Articles | Volume 19, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2497-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2497-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
30 Mar 2026
Development and technical paper |
| 30 Mar 2026
| 30 Mar 2026
Modular wind profile retrieval software for heterogeneous Doppler lidar measurements (AtmoProKIT v1.1)
Anselm Erdmann
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Troposphere Research, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Philipp Gasch
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Troposphere Research, Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Related authors
Julia Thomas, Hendrik Reich, Thorsten Steinert, Gernot Geppert, Klaus Stephan, Anselm Erdmann, Philipp Gasch, Maxime Hervo, Jan Keller, Alberto Carrassi, Peter Knippertz, and Annika Oertel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-352, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-352, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a convective-scale reanalysis of the 'Swabian MOSES 2023' campaign that assimilates 3-months of additional field campaign observations in southwest Germany. It is computed with a 1-hourly assimilation timestep on a 2.2 km grid centred over Germany in moderately complex terrain. In addition to all operationally available observations, it incorporates 6 additional observation types. Among these is an unprecedented number of vertical wind profiles retrieved from 12 Doppler wind lidars.
Julia Thomas, Hendrik Reich, Thorsten Steinert, Gernot Geppert, Klaus Stephan, Anselm Erdmann, Philipp Gasch, Maxime Hervo, Jan Keller, Alberto Carrassi, Peter Knippertz, and Annika Oertel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-352, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-352, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present a convective-scale reanalysis of the 'Swabian MOSES 2023' campaign that assimilates 3-months of additional field campaign observations in southwest Germany. It is computed with a 1-hourly assimilation timestep on a 2.2 km grid centred over Germany in moderately complex terrain. In addition to all operationally available observations, it incorporates 6 additional observation types. Among these is an unprecedented number of vertical wind profiles retrieved from 12 Doppler wind lidars.
Christoph Kottmeier, Andreas Wieser, Ulrich Corsmeier, Norbert Kalthoff, Philipp Gasch, Bastian Kirsch, Dörthe Ebert, Zbigniew Ulanowski, Dieter Schell, Harald Franke, Florian Schmidmer, Johannes Frielingsdorf, Thomas Feuerle, and Rudolf Hankers
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3161–3178, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3161-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3161-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A new aerological dropsonde system for research aircraft has been developed. The system allows up to four sondes to be dropped with one release container, and data from up to 30 sondes can be transmitted simultaneously. The sondes enable high-resolution profiling of temperature, humidity, pressure, and wind. Additional sensors for radioactivity and particles have been integrated and tested. Operations in different campaigns have confirmed the reliability of the system and the quality of data.
Philipp Gasch, James Kasic, Oliver Maas, and Zhien Wang
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5495–5523, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5495-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5495-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper rethinks airborne wind measurements and investigates a new design for airborne Doppler lidar systems. Recent advances in lidar technology allow the use of multiple lidar systems with fixed viewing directions instead of a single lidar attached to a scanner. Our simulation results show that the proposed new design offers great potential for both higher accuracy and higher-resolution airborne wind measurements.
Cited articles
Adler, B., Gohm, A., Kalthoff, N., Babić, N., Corsmeier, U., Lehner, M., Rotach, M. W., Haid, M., Markmann, P., Gast, E., Tsaknakis, G., and Georgoussis, G.: CROSSINN-a field experiment to study the three-dimensional flow structure in the Inn Valley, Austria, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 1–55, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0283.1, 2020. a
Baidar, S., Wagner, T. J., Turner, D. D., and Brewer, W. A.: Using optimal estimation to retrieve winds from velocity-azimuth display (VAD) scans by a Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3715–3726, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3715-2023, 2023. a, b, c
Baker, W. E., Emmitt, G. D., Robertson, F., Atlas, R. M., Molinari, J. E., Bowdle, D. A., Paegle, J., Hardesty, R. M., Post, M. J., Menzies, R. T., Krishnamurti, T. N., Brown, R. A., Anderson, J. R., Lorenc, A. C., and McElroy, J.: Lidar-measured winds from space: A key component for weather and climate prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 76, 869–888, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1995)076<0869:lmwfsa>2.0.co;2, 1995. a
Baker, W. E., Atlas, R., Cardinali, C., Clement, A., Emmitt, G. D., Gentry, B. M., Hardesty, R. M., Källén, E., Kavaya, M. J., Langland, R., Ma, Z., Masutani, M., McCarty, W., Pierce, R. B., Pu, Z., Riishojgaard, L. P., Ryan, J., Tucker, S., Weissmann, M., and Yoe, J. G.: Lidar-measured wind profiles: The missing link in the global observing system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 95, 543–564, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00164.1, 2014. a, b
Banta, R. M., Darby, L. S., Kaufmann, P., Levinson, D. H., and Zhu, C.-J.: Wind-Flow Patterns in the Grand Canyon as Revealed by Doppler Lidar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 38, 1069–1083, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1069:wfpitg>2.0.co;2, 1999. a
Bell, T. M., Klein, P., Wildmann, N., and Menke, R.: Analysis of flow in complex terrain using multi-Doppler lidar retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1357–1371, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1357-2020, 2020. a, b
Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Foussekis, D.: Conically scanning lidar error in complex terrain, Meteorol. Z., 18, 189–195, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2009/0368, 2009. a
Boccippio, D. J.: A diagnostic analysis of the VVP single-Doppler retrieval technique, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 12, 230–248, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0230:adaotv>2.0.co;2, 1995. a, b, c, d
Bonin, T. A., Choukulkar, A., Brewer, W. A., Sandberg, S. P., Weickmann, A. M., Pichugina, Y. L., Banta, R. M., Oncley, S. P., and Wolfe, D. E.: Evaluation of turbulence measurement techniques from a single Doppler lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3021–3039, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3021-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Bonin, T. A., Carroll, B. J., Hardesty, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Hajny, K., Salmon, O. E., and Shepson, P. B.: Doppler Lidar Observations of the Mixing Height in Indianapolis Using an Automated Composite Fuzzy Logic Approach, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 35, 473–490, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0159.1, 2018. a, b, c
Browning, K. and Wexler, R.: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar, J. Appl. Meteorol., 7, 105–113, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0105:tdokpo>2.0.co;2, 1968. a, b
Chui, C. K. and Mhaskar, H.: MRA contextual-recovery extension of smooth functions on manifolds, Appl. Comput. Harmon. A., 28, 104–113, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2009.04.004, 2010. a
Damelin, S. B. and Hoang, N. S.: On Surface Completion and Image Inpainting by Biharmonic Functions: Numerical Aspects, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3950312, 2018. a
Drew, D. R., Barlow, J. F., and Lane, S. E.: Observations of wind speed profiles over Greater London, UK, using a Doppler lidar, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 121, 98–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.019, 2013. a
Eaton, B., Gregory, J., Drach, B., Taylor, K., Hankin, S., Blower, J., Caron, J., Signell, R., Bentley, P., Rappa, G., Höck, H., Pamment, A., Juckes, M., Raspaud, M., Randy Horne, T. W., Blodgett, D., Zender, C., Lee, D., Hassell, D., Snow, A. D., Kölling, T., Allured, D., Jelenak, A., Soerensen, A. M., Gaultier, L., Herlédan, S., Manzano, F., Bärring, L., Barker, C., and Bartholomew, S.: NetCDF Climate and Forecast (CF) Metadata Conventions, version 1.11, https://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-conventions/cf-conventions-1.11/cf-conventions.pdf (last access: 27 August 2024), 2023. a, b
Erdmann, A.: AtmoProKIT level 1 Doppler lidar measurements demonstration dataset, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology [data set], https://doi.org/10.35097/XZWDZQJFYUAJC0CE, 2025. a
Erdmann, A. and Gasch, P.: Code for Erdmann and Gasch: Modular wind profile retrieval software for heterogeneous Doppler lidar measurements (AtmoProKIT v1.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844632, 2026a. a
Erdmann, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar validation data for Erdmann and Gasch: Modular wind profile retrieval software for heterogeneous Doppler lidar measurements, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844887, 2026b. a
Fernando, H. J. S., Mann, J., Palma, J. M. L. M., Lundquist, J. K., Barthelmie, R. J., Belo-Pereira, M., Brown, W. O. J., Chow, F. K., Gerz, T., Hocut, C. M., Klein, P. M., Leo, L. S., Matos, J. C., Oncley, S. P., Pryor, S. C., Bariteau, L., Bell, T. M., Bodini, N., Carney, M. B., Courtney, M. S., Creegan, E. D., Dimitrova, R., Gomes, S., Hagen, M., Hyde, J. O., Kigle, S., Krishnamurthy, R., Lopes, J. C., Mazzaro, L., Neher, J. M. T., Menke, R., Murphy, P., Oswald, L., Otarola-Bustos, S., Pattantyus, A. K., Rodrigues, C. V., Schady, A., Sirin, N., Spuler, S., Svensson, E., Tomaszewski, J., Turner, D. D., van Veen, L., Vasiljević, N., Vassallo, D., Voss, S., Wildmann, N., and Wang, Y.: The Perdigão: Peering into microscale details of mountain winds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 799–819, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-17-0227.1, 2019. a
Gasch, P., Kasic, J., Maas, O., and Wang, Z.: Advancing airborne Doppler lidar wind profiling in turbulent boundary layer flow – an LES-based optimization of traditional scanning-beam versus novel fixed-beam measurement systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 5495–5523, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-5495-2023, 2023. a, b
Gebauer, J. G. and Bell, T. M.: A Flexible, Multi-Instrument Optimal Estimation Retrieval for Wind Profiles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 41, 605–620, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-23-0134.1, 2024. a
Handwerker, J., Barthlott, C., Bauckholt, M., Belleflamme, A., Böhmländer, A., Borg, E., Dick, G., Dietrich, P., Fichtelmann, B., Geppert, G., Goergen, K., Güntner, A., Hammoudeh, S., Hervo, M., Hühn, E., Kaniyodical Sebastian, M., Keller, J., Kohler, M., Knippertz, P., Kunz, M., Landmark, S., Li, Y., Mohannazadeh, M., Möhler, O., Morsy, M., Najafi, H., Nallasamy, N. D., Oertel, A., Rakovec, O., Reich, H., Reich, M., Saathoff, H., Samaniego, L., Schrön, M., Schütze, C., Steinert, T., Vogel, F., Vorogushyn, S., Weber, U., Wieser, A., and Zhang, H.: From initiation of convective storms to their impact – the Swabian MOSES 2023 campaign in southwestern Germany, Front. Earth Sci., 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1555755, 2025. a, b
Hervo, M. and Coen, M.: Custom collection of Doppler lidar wind data from Payerne between 1 Jun and 31 Aug 2023, ACTRIS Cloud remote sensing data centre unit (CLU) [data set], https://cloudnet.fmi.fi/instrument/a3c0f804-d91e-4966-9efb-aef54b9f2cd1 (last access: 4 March 2026), 2024. a
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in Python, J. Open Res. Softw., 5, 10–10, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148, 2017. a
Kawabata, T., Iwai, H., Seko, H., Shoji, Y., Saito, K., Ishii, S., and Mizutani, K.: Cloud-resolving 4D-Var assimilation of Doppler wind lidar data on a meso-gamma-scale convective system, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 4484–4498, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-13-00362.1, 2014. a
Kayser, M., Päschke, E., Detring, C., Lehmann, V., Beyrich, F., and Leinweber, R.: Standardized Doppler lidar processing for operational use in a future network, DACH2022, Leipzig, Deutschland, 21–25 Mar 2022, DACH2022-209, https://doi.org/10.5194/dach2022-209, 2022. a
Kohler, M.: Radiosonde measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 BUFR files [data set], https://doi.org/10.35097/2gc4v9mv5k8qmsa8, 2025. a
Kunz, M., Abbas, S. S., Bauckholt, M., Böhmländer, A., Feuerle, T., Gasch, P., Glaser, C., Groß, J., Hajnsek, I., Handwerker, J., Hase, F., Khordakova, D., Knippertz, P., Kohler, M., Lange, D., Latt, M., Laube, J., Martin, L., Mauder, M., Möhler, O., Mohr, S., Reitter, R. W., Rettenmeier, A., Rolf, C., Saathoff, H., Schrön, M., Schütze, C., Spahr, S., Späth, F., Vogel, F., Völksch, I., Weber, U., Wieser, A., Wilhelm, J., Zhang, H., and Dietrich, P.: Swabian MOSES 2021: An interdisciplinary field campaign for investigating convective storms and their event chains, Front. Earth Sci., p. 1886, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.999593, 2022. a
Manninen, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Vakkari, V., and Petäjä, T.: A generalised background correction algorithm for a Halo Doppler lidar and its application to data from Finland, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 817–827, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-817-2016, 2016. a
Menke, W.: Describing inverse problems, Elsevier/Academic Press, Oxford UK, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397160-9.00001-1, 2012. a, b, c
Mense, T. H., Höffner, J., Baumgarten, G., Eixmann, R., Froh, J., Mauer, A., Munk, A., Wing, R., and Lübken, F.-J.: 3D wind observations with a compact mobile lidar based on tropo- and stratospheric aerosol backscatter, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 1665–1677, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-1665-2024, 2024. a
Neto, J. D. and Castelao, G. P.: lidarwind: A Python package for retrieving wind profiles from Doppler lidar observations, J. Open Source Softw., 8, 4852, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.04852, 2023. a
Newsom, R. K. and Banta, R. M.: Assimilating Coherent Doppler Lidar Measurements into a Model of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Algorithm Development and Sensitivity to Measurement Error, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 21, 1328–1345, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1328:acdlmi>2.0.co;2, 2004. a
O’Connor, E. J., Illingworth, A. J., Brooks, I. M., Westbrook, C. D., Hogan, R. J., Davies, F., and Brooks, B. J.: A Method for Estimating the Turbulent Kinetic Energy Dissipation Rate from a Vertically Pointing Doppler Lidar, and Independent Evaluation from Balloon-Borne In Situ Measurements, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 1652–1664, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jtecha1455.1, 2010. a
Pearson, G. N. and Collier, C. G.: A pulsed coherent CO2 lidar for boundary-layer meteorology, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2703–2721, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712555918, 1999. a
Pentikäinen, P., O'Connor, E. J., and Ortiz-Amezcua, P.: Evaluating wind profiles in a numerical weather prediction model with Doppler lidar, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2077–2094, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2077-2023, 2023. a
Pichugina, Y. L., Banta, R. M., Bonin, T., Brewer, W. A., Choukulkar, A., McCarty, B. J., Baidar, S., Draxl, C., Fernando, H. J. S., Kenyon, J., Krishnamurthy, R., Marquis, M., Olson, J., Sharp, J., and Stoelinga, M.: Spatial Variability of Winds and HRRR–NCEP Model Error Statistics at Three Doppler-Lidar Sites in the Wind-Energy Generation Region of the Columbia River Basin, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 1633–1656, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0244.1, 2019. a, b, c
Rew, R. and Davis, G.: NetCDF: an interface for scientific data access, IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 10, 76–82, https://doi.org/10.1109/38.56302, 1990. a, b
Rucker, M., Banta, R. M., and Steyn, D. G.: Along-Valley Structure of Daytime Thermally Driven Flows in the Wipp Valley, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 733–751, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jamc1319.1, 2008. a, b
Rye, B. J. and Hardesty, R. M.: Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. I. Spectral accumulation and the Cramer-Rao lower bound, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 31, 16–27, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.210440, 1993a. a
Rye, B. J. and Hardesty, R. M.: Discrete spectral peak estimation in incoherent backscatter heterodyne lidar. II. Correlogram accumulation, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 31, 28–35, https://doi.org/10.1109/36.210441, 1993b. a
Sathe, A. and Mann, J.: A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3147–3167, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3147-2013, 2013. a, b
Schmithüsen, H.: Radiosonde measurements from Neumayer Station (1983-02 et seq), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.940584, 2022. a
Schmithüsen, H., Engelmann, R., and Radenz, M.: Custom collection of Doppler lidar wind data from Neumayer Station between 1 Jan and 27 Nov 2024, ACTRIS Cloud remote sensing data centre unit (CLU) [data set], https://cloudnet.fmi.fi/instrument/e166bb0b-5e92-46ce-adb8-73ed38ecc459 (last access: 4 March 2026), 2024. a, b
Smalikho, I. N. and Banakh, V. A.: Measurements of wind turbulence parameters by a conically scanning coherent Doppler lidar in the atmospheric boundary layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4191–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4191-2017, 2017. a, b
Teschke, G. and Lehmann, V.: Mean wind vector estimation using the velocity–azimuth display (VAD) method: an explicit algebraic solution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3265–3271, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3265-2017, 2017. a, b
Träumner, K., Damian, T., Stawiarski, C., and Wieser, A.: Turbulent structures and coherence in the atmospheric surface layer, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 154, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9967-6, 2015. a, b
Tucker, S. C., Senff, C. J., Weickmann, A. M., Brewer, W. A., Banta, R. M., Sandberg, S. P., Law, D. C., and Hardesty, R. M.: Doppler Lidar Estimation of Mixing Height Using Turbulence, Shear, and Aerosol Profiles, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 673–688, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHA1157.1, 2009. a, b, c
Tukiainen, S., Siipola, T., Leskinen, N., and O'Connor, E.: Cloudnet – an ACTRIS data repository for cloud remote sensing observations, EGU General Assembly 2024, Vienna, Austria, 14–19 Apr 2024, EGU24-20005, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-20005, 2024. a
Vakkari, V., Manninen, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Schween, J. H., van Zyl, P. G., and Marinou, E.: A novel post-processing algorithm for Halo Doppler lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 839–852, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-839-2019, 2019. a
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37, 2011. a
Wagner, T. J., Turner, D. D., Heus, T., and Blumberg, W. G.: Observing Profiles of Derived Kinematic Field Quantities Using a Network of Profiling Sites, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 39, 335–351, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-21-0061.1, 2022. a, b
Waldteufel, P. and Corbin, H.: On the analysis of single-Doppler radar data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 18, 532–542, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0532:OTAOSD>2.0.CO;2, 1978. a
Wang, H., Barthelmie, R. J., Clifton, A., and Pryor, S. C.: Wind measurements from arc scans with Doppler wind lidar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 32, 2024–2040, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00059.1, 2015. a, b, c
Wang, H., Barthelmie, R. J., Pryor, S. C., and Brown, G.: Lidar arc scan uncertainty reduction through scanning geometry optimization, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1653–1669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1653-2016, 2016. a
Werner, C.: Doppler wind lidar, in: Lidar – range-resolved optical remote sensing of the atmosphere, chap. 12, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 326–354, https://doi.org/10.1007/b106786, 2005. a, b
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Albbruck, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844518, 2025a. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Fischerbach, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844362, 2025b. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Schallstadt, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14842966, 2025c. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Titisee-Neustadt, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14843671, 2025d. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, August 2023, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844286, 2025e. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, July 2023, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844229, 2025f. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Villingen-Schwenningen, June 2023, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14844019, 2025g. a
Wieser, A. and Gasch, P.: Doppler lidar measurements from Weil am Rhein, Swabian MOSES 2023, Level 0 netCDF files, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14843822, 2025h. a
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gray, A. J., Groth, P., Goble, C., Grethe, J. S., Heringa, J., t Hoen, P. A., Hooft, R., Kuhn, T., Kok, R., Kok, J., Lusher, S. J., Martone, M. E., Mons, A., Packer, A. L., Persson, B., Rocca-Serra, P., Roos, M., van Schaik, R., Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Sengstag, T., Slater, T., Strawn, G., Swertz, M. A., Thompson, M., Van Der Lei, J., Van Mulligen, E., Velterop, J., Waagmeester, A., Wittenburg, P., Wolstencroft, K., Zhao, J., and Mons, B.: Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci. Data, 3, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18, 2016. a
Zentek, R., Kohnemann, S. H. E., and Heinemann, G.: Analysis of the performance of a ship-borne scanning wind lidar in the Arctic and Antarctic, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 5781–5795, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-5781-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d
Short summary
A new software for the calculation of quality controlled wind profiles from heterogeneous Doppler lidar measurements is presented. The processing is designed modularly. A provided standard processing chain is validated using radiosondes for three common Doppler lidar types at different locations.
A new software for the calculation of quality controlled wind profiles from heterogeneous...
