Two reviewer have favorable opinions on the manuscript, and I satisfied with author's responses for the reviewer's comments. But, before publishing it, the corresponding author has to correct the authorships of the main manuscript and tech note.

As the referee 1 pointed out that the tech note has a different authors list from the main manuscript. I consulted this matter with the chief-executive editor of GMD, Dr. Julia Hargreaves.

I and Julia agreed that the authors of the paper cannot publish the supplement without the agreement of all the authors of that supplement without very special reasons (like some author is dead and so can't agree to the publication). Otherwise they are publishing work which is not theirs, because the tech note is an important part of the paper, explaining the full technical description of the model that is being described in the paper.

It may be possible that an author on the paper might not be author on the supplement. But it is the other way round.

Affiliation of Dr. Nate McDowell differs between the main manuscript and technical document. Please check it.