Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-297-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-297-2020
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
29 Jan 2020
Methods for assessment of models |  | 29 Jan 2020

A simulator for the CLARA-A2 cloud climate data record and its application to assess EC-Earth polar cloudiness

Salomon Eliasson, Karl-Göran Karlsson, and Ulrika Willén

Related authors

Extension of AVHRR-based climate data records: exploring ways to simulate AVHRR radiances from Suomi NPP VIIRS data
Karl-Göran Karlsson, Nina Håkansson, Salomon Eliasson, Erwin Wolters, and Ronald Scheirer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3833–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3833-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3833-2025, 2025
Short summary
CLAAS-3: the third edition of the CM SAF cloud data record based on SEVIRI observations
Nikos Benas, Irina Solodovnik, Martin Stengel, Imke Hüser, Karl-Göran Karlsson, Nina Håkansson, Erik Johansson, Salomon Eliasson, Marc Schröder, Rainer Hollmann, and Jan Fokke Meirink
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5153–5170, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5153-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5153-2023, 2023
Short summary
CLARA-A3: The third edition of the AVHRR-based CM SAF climate data record on clouds, radiation and surface albedo covering the period 1979 to 2023
Karl-Göran Karlsson, Martin Stengel, Jan Fokke Meirink, Aku Riihelä, Jörg Trentmann, Tom Akkermans, Diana Stein, Abhay Devasthale, Salomon Eliasson, Erik Johansson, Nina Håkansson, Irina Solodovnik, Nikos Benas, Nicolas Clerbaux, Nathalie Selbach, Marc Schröder, and Rainer Hollmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4901–4926, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4901-2023, 2023
Short summary
Mass of different snow crystal shapes derived from fall speed measurements
Sandra Vázquez-Martín, Thomas Kuhn, and Salomon Eliasson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18669–18688, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18669-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18669-2021, 2021
Short summary
Shape dependence of snow crystal fall speed
Sandra Vázquez-Martín, Thomas Kuhn, and Salomon Eliasson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7545–7565, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7545-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
COSP-RTTOV-1.0: flexible radiation diagnostics to enable new science applications in model evaluation, climate change detection, and satellite mission design
Jonah K. Shaw, Dustin J. Swales, Sergio DeSouza-Machado, David D. Turner, Jennifer E. Kay, and David P. Schneider
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4935–4950, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4935-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4935-2025, 2025
Short summary
Assessing modifications to the Abdul-Razzak and Ghan aerosol activation parameterization (version ARG2000) to improve simulated aerosol–cloud radiative effects in the UK Met Office Unified Model (UM version 13.0)
Pratapaditya Ghosh, Katherine J. Evans, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Hyun-Gyu Kang, Salil Mahajan, Min Xu, Wei Zhang, and Hamish Gordon
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4899–4913, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4899-2025, 2025
Short summary
Correction of sea surface biases in the NEMO ocean general circulation model using neural networks
Andrea Storto, Sergey Frolov, Laura Slivinski, and Chunxue Yang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4789–4804, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4789-2025, 2025
Short summary
Representing lateral groundwater flow from land to river in Earth system models
Chang Liao, L. Ruby Leung, Yilin Fang, Teklu Tesfa, and Robinson Negron-Juarez
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4601-2025, 2025
Short summary
FINAM is not a model (v1.0): a new Python-based model coupling framework
Sebastian Müller, Martin Lange, Thomas Fischer, Sara König, Matthias Kelbling, Jeisson Javier Leal Rojas, and Stephan Thober
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4483–4498, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4483-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bodas-Salcedo, A., Webb, M. J., Bony, S., Chepfer, H., Dufresne, J.-L., Klein, S. A., Zhang, Y., Marchand, R., Haynes, J. M., Pincus, R., and John, V. O.: COSP: satellite simulation software for model assessment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1023–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011BAMS2856.1, 2011. a, b
Bugliaro, L., Zinner, T., Keil, C., Mayer, B., Hollmann, R., Reuter, M., and Thomas, W.: Validation of cloud property retrievals with simulated satellite radiances: a case study for SEVIRI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5603–5624, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5603-2011, 2011. a
Dybbroe, A., Karlsson, K.-G., and Thoss, A.: NWCSAF AVHRR cloud detection and analysis using dynamic thresholds and radiative modelling – Part I: Algorithm description, J. Appl. Meteorol., 44, 39–54, 2005. a
EC Earth consortium: WCRP CMIP5: The EC-EARTH Consortium EC-EARTH model output collection, available at: http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/526ec947ec2d4467b128749e9fe46f1a (last access: 16 January 2020), 2017. a
Eliasson, S.: CLARA-A2 satellite simulator, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3577506, available at: https://github.com/SatelliteSimulators/AVHRR_based_satellite_simulators (last access: 22 January 2020), 2019. a
Download
Short summary
This paper describes a new satellite simulator. Its purpose is to simulate the CLARA-A2 climate data record from a climate model atmosphere. We explain how the simulator takes into account the regionally variable cloud detection skill of the observations. The simulator makes use of the long/lat-gridded validation between CLARA-A2 and the CALIOP satellite-borne lidar dataset. Using the EC-Earth climate model, we show a sizable impact on climate model validation, especially at high latitudes.
Share