Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 41–91, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-41-2014
Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 41–91, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-41-2014

Model description paper 10 Jan 2014

Model description paper | 10 Jan 2014

Evaluation of the new UKCA climate-composition model – Part 2: The Troposphere

F. M. O'Connor et al.

Related authors

Changes of Anthropogenic Precursor Emissions Drive Shifts of Ozone Seasonal Cycle throughout Northern Midlatitude Troposphere
Henry Bowman, Steven Turnock, Susanne E. Bauer, Kostas Tsigaridis, Makoto Deushi, Naga Oshima, Fiona M. O'Connor, Larry Horowitz, Tongwen Wu, Jie Zhang, and David D. Parrish
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-786,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-786, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Tropospheric ozone changes and ozone sensitivity from present-day to future under shared socio-economic pathways
Zhenze Liu, Ruth M. Doherty, Oliver Wild, Fiona M. O’Connor, and Steven T. Turnock
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-689,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-689, 2021
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Contrasting chemical environments in summertime for atmospheric ozone across major Chinese industrial regions: the effectiveness of emission control strategies
Zhenze Liu, Ruth M. Doherty, Oliver Wild, Michael Hollaway, and Fiona M. O’Connor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10689–10706, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10689-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10689-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evaluation of natural aerosols in CRESCENDO Earth system models (ESMs): mineral dust
Ramiro Checa-Garcia, Yves Balkanski, Samuel Albani, Tommi Bergman, Ken Carslaw, Anne Cozic, Chris Dearden, Beatrice Marticorena, Martine Michou, Twan van Noije, Pierre Nabat, Fiona M. O'Connor, Dirk Olivié, Joseph M. Prospero, Philippe Le Sager, Michael Schulz, and Catherine Scott
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10295–10335, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10295-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10295-2021, 2021
Short summary
Investigations on the anthropogenic reversal of the natural ozone gradient between northern and southern midlatitudes
David D. Parrish, Richard G. Derwent, Steven T. Turnock, Fiona M. O'Connor, Johannes Staehelin, Susanne E. Bauer, Makoto Deushi, Naga Oshima, Kostas Tsigaridis, Tongwen Wu, and Jie Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9669–9679, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9669-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9669-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Incorporation of volcanic SO2 emissions in the Hemispheric CMAQ (H-CMAQ) version 5.2 modeling system and assessing their impacts on sulfate aerosol over the Northern Hemisphere
Syuichi Itahashi, Rohit Mathur, Christian Hogrefe, Sergey L. Napelenok, and Yang Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5751–5768, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5751-2021, 2021
Short summary
Efficient ensemble generation for uncertain correlated parameters in atmospheric chemical models: a case study for biogenic emissions from EURAD-IM version 5
Annika Vogel and Hendrik Elbern
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5583–5605, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5583-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5583-2021, 2021
Short summary
Position correction in dust storm forecasting using LOTOS-EUROS v2.1: grid-distorted data assimilation v1.0
Jianbing Jin, Arjo Segers, Hai Xiang Lin, Bas Henzing, Xiaohui Wang, Arnold Heemink, and Hong Liao
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5607–5622, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5607-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5607-2021, 2021
Short summary
Atmosphere–ocean–aerosol–chemistry–climate model SOCOLv4.0: description and evaluation
Timofei Sukhodolov, Tatiana Egorova, Andrea Stenke, William T. Ball, Christina Brodowsky, Gabriel Chiodo, Aryeh Feinberg, Marina Friedel, Arseniy Karagodin-Doyennel, Thomas Peter, Jan Sedlacek, Sandro Vattioni, and Eugene Rozanov
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5525–5560, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5525-2021, 2021
Short summary
Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models
Haipeng Lin, Daniel J. Jacob, Elizabeth W. Lundgren, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Christoph A. Keller, Thibaud M. Fritz, Sebastian D. Eastham, Louisa K. Emmons, Patrick C. Campbell, Barry Baker, Rick D. Saylor, and Raffaele Montuoro
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Allen, D., Rood, R., Thompson, A., and Hudson, R.: Three-dimensional radon 222 calculations using assimilated meteorological data and a convective mixing algorithm, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 6871–6881, 1996.
Andreae, M. and Merlet, P.: Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 955–966, 2001.
Archibald, A. T., Jenkin, M., and Shallcross, D.: An isoprene mechanism intercomparison, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5356–5364, 2010.
Archibald, A. T., Levine, J. G., Abraham, N. L., Cooke, M. C., Edwards, P. M., Heard, D. E., Jenkin, M. E., Karunaharan, A., Pike, R. C., Monks, P. S., Shallcross, D. E., Telford, P. J., Whalley, L. K., and Pyle, J. A.: Impacts of HOx regeneration and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene: consequences for the composition of past, present and future atmospheres, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046520, 2011.
Arneth, A., Monson, R. K., Schurgers, G., Niinemets, Ü., and Palmer, P. I.: Why are estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4605–4620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4605-2008, 2008.