Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2577-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2577-2026
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
01 Apr 2026
Methods for assessment of models |  | 01 Apr 2026

Introducing Volatile Organic Compound Model Intercomparison Project (VOCMIP)

Gunnar Myhre, Øivind Hodnebrog, Srinath Krishnan, Maria Sand, Marit Sandstad, Ragnhild B. Skeie, Lieven Clarisse, Bruno Franco, Dylan B. Millet, Kelley C. Wells, Alexander Archibald, Hannah N. Bryant, Alex T. Chaudhri, David S. Stevenson, Didier Hauglustaine, Michael Prather, J. Christopher Kaiser, Dirk J. L. Olivie, Michael Schulz, Oliver Wild, Ye Wang, Thérèse Salameh, Jason E. Williams, Philippe Le Sager, Fabien Paulot, Kostas Tsigaridis, and Haley E. Plaas

Data sets

VOCs_OsloCTM3_WACCM [Data set] Gunnar Myhre https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15827664

ROCRv2 methanol, ethene, ethyne, and HCN retrievals from the CrIS satellite sensor Kelley Wells et al. https://doi.org/10.13020/9r8x-pp66

Model code and software

ciceroOslo/OsloCTM3: v1.0.1-hydrogen-sensitivity Marit Sandstad and Stefanie Falk https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15309428

Download
Short summary
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) affect air quality and climate, but their behavior in the atmosphere is still uncertain. We launched a global research effort to compare how different models represent these compounds and to improve their accuracy. By analyzing model results alongside observations and satellite data, we aim to better understand the atmospheric composition of these compounds.
Share