Articles | Volume 9, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2925-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2925-2016
Model evaluation paper
 | 
31 Aug 2016
Model evaluation paper |  | 31 Aug 2016

Large-eddy simulation and stochastic modeling of Lagrangian particles for footprint determination in the stable boundary layer

Andrey Glazunov, Üllar Rannik, Victor Stepanenko, Vasily Lykosov, Mikko Auvinen, Timo Vesala, and Ivan Mammarella

Related authors

On dissipation timescales of the basic second-order moments: the effect on the energy and flux budget (EFB) turbulence closure for stably stratified turbulence
Evgeny Kadantsev, Evgeny Mortikov, Andrey Glazunov, Nathan Kleeorin, and Igor Rogachevskii
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 31, 395–408, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-395-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-31-395-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy in stably stratified sheared flows
Sergej Zilitinkevich, Oleg Druzhinin, Andrey Glazunov, Evgeny Kadantsev, Evgeny Mortikov, Iryna Repina, and Yulia Troitskaya
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2489–2496, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2489-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2489-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Development of the CMA-GFS-AERO 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0 – Part 1: System description and preliminary experimental results
Yongzhu Liu, Xiaoye Zhang, Wei Han, Chao Wang, Wenxing Jia, Deying Wang, Zhaorong Zhuang, and Xueshun Shen
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4855–4876, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4855-2025, 2025
Short summary
Optimized dynamic mode decomposition for reconstruction and forecasting of atmospheric chemistry data
Meghana Velagar, Christoph Keller, and J. Nathan Kutz
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4667–4684, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Interpolating turbulent heat fluxes missing from a prairie observation on the Tibetan Plateau using artificial intelligence models
Quanzhe Hou, Zhiqiu Gao, Zexia Duan, and Minghui Yu
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4625–4641, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4625-2025, 2025
Short summary
Carbon dioxide plume dispersion simulated at the hectometer scale using DALES: model formulation and observational evaluation
Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Fredrik Jansson, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Jordi Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, and Sander Houweling
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4571–4599, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4571-2025, 2025
Short summary
Low-level jets in the North and Baltic seas: mesoscale model sensitivity and climatology using WRF V4.2.1
Bjarke T. E. Olsen, Andrea N. Hahmann, Nicolas G. Alonso-de-Linaje, Mark Žagar, and Martin Dörenkämper
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4499–4533, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4499-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, P. S.: Measurement of Prandtl number as a function of Richardson number avoiding self-correlation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 131, 345–362, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9376-4, 2009.
Banta, R. M., Pichugina, Y. L., and Brewer, W. A.: Turbulent Velocity-Variance Profiles in the Stable Boundary Layer Generated by a Nocturnal Low-Level Jet, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 700–2719, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3776.1, 2006.
Barad, M.: Project Prairie Grass, a field program in diffusion, vol 2. Technical Report Geophysical Research Papers No. 59, TR-58-235(II)m Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Bedford, 209 pp., http://www.jsirwin.com/PGrassVolumeII.pdf, 1958.
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H., and Reynolds, W. C.: Improved subgrid scale models for large-eddy simulation, Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut., paper 80-1357, https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1980-1357, 1980.
Basu, S. and Porté-Agel, F.: Large-Eddy Simulation of Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulence: A Scale-Dependent Dynamic Modeling Approach, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2074–2091, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3734.1, 2006.
Download
Short summary
Large-eddy simulation (LES) and Lagrangian stochastic modeling of passive particle dispersion were applied to the scalar flux footprint determination in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. The footprint functions obtained in LES were compared with the functions calculated with the use of first-order single-particle Lagrangian stochastic models (LSMs) and zeroth-order Lagrangian stochastic models - the random displacement models (RDMs).
Share