Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js
Articles | Volume 6, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1745-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1745-2013
Model description paper
 | 
23 Oct 2013
Model description paper |  | 23 Oct 2013

Scheme for calculation of multi-layer cloudiness and precipitation for climate models of intermediate complexity

A. V. Eliseev, D. Coumou, A. V. Chernokulsky, V. Petoukhov, and S. Petri

Related authors

Subsea permafrost and associated methane hydrates: how long will they survive in the future?
Valentina V. Malakhova and Alexey V. Eliseev
Earth Syst. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-99,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-99, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
ChAP 1.0: a stationary tropospheric sulfur cycle for Earth system models of intermediate complexity
Alexey V. Eliseev, Rustam D. Gizatullin, and Alexandr V. Timazhev
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7725–7747, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7725-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7725-2021, 2021
Short summary
Is there warming in the pipeline? A multi-model analysis of the Zero Emissions Commitment from CO2
Andrew H. MacDougall, Thomas L. Frölicher, Chris D. Jones, Joeri Rogelj, H. Damon Matthews, Kirsten Zickfeld, Vivek K. Arora, Noah J. Barrett, Victor Brovkin, Friedrich A. Burger, Micheal Eby, Alexey V. Eliseev, Tomohiro Hajima, Philip B. Holden, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Charles Koven, Nadine Mengis, Laurie Menviel, Martine Michou, Igor I. Mokhov, Akira Oka, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Gary Shaffer, Andrei Sokolov, Kaoru Tachiiri, Jerry Tjiputra, Andrew Wiltshire, and Tilo Ziehn
Biogeosciences, 17, 2987–3016, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2987-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-2987-2020, 2020
Short summary
The dynamical core of the Aeolus 1.0 statistical–dynamical atmosphere model: validation and parameter optimization
Sonja Totz, Alexey V. Eliseev, Stefan Petri, Michael Flechsig, Levke Caesar, Vladimir Petoukhov, and Dim Coumou
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 665–679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-665-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-665-2018, 2018
How sensitive are modeled contemporary subsea permafrost thaw and thickness of the methane clathrates stability zone in Eurasian Arctic to assumptions on Pleistocene glacial cycles?
Valentina V. Malakhova and Alexey V. Eliseev
Clim. Past Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2016-66,https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2016-66, 2016
Manuscript not accepted for further review

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
CICERO Simple Climate Model (CICERO-SCM v1.1.1) – an improved simple climate model with a parameter calibration tool
Marit Sandstad, Borgar Aamaas, Ane Nordlie Johansen, Marianne Tronstad Lund, Glen Philip Peters, Bjørn Hallvard Samset, Benjamin Mark Sanderson, and Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6589–6625, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development of a plant carbon–nitrogen interface coupling framework in a coupled biophysical-ecosystem–biogeochemical model (SSiB5/TRIFFID/DayCent-SOM v1.0)
Zheng Xiang, Yongkang Xue, Weidong Guo, Melannie D. Hartman, Ye Liu, and William J. Parton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6437–6464, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6437-2024, 2024
Short summary
Dynamical Madden–Julian Oscillation forecasts using an ensemble subseasonal-to-seasonal forecast system of the IAP-CAS model
Yangke Liu, Qing Bao, Bian He, Xiaofei Wu, Jing Yang, Yimin Liu, Guoxiong Wu, Tao Zhu, Siyuan Zhou, Yao Tang, Ankang Qu, Yalan Fan, Anling Liu, Dandan Chen, Zhaoming Luo, Xing Hu, and Tongwen Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6249–6275, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6249-2024, 2024
Short summary
Implementation of a brittle sea ice rheology in an Eulerian, finite-difference, C-grid modeling framework: impact on the simulated deformation of sea ice in the Arctic
Laurent Brodeau, Pierre Rampal, Einar Ólason, and Véronique Dansereau
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6051–6082, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6051-2024, 2024
Short summary
HSW-V v1.0: localized injections of interactive volcanic aerosols and their climate impacts in a simple general circulation model
Joseph P. Hollowed, Christiane Jablonowski, Hunter Y. Brown, Benjamin R. Hillman, Diana L. Bull, and Joseph L. Hart
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5913–5938, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5913-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Albrecht, B.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989.
Bauer, E., Petoukhov, V., Ganopolski, A., and Eliseev, A.: Climatic response to anthropogenic sulphate aerosols versus well-mixed greenhouse gases from 1850 to 2000 AD in CLIMBER-2, Tellus, 60B, 82–97, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00318.x, 2008.
Bony, S., Colman, R., Kattsov, V., Allan, R., Bretherton, C., J.-L., D., Hall, A., Hallegatte, S., Holland, M., Ingram, W., Randall, D., Soden, B., Tselioudis, G., and Webb, M.: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?, J. Climate, 19, 3445–3482, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3819.1, 2006.
Cesana, G. and Chepfer, H.: How well do climate models simulate cloud vertical structure? A comparison between CALIPSO}-{GOCCP satellite observations and CMIP5 models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053153, 2012.
Charlson, R., Schwartz, S., Hales, J., Cess, R., Coackley, J., Hansen, J., and Hofmann, D.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.255.5043.423, 1992.
Download