Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
GMD
Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1769-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 18, issue 5
Model evaluation paper
 | 
13 Mar 2025
Model evaluation paper |  | 13 Mar 2025

Simulation performance of planetary boundary layer schemes in WRF v4.3.1 for near-surface wind over the western Sichuan Basin: a single-site assessment

Qin Wang, Bo Zeng, Gong Chen, and Yaoting Li

Viewed

Total article views: 668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
495 119 54 668 28 29
  • HTML: 495
  • PDF: 119
  • XML: 54
  • Total: 668
  • BibTeX: 28
  • EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jun 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 668 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 653 with geography defined and 15 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Apr 2025
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates the performance of four planetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes in near-surface wind fields over the Sichuan Basin, China. Using 112 sensitivity experiments with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and focusing on 28 wind events, it is found that wind direction was less sensitive to the PBL schemes. The quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE) scheme captured temporal variations best, while the Mellor–Yamada–Janjić (MYJ) scheme had the least error in wind speed.
Read more
Share