Articles | Volume 12, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4053-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4053-2019
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
17 Sep 2019
Methods for assessment of models |  | 17 Sep 2019

Detecting causality signal in instrumental measurements and climate model simulations: global warming case study

Mikhail Y. Verbitsky, Michael E. Mann, Byron A. Steinman, and Dmitry M. Volobuev

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Mikhail Verbitsky on behalf of the Authors (25 May 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Jun 2019) by Lauren Gregoire
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (21 Jun 2019)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (17 Jul 2019) by Lauren Gregoire
AR by Mikhail Verbitsky on behalf of the Authors (22 Jul 2019)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (23 Aug 2019) by Lauren Gregoire
AR by Mikhail Verbitsky on behalf of the Authors (23 Aug 2019)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
In this study, we propose an additional climate model validation procedure that assesses whether causality signals between model drivers and responses are consistent with those observed in nature. Specifically, we suggest the method of conditional dispersion as the best approach to directly measure the causality between model forcing and response. Our results show that there is a strong causal signal from the carbon dioxide series to the global temperature series.