58 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Aerosol indirect effect on the grid-scale clouds in the two-way coupled WRF–CMAQ: model description, development, evaluation and regional analysis S. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11247-2014
2. Contribution of regional-scale fire events to ozone and PM2.5 air quality estimated by photochemical modeling approaches K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.032
3. Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.055
4. Source apportionment modelling of PM2.5 using CMAQ-ISAM over a tropical coastal-urban area Y. Kitagawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.101250
5. Factors dominating 3-dimensional ozone distribution during high tropospheric ozone period X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.017
6. Modeling the Current and Future Roles of Particulate Organic Nitrates in the Southeastern United States H. Pye et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03738
7. Regional temperature-ozone relationships across the U.S. under multiple climate and emissions scenarios C. Nolte et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1970048
8. Contribution of Isoprene Epoxydiol to Urban Organic Aerosol: Evidence from Modeling and Measurements A. Karambelas et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez5001353
9. Summertime Clean-Background Ozone Concentrations Derived from Ozone Precursor Relationships are Lower than Previous Estimates in the Southeast United States Q. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03035
10. Dynamic evaluation of CMAQ part II: Evaluation of relative response factor metrics for ozone attainment demonstrations K. Foley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.039
11. Future U.S. ozone projections dependence on regional emissions, climate change, long-range transport and differences in modeling design H. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.064
12. UAV-measured vertical ozone profile (0–1000 m) and model-estimated regulation effect on the western coast of Japan in autumn 2023 S. Itahashi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2025.100271
13. Assessing Human Health PM2.5and Ozone Impacts from U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Sector Emissions in 2025 N. Fann et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02050
14. Comparison of ozone formation attribution techniques in the northeastern United States Q. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2303-2023
15. Dependence on the lateral boundary condition of ozone concentration over East Asia simulated by the regional air quality model S. Itahashi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100464
16. Additional Benefits of Federal Air-Quality Rules: Model Estimates of Controllable Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol A. Carlton et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01869
17. Exposure and dose assessment of school children to air pollutants in a tropical coastal-urban area Y. Kitagawa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149747
18. Evaluating reduced-form modeling tools for simulating ozone and PM2.5 monetized health impacts H. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00092C
19. Evaluation of improved land use and canopy representation in BEIS v3.61 with biogenic VOC measurements in California J. Bash et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016
20. Characterizing CO and NOy Sources and Relative Ambient Ratios in the Baltimore Area Using Ambient Measurements and Source Attribution Modeling H. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027688
21. Improving the particle dry deposition scheme in the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Q. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119343
22. Evidence for an increase in the ozone photochemical lifetime in the eastern United States using a regional air quality model D. Goldberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023930
23. Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and plume transport L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.237
24. Source apportionment of biogenic contributions to ozone formation over the United States R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.044
25. Resolution dependence of uncertainties in gridded emission inventories: a case study in Hebei, China B. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-921-2017
26. Updating sea spray aerosol emissions in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.0.2 B. Gantt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3733-2015
27. A framework for expanding aqueous chemistry in the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 5.1 K. Fahey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1587-2017
28. Modeled Full‐Flight Aircraft Emissions Impacts on Air Quality and Their Sensitivity to Grid Resolution L. Vennam et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026598
29. The potential effects of climate change on air quality across the conterminous US at 2030 under three Representative Concentration Pathways C. Nolte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15471-2018
30. Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex-2010 using the CMAQ-VBS M. Woody et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4081-2016
31. Simulating the phase partitioning of NH3, HNO3, and HCl with size-resolved particles over northern Colorado in winter J. Kelly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.01.049
32. CAMx ozone source attribution in the eastern United States using guidance from observations during DISCOVER‐AQ Maryland D. Goldberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067332
33. Modeling regional air quality and climate: improving organic aerosol and aerosol activation processes in WRF/Chem version 3.7.1 K. Yahya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2333-2017
34. Gas and aerosol carbon in California: comparison of measurements and model predictions in Pasadena and Bakersfield K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5243-2015
35. Gas-Phase Water-Soluble Organic Carbon: CMAQ Model Evaluation in Baltimore County E. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00379
36. A Measurement‐Model Fusion Approach for Improved Wet Deposition Maps and Trends Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029051
37. Methodology for evaluating lateral boundary conditions in the regional chemical transport model MATCH (v5.5.0) using combined satellite and ground-based observations E. Andersson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3747-2015
38. A perspective on the development of gas-phase chemical mechanisms for Eulerian air quality models W. Stockwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1694605
39. Semivolatile POA and parameterized total combustion SOA in CMAQv5.2: impacts on source strength and partitioning B. Murphy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11107-2017
40. Projections of Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed P. Campbell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005203
41. Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts using surface, aircraft, and satellite data K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.048
42. Quantifying Multipollutant Health Impacts Using the Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program–Community Edition (BenMAP-CE): A Case Study in Atlanta, Georgia E. Coffman et al. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12969
43. Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model v5.0 against size-resolved measurements of inorganic particle composition across sites in North America C. Nolte et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2877-2015
44. A method to predict PM 2.5 resulting from compliance with national ambient air quality standards J. Kelly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.009
45. The Impact of Iodide-Mediated Ozone Deposition and Halogen Chemistry on Surface Ozone Concentrations Across the Continental United States B. Gantt et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03556
46. Performance evaluation of a photochemical model using different boundary conditions over the urban and industrialized metropolitan area of Vitória, Brazil R. Pedruzzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04953-1
47. Evaluation of 15 years of modeled atmospheric oxidized nitrogen compounds across the contiguous United States C. Toro et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.00158
48. Improving predictability of high-ozone episodes through dynamic boundary conditions, emission refresh and chemical data assimilation during the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS) field campaign S. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16531-2021
49. Future year ozone source attribution modeling study using CMAQ-ISAM S. Collet et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1496954
50. An optimized data fusion method and its application to improve lateral boundary conditions in winter for Pearl River Delta regional PM2.5 modeling, China Z. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.02.016
51. Satellite Formaldehyde to Support Model Evaluation M. Harkey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032881
52. Comparison of background ozone estimates over the western United States based on two separate model methodologies P. Dolwick et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.005
53. Comparison of chemical lateral boundary conditions for air quality predictions over the contiguous United States during pollutant intrusion events Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-2527-2021
54. Dynamic evaluation of CMAQ part I: Separating the effects of changing emissions and changing meteorology on ozone levels between 2002 and 2005 in the eastern US K. Foley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.038
55. Impacts of replacing coal with renewable energy sources and electrifying the transportation sector on future ozone concentrations in the U.S. under a warming climate M. Moghani & C. Archer https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101522
56. Photochemical model representation of ozone and precursors during the 2017 Lake Michigan ozone study (LMOS) K. Baker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119465
57. Impacts of different characterizations of large-scale background on simulated regional-scale ozone over the continental United States C. Hogrefe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3839-2018
58. The impact of emissions and climate change on future ozone concentrations in the USA M. Moghani & C. Archer https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00900-z