Articles | Volume 8, issue 11
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3695–3713, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015
Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3695–3713, 2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015

Development and technical paper 17 Nov 2015

Development and technical paper | 17 Nov 2015

A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP)

N. Kljun et al.

Related authors

Field-scale CH4 emission at a sub-arctic mire with heterogeneous permafrost thaw status
Patryk Łakomiec, Jutta Holst, Thomas Friborg, Patrick Crill, Niklas Rakos, Natascha Kljun, Per-Ola Olsson, Lars Eklundh, and Janne Rinne
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-81,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2021-81, 2021
Preprint under review for BG
Short summary
Methane efflux from an American bison herd
Paul C. Stoy, Adam A. Cook, John E. Dore, Natascha Kljun, William Kleindl, E. N. Jack Brookshire, and Tobias Gerken
Biogeosciences, 18, 961–975, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-961-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-961-2021, 2021
Short summary
Technical note: Dynamic INtegrated Gap-filling and partitioning for OzFlux (DINGO)
Jason Beringer, Ian McHugh, Lindsay B. Hutley, Peter Isaac, and Natascha Kljun
Biogeosciences, 14, 1457–1460, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1457-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1457-2017, 2017
Short summary
Carbon uptake and water use in woodlands and forests in southern Australia during an extreme heat wave event in the “Angry Summer” of 2012/2013
Eva van Gorsel, Sebastian Wolf, James Cleverly, Peter Isaac, Vanessa Haverd, Cäcilia Ewenz, Stefan Arndt, Jason Beringer, Víctor Resco de Dios, Bradley J. Evans, Anne Griebel, Lindsay B. Hutley, Trevor Keenan, Natascha Kljun, Craig Macfarlane, Wayne S. Meyer, Ian McHugh, Elise Pendall, Suzanne M. Prober, and Richard Silberstein
Biogeosciences, 13, 5947–5964, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5947-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5947-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences
Bruno Ringeval, Christoph Müller, Thomas A. M. Pugh, Nathaniel D. Mueller, Philippe Ciais, Christian Folberth, Wenfeng Liu, Philippe Debaeke, and Sylvain Pellerin
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1639–1656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Integrated modeling of canopy photosynthesis, fluorescence, and the transfer of energy, mass, and momentum in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum (STEMMUS–SCOPE v1.0.0)
Yunfei Wang, Yijian Zeng, Lianyu Yu, Peiqi Yang, Christiaan Van der Tol, Qiang Yu, Xiaoliang Lü, Huanjie Cai, and Zhongbo Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1379–1407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1379-2021, 2021
Short summary
CoupModel (v6.0): an ecosystem model for coupled phosphorus, nitrogen, and carbon dynamics – evaluated against empirical data from a climatic and fertility gradient in Sweden
Hongxing He, Per-Erik Jansson, and Annemieke I. Gärdenäs
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 735–761, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-735-2021, 2021
Short summary
Improving the representation of cropland sites in the Community Land Model (CLM) version 5.0
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Thomas Grünwald, Bernard Heinesch, Dongryeol Ryu, Marius Schmidt, Harry Vereecken, Andrew Western, and Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 573–601, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-573-2021, 2021
Short summary
Numerical model to simulate long-term soil organic carbon and ground ice budget with permafrost and ice sheets (SOC-ICE-v1.0)
Kazuyuki Saito, Hirokazu Machiya, Go Iwahana, Tokuta Yokohata, and Hiroshi Ohno
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 521–542, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-521-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-521-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Aubinet, M., Chermanne, B., Vandenhaute, M., Longdoz, B., Yernaux, M., and Laitat, E.: Long Term Carbon Dioxide Exchange Above a Mixed Forest in the Belgian Ardennes, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 108, 293–315, 2001.
Baldocchi, D.: Flux Footprints Within and Over Forest Canopies, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 85, 273–292, 1997.
Barcza, Z., Kern, A., Haszpra, L., and Kljun, N.: Spatial Representativeness of Tall Tower Eddy Covariance Measurements Using Remote Sensing and Footprint Analysis, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 149, 795–807, 2009.
Batchvarova, E. and Gryning, S.-E.: Applied Model for the Growth of the Daytime Mixed Layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 56, 261–274, 1991.
Chang, J. C. and Hanna, S. R.: Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87, 167–196, 2004.
Download
Short summary
Flux footprint models describe the surface area of influence of a flux measurement. They are used for designing flux tower sites, and for interpretation of flux measurements. The two-dimensional footprint parameterisation (FFP) presented here is suitable for processing large data sets, and, unlike other fast footprint models, FFP is applicable to daytime or night-time measurements, fluxes from short masts over grassland to tall towers over mature forests, and even to airborne flux measurements.