Comparison of simulations from a state-of-the-art dynamic global vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) driven by low- and high-resolution climate data

Dmitry Otryakhin, David Martín Belda, and Almut Arneth

Viewed

Total article views: 1,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	Supplement	BibTeX	EndNote
851	202	40	1,093	105	47	69

HTML: 851
PDF: 202
XML: 40
Total: 1,093
Supplement: 105
BibTeX: 47
EndNote: 69

Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2025)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Apr 2025	57	13	3	73
May 2025	71	12	4	87
Jun 2025	62	16	6	84
Jul 2025	43	14	0	57
Aug 2025	54	19	6	79
Sep 2025	18	18	1	37
Oct 2025	35	9	2	46
Nov 2025	124	35	3	162
Dec 2025	188	64	13	265
Jan 2026	199	2	2	203

Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Apr 2025)

Month	HTML	PDF	XML	Total
Apr 2025	57	13	3	73
May 2025	71	12	4	87
Jun 2025	62	16	6	84
Jul 2025	43	14	0	57
Aug 2025	54	19	6	79
Sep 2025	18	18	1	37
Oct 2025	35	9	2	46
Nov 2025	124	35	3	162
Dec 2025	188	64	13	265
Jan 2026	199	2	2	203

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	Supplement	BibTeX	EndNote
480	83	17	580	44	22	25

HTML	PDF	XML	Total	Supplement	BibTeX	EndNote
371	119	23	513	61	25	44

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,093 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 972 with geography defined and 121 with unknown origin.

Country	#	Views	%


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0


Total:	0
HTML:	0
PDF:	0
XML:	0

Latest update: 09 Jan 2026

Short summary

We developed a methodology for comparison of simulation results by a dynamic global vegetation model (DGVM). Using this methodology, we reveal systematic differences between high- and low-resolution DGVM simulations caused by under-representation of climate variability in the low-resolution data and poor representation of shore lines and inland water bodies. In a study area covering European Union, the differences in aggregated output variables were found to be 2.8%–7.3%.