the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
HIMMELI v1.0: HelsinkI Model of MEthane buiLd-up and emIssion for peatlands
Maarit Raivonen
Sampo Smolander
Leif Backman
Jouni Susiluoto
Tuula Aalto
Tiina Markkanen
Jarmo Mäkelä
Janne Rinne
Olli Peltola
Mika Aurela
Annalea Lohila
Marin Tomasic
Xuefei Li
Tuula Larmola
Sari Juutinen
Eeva-Stiina Tuittila
Martin Heimann
Sanna Sevanto
Thomas Kleinen
Victor Brovkin
Timo Vesala
Related authors
Accurate national methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for tracking progress towards climate goals. This study compares estimates from Finland, which use different methods and scales, and shows how well a global model estimates emissions within a country. The bottom-up estimates vary a lot but constraining them with atmospheric CH4 measurements brought the estimates closer together. We also highlight the importance of quantifying natural emissions alongside anthropogenic emissions.
Accurate national methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for tracking progress towards climate goals. This study compares estimates from Finland, which use different methods and scales, and shows how well a global model estimates emissions within a country. The bottom-up estimates vary a lot but constraining them with atmospheric CH4 measurements brought the estimates closer together. We also highlight the importance of quantifying natural emissions alongside anthropogenic emissions.
Boreal rivers are significant sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) to the atmosphere but the controls of these emissions are uncertain. We measured four months of CO2 and CH4 exchange between a regulated boreal river and the atmosphere with eddy covariance. We found statistical relationships between the gas exchange and several environmental variables, the most important of which were dissolved CO2 partial pressure in water, wind speed, and water temperature.
emergent constraintsis a key method to reduce uncertainty in multi-model climate projections using historical simulations and observations. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of the applicability of the method and uncover possible limitations. Key limitations are a lack of comparability (temporal, spatial, and conceptual) between models and observations and the disagreement between models on system dynamics throughout different levels of atmospheric CO2 concentration.