Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Mar 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Mar 2025

Simulation performance of planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF v4.3.1 for near-surface wind over the western Sichuan Basin: a single-site assessment

Qin Wang, Bo Zeng, Gong Chen, and Yaoting Li

Related authors

Model-based insights into aerosol perturbation on pristine continental convective precipitation
Mengjiao Jiang, Yaoting Li, Weiji Hu, Yinshan Yang, Guy Brasseur, and Xi Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4545–4557, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4545-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4545-2023, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
FootNet v1.0: development of a machine learning emulator of atmospheric transport
Tai-Long He, Nikhil Dadheech, Tammy M. Thompson, and Alexander J. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Updates and evaluation of NOAA's online-coupled air quality model version 7 (AQMv7) within the Unified Forecast System
Wei Li, Beiming Tang, Patrick C. Campbell, Youhua Tang, Barry Baker, Zachary Moon, Daniel Tong, Jianping Huang, Kai Wang, Ivanka Stajner, and Raffaele Montuoro
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1635–1660, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1635-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Quantifying the analysis uncertainty for nowcasting application
Yanwei Zhu, Aitor Atencia, Markus Dabernig, and Yong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1545–1559, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1545-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1545-2025, 2025
Short summary
Improving the ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) in the Community Inversion Framework: a case study with ICON-ART 2024.01
Joël Thanwerdas, Antoine Berchet, Lionel Constantin, Aki Tsuruta, Michael Steiner, Friedemann Reum, Stephan Henne, and Dominik Brunner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1505–1544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1505-2025, 2025
Short summary
The MESSy DWARF (based on MESSy v2.55.2)
Astrid Kerkweg, Timo Kirfel, Duong H. Do, Sabine Griessbach, Patrick Jöckel, and Domenico Taraborrelli
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1265–1286, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1265-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1265-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Chen, L., Li, G., Zhang, F., and Wang, C.: Simulation uncertainty of Near-Surface wind caused by boundary layer parameterization over the complex terrain, Front. Energy Res., 8, 554544, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.554544, 2020. 
Coccia, M.: The effects of atmospheric stability with low wind speed and of air pollution on the accelerated transmission dynamics of COVID-19, Int. J. Environ. Stud., 78, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2020.1802937, 2020. 
Cohen, A. E., Cavallo, S. M., Coniglio, M. C., and Brooks, H. E.: A Review of Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes and Their Sensitivity in Simulating Southeastern U.S. Cold Season Severe Weather Environments, Weather Forecast., 30, 591–612, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-14-00105.1, 2015. 
Cui, C.-X., Bao, Y.-X., Yuan, C.-S., Zhou, L.-Y., Jiao, S.-M, and Zong, C.: Influence of Different Boundary Layer Parameterization Schemes on the Simulation of an Advection Fog Process in Jiangsu, Chinese J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 1344-1362, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1801.17212, 2018. 
Dudhia, J.: A history of mesoscale model development, Asia-Pacif. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-014-0031-8, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of four planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in near-surface wind fields over the Sichuan Basin, China. Using 112 sensitivity experiments with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and focusing on 28 wind events, it is found that wind direction was less sensitive to the PBL schemes. The quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE) scheme captured temporal variations best, while the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić (MYJ) scheme had the least error in wind speed.
Share