Both referees comments have been satisfactorily addressed, and the revised manuscript is much clearer. The paper can now be published subject to the following technical corrections:

1. In the Abstract (lines 3-4), I suggest the revised text "... the various effects on destination ..."

2. In the Abstract (lines 3-4), I suggest the revised text "CranSLIK", in place of "the developed model"

3. p.6 (line 8), typo: "... that arise from model initial conditions ..."

4. p.6 (line 18), clarify: "... making the consideration of every possible quantity unfeasible."

5. p.6 (line 20), re-phrase: "... due to the time constraints, this is not a suitable approach. Another alternative ..."

6. p.9 (line 13), typo: "... as opposed to ..."

7. p.14: "4.5 Technical specifications" should be re-titled "6 Code Availability" and moved after Conclusions, in line with requirements for GMD model description papers