Articles | Volume 3, issue 2
Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 391–412, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010

Special issue: The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 391–412, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-391-2010

  10 Sep 2010

10 Sep 2010

Description and evaluation of GMXe: a new aerosol submodel for global simulations (v1)

K. J. Pringle et al.

Related subject area

Atmospheric Sciences
Implementation of a synthetic inflow turbulence generator in idealised WRF v3.6.1 large eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric conditions
Jian Zhong, Xiaoming Cai, and Zheng-Tong Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 323–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021, 2021
Short summary
Numerical study of the effects of initial conditions and emissions on PM2.5 concentration simulations with CAMx v6.1: a Xi'an case study
Han Xiao, Qizhong Wu, Xiaochun Yang, Lanning Wang, and Huaqiong Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 223–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021, 2021
Short summary
A multi-year short-range hindcast experiment with CESM1 for evaluating climate model moist processes from diurnal to interannual timescales
Hsi-Yen Ma, Chen Zhou, Yunyan Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wei-Ting Chen, and Chien-Ming Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 73–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021, 2021
Short summary
Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations (ALCF 1.0)
Peter Kuma, Adrian J. McDonald, Olaf Morgenstern, Richard Querel, Israel Silber, and Connor J. Flynn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 43–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, 2021
Development of an Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) data assimilation scheme for aerosol modeling over bright surfaces – a step toward direct radiance assimilation in the UV spectrum
Jianglong Zhang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Jeffrey S. Reid, Peng Xian, Peter R. Colarco, James R. Campbell, Edward J. Hyer, and Nancy L. Baker
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 27–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: Global concentrations of tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 13791–13824, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900083, 1999.
Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., Koch, D. M., Mickley, L. J., and Jacob, D. J.: General circulation model assessment of direct radiative forcing by the sulfate-nitrate-ammonium-water inorganic aerosol system, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 1097–1111, 2001.
Ames, R. B. and Malm, W. C.: Comparison of sulfate and nitrate particle mass concentrations measured by IMPROVE and the CDN, Atmos. Environ., 35, 905–916, 2001.
Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 543–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009, 2009.
Bauer, S. E. and Koch, D.: Impact of heterogeneous sulfate formation at mineral dust surfaces on aerosol loads and radiative forcing in the Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D17202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005870, 2005.
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.