Articles | Volume 10, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1751-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1751-2017
Development and technical paper
 | 
24 Apr 2017
Development and technical paper |  | 24 Apr 2017

Accelerating volcanic ash data assimilation using a mask-state algorithm based on an ensemble Kalman filter: a case study with the LOTOS-EUROS model (version 1.10)

Guangliang Fu, Hai Xiang Lin, Arnold Heemink, Sha Lu, Arjo Segers, Nils van Velzen, Tongchao Lu, and Shiming Xu

Related authors

Cloud detection from multi-angular polarimetric satellite measurements using a neural network ensemble approach
Zihao Yuan, Guangliang Fu, Bastiaan van Diedenhoven, Hai Xiang Lin, Jan Willem Erisman, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2595–2610, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2595-2024, 2024
Short summary
Algorithm evaluation for polarimetric remote sensing of atmospheric aerosols
Otto Hasekamp, Pavel Litvinov, Guangliang Fu, Cheng Chen, and Oleg Dubovik
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1497–1525, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Aerosol retrieval over snow using the RemoTAP algorithm
Zihan Zhang, Guangliang Fu, and Otto Hasekamp
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 6051–6063, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6051-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-6051-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and ocean properties from PACE HARP2 with uncertainty assessment using cascading neural network radiative transfer models
Meng Gao, Bryan A. Franz, Peng-Wang Zhai, Kirk Knobelspiesse, Andrew M. Sayer, Xiaoguang Xu, J. Vanderlei Martins, Brian Cairns, Patricia Castellanos, Guangliang Fu, Neranga Hannadige, Otto Hasekamp, Yongxiang Hu, Amir Ibrahim, Frederick Patt, Anin Puthukkudy, and P. Jeremy Werdell
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5863–5881, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5863-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5863-2023, 2023
Short summary
Estimating aerosol emission from SPEXone on the NASA PACE mission using an ensemble Kalman smoother: observing system simulation experiments (OSSEs)
Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Nick A. J. Schutgens, Guangliang Fu, and Otto P. Hasekamp
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 3253–3279, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3253-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
An updated parameterization of the unstable atmospheric surface layer in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) modeling system
Prabhakar Namdev, Maithili Sharan, Piyush Srivastava, and Saroj Kanta Mishra
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8093–8114, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8093-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of cloud microphysics and ice nucleation on Southern Ocean clouds assessed with single-column modeling and instrument simulators
Andrew Gettelman, Richard Forbes, Roger Marchand, Chih-Chieh Chen, and Mark Fielding
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8069–8092, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8069-2024, 2024
Short summary
An updated aerosol simulation in the Community Earth System Model (v2.1.3): dust and marine aerosol emissions and secondary organic aerosol formation
Yujuan Wang, Peng Zhang, Jie Li, Yaman Liu, Yanxu Zhang, Jiawei Li, and Zhiwei Han
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7995–8021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization
Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7867–7888, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Do data-driven models beat numerical models in forecasting weather extremes? A comparison of IFS HRES, Pangu-Weather, and GraphCast
Leonardo Olivetti and Gabriele Messori
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7915–7962, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7915-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Amdahl, G. M.: Validity of the Single Processor Approach to Achieving Large Scale Computing Capabilities, in: Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, Spring Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS '67 (Spring), pp. 483–485, ACM, New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1145/1465482.1465560, 1967.
Bank, R. and Douglas, C.: Sparse matrix multiplication package (SMMP), Adv. Comput. Math., 1, 127–137, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02070824, 1993.
Barbu, A. L., Segers, A. J., Schaap, M., Heemink, A. W., and Builtjes, P. J. H.: A multi-component data assimilation experiment directed to sulphur dioxide and sulphate over Europe, Atmos. Environ., 43, 1622–1631, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.005, 2009.
Casadevall, T. J.: The 1989–1990 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska: impacts on aircraft operations, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 62, 301–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(94)90038-8, 1994.
Chatterjee, A., Michalak, A. M., Anderson, J. L., Mueller, K. L., and Yadav, V.: Toward reliable ensemble Kalman filter estimates of CO2 fluxes, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D22306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018176, 2012.
Download
Short summary
We propose a mask-state algorithm (MS) which records the sparsity information of the full ensemble state matrix and transforms the full matrix into a relatively small one. It will reduce the computational cost in the analysis step for plume assimilation applications. Ensemble-based DA with the mask-state algorithm is generic and flexible, because it implements exactly the standard DA without any approximation and it realizes the satisfying performance without any change of the full model.