Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4053-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4053-2019
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Sep 2019
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Sep 2019

Detecting causality signal in instrumental measurements and climate model simulations: global warming case study

Mikhail Y. Verbitsky, Michael E. Mann, Byron A. Steinman, and Dmitry M. Volobuev

Related authors

Absence of causality between seismic activity and global warming
Mikhail Verbitsky, Michael E. Mann, and Dmitry Volobuev
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-10,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2024-10, 2024
Preprint under review for ESD
Short summary
Do phenomenological dynamical paleoclimate models have physical similarity with Nature? Seemingly, not all of them do
Mikhail Y. Verbitsky and Michel Crucifix
Clim. Past, 19, 1793–1803, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1793-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-1793-2023, 2023
Short summary
Do phenomenological dynamical paleoclimate models have physical similarity with nature?
Mikhail Verbitsky
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-758,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-758, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Inarticulate past: similarity properties of the ice–climate system and their implications for paleo-record attribution
Mikhail Y. Verbitsky
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 879–884, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-879-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-879-2022, 2022
Short summary
ESD Ideas: A Global Warming Scaling Law
Mikhail Verbitsky and Michael Mann
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-87,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-87, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Continental-scale bias-corrected climate and hydrological projections for Australia
Justin Peter, Elisabeth Vogel, Wendy Sharples, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Louise Wilson, Pandora Hope, Andrew Dowdy, Greg Kociuba, Sri Srikanthan, Vi Co Duong, Jake Roussis, Vjekoslav Matic, Zaved Khan, Alison Oke, Margot Turner, Stuart Baron-Hay, Fiona Johnson, Raj Mehrotra, Ashish Sharma, Marcus Thatcher, Ali Azarvinand, Steven Thomas, Ghyslaine Boschat, Chantal Donnelly, and Robert Argent
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2755–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, 2024
Short summary
G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies
Daniele Visioni, Alan Robock, Jim Haywood, Matthew Henry, Simone Tilmes, Douglas G. MacMartin, Ben Kravitz, Sarah J. Doherty, John Moore, Chris Lennard, Shingo Watanabe, Helene Muri, Ulrike Niemeier, Olivier Boucher, Abu Syed, Temitope S. Egbebiyi, Roland Séférian, and Ilaria Quaglia
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2583–2596, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024, 2024
Short summary
Modeling the effects of tropospheric ozone on the growth and yield of global staple crops with DSSAT v4.8.0
Jose Rafael Guarin, Jonas Jägermeyr, Elizabeth A. Ainsworth, Fabio A. A. Oliveira, Senthold Asseng, Kenneth Boote, Joshua Elliott, Lisa Emberson, Ian Foster, Gerrit Hoogenboom, David Kelly, Alex C. Ruane, and Katrina Sharps
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2547–2567, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2547-2024, 2024
Short summary
A one-dimensional urban flow model with an eddy-diffusivity mass-flux (EDMF) scheme and refined turbulent transport (MLUCM v3.0)
Jiachen Lu, Negin Nazarian, Melissa Anne Hart, E. Scott Krayenhoff, and Alberto Martilli
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2525–2545, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2525-2024, 2024
Short summary
DCMIP2016: the tropical cyclone test case
Justin L. Willson, Kevin A. Reed, Christiane Jablonowski, James Kent, Peter H. Lauritzen, Ramachandran Nair, Mark A. Taylor, Paul A. Ullrich, Colin M. Zarzycki, David M. Hall, Don Dazlich, Ross Heikes, Celal Konor, David Randall, Thomas Dubos, Yann Meurdesoif, Xi Chen, Lucas Harris, Christian Kühnlein, Vivian Lee, Abdessamad Qaddouri, Claude Girard, Marco Giorgetta, Daniel Reinert, Hiroaki Miura, Tomoki Ohno, and Ryuji Yoshida
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2493–2507, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2493-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abarbanel, H. D., Brown, R., Sidorowich, J. J., and Tsimring, L. S.: The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems, Rev. Mod. Phys., 65, 1331–1392, 1993. 
Attanasio, A.: Testing for linear Granger causality from natural/anthropogenic forcings to global temperature anomalies, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 110, 281–289, 2012. 
Attanasio, A., Pasini, A., and Triacca, U.: A contribution to attribution of recent global warming by out-of-sample Granger causality analysis, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 13, 67–72, 2012. 
Barnett, L., Barrett, A. B., and Seth, A. K.: Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables, Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, 238701, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.238701, 2009. 
Čenys, A., Lasiene, G., and Pyragas, K.: Estimation of interrelation between chaotic observables, Physica D, 52, 332–337, 1991. 
Download
Short summary
In this study, we propose an additional climate model validation procedure that assesses whether causality signals between model drivers and responses are consistent with those observed in nature. Specifically, we suggest the method of conditional dispersion as the best approach to directly measure the causality between model forcing and response. Our results show that there is a strong causal signal from the carbon dioxide series to the global temperature series.