Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2577-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2577-2026
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
01 Apr 2026
Methods for assessment of models |  | 01 Apr 2026

Introducing Volatile Organic Compound Model Intercomparison Project (VOCMIP)

Gunnar Myhre, Øivind Hodnebrog, Srinath Krishnan, Maria Sand, Marit Sandstad, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Dylan B. Millet, Kelley C. Wells, Alexander Archibald, Hannah N. Bryant, Alex T. Chaudhri, David S. Stevenson, Didier Hauglustaine, Michael Prather, J. Christopher Kaiser, Dirk J. L. Olivie, Michael Schulz, Oliver Wild, Ye Wang, Thérèse Salameh, Jason E. Williams, Philippe Le Sager, Fabien Paulot, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Haley E. Plaas

Viewed

Total article views: 1,961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,707 220 34 1,961 31 34
  • HTML: 1,707
  • PDF: 220
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 1,961
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,913 with geography defined and 48 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) affect air quality and climate, but their behavior in the atmosphere is still uncertain. We launched a global research effort to compare how different models represent these compounds and to improve their accuracy. By analyzing model results alongside observations and satellite data, we aim to better understand the atmospheric composition of these compounds.
Share