Articles | Volume 7, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-339-2014
Model evaluation paper
 | 
18 Feb 2014
Model evaluation paper |  | 18 Feb 2014

A database and tool for boundary conditions for regional air quality modeling: description and evaluation

B. H. Henderson, F. Akhtar, H. O. T. Pye, S. L. Napelenok, and W. T. Hutzell

Related authors

Slower ozone production in Houston, Texas following emission reductions: evidence from Texas Air Quality Studies in 2000 and 2006
W. Zhou, D. S. Cohan, and B. H. Henderson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2777–2788, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2777-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2777-2014, 2014
A comparison of atmospheric composition using the Carbon Bond and Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanisms
G. Sarwar, J. Godowitch, B. H. Henderson, K. Fahey, G. Pouliot, W. T. Hutzell, R. Mathur, D. Kang, W. S. Goliff, and W. R. Stockwell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9695–9712, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9695-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9695-2013, 2013

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Effects of vertical grid spacing on the climate simulated in the ICON-Sapphire global storm-resolving model
Hauke Schmidt, Sebastian Rast, Jiawei Bao, Amrit Cassim, Shih-Wei Fang, Diego Jimenez-de la Cuesta, Paul Keil, Lukas Kluft, Clarissa Kroll, Theresa Lang, Ulrike Niemeier, Andrea Schneidereit, Andrew I. L. Williams, and Bjorn Stevens
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1563–1584, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1563-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1563-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of the tangent linear and adjoint models of the global online chemical transport model MPAS-CO2 v7.3
Tao Zheng, Sha Feng, Jeffrey Steward, Xiaoxu Tian, David Baker, and Martin Baxter
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1543–1562, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1543-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of updated reaction kinetics on the global GEOS-Chem simulation of atmospheric chemistry
Kelvin H. Bates, Mathew J. Evans, Barron H. Henderson, and Daniel J. Jacob
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1511–1524, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024, 2024
Short summary
Spatial spin-up of precipitation in limited-area convection-permitting simulations over North America using the CRCM6/GEM5.0 model
François Roberge, Alejandro Di Luca, René Laprise, Philippe Lucas-Picher, and Julie Thériault
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1497–1510, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1497-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Sensitivity of atmospheric rivers to aerosol treatment in regional climate simulations: insights from the AIRA identification algorithm
Eloisa Raluy-López, Juan Pedro Montávez, and Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1469–1495, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1469-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1469-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Alexander, B.: Sulfate formation in sea-salt aerosols: constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005659, 2005.
Appel, K. W. and Gilliland, A. B.: Effects of vertical-layer structure and boundary conditions on CMAQ – v4.5 and v4.6 models, Chapel Hill, NC, available at: http://www.cmascenter.org/conference/2006/abstracts/appel_session4.pdf (last access: 23 August 2013), 2006.
Appel, K. W., Pouliot, G. A., Simon, H., Sarwar, G., Pye, H. O. T., Napelenok, S. L., Akhtar, F., and Roselle, S. J.: Evaluation of dust and trace metal estimates from the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 883–899, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-883-2013, 2013.
Barna, M. G. and Knipping, E. M.: Insights from the BRAVO study on nesting global models to specify boundary conditions in regional air quality modeling simulations, Atmos. Environ., 40, Supplement 2, 574–582, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.01.065, 2006.
Download