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7795–7813, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7795-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7795-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, several studies focused their attention on the disposition of convection. Lots of methods, called indices, have been developed to quantify the amount of convection clustering. These indices are evaluated in this study by defining criteria that must be satisfied and then evaluating the indices against these standards. None of the indices meet all criteria, with some only partially meeting them.
Kerry Anderson, Jack Chen, Peter Englefield, Debora Griffin, Paul A. Makar, and Dan Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7713–7749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System (GFFEPS) is a model that predicts smoke and carbon emissions from wildland fires. The model calculates emissions from the ground up based on satellite-detected fires, modelled weather and fire characteristics. Unlike other global models, GFFEPS uses daily weather conditions to capture changing burning conditions on a day-to-day basis. GFFEPS produced lower carbon emissions due to the changing weather not captured by the other models.
Samiha Binte Shahid, Forrest G. Lacey, Christine Wiedinmyer, Robert J. Yokelson, and Kelley C. Barsanti
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7679–7711, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi (NEIVA) v.1.0 is a comprehensive biomass burning emissions database that allows integration of new data and flexible querying. Data are stored in connected datasets, including recommended averages of ~1500 constituents for 14 globally relevant fire types. Individual compounds were mapped to common model species to allow better attribution of emissions in modeling studies that predict the effects of fires on air quality and climate.
Lucie Bakels, Daria Tatsii, Anne Tipka, Rona Thompson, Marina Dütsch, Michael Blaschek, Petra Seibert, Katharina Baier, Silvia Bucci, Massimo Cassiani, Sabine Eckhardt, Christine Groot Zwaaftink, Stephan Henne, Pirmin Kaufmann, Vincent Lechner, Christian Maurer, Marie D. Mulder, Ignacio Pisso, Andreas Plach, Rakesh Subramanian, Martin Vojta, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7595–7627, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Computer models are essential for improving our understanding of how gases and particles move in the atmosphere. We present an update of the atmospheric transport model FLEXPART. FLEXPART 11 is more accurate due to a reduced number of interpolations and a new scheme for wet deposition. It can simulate non-spherical aerosols and includes linear chemical reactions. It is parallelised using OpenMP and includes new user options. A new user manual details how to use FLEXPART 11.
Jaroslav Resler, Petra Bauerová, Michal Belda, Martin Bureš, Kryštof Eben, Vladimír Fuka, Jan Geletič, Radek Jareš, Jan Karel, Josef Keder, Pavel Krč, William Patiño, Jelena Radović, Hynek Řezníček, Matthias Sühring, Adriana Šindelářová, and Ondřej Vlček
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7513–7537, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7513-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Detailed modeling of urban air quality in stable conditions is a challenge. We show the unprecedented sensitivity of a large eddy simulation (LES) model to meteorological boundary conditions and model parameters in an urban environment under stable conditions. We demonstrate the crucial role of boundary conditions for the comparability of results with observations. The study reveals a strong sensitivity of the results to model parameters and model numerical instabilities during such conditions.
Jorge E. Pachón, Mariel A. Opazo, Pablo Lichtig, Nicolas Huneeus, Idir Bouarar, Guy Brasseur, Cathy W. Y. Li, Johannes Flemming, Laurent Menut, Camilo Menares, Laura Gallardo, Michael Gauss, Mikhail Sofiev, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Julia Palamarchuk, Andreas Uppstu, Laura Dawidowski, Nestor Y. Rojas, María de Fátima Andrade, Mario E. Gavidia-Calderón, Alejandro H. Delgado Peralta, and Daniel Schuch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7467–7512, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7467-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Latin America (LAC) has some of the most populated urban areas in the world, with high levels of air pollution. Air quality management in LAC has been traditionally focused on surveillance and building emission inventories. This study performed the first intercomparison and model evaluation in LAC, with interesting and insightful findings for the region. A multiscale modeling ensemble chain was assembled as a first step towards an air quality forecasting system.
David Ho, Michał Gałkowski, Friedemann Reum, Santiago Botía, Julia Marshall, Kai Uwe Totsche, and Christoph Gerbig
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7401–7422, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7401-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7401-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric model users often overlook the impact of the land–atmosphere interaction. This study accessed various setups of WRF-GHG simulations that ensure consistency between the model and driving reanalysis fields. We found that a combination of nudging and frequent re-initialization allows certain improvement by constraining the soil moisture fields and, through its impact on atmospheric mixing, improves atmospheric transport.
Phuong Loan Nguyen, Lisa V. Alexander, Marcus J. Thatcher, Son C. H. Truong, Rachael N. Isphording, and John L. McGregor
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7285–7315, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7285-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7285-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use a comprehensive approach to select a subset of CMIP6 models for dynamical downscaling over Southeast Asia, taking into account model performance, model independence, data availability and the range of future climate projections. The standardised benchmarking framework is applied to assess model performance through both statistical and process-based metrics. Ultimately, we identify two independent model groups that are suitable for dynamical downscaling in the Southeast Asian region.
Ingrid Super, Tia Scarpelli, Arjan Droste, and Paul I. Palmer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7263–7284, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Monitoring greenhouse gas emission reductions requires a combination of models and observations, as well as an initial emission estimate. Each component provides information with a certain level of certainty and is weighted to yield the most reliable estimate of actual emissions. We describe efforts for estimating the uncertainty in the initial emission estimate, which significantly impacts the outcome. Hence, a good uncertainty estimate is key for obtaining reliable information on emissions.
Álvaro González-Cervera and Luis Durán
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7245–7261, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7245-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7245-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
RASCAL is an open-source Python tool designed for reconstructing daily climate observations, especially in regions with complex local phenomena. It merges large-scale weather patterns with local weather using the analog method. Evaluations in central Spain show that RASCAL outperforms ERA20C reanalysis in reconstructing precipitation and temperature. RASCAL offers opportunities for broad scientific applications, from short-term forecasts to local-scale climate change scenarios.
Sun-Young Park, Kyo-Sun Sunny Lim, Kwonil Kim, Gyuwon Lee, and Jason A. Milbrandt
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7199–7218, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We enhance the WDM6 scheme by incorporating predicted graupel density. The modification affects graupel characteristics, including fall velocity–diameter and mass–diameter relationships. Simulations highlight changes in graupel distribution and precipitation patterns, potentially influencing surface snow amounts. The study underscores the significance of integrating predicted graupel density for a more realistic portrayal of microphysical properties in weather models.
Christos I. Efstathiou, Elizabeth Adams, Carlie J. Coats, Robert Zelt, Mark Reed, John McGee, Kristen M. Foley, Fahim I. Sidi, David C. Wong, Steven Fine, and Saravanan Arunachalam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7001–7027, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7001-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7001-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a summary of enabling high-performance computing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) – a state-of-the-science community multiscale air quality model – on two cloud computing platforms through documenting the technologies, model performance, scaling and relative merits. This may be a new paradigm for computationally intense future model applications. We initiated this work due to a need to leverage cloud computing advances and to ease the learning curve for new users.
Peter A. Bogenschutz, Jishi Zhang, Qi Tang, and Philip Cameron-Smith
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7029–7050, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7029-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7029-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using high-resolution and state-of-the-art modeling techniques we simulate five atmospheric river events for California to test the capability to represent precipitation for these events. We find that our model is able to capture the distribution of precipitation very well but suffers from overestimating the precipitation amounts over high elevation. Increasing the resolution further has no impact on reducing this bias, while increasing the domain size does have modest impacts.
Manu Anna Thomas, Klaus Wyser, Shiyu Wang, Marios Chatziparaschos, Paraskevi Georgakaki, Montserrat Costa-Surós, Maria Gonçalves Ageitos, Maria Kanakidou, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Athanasios Nenes, Twan van Noije, Philippe Le Sager, and Abhay Devasthale
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6903–6927, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6903-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol–cloud interactions occur at a range of spatio-temporal scales. While evaluating recent developments in EC-Earth3-AerChem, this study aims to understand the extent to which the Twomey effect manifests itself at larger scales. We find a reduction in the warm bias over the Southern Ocean due to model improvements. While we see footprints of the Twomey effect at larger scales, the negative relationship between cloud droplet number and liquid water drives the shortwave radiative effect.
Kai Cao, Qizhong Wu, Lingling Wang, Hengliang Guo, Nan Wang, Huaqiong Cheng, Xiao Tang, Dongxing Li, Lina Liu, Dongqing Li, Hao Wu, and Lanning Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6887–6901, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6887-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6887-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
AMD’s heterogeneous-compute interface for portability was implemented to port the piecewise parabolic method solver from NVIDIA GPUs to China's GPU-like accelerators. The results show that the larger the model scale, the more acceleration effect on the GPU-like accelerator, up to 28.9 times. The multi-level parallelism achieves a speedup of 32.7 times on the heterogeneous cluster. By comparing the results, the GPU-like accelerators have more accuracy for the geoscience numerical models.
Ruyi Zhang, Limin Zhou, Shin-ichiro Shima, and Huawei Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6761–6774, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6761-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Solar activity weakly ionises Earth's atmosphere, charging cloud droplets. Electro-coalescence is when oppositely charged droplets stick together. We introduce an analytical expression of electro-coalescence probability and use it in a warm-cumulus-cloud simulation. Results show that charge cases increase rain and droplet size, with the new method outperforming older ones. The new method requires longer computation time, but its impact on rain justifies inclusion in meteorology models.
Máté Mile, Stephanie Guedj, and Roger Randriamampianina
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6571–6587, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6571-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6571-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite observations provide crucial information about atmospheric constituents in a global distribution that helps to better predict the weather over sparsely observed regions like the Arctic. However, the use of satellite data is usually conservative and imperfect. In this study, a better spatial representation of satellite observations is discussed and explored by a so-called footprint function or operator, highlighting its added value through a case study and diagnostics.
Lukas Pfitzenmaier, Pavlos Kollias, Nils Risse, Imke Schirmacher, Bernat Puigdomenech Treserras, and Katia Lamer
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-129, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-129, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
Orbital-radar is a Python tool transferring sub-orbital radar data (ground-based, airborne, and forward-simulated NWP) into synthetical space-borne cloud profiling radar data mimicking the platform characteristics, e.g. EarthCARE or CloudSat CPR. The novelty of orbital-radar is the simulation platform characteristic noise floors and errors. By this long time data sets can be transformed into synthetic observations for Cal/Valor sensitivity studies for new or future satellite missions.
Hynek Bednář and Holger Kantz
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6489–6511, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6489-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6489-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The forecast error growth of atmospheric phenomena is caused by initial and model errors. When studying the initial error growth, it may turn out that small-scale phenomena, which contribute little to the forecast product, significantly affect the ability to predict this product. With a negative result, we investigate in the extended Lorenz (2005) system whether omitting these phenomena will improve predictability. A theory explaining and describing this behavior is developed.
Giorgio Veratti, Alessandro Bigi, Sergio Teggi, and Grazia Ghermandi
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6465–6487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6465-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we present VERT (Vehicular Emissions from Road Traffic), an R package designed to estimate transport emissions using traffic estimates and vehicle fleet composition data. Compared to other tools available in the literature, VERT stands out for its user-friendly configuration and flexibility of user input. Case studies demonstrate its accuracy in both urban and regional contexts, making it a valuable tool for air quality management and transport scenario planning.
Sam P. Raj, Puna Ram Sinha, Rohit Srivastava, Srinivas Bikkina, and Damu Bala Subrahamanyam
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6379–6399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6379-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6379-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A Python successor to the aerosol module of the OPAC model, named AeroMix, has been developed, with enhanced capabilities to better represent real atmospheric aerosol mixing scenarios. AeroMix’s performance in modeling aerosol mixing states has been evaluated against field measurements, substantiating its potential as a versatile aerosol optical model framework for next-generation algorithms to infer aerosol mixing states and chemical composition.
Angeline G. Pendergrass, Michael P. Byrne, Oliver Watt-Meyer, Penelope Maher, and Mark J. Webb
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6365–6378, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The width of the tropical rain belt affects many aspects of our climate, yet we do not understand what controls it. To better understand it, we present a method to change it in numerical model experiments. We show that the method works well in four different models. The behavior of the width is unexpectedly simple in some ways, such as how strong the winds are as it changes, but in other ways, it is more complicated, especially how temperature increases with carbon dioxide.
Tianning Su and Yunyan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6319–6336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6319-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6319-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using 2 decades of field observations over the Southern Great Plains, this study developed a deep-learning model to simulate the complex dynamics of boundary layer clouds. The deep-learning model can serve as the cloud parameterization within reanalysis frameworks, offering insights into improving the simulation of low clouds. By quantifying biases due to various meteorological factors and parameterizations, this deep-learning-driven approach helps bridge the observation–modeling divide.
Siyuan Chen, Yi Zhang, Yiming Wang, Zhuang Liu, Xiaohan Li, and Wei Xue
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6301–6318, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6301-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores strategies and techniques for implementing mixed-precision code optimization within an atmosphere model dynamical core. The coded equation terms in the governing equations that are sensitive (or insensitive) to the precision level have been identified. The performance of mixed-precision computing in weather and climate simulations was analyzed.
Sam O. Owens, Dipanjan Majumdar, Chris E. Wilson, Paul Bartholomew, and Maarten van Reeuwijk
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6277–6300, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6277-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Designing cities that are resilient, sustainable, and beneficial to health requires an understanding of urban climate and air quality. This article presents an upgrade to the multi-physics numerical model uDALES, which can simulate microscale airflow, heat transfer, and pollutant dispersion in urban environments. This upgrade enables it to resolve realistic urban geometries more accurately and to take advantage of the resources available on current and future high-performance computing systems.
Allison A. Wing, Levi G. Silvers, and Kevin A. Reed
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6195–6225, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6195-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6195-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the experimental design for a model intercomparison project to study tropical clouds and climate. It is a follow-up from a prior project that used a simplified framework for tropical climate. The new project adds one new component – a specified pattern of sea surface temperatures as the lower boundary condition. We provide example results from one cloud-resolving model and one global climate model and test the sensitivity to the experimental parameters.
Philip G. Sansom and Jennifer L. Catto
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6137–6151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6137-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6137-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Weather fronts bring a lot of rain and strong winds to many regions of the mid-latitudes. We have developed an updated method of identifying these fronts in gridded data that can be used on new datasets with small grid spacing. The method can be easily applied to different datasets due to the use of open-source software for its development and shows improvements over similar previous methods. We present an updated estimate of the average frequency of fronts over the past 40 years.
Kelly M. Núñez Ocasio and Zachary L. Moon
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6035–6049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6035-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6035-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
TAMS is an open-source Python-based package for tracking and classifying mesoscale convective systems that can be used to study observed and simulated systems. Each step of the algorithm is described in this paper with examples showing how to make use of visualization and post-processing tools within the package. A unique and valuable feature of this tracker is its support for unstructured grids in the identification stage and grid-independent tracking.
Irene C. Dedoussi, Daven K. Henze, Sebastian D. Eastham, Raymond L. Speth, and Steven R. H. Barrett
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5689–5703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric model gradients provide a meaningful tool for better understanding the underlying atmospheric processes. Adjoint modeling enables computationally efficient gradient calculations. We present the adjoint of the GEOS-Chem unified chemistry extension (UCX). With this development, the GEOS-Chem adjoint model can capture stratospheric ozone and other processes jointly with tropospheric processes. We apply it to characterize the Antarctic ozone depletion potential of active halogen species.
Sylvain Mailler, Sotirios Mallios, Arineh Cholakian, Vassilis Amiridis, Laurent Menut, and Romain Pennel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5641–5655, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5641-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5641-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We propose two explicit expressions to calculate the settling speed of solid atmospheric particles with prolate spheroidal shapes. The first formulation is based on theoretical arguments only, while the second one is based on computational fluid dynamics calculations. We show that the first method is suitable for virtually all atmospheric aerosols, provided their shape can be adequately described as a prolate spheroid, and we provide an implementation of the first method in AerSett v2.0.2.
Hejun Xie, Lei Bi, and Wei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5657–5688, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5657-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5657-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A radar operator plays a crucial role in utilizing radar observations to enhance numerical weather forecasts. However, developing an advanced radar operator is challenging due to various complexities associated with the wave scattering by non-spherical hydrometeors, radar beam propagation, and multiple platforms. In this study, we introduce a novel radar operator named the Accurate and Efficient Radar Operator developed by ZheJiang University (ZJU-AERO) which boasts several unique features.
Jonathan J. Day, Gunilla Svensson, Barbara Casati, Taneil Uttal, Siri-Jodha Khalsa, Eric Bazile, Elena Akish, Niramson Azouz, Lara Ferrighi, Helmut Frank, Michael Gallagher, Øystein Godøy, Leslie M. Hartten, Laura X. Huang, Jareth Holt, Massimo Di Stefano, Irene Suomi, Zen Mariani, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Teresa Remes, Rostislav Fadeev, Amy Solomon, Johanna Tjernström, and Mikhail Tolstykh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5511–5543, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The YOPP site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP), which was designed to facilitate enhanced weather forecast evaluation in polar regions, is discussed here, focussing on describing the archive of forecast data and presenting a multi-model evaluation at Arctic supersites during February and March 2018. The study highlights an underestimation in boundary layer temperature variance that is common across models and a related inability to forecast cold extremes at several of the sites.
Hossain Mohammed Syedul Hoque, Kengo Sudo, Hitoshi Irie, Yanfeng He, and Md Firoz Khan
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5545–5571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5545-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5545-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using multi-platform observations, we validated global formaldehyde (HCHO) simulations from a chemistry transport model. HCHO is a crucial intermediate in the chemical catalytic cycle that governs the ozone formation in the troposphere. The model was capable of replicating the observed spatiotemporal variability in HCHO. In a few cases, the model's capability was limited. This is attributed to the uncertainties in the observations and the model parameters.
Zijun Liu, Li Dong, Zongxu Qiu, Xingrong Li, Huiling Yuan, Dongmei Meng, Xiaobin Qiu, Dingyuan Liang, and Yafei Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5477–5496, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5477-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5477-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we completed a series of simulations with MPAS-Atmosphere (version 7.3) to study the extreme precipitation event of Henan, China, during 20–22 July 2021. We found the different performance of two built-in parameterization scheme suites (mesoscale and convection-permitting suites) with global quasi-uniform and variable-resolution meshes. This study holds significant implications for advancing the understanding of the scale-aware capability of MPAS-Atmosphere.
Laurent Menut, Arineh Cholakian, Romain Pennel, Guillaume Siour, Sylvain Mailler, Myrto Valari, Lya Lugon, and Yann Meurdesoif
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5431–5457, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5431-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5431-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new version of the CHIMERE model is presented. This version contains both computational and physico-chemical changes. The computational changes make it easy to choose the variables to be extracted as a result, including values of maximum sub-hourly concentrations. Performance tests show that the model is 1.5 to 2 times faster than the previous version for the same setup. Processes such as turbulence, transport schemes and dry deposition have been modified and updated.
G. Alexander Sokolowsky, Sean W. Freeman, William K. Jones, Julia Kukulies, Fabian Senf, Peter J. Marinescu, Max Heikenfeld, Kelcy N. Brunner, Eric C. Bruning, Scott M. Collis, Robert C. Jackson, Gabrielle R. Leung, Nils Pfeifer, Bhupendra A. Raut, Stephen M. Saleeby, Philip Stier, and Susan C. van den Heever
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5309–5330, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5309-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Building on previous analysis tools developed for atmospheric science, the original release of the Tracking and Object-Based Analysis (tobac) Python package, v1.2, was open-source, modular, and insensitive to the type of gridded input data. Here, we present the latest version of tobac, v1.5, which substantially improves scientific capabilities and computational efficiency from the previous version. These enhancements permit new uses for tobac in atmospheric science and potentially other fields.
Taneil Uttal, Leslie M. Hartten, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Barbara Casati, Gunilla Svensson, Jonathan Day, Jareth Holt, Elena Akish, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Laura X. Huang, Robert Crawford, Zen Mariani, Øystein Godøy, Johanna A. K. Tjernström, Giri Prakash, Nicki Hickmon, Marion Maturilli, and Christopher J. Cox
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5225–5247, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5225-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5225-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A Merged Observatory Data File (MODF) format to systematically collate complex atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial data sets collected by multiple instruments during field campaigns is presented. The MODF format is also designed to be applied to model output data, yielding format-matching Merged Model Data Files (MMDFs). MODFs plus MMDFs will augment and accelerate the synergistic use of model results with observational data to increase understanding and predictive skill.
Chongzhi Yin, Shin-ichiro Shima, Lulin Xue, and Chunsong Lu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5167–5189, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5167-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate numerical convergence properties of a particle-based numerical cloud microphysics model (SDM) and a double-moment bulk scheme for simulating a marine stratocumulus case, compare their results with model intercomparison project results, and present possible explanations for the different results of the SDM and the bulk scheme. Aerosol processes can be accurately simulated using SDM, and this may be an important factor affecting the behavior and morphology of marine stratocumulus.
Zichen Wu, Xueshun Chen, Zifa Wang, Huansheng Chen, Zhe Wang, Qing Mu, Lin Wu, Wending Wang, Xiao Tang, Jie Li, Ying Li, Qizhong Wu, Yang Wang, Zhiyin Zou, and Zijian Jiang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1437, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1437, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a model to simulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from global to regional scales. The model can well reproduce the distribution of PAHs. The concentration of BaP (indicator species for PAHs) could exceed the target values of 1 ng m-3 over some areas (e.g., in central Europe, India, and eastern China). The change of BaP is less than PM2.5 from 2013 to 2018. China still faces significant potential health risks posed by BaP although "the Action Plan" has been implemented.
Alberto Martilli, Negin Nazarian, E. Scott Krayenhoff, Jacob Lachapelle, Jiachen Lu, Esther Rivas, Alejandro Rodriguez-Sanchez, Beatriz Sanchez, and José Luis Santiago
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5023–5039, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Here, we present a model that quantifies the thermal stress and its microscale variability at a city scale with a mesoscale model. This tool can have multiple applications, from early warnings of extreme heat to the vulnerable population to the evaluation of the effectiveness of heat mitigation strategies. It is the first model that includes information on microscale variability in a mesoscale model, something that is essential for fully evaluating heat stress.
Nathan P. Arnold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5041–5056, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5041-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Earth system models often represent the land surface at smaller scales than the atmosphere, but surface–atmosphere coupling uses only aggregated surface properties. This study presents a method to allow heterogeneous surface properties to modify boundary layer updrafts. The method is tested in single column experiments. Updraft properties are found to reasonably covary with surface conditions, and simulated boundary layer variability is enhanced over more heterogeneous land surfaces.
Enrico Dammers, Janot Tokaya, Christian Mielke, Kevin Hausmann, Debora Griffin, Chris McLinden, Henk Eskes, and Renske Timmermans
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4983–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4983-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen dioxide (NOx) is produced by sources such as industry and traffic and is directly linked to negative impacts on health and the environment. The current construction of emission inventories to keep track of NOx emissions is slow and time-consuming. Satellite measurements provide a way to quickly and independently estimate emissions. In this study, we apply a consistent methodology to derive NOx emissions over Germany and illustrate the value of having such a method for fast projections.
Yuhan Xu, Sheng Fang, Xinwen Dong, and Shuhan Zhuang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4961–4982, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4961-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Recent atmospheric radionuclide leakages from unknown sources have posed a new challenge in nuclear emergency assessment. Reconstruction via environmental observations is the only feasible way to identify sources, but simultaneous reconstruction of the source location and release rate yields high uncertainties. We propose a spatiotemporally separated reconstruction strategy that avoids these uncertainties and outperforms state-of-the-art methods with respect to accuracy and uncertainty ranges.
Cited articles
Abade, G. C., Grabowski, W. W., and Pawlowska, H.: Broadening of cloud droplet
spectra through eddy hopping: Turbulent entraining parcel simulations,
J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3365–3379,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0078.1, 2018. a, b, c
Alfonso, L. and Raga, G. B.: The impact of fluctuations and correlations in droplet growth by collision–coalescence revisited – Part 1: Numerical calculation of post-gel droplet size distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6895–6905, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017, 2017. a
Andrejczuk, M., Reisner, J. M., Henson, B., Dubey, M. K., and Jeffery, C. A.:
The potential impacts of pollution on a nondrizzling stratus deck: Does
aerosol number matter more than type?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D19204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009445, 2008. a
Andrejczuk, M., Grabowski, W. W., Reisner, J., and Gadian, A.: Cloud-aerosol
interactions for boundary layer stratocumulus in the Lagrangian Cloud Model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D22214, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014248,
2010. a, b, c
Arabas, S. and Shima, S.-i.: Large-eddy simulations of trade wind cumuli using
particle-based microphysics with monte Carlo coalescence, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2768–2777, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0295.1, 2013. a, b
Arabas, S. and Shima, S.: On the CCN (de)activation nonlinearities, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 24, 535–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-24-535-2017, 2017. a
Árnason, G. and Brown, P. S.: Growth of Cloud Droplets by Condensation:
A Problem in Computational Stability, 28, 72–77
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0072:GOCDBC>2.0.CO;2,
1971. a
Auer, A. H.: Distribution of Graupel and Hail With Size, Mon. Weather Rev., 100, 325–328, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493-100-05-0325, 1972. a, b
Auer, A. H. and Veal, D. L.: The Dimension of Ice Crystals in Natural Clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 919–926,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1970)027<0919:TDOICI>2.0.CO;2, 1970. a
Bailey, M. and Hallett, J.: Growth rates and habits of ice crystals between −20 and −70 ∘C, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 514–544,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0514:GRAHOI>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Baran, A. J.: From the single-scattering properties of ice crystals to climate
prediction: A way forward, Atmos. Res., 112, 45–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.04.010, 2012. a, b
Beard, K. V.: Terminal Velocity And Shape Of Cloud And Precipitation Drops
Aloft, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 851–864,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<0851:TVASOC>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a
Beard, K. V. and Ochs, H. T.: Collisions between Small Precipitation Drops.
Part II: Formulas for Coalescence, Temporary Coalescence, and Satellites,
J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 3977–3996,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3977:CBSPDP>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Beheng, K. D.: The evolution of raindrop spectra: A review of microphysical
essentials, in: Rainfall: State of the Science, Wiley Blackwell, 29–48,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GM000957, 2010. a
Böhm, J. P.: A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics.
Part III: Riming and aggregation, Atmos. Res., 28, 103–123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(92)90023-4, 1992a. a
Böhm, J. P.: A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics.
Part II: collision kernels for coalescence, Atmos. Res., 27,
275–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(92)90036-A, 1992b. a, b, c, d
Böhm, J. P.: Theoretical collision efficiencies for riming and aerosol
impaction, Atmos. Res., 32, 171–187,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(94)90058-2, 1994. a
Böhm, J. P.: Reply to Comment on “Revision and clarification of ‘A
general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics' [Böhm J.P.,
1999, Atmos. Res. 52, 167–176]”, Atmos. Res., 69, 289–293,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2003.10.001,
2004. a, b, c
Bott, A.: A flux method for the numerical solution of the stochastic
collection equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 2284–2293,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2284:AFMFTN>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a, b
Brown, A. R., Derbyshire, S. H., and Mason, P. J.: Large‐eddy simulation of
stable atmospheric boundary layers with a revised stochastic subgrid model,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120, 1485–1512,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712052004, 1994. a
Brown, P. R. A. and Francis, P. N.: Improved Measurements of the Ice Water
Content in Cirrus Using a Total-Water Probe, J. Atmos.
Ocean. Tech., 12, 410–414,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0410:imotiw>2.0.co;2, 1995. a
Chen, S., Yau, M. K., and Bartello, P.: Turbulence effects of collision
efficiency and broadening of droplet size distribution in cumulus clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 203–217,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0123.1, 2018. a, b
Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R., Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009, 2009. a
Connolly, P. J., Emersic, C., and Field, P. R.: A laboratory investigation into the aggregation efficiency of small ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2055–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2055-2012, 2012. a, b
Cotton, W. R., Bryan, G., and van den Heever, S. C.: Storm and Cloud Dynamics
– The Dynamics of Clouds and Precipitating Mesoscale Systems, International Geophysics, vol. 99, Elsevier, 2nd edn.,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(10)09918-3,
2010. a
Cui, Z., Carslaw, K. S., Yin, Y., and Davies, S.: A numerical study of aerosol
effects on the dynamics and microphysics of a deep convective cloud in a
continental environmental, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D05201,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005981, 2006. a
Davis, M. H.: Collisions of Small Cloud Droplets: Gas Kinetic Effects,
J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 911–915,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<0911:coscdg>2.0.co;2, 1972. a
De Boer, G., Morrison, H., Shupe, M. D., and Hildner, R.: Evidence of liquid
dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface
remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L01803,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046016, 2011. a
Demange, G., Zapolsky, H., Patte, R., and Brunel, M.: A phase field model for snow crystal growth in three dimensions, npj Computational Materials, 3, 15, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-017-0015-1, 2017. a, b
DeVille, R. E., Riemer, N., and West, M.: Weighted Flow Algorithms (WFA) for
stochastic particle coagulation, J. Comput. Phys., 230,
8427–8451, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.027, 2011. a
Dunnavan, E. L., Jiang, Z., Harrington, J. Y., Verlinde, J., Fitch, K.,
Garrett, T. J., Dunnavan, E. L., Jiang, Z., Harrington, J. Y., Verlinde, J.,
Fitch, K., and Garrett, T. J.: The Shape and Density Evolution of Snow
Aggregates, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 3919–3940,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0066.1, 2019. a
Durant, A. J. and Shaw, R. A.: Evaporation freezing by contact nucleation
inside-out, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 1–4,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024175, 2005. a
Dziekan, P. and Pawlowska, H.: Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13509–13520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13509-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Dziekan, P., Waruszewski, M., and Pawlowska, H.: University of Warsaw Lagrangian Cloud Model (UWLCM) 1.0: a modern large-eddy simulation tool for warm cloud modeling with Lagrangian microphysics, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2587–2606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2587-2019, 2019. a
Erfani, E. and Mitchell, D. L.: Growth of ice particle mass and projected area during riming, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1241–1257, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1241-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Field, P. R., Heymsfield, A. J., and Bansemer, A.: A test of ice
self-collection kernels using aircraft data, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 651–666, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3653.1, 2006. a
Field, P. R., Lawson, R. P., Brown, P. R. A., Lloyd, G., Westbrook, C.,
Moisseev, D., Miltenberger, A., Nenes, A., Blyth, A., Choularton, T.,
Connolly, P., Buehl, J., Crosier, J., Cui, Z., Dearden, C., DeMott, P.,
Flossmann, A., Heymsfield, A., Huang, Y., Kalesse, H., Kanji, Z. A., Korolev,
A., Kirchgaessner, A., Lasher-Trapp, S., Leisner, T., McFarquhar, G.,
Phillips, V., Stith, J., and Sullivan, S.: Secondary Ice Production: Current
State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future, Meteorological
Monographs, 58, 7.1–7.20, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0014.1, 2017. a, b, c
Findeisen, W. and Findeisen, E.: Investigations on the ice splinter formation
on rime layers (A contribution to the origin of storm electricity and to the
microstructure of cumulonimbi), Meteorol. Z, 60, 145–154, 1943. a
Fletcher, N. H.: Active Sites and Ice Crystal Nucleation, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1266–1271,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<1266:asaicn>2.0.co;2, 1969. a
Gillespie, D. T.: The Stochastic Coalescence Model for Cloud Droplet Growth,
J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1496–1510,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1496:tscmfc>2.0.co;2, 1972. a
Grabowski, W. W. and Abade, G. C.: Broadening of Cloud Droplet Spectra through
Eddy Hopping: Turbulent Adiabatic Parcel Simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1485–1493, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0043.1,
2017. a, b, c
Hall, W. D.: A Detailed Microphysical Model Within a Two-Dimensional Dynamic
Framework: Model Description and Preliminary Results, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2486–2507,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<2486:admmwa>2.0.co;2, 1980. a, b, c
Hall, W. D. and Pruppacher, H. R.: Survival Of Ice Particles Falling From
Cirrus Clouds In Subsaturated Air, J. Atmos. Sci., 33,
1995–2006, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033< 1995:TSOIPF>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a
Hallett, J. and Mason, B. J.: The influence of temperature and supersaturation
on the habit of ice crystals grown from the vapour, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., 247,
440–453, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0199, 1958. a
Hallett, J. and Mossop, S. C.: Production of secondary ice particles during
the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0, 1974. a
Hardy, K. R.: The Development of Raindrop-size Distributions and Implications
Related to the Physics of Precipitation, J. Atmos. Sci., 20, 299–312,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0299:TDORSD>2.0.CO;2, 1963. a
Harrington, J. Y., Moyle, A., Hanson, L. E., and Morrison, H.: On calculating
deposition coefficients and aspect-ratio evolution in approximate models of
ice crystal vapor growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 76,
1609–1625, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0319.1, 2019. a, b, c
Hashino, T. and Tripoli, G. J.: The Spectral Ice Habit Prediction System
(SHIPS). Part I: Model description and simulation of the vapor deposition
process, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2210–2237,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3963.1, 2007. a, b, c, d
Hashino, T. and Tripoli, G. J.: The Spectral Ice Habit Prediction System
(SHIPS). Part IV: Box model simulations of the habit-dependent aggregation
process, J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 1142–1161,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3667.1, 2011b. a, b, c, d
Heymsfield, A.: Ice Crystal Terminal Velocities, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 1348–1357,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029<1348:ictv>2.0.co;2, 1972. a, b
Heymsfield, A. J.: The Characteristics of Graupel Particles in Northeastern
Colorado Cumulus Congestus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 35,
284–295, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<0284:TCOGPI> 2.0.CO;2, 1978. a
Heymsfield, A. J.: A comparative study of the rates of development of
potential graupel and hail embryos in High Plains storms, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2867–2897,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<2867:ACSOTR>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Heymsfield, A. J. and Kajikawa, M.: Improved Approach To Calculating Terminal
Velocities Of Plate-Like Crystals And Graupel, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1088–1099,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1088:AIATCT>2.0.CO;2, 1987. a, b
Heymsfield, A. J. and Pflaum, J. C.: A quantitative assessment of the accuracy
of techniques for calculating graupel growth., J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2264–2274,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<2264:AQAOTA>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a, b, c, d
Heymsfield, A. J. and Westbrook, C. D.: Advances in the Estimation of Ice
Particle Fall Speeds Using Laboratory and Field Measurements, J.
Atmos. Sci., 67, 2469–2482, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3379.1, 2010. a
Heymsfield, A. J., Lewis, S., Bansemer, A., Iaquinta, J., Miloshevich, L. M.,
Kajikawa, M., Twohy, C., and Poellot, M. R.: A general approach for deriving
the properties of cirrus and stratiform ice cloud particles, J.
Atmos. Sci., 59, 3–29,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0003:AGAFDT>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a, b
Heymsfield, A. J., Schmitt, C., Bansemer, A., and Twohy, C. H.: Improved
representation of ice particle masses based on observations in natural
clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 3303–3318,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3507.1, 2010. a
Higuchi, K.: On The Coalescence Between Plane Snow Crystals, J.
Meteorol., 17, 239–243,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1960)017<0239:otcbps>2.0.co;2, 1960. a, b
Hoffmann, F.: On the limits of Köhler activation theory: how do collision and coalescence affect the activation of aerosols?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8343–8356, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8343-2017, 2017. a
Hoffmann, F., Yamaguchi, T., and Feingold, G.: Inhomogeneous mixing in
lagrangian cloud models: Effects on the production of precipitation embryos,
J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 113–133,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1, 2019. a, b, c
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012, 2012. a
Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J. E., Chen, J.-P., Hazra, A., Hoose, C.,
Kristjánsson, J. E., Chen, J.-P., and Hazra, A.: A
Classical-Theory-Based Parameterization of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation by
Mineral Dust, Soot, and Biological Particles in a Global Climate Model,
J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2483–2503,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3425.1, 2010. a
Hubbard, J. B. and Douglas, J. F.: Hydrodynamic friction of arbitrarily shaped
Brownian particles, Physical Review E, 47, R2983, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.47.R2983,
1993. a
Jaruga, A. and Pawlowska, H.: libcloudph++ 2.0: aqueous-phase chemistry extension of the particle-based cloud microphysics scheme, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3623–3645, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3623-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Jensen, E. and Pfister, L.: Transport and freeze-drying in the tropical
tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D02207,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004022, 2004. a, b
Jiang, Z., Oue, M., Verlinde, J., Clothiaux, E. E., Aydin, K., Botta, G., and
Lu, Y.: What can we conclude about the real aspect ratios of ice particle
aggregates from two-dimensional images?, J. Appl. Meteorol.
Climatol., 56, 725–734, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0248.1, 2017. a
Johansen, A., Youdin, A. N., and Lithwick, Y.: Adding particle collisions to
the formation of asteroids and Kuiper belt objects via streaming
instabilities, Astron. Astrophys., 537, A125,
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117701, 2012. a, b, c, d
Jonas, P. R.: The collision efficiency of small drops, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 98, 681–683, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709841717, 1972. a
Kajikawa, M.: Observation of the Falling Motion of Early Snowflakes, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 67, 731–738,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.67.5_731, 1989. a, b
Kajikawa, M.: Characteristics of the aggregation of needle snow crystals,
J. Jpn. Soc. Snow Ice, 57, 349–355, 1995. a
Kajikawa, M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Aggregation of ice crystals in cirrus,
J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3108–3121,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1989)046<3108:AOICIC>2.0.CO;2, 1989. a
Kamra, A. K., Bhalwankar, R. V., and Sathe, A. B.: Spontaneous breakup of
charged and uncharged water drops freely suspended in a wind tunnel, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 17159–17168, https://doi.org/10.1029/91jd01475, 1991. a
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo,
D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of Ice Nucleating Particles,
Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33,
https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-16-0006.1, 2017. a, b
Khain, A., Pokrovsky, A., Pinsky, M., Seifert, A., and Phillips, V.:
Simulation of effects of atmospheric aerosols on deep turbulent convective
clouds using a spectral microphysics mixed-phase cumulus cloud model. Part I:
Model description and possible applications, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2963–2982, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3350.1, 2004. a, b, c
Khain, A. P. and Pinsky, M.: Physical Processes in Clouds and Cloud Modeling,
Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139049481, 2018. a, b, c, d
Khain, A. P., Beheng, K. D., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krichak, S. O.,
Levin, Z., Pinsky, M., Phillips, V., Prabhakaran, T., Teller, A., Van Den
Heever, S. C., and Yano, J. I.: Representation of microphysical processes
in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk
parameterization, Rev. Geophys., 53, 247–322, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468, 2015. a, b, c
Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: Terminal Velocities of Droplets and
Crystals: Power Laws with Continuous Parameters over the Size Spectrum,
J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 1872–1884,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<1872:TVODAC>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: The theory of ice nucleation by
heterogeneous freezing of deliquescent mixed CCN. Part I: Critical radius,
energy and nucleation rate, J. Atmos. Sci., 61,
2676–2691, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3266.1, 2004. a
Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: The theory of ice nucleation by
heterogeneous freezing of deliquescent mixed CCN. Part II: Parcel model
simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 261–285,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3367.1, 2005. a
Khvorostyanov, V. I. and Curry, J. A.: Thermodynamics, kinetics, and
microphysics of clouds, Cambridge University Press,
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060004, 2014. a
Kikuchi, K., Kameda, T., Higuchi, K., and Yamashita, A.: A global
classification of snow crystals, ice crystals, and solid precipitation based
on observations from middle latitudes to polar regions, Atmos. Res., 132–133, 460–472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.06.006, 2013. a
Knight, N. C. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Measurement and interpretation of
hailstone density and terminal velocity, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 1510–1516,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<1510:MAIOHD>2.0.CO;2, 1983. a, b
Kobayashi, T.: The growth of snow crystals at low supersaturations,
Philos. Mag., 6, 1363–1370, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786436108241231, 1961. a
Kogan, Y. L.: The simulation of a convective cloud in a 3-D model with
explicit microphysics. Part I: model description and sensitivity
experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 1160–1189,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<1160:TSOACC>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets,
T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161,
https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152, 1936. a
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant
for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614,
https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537, 2000. a
Korolev, A. and Isaac, G.: Roundness and aspect ratio of particles in ice
clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1795–1808,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1795:RAAROP>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a, b, c
Korolev, A., McFarquhar, G., Field, P. R., Franklin, C., Lawson, P., Wang, Z., Williams, E., Abel, S. J., Axisa, D., Borrmann, S., Crosier, J., Fugal, J., Krämer, M., Lohmann, U., Schlenczek, O., Schnaiter, M., and Wendisch, M.: Mixed-Phase Clouds: Progress and Challenges, Meteo. Monogr., 58, 5.1–5.50, https://doi.org/10.1175/amsmonographs-d-17-0001.1, 2017. a
Kumai, M.: Formation of Ice Crystals and Dissipation of Supercooled Fog by
Artificial Nucleation, and Variations of Crystal Habit at Early Growth
Stages, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 579–587,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021<0579:FOICAD>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Lasher-Trapp, S. G., Cooper, W. A., and Blyth, A. M.: Broadening of droplet
size distributions from entrainment and mixing in a cumulus cloud, Q.
J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 195–220,
https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.199, 2005. a
Lawson, R. P., Pilson, B., Baker, B., Mo, Q., Jensen, E., Pfister, L., and Bui, P.: Aircraft measurements of microphysical properties of subvisible cirrus in the tropical tropopause layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1609–1620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1609-2008, 2008. a, b
Lew, J. K. and Pruppacher, H. R.: A Theoretical Determination of the Capture
Efficiency of Small Columnar Ice Crystals by Large Cloud Drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 139–145,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0139:ATDOTC>2.0.CO;2, 1983. a
Lew, J. K., Kingsmill, D. E., and Montague, D. C.: A Theoretical Study of the Collision Efficiency of Small Planar Ice Crystals Colliding with Large
Supercooled Water Drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 857–862,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<0857:atsotc>2.0.co;2, 1985. a
Li, X. Y., Brandenburg, A., Haugen, N. E., and Svensson, G.: Eulerian and
Lagrangian approaches to multidimensional condensation and collection,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 9, 1116–1137,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000930, 2017. a
Lilly, D. K.: On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection, Tellus, 14, 148–172, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1962.tb00128.x, 1962. a
Lin, C. L. and Lee, S. C.: Collision Efficiency of Water Drops in the
Atmosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1412–1418,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1975)032<1412:CEOWDI>2.0.CO;2, 1975. a
Locatelli, J. D. and Hobbs, P. V.: Fall speeds and masses of solid
precipitation particles, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2185–2197,
https://doi.org/10.1029/jc079i015p02185, 1974. a, b, c, d
Low, R. D. H.: A Generalized Equation for the Solution Effect in Droplet
Growth, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 608–611,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<0608:agefts>2.0.co;2, 1969. a
Low, T. B. and List, R.: Collision, Coalescence and Breakup of Raindrops. Part
I: Experimentally Established Coalescence Efficiencies and Fragment Size
Distributions in Breakup, J. Atmos. Sci., 39,
1591–1606, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039< 1591:CCABOR>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Magono, C. and Lee, C. W.: Meteorological Classification of Natural Snow
Crystals, Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 7,
Geophysics, II, 321–335, 1966. a
Magono, C. and Nakamura, T.: Aerodynamic Studies of Falling Snowflakes,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 43, 139–147,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.43.3_139, 1965. a
Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014, 2014. a
Marcolli, C.: Pre-activation of aerosol particles by ice preserved in pores, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1595–1622, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1595-2017, 2017. a, b
Maruyama, K. I. and Fujiyoshi, Y.: Monte Carlo simulation of the formation of
snowflakes, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1529–1544,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3416.1, 2005. a, b
Mason, B. J. and Ramanadham, R.: Modification of the size distribution of
falling raindrops by coalescence, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor.l Soc., 80, 388–394, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708034508, 1954. a
Mazloomi Moqaddam, A., Chikatamarla, S. S., and Karlin, I. V.: Simulation of
Droplets Collisions Using Two-Phase Entropic Lattice Boltzmann Method,
J. Stat. Phys., 161, 1420–1433,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-015-1329-3, 2015. a
Milbrandt, J. A. and Morrison, H.: Parameterization of cloud microphysics
based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part III:
Introduction of multiple free categories, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 975–995, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0204.1, 2016. a
Miller, T. L. and Young, K. C.: A Numerical Simulation of Ice Crystal Growth
from the Vapor Phase, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 458–469,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036<0458:ansoic>2.0.co;2, 1979. a
Misumi, R., Hashimoto, A., Murakami, M., Kuba, N., Orikasa, N., Saito, A.,
Tajiri, T., Yamashita, K., and Chen, J. P.: Microphysical structure of a
developing convective snow cloud simulated by an improved version of the
multi-dimensional bin model, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 11, 186–191,
https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.268, 2010. a, b, c, d
Mitchell, D. L.: Use of mass- and area-dimensional power laws for determining
precipitation particle terminal velocities, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1710–1723,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053<1710:UOMAAD>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a, b, c
Mitchell, D. L., Zhang, R., and Pitter, R. L.: Mass-dimensional relationships
for ice particles and the influence of riming on snowfall rates, J.
Appl. Meteorol., 29, 153–163,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0153:MDRFIP>2.0.CO;2, 1990. a, b
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: A novel approach for representing ice
microphysics in models: Description and tests using a kinematic framework,
J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1528–1548,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2491.1, 2008. a
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: An improved representation of rimed snow
and conversion to graupel in a multicomponent bin microphysics scheme,
J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1337–1360,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3250.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Morrison, H. and Milbrandt, J. A.: Parameterization of cloud microphysics
based on the prediction of bulk ice particle properties. Part I: Scheme
description and idealized tests, J. Atmos. Sci., 72,
287–311, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0065.1, 2015. a, b, c
Morrison, H., van Lier-Walqui, M., Fridlind, A. M., Grabowski, W. W.,
Harrington, J. Y., Hoose, C., Korolev, A., Kumjian, M. R., Milbrandt, J. A.,
Pawlowska, H., Posselt, D. J., Prat, O. P., Reimel, K. J., Shima, S.-I., van
Diedenhoven, B., and Xue, L.: Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud
and precipitation microphysics, J. Adv. Model. Earth
Sy., 45, e2019MS001689, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001689, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Mosimann, L., Weingartner, E., and Waldvogel, A.: An Analysis of Accreted Drop Sizes and Mass on Rimed Snow Crystals, J. Atmos. Sci.,
51, 1548–1558, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051< 1548:aaoads>2.0.co;2, 1994. a
Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice
nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, 41, 6519–6554,
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35200a, 2012. a
Murray, W. A. and List, R.: Freezing of Water Drops, J. Glaciol.,
11, 415–429, https://doi.org/10.3189/s0022143000022371, 1972. a
Nakaya, U.: Snow Crystals: Natural and Artificial, Harvard Univ. Press,
1954. a
Naumann, A. K. and Seifert, A.: A Lagrangian drop model to study warm rain
microphysical processes in shallow cumulus, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 7, 1136–1154, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000456, 2015. a
Niedermeier, D., Shaw, R. A., Hartmann, S., Wex, H., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., and Stratmann, F.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation: exploring the transition from stochastic to singular freezing behavior, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8767–8775, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8767-2011, 2011. a
Niedermeier, D., Ervens, B., Clauss, T., Voigtländer, J., Wex, H.,
Hartmann, S., and Stratmann, F.: A computationally efficient description of
heterogeneous freezing: A simplified version of the Soccer ball model,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 736–741, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058684, 2014. a
Niedermeier, D., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Hartmann, S., Wex, H., Ignatius, K., and Stratmann, F.: Can we define an asymptotic value for the ice active surface site density for heterogeneous ice nucleation?, J. Geophys.
Res., 120, 5036–5046, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022814, 2015. a, b
Niederreiter, H.: Quasi-Monte Carlo methods and pseudo-random numbers, B. Am. Math. Soc., 84, 957–1041, 1978. a
Niehaus, J., Becker, J. G., Kostinski, A., and Cantrell, W.: Laboratory
measurements of contact freezing by dust and bacteria at temperatures of
mixed-phase clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3659–3667,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0022.1, 2014. a
Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P.,
Klein, H., Bingemer, H., Demott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A
particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert
dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1, 2012. a, b, c, d
Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Sato, Y., Miyamoto, Y., and Tomita, H.: Influence of grid aspect ratio on planetary boundary layer turbulence in large-eddy simulations, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3393–3419, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3393-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Noh, Y., Oh, D., Hoffmanna, F., and Raasch, S.: A cloud microphysics
parameterization for shallow cumulus clouds based on Lagrangian cloud model
simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 4031–4047,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0080.1, 2018. a
Okawa, D.: Improvement of the super-droplet method using recursive multiple
collision algorithm, Master's thesis, University of Hyogo, 2015. a
Onishi, R. and Seifert, A.: Reynolds-number dependence of turbulence enhancement on collision growth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12441–12455, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12441-2016, 2016. a
Ormel, C. W. and Spaans, M.: Monte Carlo Simulation of Particle Interactions
at High Dynamic Range: Advancing beyond the Googol, Astrophys.
J., 684, 1291–1309, https://doi.org/10.1086/590052, 2008. a, b
Paoli, R., Hélie, J., and Poinsot, T.: Contrail formation in aircraft
wakes, J. Fluid Mech., 502, 361–373,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003007808, 2004. a, b
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007, 2007. a
Phillips, V. T., Pokrovsky, A., and Khain, A.: The influence of time-dependent
melting on the dynamics and precipitation production in maritime and
continental storm clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 338–359,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3832.1, 2007. a, b
Phillips, V. T., Formenton, M., Bansemer, A., Kudzotsa, I., and Lienert, B.: A
parameterization of sticking efficiency for collisions of snow and graupel
with ice crystals: Theory and comparison with observations, J. Atmos. Sci., 72, 4885–4902, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0096.1, 2015. a
Phillips, V. T., Yano, J. I., and Khain, A.: Ice multiplication by breakup in
ice-ice collisions. Part I: Theoretical formulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 1705–1719, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0224.1, 2017. a
Pinsky, M., Khain, A., and Shapiro, M.: Collision Efficiency of Drops in a
Wide Range of Reynolds Numbers: Effects of Pressure on Spectrum Evolution,
J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 742–764,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058<0742:CEODIA>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Pope, S. B.: Lagrangian PDF Methods for Turbulent Flows, Ann. Rev.
Fluid Mech., 26, 23–63, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fl.26.010194.000323, 1994. a
Prat, O. P., Barros, A. P., and Testik, F. Y.: On the Influence of Raindrop
Collision Outcomes on Equilibrium Drop Size Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 1534–1546, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0192.1, 2012. a
Przybylo, V. M., Sulia, K. J., Schmitt, C. G., Lebo, Z. J., and May, W. C.:
The ice Particle and Aggregate Simulator (IPAS). Part I: Extracting
dimensional properties of ice-ice aggregates for microphysical
parameterization, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1661–1676,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0187.1, 2019. a
Rasmussen, R. and Pruppacher, H. R.: A wind tunnel and theoretical study of
the melting behavior of atmospheric ice particles. I: a wind tunnel study of
frozen drops of radius less than 500 micrometers., J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 152–158,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<0152:AWTATS>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a, b
Rasmussen, R. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: A generalized form for impact
velocities used to determine graupel accretional densities, J.
Atmos. Sci., 42, 2275–2279,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<2275:AGFFIV>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a, b, c
Rasmussen, R. M. and Heymsfield, A. J.: Melting and Shedding of Graupel and
Hail. Part I: Model Physics, J. Atmos. Sci., 44,
2754–2763, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044< 2754:masoga>2.0.co;2, 1987. a
Riechelmann, T., Noh, Y., and Raasch, S.: A new method for large-eddy
simulations of clouds with Lagrangian droplets including the effects of
turbulent collision, New J. Phys., 14,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/6/065008, 2012. a, b, c
Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics,
Butterworth-Heinemann, 3rd edn., 1989. a
Roscoe, R.: XXXI. The flow of viscous fluids round plane obstacles, The
London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science,
40, 338–351, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786444908561255, 1949. a
Rosenfeld, D. and Woodley, W. L.: Deep convective clouds with sustained
supercooled liquid water down to −37.5 ∘C, Nature, 405, 440–442, https://doi.org/10.1038/35013030,
2000. a
Sato, Y., Nakajima, T., Suzuki, K., and Iguchi, T.: Application of a Monte
Carlo integration method to collision and coagulation growth processes of
hydrometeors in a bin-type model, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D09215, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011247, 2009. a
Sato, Y., Nishizawa, S., Yashiro, H., Miyamoto, Y., Kajikawa, Y., and Tomita,
H.: Impacts of cloud microphysics on trade wind cumulus: which cloud
microphysics processes contribute to the diversity in a large eddy
simulation?, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 2, 23,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-015-0053-6, 2015. a, b
Sato, Y., Shima, S.-i., and Tomita, H.: A grid refinement study of trade wind cumuli simulated by a Lagrangian cloud microphysical model: the super-droplet method, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 18, 359–365, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.764,
2017. a
Sato, Y., Shima, S.-i., and Tomita, H.: Numerical Convergence of Shallow
Convection Cloud Field Simulations: Comparison Between Double-Moment Eulerian
and Particle-Based Lagrangian Microphysics Coupled to the Same Dynamical
Core, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 1495–1512,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001285, 2018. a
Schilling, V., Siano, S., and Etling, D.: Dispersion of aircraft emissions due to wake vortices in stratified shear flows: A two-dimensional numerical
study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 20965–20974,
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02013, 1996. a
Schmidt, D. P. and Rutland, C. J.: A New Droplet Collision Algorithm, J. Comput. Phys., 164, 62–80, https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6568, 2000. a
Schmitt, C. G. and Heymsfield, A. J.: The dimensional characteristics of ice
crystal aggregates from fractal geometry, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1605–1616, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3187.1, 2010. a, b, c, d
Scotti, A., Meneveau, C., and Lilly, D. K.: Generalized Smagorinsky model for anisotropic grids, Phys. Fluids A, 5, 2306–2308,
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858537, 1993. a
Seeßelberg, M., Trautmann, T., and Thorn, M.: Stochastic simulations as a
benchmark for mathematical methods solving the coalescence equation,
Atmos. Res., 40, 33–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(95)00024-0, 1996. a, b
Seifert, A., Khain, A., Blahak, U., and Beheng, K. D.: Possible effects of
collisional breakup on mixed-phase deep convection simulated by a spectral
(bin) cloud model, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1917–1931,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3432.1, 2005. a
Seifert, A., Leinonen, J., Siewert, C., and Kneifel, S.: The Geometry of Rimed Aggregate Snowflakes: A Modeling Study, J. Adv. Model.
Earth Sy., 11, 712–731, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001519, 2019. a, b, c, d
Seiki, T. and Nakajima, T.: Aerosol effects of the condensation process on a
convective cloud simulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 71,
833–853, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0195.1, 2014. a
Shaw, R. A., Durant, A. J., and Mi, Y.: Heterogeneous surface crystallization
observed in undercooled water, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109,
9865–9868, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0506336, 2005. a, b
Shima, S.-i.: Shima-Lab/SCALE-SDM_mixed-phase_Shima2019 SCALE-SDM_0.2.5-2.2.2 (Version SCALE-SDM_0.2.5-2.2.2), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3483650, 2020. a
Shima, S., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.: The
super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and
precipitation: A particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled
with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor.
Soc., 135, 1307–1320, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441, 2009. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p
Shima, S.-i., Hasegawa, K., and Kusano, K.: Preliminary numerical study on the
cumulus-stratus transition induced by the increase of formation rate of
aerosols, Low Temperature Science, 72, 249–264,
available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/55063 (last access: 26 August 2020), 2014. a
Shirgaonkar, A. and Lele, S.: Large Eddy Simulation of Early Stage Contrails:
Effect of Atmospheric Properties, in: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting
and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston,
Virigina, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-1414, 2006. a, b
Shupe, M. D., Daniel, J. S., de Boer, G., Eloranta, E. W., Kollias, P., Long,
C. N., Luke, E. P., Turner, D. D., and Verlinde, J.: A focus on mixed-phase
clouds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89, 1549–1562,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2378.1, 2008. a
Smagorinsky, J.: General Circulation Experiments With The Primitive
Equations, Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1963)091<0099:GCEWTP>2.3.CO;2, 1963. a
Smoluchowski, M.: Drei Vorträge über Diffusion, Brownsche
Molekularbewegung und Koagulation von Kolloidteilchen, Physik. Z., 17,
557–571, 585–599, 1916. a
Squires, P.: The growth of cloud drops by condensation. I. General
characteristics, Aust. J. Chem., 5, 59–86,
https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9520059, 1952. a
Srivastava, R. C.: On the Role of Coalescence between Raindrops in Shaping
Their Size Distribution1, J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 287–292,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1967)024<0287:OTROCB>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a
Starr, D. O. and Cox, S. K.: Cirrus clouds. Part I: a cirrus cloud model.,
J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 2663–2681,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042<2663:CCPIAC>2.0.CO;2, 1985. a, b
Steinke, I., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., and Leisner, T.: A new temperature- and humidity-dependent surface site density approach for deposition ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3703–3717, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3703-2015, 2015. a
Stevens, B. and Lenschow, D. H.: Observations, Experiments, and Large Eddy
Simulation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 283–294,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<0283:OEALES>2.3.CO;2, 2001. a
Straub, W., Beheng, K. D., Seifert, A., Schlottke, J., and Weigand, B.:
Numerical Investigation of Collision-Induced Breakup of Raindrops. Part II:
Parameterizations of Coalescence Efficiencies and Fragment Size
Distributions, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 576–588,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3175.1, 2010. a
Takahashi, T., Endoh, T., Wakahama, G., and Fukuta, N.: Vapor diffusional
growth of free-falling snow crystals between-3 and-23 C, J.
Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 69, 15–30, 1991. a
Ullrich, R., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Niemand, M., Wagner, R.,
Höhler, K., Hiranuma, N., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: A new ice
nucleation active site parameterization for desert dust and soot, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 699–717, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0074.1, 2017. a, b
Um, J., McFarquhar, G. M., Hong, Y. P., Lee, S.-S., Jung, C. H., Lawson, R. P., and Mo, Q.: Dimensions and aspect ratios of natural ice crystals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 3933–3956, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3933-2015, 2015. a
Unterstrasser, S. and Sölch, I.: Optimisation of the simulation particle number in a Lagrangian ice microphysical model, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 695–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-695-2014, 2014. a
VanZanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Nuijens, L., Siebesma, A. P., Ackerman, A. S.,
Burnet, F., Cheng, A., Couvreux, F., Jiang, H., Khairoutdinov, M., Kogan, Y.,
Lewellen, D. C., Mechem, D., Nakamura, K., Noda, A., Shipway, B. J.,
Slawinska, J., Wang, S., and Wyszogrodzki, A.: Controls on precipitation and
cloudiness in simulations of trade-wind cumulus as observed during RICO,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 3, M06001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011MS000056,
2011. a, b
Vardiman, L.: The Generation of Secondary Ice Particles in Clouds by
Crystal–Crystal Collision, J. Atmos. Sci., 35,
2168–2180, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035< 2168:tgosip>2.0.co;2, 1978. a
Vohl, O., Mitra, S. K., Wurzler, S., Diehl, K., and Pruppacher, H. R.:
Collision efficiencies empirically determined from laboratory investigations
of collisional growth of small raindrops in a laminar flow field,
Atmos. Res., 85, 120–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.12.001,
2007. a
von Blohn, N., Diehl, K., Mitra, S. K., and Borrmann, S.: Riming of graupel:
Wind tunnel investigations of collection kernels and growth regimes, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 2359–2366, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS2969.1,
2009. a
Wang, L. P., Ayala, O., Rosa, B., and Grabowski, W. W.: Turbulent collision
efficiency of heavy particles relevant to cloud droplets, New J.
Phys., 10, 075013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/075013, 2008.
a
Wang, P. K. and Ji, W.: Collision efficiencies of ice crystals at
low-intermediate Reynolds numbers colliding with supercooled cloud droplets:
A numerical study, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 1001–1009,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1001:CEOICA>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a, b, c
Wang, P. K. and Pruppacher, H. R.: Acceleration to Terminal Velocity of Cloud
and Raindrops, J. Appl. Meteorol., 16, 275–280,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1977)016<0275:ATTVOC>2.0.CO;2, 1977. a
Westbrook, C. D., Ball, R. C., Field, P. R., and Heymsfield, A. J.: Theory of growth by differential sedimentation, with application to snowflake
formation, Physical Review E, 70, 021403 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.021403,
2004a. a, b
Westbrook, C. D., Ball, R. C., Field, P. R., and Heymsfield, A. J.:
Universality in snowflake aggregation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L15104,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020363, 2004b. a, b
Wex, H., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Hartmann, S., Rösch, M., Clauss, T., Tomsche, L., Niedermeier, D., and Stratmann, F.: Kaolinite particles as ice nuclei: learning from the use of different kaolinite samples and different coatings, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5529–5546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5529-2014, 2014. a
Wex, H., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Boose, Y., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Diehl, K., Dreyer, A., Frank, F., Hartmann, S., Hiranuma, N., Jantsch, E., Kanji, Z. A., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Möhler, O., Niedermeier, D., Nillius, B., Rösch, M., Rose, D., Schmidt, C., Steinke, I., and Stratmann, F.: Intercomparing different devices for the investigation of ice nucleating particles using Snomax® as test substance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1463–1485, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1463-2015, 2015. a, b
Wicker, L. J. and Skamarock, W. C.: Time-splitting methods for elastic models using forward time schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 2088–2097,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2088:TSMFEM>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Xue, L., Fan, J., Lebo, Z. J., Wu, W., Morrison, H., Grabowski, W. W., Chu, X.,
Geresdi, I., North, K., Stenz, R., Gao, Y., Lou, X., Bansemer, A.,
Heymsfield, A. J., McFarquhar, G. M., and Rasmussen, R. M.: Idealized
simulations of a squall line from the MC3E field campaign applying three bin
microphysics schemes: Dynamic and thermodynamic structure, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 4789–4812, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0385.1, 2017. a
Zalesak, S. T.: Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for
fluids, J. Comput. Phys., 31, 335–362,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90051-2, 1979. a
Short summary
Using the super-droplet method, we constructed a detailed numerical model of mixed-phase clouds based on kinetic description and subsequently demonstrated that a large-eddy simulation of a cumulonimbus which predicts ice particle morphology without assuming ice categories or mass–dimension relationships is possible. Our results strongly support the particle-based modeling methodology’s efficacy for simulating mixed-phase clouds.
Using the super-droplet method, we constructed a detailed numerical model of mixed-phase clouds...