Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1711-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1711-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
01 Apr 2020
Development and technical paper |
| 01 Apr 2020
| 01 Apr 2020
Statistical downscaling with the downscaleR package (v3.1.0): contribution to the VALUE intercomparison experiment
Meteorology Group, Dpto. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 39005, Spain
Jorge Baño-Medina
Meteorology Group, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC – Universidad de Cantabria), Santander, 39005, Spain
Mikel N. Legasa
Meteorology Group, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC – Universidad de Cantabria), Santander, 39005, Spain
Maialen Iturbide
Meteorology Group, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC – Universidad de Cantabria), Santander, 39005, Spain
Rodrigo Manzanas
Meteorology Group, Dpto. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 39005, Spain
Sixto Herrera
Meteorology Group, Dpto. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 39005, Spain
Ana Casanueva
Meteorology Group, Dpto. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 39005, Spain
Daniel San-Martín
Predictia Intelligent Data Solutions, Santander, 39005, Spain
Antonio S. Cofiño
Meteorology Group, Dpto. de Matemática Aplicada y Ciencias de la Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 39005, Spain
José Manuel Gutiérrez
Meteorology Group, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (CSIC – Universidad de Cantabria), Santander, 39005, Spain
Related authors
Óscar Mirones, Joaquín Bedia, Sixto Herrera, Maialen Iturbide, and Jorge Baño Medina
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1402, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an adaptive method for calibrating TRMM precipitation in the South Pacific. By classifying data into weather types and applying different techniques, we achieve improved calibration. Results showed enhanced accuracy in mean and extreme precipitation indices across locations. The method offers customization options and effectively addresses intense rainfall events. Its versatility allows for application in diverse scenarios, supporting a better understanding of climate impacts.
Maialen Iturbide, José M. Gutiérrez, Lincoln M. Alves, Joaquín Bedia, Ruth Cerezo-Mota, Ezequiel Cimadevilla, Antonio S. Cofiño, Alejandro Di Luca, Sergio Henrique Faria, Irina V. Gorodetskaya, Mathias Hauser, Sixto Herrera, Kevin Hennessy, Helene T. Hewitt, Richard G. Jones, Svitlana Krakovska, Rodrigo Manzanas, Daniel Martínez-Castro, Gemma T. Narisma, Intan S. Nurhati, Izidine Pinto, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Bart van den Hurk, and Carolina S. Vera
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2959–2970, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present an update of the IPCC WGI reference regions used in AR5 for the synthesis of climate change information. This revision was guided by the basic principles of climatic consistency and model representativeness (in particular for the new CMIP6 simulations). We also present a new dataset of monthly CMIP5 and CMIP6 spatially aggregated information using the new reference regions and describe a worked example of how to use this dataset to inform regional climate change studies.
J. Bedia, S. Herrera, and J. M. Gutiérrez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 53–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-53-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-53-2014, 2014
Colin Gareth Jones, Fanny Adloff, Ben Booth, Peter Cox, Veronika Eyring, Pierre Friedlingstein, Katja Frieler, Helene Hewitt, Hazel Jeffery, Sylvie Joussaume, Torben Koenigk, Bryan N. Lawrence, Eleanor O'Rourke, Malcolm Roberts, Benjamin Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Samuel Somot, Pier-Luigi Vidale, Detlef van Vuuren, Mario Acosta, Mats Bentsen, Raffaele Bernardello, Richard Betts, Ed Blockley, Julien Boé, Tom Bracegirdle, Pascale Braconnot, Victor Brovkin, Carlo Buontempo, Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, Markus G. Donat, Italo Epicoco, Pete Falloon, Sandro Fiore, Thomas Froelicher, Neven Fuckar, Matthew Gidden, Helge Goessling, Rune Grand Graversen, Silvio Gualdi, Jose Manuel Gutiérrez, Tatiana Ilyina, Daniela Jacob, Chris Jones, Martin Juckes, Elizabeth Kendon, Erik Kjellström, Reto Knutti, Jason A. Lowe, Matthew Mizielinski, Paola Nassisi, Michael Obersteiner, Pierre Regnier, Romain Roehrig, David Salas y Melia, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Michael Schulz, Enrico Scoccimarro, Laurent Terray, Hannes Thiemann, Richard Wood, Shuting Yang, and Sönke Zaehle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-453, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-453, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a number of priority areas for the international climate research community to address over the coming ~6 years (i.e. to 2030). Advances in these areas will increase our understanding of past and future Earth system change, including the societal and environmental impacts of this change, as well as deliver significantly improved scientific support to international climate policy, such as the 7th IPCC Assessment Report and the UNFCCC Global Stocktake under the Paris Climate Agreement.
Óscar Mirones, Joaquín Bedia, Sixto Herrera, Maialen Iturbide, and Jorge Baño Medina
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1402, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1402, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an adaptive method for calibrating TRMM precipitation in the South Pacific. By classifying data into weather types and applying different techniques, we achieve improved calibration. Results showed enhanced accuracy in mean and extreme precipitation indices across locations. The method offers customization options and effectively addresses intense rainfall events. Its versatility allows for application in diverse scenarios, supporting a better understanding of climate impacts.
Rubina Ansari, Ana Casanueva, Muhammad Usman Liaqat, and Giovanna Grossi
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2055–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2055-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2055-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Bias correction (BC) has become indispensable to climate model output as a post-processing step to render output more useful for impact assessment studies. The current work presents a comparison of different state-of-the-art BC methods (univariate and multivariate) and BC approaches (direct and component-wise) for climate model simulations from three initiatives (CMIP6, CORDEX, and CORDEX-CORE) for a multivariate drought index (i.e., standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index).
Jorge Baño-Medina, Rodrigo Manzanas, Ezequiel Cimadevilla, Jesús Fernández, Jose González-Abad, Antonio S. Cofiño, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6747–6758, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6747-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6747-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Deep neural networks are used to produce downscaled regional climate change projections over Europe for temperature and precipitation for the first time. The resulting dataset, DeepESD, is analyzed against state-of-the-art downscaling methodologies, reproducing more accurately the observed climate in the historical period and showing plausible future climate change signals with low computational requirements.
João António Martins Careto, Pedro Miguel Matos Soares, Rita Margarida Cardoso, Sixto Herrera, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2635–2652, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2635-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2635-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work focuses on the added value of high-resolution models relative to their forcing simulations, with a recent observational gridded dataset as a reference, covering the entire Iberian Peninsula. The availability of such datasets with a spatial resolution close to that of regional climate models encouraged this study. For precipitation, most models reveal added value. The gains are even more evident for precipitation extremes, particularly at a more local scale.
João António Martins Careto, Pedro Miguel Matos Soares, Rita Margarida Cardoso, Sixto Herrera, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2653–2671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2653-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2653-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This work focuses on the added value of high-resolution models relative to their forcing simulations, with an observational gridded dataset as a reference covering the Iberian Peninsula. The availability of such datasets with a spatial resolution close to that of regional models encouraged this study. For the max and min temperature, although most models reveal added value, some display losses. At more local scales, coastal sites display important gains, contrasting with the interior.
Maialen Iturbide, José M. Gutiérrez, Lincoln M. Alves, Joaquín Bedia, Ruth Cerezo-Mota, Ezequiel Cimadevilla, Antonio S. Cofiño, Alejandro Di Luca, Sergio Henrique Faria, Irina V. Gorodetskaya, Mathias Hauser, Sixto Herrera, Kevin Hennessy, Helene T. Hewitt, Richard G. Jones, Svitlana Krakovska, Rodrigo Manzanas, Daniel Martínez-Castro, Gemma T. Narisma, Intan S. Nurhati, Izidine Pinto, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Bart van den Hurk, and Carolina S. Vera
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2959–2970, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present an update of the IPCC WGI reference regions used in AR5 for the synthesis of climate change information. This revision was guided by the basic principles of climatic consistency and model representativeness (in particular for the new CMIP6 simulations). We also present a new dataset of monthly CMIP5 and CMIP6 spatially aggregated information using the new reference regions and describe a worked example of how to use this dataset to inform regional climate change studies.
Jorge Baño-Medina, Rodrigo Manzanas, and José Manuel Gutiérrez
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2109–2124, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we intercompare different deep learning topologies for statistical downscaling purposes. As compared to the top-ranked methods in the largest-to-date downscaling intercomparison study, our results better predict the local climate variability. Moreover, deep learning approaches can be suitably applied to large regions (e.g., continents), which can therefore foster the use of statistical downscaling in flagship initiatives such as CORDEX.
Ana Casanueva, Sven Kotlarski, Sixto Herrera, Andreas M. Fischer, Tord Kjellstrom, and Cornelia Schwierz
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3419–3438, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3419-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3419-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Given the large number of available data sets and products currently produced for climate impact studies, it is challenging to distil the most accurate and useful information for climate services. This work presents a comparison of methods widely used to generate climate projections, from different sources and at different spatial resolutions, in order to assess the role of downscaling and statistical post-processing (bias correction).
Pere Quintana-Seguí, Marco Turco, Sixto Herrera, and Gonzalo Miguez-Macho
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2187–2201, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2187-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2187-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The quality of two high-resolution precipitation datasets for Spain at the daily time scale is reported: the new SAFRAN-based dataset and Spain02. ERA-Interim is also included. The precipitation products are compared with observations. SAFRAN and Spain02 have very similar scores, and they perform better than ERA-Interim. The high-resolution gridded products overestimate the number of precipitation days. Both SAFRAN and Spain02 underestimate high precipitation events.
J. Bedia, S. Herrera, and J. M. Gutiérrez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 53–66, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-53-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-53-2014, 2014
A. Casanueva, S. Herrera, J. Fernández, M. D. Frías, and J. M. Gutiérrez
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2089–2099, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2089-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-2089-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Climate and Earth system modeling
Multivariate adjustment of drizzle bias using machine learning in European climate projections
Development and evaluation of the interactive Model for Air Pollution and Land Ecosystems (iMAPLE) version 1.0
A perspective on the next generation of Earth system model scenarios: towards representative emission pathways (REPs)
Parallel SnowModel (v1.0): a parallel implementation of a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel)
LB-SCAM: a learning-based method for efficient large-scale sensitivity analysis and tuning of the Single Column Atmosphere Model (SCAM)
Quantifying the impact of SST feedback frequency on Madden–Julian oscillation simulations
Systematic and objective evaluation of Earth system models: PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP) version 3
A revised model of global silicate weathering considering the influence of vegetation cover on erosion rate
A radiative–convective model computing precipitation with the maximum entropy production hypothesis
Leveraging regional mesh refinement to simulate future climate projections for California using the Simplified Convection-Permitting E3SM Atmosphere Model Version 0
Machine learning parameterization of the multi-scale Kain–Fritsch (MSKF) convection scheme and stable simulation coupled in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using WRF–ML v1.0
Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model
cfr (v2024.1.26): a Python package for climate field reconstruction
NEWTS1.0: Numerical model of coastal Erosion by Waves and Transgressive Scarps
Evaluation of isoprene emissions from the coupled model SURFEX–MEGANv2.1
A comprehensive Earth system model (AWI-ESM2.1) with interactive icebergs: effects on surface and deep-ocean characteristics
The regional climate–chemistry–ecology coupling model RegCM-Chem (v4.6)–YIBs (v1.0): development and application
An overview of cloud–radiation denial experiments for the Energy Exascale Earth System Model version 1
The computational and energy cost of simulation and storage for climate science: lessons from CMIP6
Subgrid-scale variability of cloud ice in the ICON-AES 1.3.00
INFERNO-peat v1.0.0: a representation of northern high-latitude peat fires in the JULES-INFERNO global fire model
The 4DEnVar-based weakly coupled land data assimilation system for E3SM version 2
Continental-scale bias-corrected climate and hydrological projections for Australia
G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies
Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on the growth and yield of global staple crops with DSSAT v4.8.0
A one-dimensional urban flow model with an eddy-diffusivity mass-flux (EDMF) scheme and refined turbulent transport (MLUCM v3.0)
DCMIP2016: the tropical cyclone test case
Interactions between atmospheric composition and climate change – progress in understanding and future opportunities from AerChemMIP, PDRMIP, and RFMIP
CD-type discretization for sea ice dynamics in FESOM version 2
Dynamic MJO forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of IAP-CAS model
CSDMS Data Components: data–model integration tools for Earth surface processes modeling
A generic algorithm to automatically classify urban fabric according to the local climate zone system: implementation in GeoClimate 0.0.1 and application to French cities
Modelling water isotopologues (1H2H16O, 1H217O) in the coupled numerical climate model iLOVECLIM (version 1.1.5)
Localized injections of interactive volcanic aerosols and their climate impacts in a simple general circulation model
Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output
Towards variance-conserving reconstructions of climate indices with Gaussian process regression in an embedding space
A diatom extension to the cGEnIE Earth system model – EcoGEnIE 1.1
Carbon isotopes in the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3
Flux coupling approach on an exchange grid for the IOW Earth System Model (version 1.04.00) of the Baltic Sea region
Using EUREC4A/ATOMIC field campaign data to improve trade wind regimes in the Community Atmosphere Model
New model ensemble reveals how forcing uncertainty and model structure alter climate simulated across CMIP generations of the Community Earth System Model
Quantifying wildfire drivers and predictability in boreal peatlands using a two-step error-correcting machine learning framework in TeFire v1.0
Benchmarking GOCART-2G in the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS)
Energy-conserving physics for nonhydrostatic dynamics in mass coordinate models
Evaluation and optimisation of the soil carbon turnover routine in the MONICA model (version 3.3.1)
Assessing the sensitivity of aerosol mass budget and effective radiative forcing to horizontal grid spacing in E3SMv1 using a regional refinement approach
Towards the definition of a solar forcing dataset for CMIP7
ibicus: a new open-source Python package and comprehensive interface for statistical bias adjustment and evaluation in climate modelling (v1.0.1)
Disentangling the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) V2 – a case study in the Pantanal region
Constraining the carbon cycle in JULES-ES-1.0
Georgia Lazoglou, Theo Economou, Christina Anagnostopoulou, George Zittis, Anna Tzyrkalli, Pantelis Georgiades, and Jos Lelieveld
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4689–4703, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study focuses on the important issue of the drizzle bias effect in regional climate models, described by an over-prediction of the number of rainy days while underestimating associated precipitation amounts. For this purpose, two distinct methodologies are applied and rigorously evaluated. These results are encouraging for using the multivariate machine learning method random forest to increase the accuracy of climate models concerning the projection of the number of wet days.
Xu Yue, Hao Zhou, Chenguang Tian, Yimian Ma, Yihan Hu, Cheng Gong, Hui Zheng, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4621–4642, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4621-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4621-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We develop the interactive Model for Air Pollution and Land Ecosystems (iMAPLE). The model considers the full coupling between carbon and water cycles, dynamic fire emissions, wetland methane emissions, biogenic volatile organic compound emissions, and trait-based ozone vegetation damage. Evaluations show that iMAPLE is a useful tool for the study of the interactions among climate, chemistry, and ecosystems.
Malte Meinshausen, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Kathleen Beyer, Greg Bodeker, Olivier Boucher, Josep G. Canadell, John S. Daniel, Aïda Diongue-Niang, Fatima Driouech, Erich Fischer, Piers Forster, Michael Grose, Gerrit Hansen, Zeke Hausfather, Tatiana Ilyina, Jarmo S. Kikstra, Joyce Kimutai, Andrew D. King, June-Yi Lee, Chris Lennard, Tabea Lissner, Alexander Nauels, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Gian-Kasper Plattner, Hans Pörtner, Joeri Rogelj, Maisa Rojas, Joyashree Roy, Bjørn H. Samset, Benjamin M. Sanderson, Roland Séférian, Sonia Seneviratne, Christopher J. Smith, Sophie Szopa, Adelle Thomas, Diana Urge-Vorsatz, Guus J. M. Velders, Tokuta Yokohata, Tilo Ziehn, and Zebedee Nicholls
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4533–4559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4533-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The scientific community is considering new scenarios to succeed RCPs and SSPs for the next generation of Earth system model runs to project future climate change. To contribute to that effort, we reflect on relevant policy and scientific research questions and suggest categories for representative emission pathways. These categories are tailored to the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal, high-risk outcomes in the absence of further climate policy and worlds “that could have been”.
Ross Mower, Ethan D. Gutmann, Glen E. Liston, Jessica Lundquist, and Soren Rasmussen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4135–4154, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4135-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Higher-resolution model simulations are better at capturing winter snowpack changes across space and time. However, increasing resolution also increases the computational requirements. This work provides an overview of changes made to a distributed snow-evolution modeling system (SnowModel) to allow it to leverage high-performance computing resources. Continental simulations that were previously estimated to take 120 d can now be performed in 5 h.
Jiaxu Guo, Juepeng Zheng, Yidan Xu, Haohuan Fu, Wei Xue, Lanning Wang, Lin Gan, Ping Gao, Wubing Wan, Xianwei Wu, Zhitao Zhang, Liang Hu, Gaochao Xu, and Xilong Che
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3975–3992, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3975-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3975-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To enhance the efficiency of experiments using SCAM, we train a learning-based surrogate model to facilitate large-scale sensitivity analysis and tuning of combinations of multiple parameters. Employing a hybrid method, we investigate the joint sensitivity of multi-parameter combinations across typical cases, identifying the most sensitive three-parameter combination out of 11. Subsequently, we conduct a tuning process aimed at reducing output errors in these cases.
Yung-Yao Lan, Huang-Hsiung Hsu, and Wan-Ling Tseng
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3897–3918, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3897-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses the CAM5–SIT coupled model to investigate the effects of SST feedback frequency on the MJO simulations with intervals at 30 min, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 d. The simulations become increasingly unrealistic as the frequency of the SST feedback decreases. Our results suggest that more spontaneous air--sea interaction (e.g., ocean response within 3 d in this study) with high vertical resolution in the ocean model is key to the realistic simulation of the MJO.
Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Min-Seop Ahn, Ana Ordonez, Paul A. Ullrich, Kenneth R. Sperber, Karl E. Taylor, Yann Y. Planton, Eric Guilyardi, Paul Durack, Celine Bonfils, Mark D. Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Bo Dong, Charles Doutriaux, Chengzhu Zhang, Tom Vo, Jason Boutte, Michael F. Wehner, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Daehyun Kim, Zeyu Xue, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and John Krasting
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an open-source software, the PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP), developed for a comprehensive comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with real-world observations. Using diverse metrics evaluating climatology, variability, and extremes simulated in thousands of simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), PMP aids in benchmarking model improvements across generations. PMP also enables efficient tracking of performance evolutions during ESM developments.
Haoyue Zuo, Yonggang Liu, Gaojun Li, Zhifang Xu, Liang Zhao, Zhengtang Guo, and Yongyun Hu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3949–3974, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3949-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Compared to the silicate weathering fluxes measured at large river basins, the current models tend to systematically overestimate the fluxes over the tropical region, which leads to an overestimation of the global total weathering flux. The most possible cause of such bias is found to be the overestimation of tropical surface erosion, which indicates that the tropical vegetation likely slows down physical erosion significantly. We propose a way of taking this effect into account in models.
Quentin Pikeroen, Didier Paillard, and Karine Watrin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3801–3814, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3801-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3801-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
All accurate climate models use equations with poorly defined parameters, where knobs for the parameters are turned to fit the observations. This process is called tuning. In this article, we use another paradigm. We use a thermodynamic hypothesis, the maximum entropy production, to compute temperatures, energy fluxes, and precipitation, where tuning is impossible. For now, the 1D vertical model is used for a tropical atmosphere. The correct order of magnitude of precipitation is computed.
Jishi Zhang, Peter Bogenschutz, Qi Tang, Philip Cameron-smith, and Chengzhu Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3687–3731, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3687-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a regionally refined climate model that allows resolved convection and performed a 20-year projection to the end of the century. The model has a resolution of 3.25 km in California, which allows us to predict climate with unprecedented accuracy, and a resolution of 100 km for the rest of the globe to achieve efficient, self-consistent simulations. The model produces superior results in reproducing climate patterns over California that typical modern climate models cannot resolve.
Xiaohui Zhong, Xing Yu, and Hao Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3667–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In order to forecast localized warm-sector rainfall in the south China region, numerical weather prediction models are being run with finer grid spacing. The conventional convection parameterization (CP) performs poorly in the gray zone, necessitating the development of a scale-aware scheme. We propose a machine learning (ML) model to replace the scale-aware CP scheme. Evaluation against the original CP scheme has shown that the ML-based CP scheme can provide accurate and reliable predictions.
Taufiq Hassan, Kai Zhang, Jianfeng Li, Balwinder Singh, Shixuan Zhang, Hailong Wang, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Anthropogenic aerosol emissions are an essential part of global aerosol models. Significant errors can exist from the loss of emission heterogeneity. We introduced an emission treatment that significantly improved aerosol emission heterogeneity in high-resolution model simulations, with improvements in simulated aerosol surface concentrations. The emission treatment will provide a more accurate representation of aerosol emissions and their effects on climate.
Feng Zhu, Julien Emile-Geay, Gregory J. Hakim, Dominique Guillot, Deborah Khider, Robert Tardif, and Walter A. Perkins
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3409–3431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate field reconstruction encompasses methods that estimate the evolution of climate in space and time based on natural archives. It is useful to investigate climate variations and validate climate models, but its implementation and use can be difficult for non-experts. This paper introduces a user-friendly Python package called cfr to make these methods more accessible, thanks to the computational and visualization tools that facilitate efficient and reproducible research on past climates.
Rose V. Palermo, J. Taylor Perron, Jason M. Soderblom, Samuel P. D. Birch, Alexander G. Hayes, and Andrew D. Ashton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3433–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Models of rocky coastal erosion help us understand the controls on coastal morphology and evolution. In this paper, we present a simplified model of coastline erosion driven by either uniform erosion where coastline erosion is constant or wave-driven erosion where coastline erosion is a function of the wave power. This model can be used to evaluate how coastline changes reflect climate, sea-level history, material properties, and the relative influence of different erosional processes.
Safae Oumami, Joaquim Arteta, Vincent Guidard, Pierre Tulet, and Paul David Hamer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3385–3408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we coupled the SURFEX and MEGAN models. The aim of this coupling is to improve the estimation of biogenic fluxes by using the SURFEX canopy environment model. The coupled model results were validated and several sensitivity tests were performed. The coupled-model total annual isoprene flux is 442 Tg; this value is within the range of other isoprene estimates reported. The ultimate aim of this coupling is to predict the impact of climate change on biogenic emissions.
Lars Ackermann, Thomas Rackow, Kai Himstedt, Paul Gierz, Gregor Knorr, and Gerrit Lohmann
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3279–3301, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present long-term simulations with interactive icebergs in the Southern Ocean. By melting, icebergs reduce the temperature and salinity of the surrounding ocean. In our simulations, we find that this cooling effect of iceberg melting is not limited to the surface ocean but also reaches the deep ocean and propagates northward into all ocean basins. Additionally, the formation of deep-water masses in the Southern Ocean is enhanced.
Nanhong Xie, Tijian Wang, Xiaodong Xie, Xu Yue, Filippo Giorgi, Qian Zhang, Danyang Ma, Rong Song, Beiyao Xu, Shu Li, Bingliang Zhuang, Mengmeng Li, Min Xie, Natalya Andreeva Kilifarska, Georgi Gadzhev, and Reneta Dimitrova
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3259–3277, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3259-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3259-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
For the first time, we coupled a regional climate chemistry model, RegCM-Chem, with a dynamic vegetation model, YIBs, to create a regional climate–chemistry–ecology model, RegCM-Chem–YIBs. We applied it to simulate climatic, chemical, and ecological parameters in East Asia and fully validated it on a variety of observational data. Results show that RegCM-Chem–YIBs model is a valuable tool for studying the terrestrial carbon cycle, atmospheric chemistry, and climate change on a regional scale.
Bryce E. Harrop, Jian Lu, L. Ruby Leung, William K. M. Lau, Kyu-Myong Kim, Brian Medeiros, Brian J. Soden, Gabriel A. Vecchi, Bosong Zhang, and Balwinder Singh
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3111–3135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3111-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Seven new experimental setups designed to interfere with cloud radiative heating have been added to the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM). These experiments include both those that test the mean impact of cloud radiative heating and those examining its covariance with circulations. This paper documents the code changes and steps needed to run these experiments. Results corroborate prior findings for how cloud radiative heating impacts circulations and rainfall patterns.
Mario C. Acosta, Sergi Palomas, Stella V. Paronuzzi Ticco, Gladys Utrera, Joachim Biercamp, Pierre-Antoine Bretonniere, Reinhard Budich, Miguel Castrillo, Arnaud Caubel, Francisco Doblas-Reyes, Italo Epicoco, Uwe Fladrich, Sylvie Joussaume, Alok Kumar Gupta, Bryan Lawrence, Philippe Le Sager, Grenville Lister, Marie-Pierre Moine, Jean-Christophe Rioual, Sophie Valcke, Niki Zadeh, and Venkatramani Balaji
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3081–3098, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3081-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present a collection of performance metrics gathered during the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), a worldwide initiative to study climate change. We analyse the metrics that resulted from collaboration efforts among many partners and models and describe our findings to demonstrate the utility of our study for the scientific community. The research contributes to understanding climate modelling performance on the current high-performance computing (HPC) architectures.
Sabine Doktorowski, Jan Kretzschmar, Johannes Quaas, Marc Salzmann, and Odran Sourdeval
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3099–3110, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3099-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Especially over the midlatitudes, precipitation is mainly formed via the ice phase. In this study we focus on the initial snow formation process in the ICON-AES, the aggregation process. We use a stochastical approach for the aggregation parameterization and investigate the influence in the ICON-AES. Therefore, a distribution function of cloud ice is created, which is evaluated with satellite data. The new approach leads to cloud ice loss and an improvement in the process rate bias.
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Peatlands are globally important stores of carbon which are being increasingly threatened by wildfires with knock-on effects on the climate system. Here we introduce a novel peat fire parameterization in the northern high latitudes to the INFERNO global fire model. Representing peat fires increases annual burnt area across the high latitudes, alongside improvements in how we capture year-to-year variation in burning and emissions.
Pengfei Shi, L. Ruby Leung, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, Samson M. Hagos, and Shixuan Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3025–3040, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3025-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Improving climate predictions have profound socio-economic impacts. This study introduces a new weakly coupled land data assimilation (WCLDA) system for a coupled climate model. We demonstrate improved simulation of soil moisture and temperature in many global regions and throughout the soil layers. Furthermore, significant improvements are also found in reproducing the time evolution of the 2012 US Midwest drought. The WCLDA system provides the groundwork for future predictability studies.
Justin Peter, Elisabeth Vogel, Wendy Sharples, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Louise Wilson, Pandora Hope, Andrew Dowdy, Greg Kociuba, Sri Srikanthan, Vi Co Duong, Jake Roussis, Vjekoslav Matic, Zaved Khan, Alison Oke, Margot Turner, Stuart Baron-Hay, Fiona Johnson, Raj Mehrotra, Ashish Sharma, Marcus Thatcher, Ali Azarvinand, Steven Thomas, Ghyslaine Boschat, Chantal Donnelly, and Robert Argent
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2755–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We detail the production of datasets and communication to end users of high-resolution projections of rainfall, runoff, and soil moisture for the entire Australian continent. This is important as previous projections for Australia were for small regions and used differing techniques for their projections, making comparisons difficult across Australia's varied climate zones. The data will be beneficial for research purposes and to aid adaptation to climate change.
Daniele Visioni, Alan Robock, Jim Haywood, Matthew Henry, Simone Tilmes, Douglas G. MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, Sarah J. Doherty, John Moore, Chris Lennard, Shingo Watanabe, Helene Muri, Ulrike Niemeier, Olivier Boucher, Abu Syed, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, Roland Séférian, and Ilaria Quaglia
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2583–2596, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a new experimental protocol for the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). In it, we describe the details of a new simulation of sunlight reflection using the stratospheric aerosols that climate models are supposed to run, and we explain the reasons behind each choice we made when defining the protocol.
Jose Rafael Guarin, Jonas Jägermeyr, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Fabio A. A. Oliveira, Senthold Asseng, Kenneth Boote, Joshua Elliott, Lisa Emberson, Ian Foster, Gerrit Hoogenboom, David Kelly, Alex C. Ruane, and Katrina Sharps
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2547–2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The effects of ozone (O3) stress on crop photosynthesis and leaf senescence were added to maize, rice, soybean, and wheat crop models. The modified models reproduced growth and yields under different O3 levels measured in field experiments and reported in the literature. The combined interactions between O3 and additional stresses were reproduced with the new models. These updated crop models can be used to simulate impacts of O3 stress under future climate change and air pollution scenarios.
Jiachen Lu, Negin Nazarian, Melissa Anne Hart, E. Scott Krayenhoff, and Alberto Martilli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2525–2545, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study enhances urban canopy models by refining key assumptions. Simulations for various urban scenarios indicate discrepancies in turbulent transport efficiency for flow properties. We propose two modifications that involve characterizing diffusion coefficients for momentum and turbulent kinetic energy separately and introducing a physics-based
mass-fluxterm. These adjustments enhance the model's performance, offering more reliable temperature and surface flux estimates.
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate simulation of tropical cyclones (TCs) is essential to understanding their behavior in a changing climate. One way this is accomplished is through model intercomparison projects, where results from multiple climate models are analyzed to provide benchmark solutions for the wider climate modeling community. This study describes and analyzes the previously developed TC test case for nine climate models in an intercomparison project, providing solutions that aid in model development.
Stephanie Fiedler, Vaishali Naik, Fiona M. O'Connor, Christopher J. Smith, Paul Griffiths, Ryan J. Kramer, Toshihiko Takemura, Robert J. Allen, Ulas Im, Matthew Kasoar, Angshuman Modak, Steven Turnock, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Duncan Watson-Parris, Daniel M. Westervelt, Laura J. Wilcox, Alcide Zhao, William J. Collins, Michael Schulz, Gunnar Myhre, and Piers M. Forster
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2387–2417, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate scientists want to better understand modern climate change. Thus, climate model experiments are performed and compared. The results of climate model experiments differ, as assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report. This article gives insights into the challenges and outlines opportunities for further improving the understanding of climate change. It is based on views of a group of experts in atmospheric composition–climate interactions.
Sergey Danilov, Carolin Mehlmann, Dmitry Sidorenko, and Qiang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2287–2297, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2287-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Sea ice models are a necessary component of climate models. At very high resolution they are capable of simulating linear kinematic features, such as leads, which are important for better prediction of heat exchanges between the ocean and atmosphere. Two new discretizations are described which improve the sea ice component of the Finite volumE Sea ice–Ocean Model (FESOM version 2) by allowing simulations of finer scales.
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This article gives an overview introduction of the IAP-CAS S2S (sub-seasonal to seasonal) ensemble forecasting system and MJO forecast evaluation of the system. Compared to other S2S models, the IAP-CAS model has its advantages but also exhibits some biases, including underdispersive ensemble, overestimated amplitude and faster propagation speed when forecasting MJO. We also provide the explanation towards these biases and prospects for further improvement of this system in the future.
Tian Gan, Gregory E. Tucker, Eric W. H. Hutton, Mark D. Piper, Irina Overeem, Albert J. Kettner, Benjamin Campforts, Julia M. Moriarty, Brianna Undzis, Ethan Pierce, and Lynn McCready
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2165–2185, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents the design, implementation, and application of the CSDMS Data Components. The case studies demonstrate that the Data Components provide a consistent way to access heterogeneous datasets from multiple sources, and to seamlessly integrate them with various models for Earth surface process modeling. The Data Components support the creation of open data–model integration workflows to improve the research transparency and reproducibility.
Jérémy Bernard, Erwan Bocher, Matthieu Gousseff, François Leconte, and Elisabeth Le Saux Wiederhold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2077–2116, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2077-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2077-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Geographical features may have a considerable effect on local climate. The local climate zone (LCZ) system proposed by Stewart and Oke (2012) is seen as a standard approach for classifying any zone according to a set of geographic indicators. While many methods already exist to map the LCZ, only a few tools are openly and freely available. We present the algorithm implemented in GeoClimate software to identify the LCZ of any place in the world using OpenStreetMap data.
Thomas Extier, Thibaut Caley, and Didier M. Roche
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2117–2139, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2117-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2117-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Stable water isotopes are used to infer changes in the hydrological cycle for different time periods in climatic archive and climate models. We present the implementation of the δ2H and δ17O water isotopes in the coupled climate model iLOVECLIM and calculate the d- and 17O-excess. Results of a simulation under preindustrial conditions show that the model correctly reproduces the water isotope distribution in the atmosphere and ocean in comparison to data and other global circulation models.
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Hunter Y. Brown, Benjamin R. Hillman, Diana L. Bull, and Joseph L. Hart
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-335, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-335, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Large volcanic eruptions deposit material into the upper-atmosphere, which is capable of altering temperature and wind patterns of the Earth's atmosphere for years following. This research describes a new method of simulating these effects in an idealized, efficient atmospheric model. A volcanic eruption of sulfur dioxide is described with a simplified set of physical rules, which eventually cools the planetary surface. This model has been designed as a testbed for climate attribution studies.
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a request for sub-daily data to accurately capture the process-level connections between land states, surface fluxes, and the boundary layer response. This high-frequency model output will allow for more direct comparison with observational field campaigns on process-relevant timescales, enable demonstration of inter-model spread in land–atmosphere coupling processes, and aid in targeted identification of sources of deficiencies and opportunities for improvement of the models.
Marlene Klockmann, Udo von Toussaint, and Eduardo Zorita
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1765–1787, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1765-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1765-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Reconstructions of climate variability before the observational period rely on climate proxies and sophisticated statistical models to link the proxy information and climate variability. Existing models tend to underestimate the true magnitude of variability, especially if the proxies contain non-climatic noise. We present and test a promising new framework for climate-index reconstructions, based on Gaussian processes, which reconstructs robust variability estimates from noisy and sparse data.
Aaron A. Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny M. Monteiro, Katharine R. Hendry, Scott Burgan, Jamie D. Wilson, Ben A. Ward, Andy Ridgwell, and Daniel J. Conley
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1729–1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
As an extension to the EcoGEnIE 1.0 Earth system model that features a diverse plankton community, EcoGEnIE 1.1 includes siliceous plankton diatoms and also considers their impact on biogeochemical cycles. With updates to existing nutrient cycles and the introduction of the silicon cycle, we see improved model performance relative to observational data. Through a more functionally diverse plankton community, the new model enables more comprehensive future study of ocean ecology.
Martin Butzin, Ying Ye, Christoph Völker, Özgür Gürses, Judith Hauck, and Peter Köhler
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1709–1727, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1709-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we describe the implementation of the carbon isotopes 13C and 14C into the marine biogeochemistry model FESOM2.1-REcoM3 and present results of long-term test simulations. Our model results are largely consistent with marine carbon isotope reconstructions for the pre-anthropogenic period, but also exhibit some discrepancies.
Sven Karsten, Hagen Radtke, Matthias Gröger, Ha T. M. Ho-Hagemann, Hossein Mashayekh, Thomas Neumann, and H. E. Markus Meier
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1689–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1689-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the development of a regional Earth System Model for the Baltic Sea region. In contrast to conventional coupling approaches, the presented model includes a flux calculator operating on a common exchange grid. This approach automatically ensures a locally consistent treatment of fluxes and simplifies the exchange of model components. The presented model can be used for various scientific questions, such as studies of natural variability and ocean–atmosphere interactions.
Skyler Graap and Colin M. Zarzycki
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1627–1650, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1627-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A key target for improving climate models is how low, bright clouds are predicted over tropical oceans, since they have important consequences for the Earth's energy budget. A climate model has been updated to improve the physical realism of the treatment of how momentum is moved up and down in the atmosphere. By comparing this updated model to real-world observations from balloon launches, it can be shown to more accurately depict atmospheric structure in trade-wind areas close to the Equator.
Marika M. Holland, Cecile Hannay, John Fasullo, Alexandra Jahn, Jennifer E. Kay, Michael Mills, Isla R. Simpson, William Wieder, Peter Lawrence, Erik Kluzek, and David Bailey
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1585–1602, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1585-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Climate evolves in response to changing forcings, as prescribed in simulations. Models and forcings are updated over time to reflect new understanding. This makes it difficult to attribute simulation differences to either model or forcing changes. Here we present new simulations which enable the separation of model structure and forcing influence between two widely used simulation sets. Results indicate a strong influence of aerosol emission uncertainty on historical climate.
Rongyun Tang, Mingzhou Jin, Jiafu Mao, Daniel M. Ricciuto, Anping Chen, and Yulong Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1525–1542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Carbon-rich boreal peatlands are at risk of burning. The reproducibility and predictability of rare peatland fire events are investigated by constructing a two-step error-correcting machine learning framework to tackle such complex systems. Fire occurrence and impacts are highly predictable with our approach. Factor-controlling simulations revealed that temperature, moisture, and freeze–thaw cycles control boreal peatland fires, indicating thermal impacts on causing peat fires.
Allison B. Collow, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo M. da Silva, Virginie Buchard, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Sampa Das, Ravi Govindaraju, Dongchul Kim, and Valentina Aquila
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1443–1468, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1443-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The GOCART aerosol module within the Goddard Earth Observing System recently underwent a major refactoring and update to the representation of physical processes. Code changes that were included in GOCART Second Generation (GOCART-2G) are documented, and we establish a benchmark simulation that is to be used for future development of the system. The 4-year benchmark simulation was evaluated using in situ and spaceborne measurements to develop a baseline and prioritize future development.
Oksana Guba, Mark A. Taylor, Peter A. Bosler, Christopher Eldred, and Peter H. Lauritzen
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1429–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1429-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We want to reduce errors in the moist energy budget in numerical atmospheric models. We study a few common assumptions and mechanisms that are used for the moist physics. Some mechanisms are more consistent with the underlying equations. Separately, we study how assumptions about models' thermodynamics affect the modeled energy of precipitation. We also explain how to conserve energy in the moist physics for nonhydrostatic models.
Konstantin Aiteew, Jarno Rouhiainen, Claas Nendel, and René Dechow
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1349–1385, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1349-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluated the biogeochemical model MONICA and its performance in simulating soil organic carbon changes. MONICA can reproduce plant growth, carbon and nitrogen dynamics, soil water and temperature. The model results were compared with five established carbon turnover models. With the exception of certain sites, adequate reproduction of soil organic carbon stock change rates was achieved. The MONICA model was capable of performing similar to or even better than the other models.
Jianfeng Li, Kai Zhang, Taufiq Hassan, Shixuan Zhang, Po-Lun Ma, Balwinder Singh, Qiyang Yan, and Huilin Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1327–1347, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1327-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
By comparing E3SM simulations with and without regional refinement, we find that model horizontal grid spacing considerably affects the simulated aerosol mass budget, aerosol–cloud interactions, and the effective radiative forcing of anthropogenic aerosols. The study identifies the critical physical processes strongly influenced by model resolution. It also highlights the benefit of applying regional refinement in future modeling studies at higher or even convection-permitting resolutions.
Bernd Funke, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Ilaria Ermolli, Margit Haberreiter, Doug Kinnison, Daniel Marsh, Hilde Nesse, Annika Seppälä, Miriam Sinnhuber, and Ilya Usoskin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1217–1227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We outline a road map for the preparation of a solar forcing dataset for the upcoming Phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7), considering the latest scientific advances made in the reconstruction of solar forcing and in the understanding of climate response while also addressing the issues that were raised during CMIP6.
Fiona Raphaela Spuler, Jakob Benjamin Wessel, Edward Comyn-Platt, James Varndell, and Chiara Cagnazzo
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1249–1269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1249-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Before using climate models to study the impacts of climate change, bias adjustment is commonly applied to the models to ensure that they correspond with observations at a local scale. However, this can introduce undesirable distortions into the climate model. In this paper, we present an open-source python package called ibicus to enable the comparison and detailed evaluation of bias adjustment methods, facilitating their transparent and rigorous application.
Donghui Xu, Gautam Bisht, Zeli Tan, Chang Liao, Tian Zhou, Hong-Yi Li, and L. Ruby Leung
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1197–1215, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1197-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to disentangle the hydrological and hydraulic controls on streamflow variability in a fully coupled earth system model. We found that calibrating only one process (i.e., traditional calibration procedure) will result in unrealistic parameter values and poor performance of the water cycle, while the simulated streamflow is improved. To address this issue, we further proposed a two-step calibration procedure to reconcile the impacts from hydrological and hydraulic processes on streamflow.
Douglas McNeall, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1059–1089, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1059-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We can run simulations of the land surface and carbon cycle, using computer models to help us understand and predict climate change and its impacts. These simulations are not perfect reproductions of the real land surface, and that can make them less effective tools. We use new statistical and computational techniques to help us understand how different our models are from the real land surface, how to make them more realistic, and how well we can simulate past and future climate.
Cited articles
Abaurrea, J. and Asín, J.: Forecasting local daily precipitation patterns in
a climate change scenario, Clim. Res., 28, 183–197,
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr028183, 2005. a
Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Configuration and Intercomparison of Deep Learning Neural Models for Statistical Downscaling, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-278, in review, 2019. a
Barsugli, J. J., Guentchev, G., Horton, R. M., Wood, A., Mearns, L. O., Liang,
X.-Z., Winkler, J. A., Dixon, K., Hayhoe, K., Rood, R. B., Goddard, L., Ray,
A., Buja, L., and Ammann, C.: The Practitioner's Dilemma: How to
Assess the Credibility of Downscaled Climate Projections, Eos
T. Am. Geophys. Un., 94, 424–425,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO460005, 2013. a
Bedia, J., Herrera, S., San-Martín, D., Koutsias, N., and Gutiérrez, J. M.:
Robust projections of Fire Weather Index in the Mediterranean using
statistical downscaling, Climatic Change, 120, 229–247,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0787-3, 2013. a
Bedia, J., Golding, N., Casanueva, A., Iturbide, M., Buontempo, C., and
Gutiérrez, J.: Seasonal predictions of Fire Weather Index: Paving
the way for their operational applicability in Mediterranean Europe,
Climate Services, 9, 101–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.001, 2018. a
Bedia, J., San-Martín, D., Iturbide, M., Herrera, S., Manzanas, R., and
Gutiérrez, J. M.: The METACLIP semantic provenance framework for climate
products, Environ. Modell. Softw., 119, 445–457,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.07.005, 2019a. a
Bedia, J., Baño-Medina, J., Casanueva, A., Cofiño, A. S.,
Gutiérrez, J. M., Herrera, S., Iturbide, M., Legasa, M.N., Manzanas, R., and San-Martín, D.: Paper notebook repository of the Santander Meteorology Group, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3277316, 2019b. a, b
Benestad, R.: Novel methods for inferring future changes in extreme rainfall
over Northern Europe, Clim. Res., 34, 195–210,
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00693, 2007. a
Benestad, R. E.: A comparison between two empirical downscaling strategies,
International J. Climatol., 21, 1645–1668, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.703,
2001. a, b
Benestad, R. E.: Downscaling precipitation extremes: Correction of analog
models through PDF predictions, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 100,
1–21, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0158-1, 2010. a
Benestad, R. E., Mezghani, A., and Parding, K. M.: “esd” – The
Empirical-Statistical Downscaling tool & its visualisation
capabilities., Tech. rep., Norwegian Meteorological Institute,
available at: https://figshare.com/articles/_esd_The_Empirical_Statistical_Downscaling_tool_amp_its_visualisation_capabilities_/1454425 (last access: 30 March 2020),
2015. a
Brands, S., Gutiérrez, J., Herrera, S., and Cofiño, A.: On the Use of
Reanalysis Data for Downscaling, J. Climate, 25, 2517–2526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00251.1, 2012. a, b
Brands, S., Gutiérrez, J. M., Herrera, S., and Cofiño, A. S.: On the use
of reanalysis data for downscaling, J. Climate, 25,
2517–2526, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00251.1, 2012. a
Brands, S., Herrera, S., Fernández, J., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: How well do
CMIP5 Earth System Models simulate present climate conditions in
Europe and Africa?: A performance comparison for the downscaling
community, Clim. Dynam., 41, 803–817, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1742-8,
2013. a
Brandsma, T. and Buishand, T. A.: Statistical linkage of daily precipitation in
Switzerland to atmospheric circulation and temperature, J.
Hydrol., 198, 98–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03326-4, 1997. a
Bürger, G. and Chen, Y.: Regression-based downscaling of spatial
variability for hydrologic applications, J. Hydrol., 311,
299–317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.025, 2005. a
Chandler, R. E. and Wheater, H. S.: Analysis of rainfall variability using
generalized linear models: A case study from the west of Ireland, Water
Resour. Res., 38, 10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000906, 2002. a, b, c
Charles, S. P., Bryson, C. B., Whetton, P. H., and Hughes, J. P.: Validation of
downscaling models for changed climate conditions: Case study of
southwestern Australia, Clim. Res., 12, 1–14,
https://doi.org/10.3354/cr012001, 1999. a
Christensen, J. H., Carter, T. R., Rummukainen, M., and Amanatidis, G.:
Evaluating the performance and utility of regional climate models: the
PRUDENCE project, Climatic Change, 81, 1–6,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9211-6, 2007. a
Christensen, J. H., Boberg, F., Christensen, O. B., and Lucas-Picher, P.: On
the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of
temperature and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20709,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035694, 2008. a
Cinquini, L., Crichton, D., Mattmann, C., Harney, J., Shipman, G., Wang, F.,
Ananthakrishnan, R., Miller, N., Denvil, S., Morgan, M., Pobre, Z., Bell,
G. M., Doutriaux, C., Drach, R., Williams, D., Kershaw, P., Pascoe, S.,
Gonzalez, E., Fiore, S., and Schweitzer, R.: The Earth System Grid
Federation: An open infrastructure for access to distributed geospatial
data, Future Gener. Comp. Sy., 36, 400–417,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.07.002, 2014. a
Cofiño, A., Bedia, J., Iturbide, M., Vega, M., Herrera, S., Fernández, J.,
Frías, M., Manzanas, R., and Gutiérrez, J.: The ECOMS User Data
Gateway: Towards seasonal forecast data provision and research
reproducibility in the era of Climate Services, Climate Services, 9,
33–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.07.001, 2018. a, b
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hölm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kåallberg, P.,
Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette,
J., Park, B., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and
Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of
the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, 2011. a
EC-Earth Consortium: EC-EARTH model output prepared for CMIP5 rcp85, served
by ESGF, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,
available at: http://cera-www.dkrz.de/WDCC/CMIP5/Compact.jsp?acronym=IHECr8 (last access: 30 March 2020),
2014. a
Fealy, R. and Sweeney, J.: Statistical downscaling of precipitation for a
selection of sites in Ireland employing a generalised linear modelling
approach, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 2083–2094,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1506, 2007. a
Fowler, H. J., Blenkinsop, S., and Tebaldi, C.: Linking climate change
modelling to impacts studies: Recent advances in downscaling techniques for
hydrological modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 27,
1547–1578, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1556, 2007. a
Frías, M. D., Iturbide, M., Manzanas, R., Bedia, J., Fernández, J., Herrera,
S., Cofiño, A. S., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: An R package to visualize and
communicate uncertainty in seasonal climate prediction, Environ.
Modell. Softw., 99, 101–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.09.008,
2018. a, b
Giorgi, F., Jones, C., and Asrar, G. R.: Addressing climate information needs
at the regional level: the CORDEX framework, Bulletin – World
Meteorological Organization, 58, 175–183, 2009. a
Glahn, H. R. and Lowry, D. A.: The use of Model Output Statistics (MOS) in
objective weather forecasting, J. Appl. Meteorol, 11,
1203–1211, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1972)011<1203:TUOMOS>2.0.CO;2, 1972. a
Gutiérrez, J. M., San Martín, D., Cofiño, A. S., Herrera, S., Manzanas,
R., and Frías, M. D.: User Guide of the ENSEMBLES Downscaling Portal
(version 2), Tech. Rep. 2.2011, Santander Meteorology Group, CSIC-UC,
available at: https://meteo.unican.es/downscaling/doc/UserGuide.pdf (last access: 30 March 2020), 2012. a
Gutiérrez, J. M., Maraun, D. abd Widmann, M., Huth, R., Hertig, E., Benestad,
R., Roessler, R., Wibig, T., Wilcke, R., Kotlarski, S., San-Martín, D.,
Herrera, S., Bedia, J., Casanueva, A., Manzanas, R., Iturbide, M., and Vrac,
M.: An intercomparison of a large ensemble of statistical downscaling
methods over Europe: Results from the VALUE perfect predictor
cross-validation experiment, Int. J. Climatol., 39,
3750–3785, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5462, 2019. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Hanssen-Bauer, I., Achberger, C., Benestad, R. E., Chen, D., and Forland,
E. J.: Statistical downscaling of climate scenarios over Scandinavia,
Clim. Res., 29, 255–268, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr029255, 2005. a
Haylock, M. R., Cawley, G. C., Harpham, C., Wilby, R. L., and Goodess, C. M.:
Downscaling heavy precipitation over the United Kingdom: A comparison
of dynamical and statistical methods and their future scenarios,
Int. J. Climatol., 26, 1397–1415, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1318,
2006. a
Hertig, E. and Jacobeit, J.: Assessments of Mediterranean precipitation
changes for the 21st century using statistical downscaling techniques,
Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1025–1045, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1597,
2008. a
Hertig, E., Seubert, S., Paxian, A., Vogt, G., Paeth, H., and Jacobeit, J.:
Changes of total versus extreme precipitation and dry periods until the end
of the twenty-first century: Statistical assessments for the Mediterranean
area, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 111, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-012-0639-5, 2013. a
Hertig, E., Maraun, D., Bartholy, J., Pongracz, R., Vrac, M., Mares, I.,
Gutiérrez, J. M., Wibig, J., Casanueva, A., and Soares, P. M. M.: Comparison
of statistical downscaling methods with respect to extreme events over
Europe: Validation results from the perfect predictor experiment of the
COST Action VALUE, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3846–3867,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5469, 2019. a
Huth, R.: Statistical downscaling in central Europe: Evaluation of methods and
potential predictors, Clim. Res., 13, 91–101, https://doi.org/10.3354/cr013091,
1999. a
Huth, R.: Sensitivity of Local Daily Temperature Change Estimates to
the Selection of Downscaling Models and Predictors, J.
Climate, 17, 640–652, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0640:SOLDTC>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Iturbide, M., Bedia, J., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Tackling Uncertainties of
Species Distribution Model Projections with Package mopa, The R
Journal, 10, 122–139,
2018. a
Iturbide, M., Bedia, J., Herrera, S., Baño Medina, J., Fernández, J.,
Frías, M. D., Manzanas, R., D., S.-M., Cimadevilla, E., Cofiño, J. M., ,
and Gutiérrez, J. M.: climate4R: An R-based Framework for Climate Data
Access,Post-processing and Bias Correction, Environ. Modell.
Softwa., 111, 42–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.009, 2019. a, b, c, d, e
Jacob, D., Petersen, J., Eggert, B., Alias, A., Christensen, O. B., Bouwer, L.,
Braun, A., Colette, A., Déqué, M., Georgievski, G., Georgopoulou, E.,
Gobiet, A., Menut, L., Nikulin, G., Haensler, A., Hempelmann, N., Jones, C.,
Keuler, K., Kovats, S., Kröner, N., Kotlarski, S., Kriegsmann, A., Martin,
E., van Meijgaard, E., Moseley, C., Pfeifer, S., Preuschmann, S.,
Radermacher, C., Radtke, K., Rechid, D., Rounsevell, M., Samuelsson, P.,
Somot, S., Soussana, J.-F., Teichmann, C., Valentini, R., Vautard, R., Weber,
B., and Yiou, P.: EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections
for European impact research, Reg. Environ. Change, 14, 563–578,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2, 2014. a
Klein, W. H., Lewis, B. M., and Enger, I.: Objective prediction of five-day
mean temperatures during winter, J. Meteorol., 16, 672–682,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1959)016<0672:OPOFDM>2.0.CO;2, 1959. a
Klein Tank, A. M. G., Wijngaard, J. B., Können, G. P., Böhm, R., Demarée,
G., Gocheva, A., Mileta, M., Pashiardis, S., Hejkrlik, L., Kern-Hansen, C.,
Heino, R., Bessemoulin, P., Müller-Westermeier, G., Tzanakou, M., Szalai,
S., Pálsdóttir, T., Fitzgerald, D., Rubin, S., Capaldo, M., Maugeri, M.,
Leitass, A., Bukantis, A., Aberfeld, R., van Engelen, A. F. V., Forland, E.,
Mietus, M., Coelho, F., Mares, C., Razuvaev, V., Nieplova, E., Cegnar, T.,
Antonio López, J., Dahlström, B., Moberg, A., Kirchhofer, W., Ceylan, A.,
Pachaliuk, O., Alexander, L. V., and Petrovic, P.: Daily dataset of
20th-century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the
European Climate Assessment, Int. J. Climatol., 22,
1441–1453, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.773, 2002. a
Kohavi, R.: A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy
Estimation and Model Selection, in: Proceedings of the International
Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Morgan
Kaufmann, 1137–1143, 1995. a
Lachenbruch, P. A. and Mickey, M. R.: Estimation of Error Rates in Discriminant
Analysis, Technometrics, 10, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.2307/1266219, 1968. a
Laprise, R.: Regional climate modelling, J. Comput. Phys., 227,
3641–666, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.024, 2008. a
Lorenz, E. N.: Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring
analogues, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 636–646,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)26<636:APARBN>2.0.CO;2, 1969. a
Manzanas, R., Brands, S., San-Martín, D., Lucero, A., Limbo, C., and
Gutiérrez, J. M.: Statistical Downscaling in the Tropics Can Be
Sensitive to Reanalysis Choice: A Case Study for Precipitation
in the Philippines, J. Climate, 28, 4171–4184,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00331.1, 2015. a
Manzanas, R., Lucero, A., Weisheimer, A., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Can bias
correction and statistical downscaling methods improve the skill of seasonal
precipitation forecasts?, Clim. Dynam., 50, 1161–1176,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3668-z, 2017. a, b
Maraun, D. and Widmann, M.: Structure of Statistical Downscaling Methods,
Cambridge University Press, 135–140, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107588783.011, 2018. a, b, c, d
Maraun, D., Widmann, M., Gutiérrez, J. M., Kotlarski, S., Chandler, R. E.,
Hertig, E., Wibig, J., Huth, R., and Wilcke, R. A.: VALUE: A framework to
validate downscaling approaches for climate change studies, Earth's Future,
3, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000259, 2015. a, b, c, d
Maraun, D., Huth, R., Gutiérrez, J. M., Martín, D. S., Dubrovsky, M.,
Fischer, A., Hertig, E., Soares, P. M. M., Bartholy, J., Pongrácz, R.,
Widmann, M., Casado, M. J., Ramos, P., and Bedia, J.: The VALUE perfect
predictor experiment: evaluation of temporal variability, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3786–3818, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5222,
2019a. a
Maraun, D., Widmann, M., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Statistical downscaling skill
under present climate conditions: A synthesis of the VALUE perfect
predictor experiment, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3692–3703,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5877,
2019b. a, b, c
Markatou, M., Tian, H., Biswas, S., and Hripcsak, G.: Analysis of Variance of
Cross-Validation Estimators of the Generalization Error, J. Mach.
Learn. Res., 6, 1127–1168, https://doi.org/10.7916/D86D5R2X, 2005. a
Marzban, C., Sandgathe, S., and Kalnay, E.: MOS, Perfect-Prog and reanalysis,
Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 657–663, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3088.1, 2006. a
Matulla, C., Zhang, X., Wang, X., Wang, J., Zorita, E., Wagner, S., and von
Storch, H.: Influence of similarity measures on the performance of the analog
method for downscaling daily precipitation, Clim. Dynam., 30, 133–144,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0277-2, 2008. a
Mersmann, O.: microbenchmark: Accurate Timing Functions,
r package
version 1.4-7, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=microbenchmark (last access: 30 March 2020), 2019. a
Moss, R. H., Edmonds, J. A., Hibbard, K. A., Manning, M. R., Rose, S. K., van
Vuuren, D. P., Carter, T. R., Emori, S., Kainuma, M., Kram, T., Meehl, G. A.,
Mitchell, J. F. B., Nakicenovic, N., Riahi, K., Smith, S. J., Stouffer,
R. J., Thomson, A. M., Weyant, J. P., and Wilbanks, T. J.: The next
generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment, Nature,
463, 747–756, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823, 2010. a
Nelder, J. A. and Wedderburn, R. W. M.: Generalized linear models, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A, 135,
370–384, https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614, 1972. a
Preisendorfer, R.: Principal component analysis in meteorology and
oceanography, Elsevier, 1st Edn., 1988. a
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
available at: https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 30 March 2020), 2019. a
Rössler, O., Fischer, A. M., Huebener, H., Maraun, D., Benestad, R. E.,
Christodoulides, P., Soares, P. M. M., Cardoso, R. M., Pagé, C., Kanamaru,
H., Kreienkamp, F., and Vlachogiannis, D.: Challenges to link climate change
data provision and user needs: Perspective from the COST-action VALUE,
Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3704–3716, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5060,
2019. a
Rummukainen, M.: Methods for Statistical Downscaling of GCM Simulations,
Tech. rep., Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute,
available at: https://www.smhi.se/polopoly_fs/1.124322!/RMK_80.pdf
(last access: 9 July 2019), 1997. a
San-Martín, D., Manzanas, R., Brands, S., Herrera, S., and Gutiérrez, J. M.:
Reassessing Model Uncertainty for Regional Projections of
Precipitation with an Ensemble of Statistical Downscaling Methods,
J. Climate, 30, 203–223, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0366.1, 2016. a, b, c, d
Sarkar, D.: Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R, Springer, New
York, available at: http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org (last access: 30 March 2020), 2008. a
Sauter, T. and Venema, V.: Natural three-dimensional predictor domains for
statistical precipitation downscaling, J. Climate, 24,
6132–6145, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4155.1, 2011. a
Soares, P. M. M., Maraun, D., Brands, S., Jury, M. W., Gutiérrez, J. M.,
San-Martín, D., Hertig, E., Huth, R., Belušić Vozila, A., Cardoso, R. M.,
Kotlarski, S., Drobinski, P., and Obermann-Hellhund, A.: Process-based
evaluation of the VALUE perfect predictor experiment of statistical
downscaling methods, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3868–3893,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5911, 2019. a
Sterl, A.: On the (in)homogeneity of reanalysis products, J. Climate,
17, 3866–3873, 2004. a
Stone, M.: Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 6, 11–147, 1974. a
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and
the Experiment Design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
93, 485–498, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1, 2011. a
Timbal, B., Dufour, A., and McAvaney, B.: An estimate of future climate change
for western France using a statistical downscaling technique, Clim.
Dynam., 20, 807–823, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-002-0298-9, 2003. a
Turco, M., Quintana-Seguí, P., Llasat, M. C., Herrera, S., and Gutiérrez, J. M.: Testing MOS
precipitation downscaling for ENSEMBLES regional climate models over Spain,
J. Geophys. Res., 116, D18109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016166,
2011. a
Unidata: NetCDF-Java library and THREDDS Data Server (TDS), Boulder, CO,
https://doi.org/10.5065/D6N014KG, 2006. a, b
van der Linden, P. and Mitchell, J.: ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its
Impacts: Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project –
European Environment Agency (EEA), Tech. rep., Met Office Hadley
Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK,
available at: http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/global-and-european-temperature/ensembles-climate-change-and-its (last access: 30 March 2020),
2009. a
von Storch, H., Zorita, E., and Cubasch, U.: Downscaling of global climate
change estimates to regional scales: An application to Iberian rainfall in
wintertime, J. Climate, 6, 1161–1171,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<1161:DOGCCE>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Widmann, M., Bretherton, C. S., and Salathé, E. P.: Statistical
Precipitation Downscaling over the Northwestern United States
Using Numerically Simulated Precipitation as a Predictor, J. Climate, 16, 799–816,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<0799:SPDOTN>2.0.CO;2, 2003. a
Widmann, M., Bedia, J., Gutiérrez, J., Bosshard, T., Hertig, E., Maraun, D.,
Casado, M., Ramos, P., Cardoso, R., Soares, P., Ribalaygua, J., Pagé, C.,
Fischer, A., Herrera, S., and Huth, R.: Validation of spatial variability in
downscaling results from the VALUE perfect predictor experiment,
Int. J. Climatol., 39, 3819–3845, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6024,
2019. a, b
Wilby, R. L., Charles, S., Zorita, E., Timbal, B., Whetton, P., and Mearns, L.:
Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical
downscaling methods, Tech. rep., IPCC-TGCIA, 2004. a
Wilks, D. S.: Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, Amsterdam,
Elsevier, 2nd Edn., 2006. a
Zorita, E. and von Storch, H.: The Analog Method as a Simple Statistical
Downscaling Technique: Comparison with More Complicated Methods, J.
Climate, 12, 2474–2489,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2474:TAMAAS>2.0.CO;2, 1999. a, b
Short summary
We introduce downscaleR, an open-source tool for statistical downscaling (SD) of climate information, implementing the most popular approaches and state-of-the-art techniques. It makes possible the development of end-to-end downscaling applications, from data retrieval to model building, validation, and prediction, bringing to climate scientists and practitioners a unique comprehensive framework for the development of complex and fully reproducible SD experiments.
We introduce downscaleR, an open-source tool for statistical downscaling (SD) of climate...
