Articles | Volume 9, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-111-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-111-2016
Model description paper
 | 
19 Jan 2016
Model description paper |  | 19 Jan 2016

Prediction of cloud condensation nuclei activity for organic compounds using functional group contribution methods

M. D. Petters, S. M. Kreidenweis, and P. J. Ziemann

Related authors

Wind-Driven Emissions of Coarse Mode Particles in an Urban Environment
Markus D. Petters, Tyas Pujiastuti, Ajmal Rasheeda Satheesh, Sabin Kasparoglu, Bethany Sutherland, and Nicholas Meskhidze
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-951,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-951, 2023
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Characterization of a modified printed optical particle spectrometer for high-frequency and high-precision laboratory and field measurements
Sabin Kasparoglu, Mohammad Maksimul Islam, Nicholas Meskhidze, and Markus D. Petters
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5007–5018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5007-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5007-2022, 2022
Short summary
Revisiting matrix-based inversion of scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) data
Markus D. Petters
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7909–7928, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7909-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7909-2021, 2021
Short summary
Toward closure between predicted and observed particle viscosity over a wide range of temperatures and relative humidity
Sabin Kasparoglu, Ying Li, Manabu Shiraiwa, and Markus D. Petters
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 1127–1141, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1127-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1127-2021, 2021
Short summary
Classification of aerosol population type and cloud condensation nuclei properties in a coastal California littoral environment using an unsupervised cluster model
Samuel A. Atwood, Sonia M. Kreidenweis, Paul J. DeMott, Markus D. Petters, Gavin C. Cornwell, Andrew C. Martin, and Kathryn A. Moore
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6931–6947, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6931-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6931-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
An optimisation method to improve modelling of wet deposition in atmospheric transport models: applied to FLEXPART v10.4
Stijn Van Leuven, Pieter De Meutter, Johan Camps, Piet Termonia, and Andy Delcloo
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5323–5338, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5323-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5323-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling concentration heterogeneities in streets using the street-network model MUNICH
Thibaud Sarica, Alice Maison, Yelva Roustan, Matthias Ketzel, Steen Solvang Jensen, Youngseob Kim, Christophe Chaillou, and Karine Sartelet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5281–5303, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5281-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5281-2023, 2023
Short summary
Simulation model of Reactive Nitrogen Species in an Urban Atmosphere using a Deep Neural Network: RNDv1.0
Junsu Gil, Meehye Lee, Jeonghwan Kim, Gangwoong Lee, Joonyoung Ahn, and Cheol-Hee Kim
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5251–5263, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5251-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5251-2023, 2023
Short summary
J-GAIN v1.1: a flexible tool to incorporate aerosol formation rates obtained by molecular models into large-scale models
Daniel Yazgi and Tinja Olenius
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5237–5249, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5237-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5237-2023, 2023
Short summary
Metrics for evaluating the quality in linear atmospheric inverse problems: a case study of a trace gas inversion
Vineet Yadav, Subhomoy Ghosh, and Charles E. Miller
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5219–5236, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5219-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5219-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Amundson, N. R., Caboussat, A., He, J. W., and Seinfeld, J. H.: An optimization problem related to the modeling of atmospheric organic aerosols, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I, 340, 765–768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2005.04.018, 2005.
Amundson, N. R., Caboussat, A., He, J. W., Martynenko, A. V., Landry, C., Tong, C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: A new atmospheric aerosol phase equilibrium model (UHAERO): organic systems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4675–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4675-2007, 2007.
Andreae, M. O. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions, Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth-Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001, 2008.
Barley, M. H., Topping, D. O., and McFiggans, G.: The critical assessment of liquid density estimation methods for multifunctional organic compounds, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 3428–3441, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp304547r, 2013.
Bilde, M. and Svenningsson, B.: CCN activation of slightly soluble organics: The importance of small amounts of inorganic salt and particle phase, Tellus, 56B, 128–134, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2004.00090.x, 2004
Download
Short summary
Organic particles suspended in air serve as nucleation seeds for droplets in atmospheric clouds. Over time their chemical composition changes towards more functionalized compounds. This work presents a model that can predict an organic compounds' ability promote the nucleation of cloud drops from its functional group composition. Hydroxyl, carboxyl, aldehyde, hydroperoxide, carbonyl, and ether moieties promote droplet nucleation. Methylene and nitrate moieties inhibit droplet nucleation.