Articles | Volume 17, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6365-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Model experiment description paper
| 
29 Aug 2024
Model experiment description paper |
| 29 Aug 2024
| 29 Aug 2024
Impact of ITCZ width on global climate: ITCZ-MIP
Angeline G. Pendergrass
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Michael P. Byrne
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Oliver Watt-Meyer
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, Washington, USA
Penelope Maher
Department of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Mark J. Webb
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
Related authors
Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Min-Seop Ahn, Ana Ordonez, Paul A. Ullrich, Kenneth R. Sperber, Karl E. Taylor, Yann Y. Planton, Eric Guilyardi, Paul Durack, Celine Bonfils, Mark D. Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Bo Dong, Charles Doutriaux, Chengzhu Zhang, Tom Vo, Jason Boutte, Michael F. Wehner, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Daehyun Kim, Zeyu Xue, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and John Krasting
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an open-source software, the PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP), developed for a comprehensive comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with real-world observations. Using diverse metrics evaluating climatology, variability, and extremes simulated in thousands of simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), PMP aids in benchmarking model improvements across generations. PMP also enables efficient tracking of performance evolutions during ESM developments.
Min-Seop Ahn, Paul A. Ullrich, Peter J. Gleckler, Jiwoo Lee, Ana C. Ordonez, and Angeline G. Pendergrass
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3927–3951, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a framework for regional-scale evaluation of simulated precipitation distributions with 62 climate reference regions and 10 metrics and apply it to evaluate CMIP5 and CMIP6 models against multiple satellite-based precipitation products. The common model biases identified in this study are mainly associated with the overestimated light precipitation and underestimated heavy precipitation. These biases persist from earlier-generation models and have been slightly improved in CMIP6.
Iris Elisabeth de Vries, Sebastian Sippel, Angeline Greene Pendergrass, and Reto Knutti
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-81-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-81-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation change is an important consequence of climate change, but it is hard to detect and quantify. Our intuitive method yields robust and interpretable detection of forced precipitation change in three observational datasets for global mean and extreme precipitation, but the different observational datasets show different magnitudes of forced change. Assessment and reduction of uncertainties surrounding forced precipitation change are important for future projections and adaptation.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Charles D. Koven, Florent Brient, Ben B. B. Booth, Rosie A. Fisher, and Reto Knutti
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 899–918, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-899-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-899-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Emergent constraints promise a pathway to the reduction in climate projection uncertainties by exploiting ensemble relationships between observable quantities and unknown climate response parameters. This study considers the robustness of these relationships in light of biases and common simplifications that may be present in the original ensemble of climate simulations. We propose a classification scheme for constraints and a number of practical case studies.
Christina Heinze-Deml, Sebastian Sippel, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Flavio Lehner, and Nicolai Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4977–4999, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4977-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4977-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying dynamical and thermodynamical components of regional precipitation change is a key challenge in climate science. We introduce a novel statistical model (Latent Linear Adjustment Autoencoder) that combines the flexibility of deep neural networks with the robustness advantages of linear regression. The method enables estimation of the contribution of a coarse-scale atmospheric circulation proxy to daily precipitation at high resolution and in a spatially coherent manner.
Paulo Ceppi, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Mark D. Zelinka, Timothy Andrews, Florent Brient, Robin Chadwick, Jonathan M. Gregory, Yen-Ting Hwang, Sarah M. Kang, Jennifer E. Kay, Thorsten Mauritsen, Tomoo Ogura, George Tselioudis, Masahiro Watanabe, Mark J. Webb, and Allison A. Wing
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-398, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds constitute a key uncertainty for climate change projections. The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) aims to address this challenge by evaluating and understanding clouds and their impacts on atmospheric circulation, precipitation, and climate sensitivity. The present paper describes the CFMIP experiment protocol for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 7 (CMIP7), and discusses the accompanying science questions and opportunities for progress.
Kate Marvel and Mark Webb
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 317–332, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-317-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-317-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate sensitivity (S) to doubled atmospheric carbon dioxide has remained stubbornly uncertain for decades. Multiple lines of evidence can be used to constrain S, but any analysis relies on unavoidable subjective decisions. Here, we present a framework for combining the subjective judgments of multiple experts in a fair and robust way.
Michael P. Byrne, William R. Boos, and Shineng Hu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 763–777, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-763-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate why climate change is amplified in mountain regions, a phenomenon known as elevation-dependent warming (EDW). We examine EDW using observations and models and assess the roles of radiative forcing vs. internal variability in driving the historical signal. Using a forcing–feedback framework we also quantify for the first time the processes driving EDW on large scales. Our results have important implications for understanding future climate change in mountain regions.
Jiwoo Lee, Peter J. Gleckler, Min-Seop Ahn, Ana Ordonez, Paul A. Ullrich, Kenneth R. Sperber, Karl E. Taylor, Yann Y. Planton, Eric Guilyardi, Paul Durack, Celine Bonfils, Mark D. Zelinka, Li-Wei Chao, Bo Dong, Charles Doutriaux, Chengzhu Zhang, Tom Vo, Jason Boutte, Michael F. Wehner, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Daehyun Kim, Zeyu Xue, Andrew T. Wittenberg, and John Krasting
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3919–3948, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3919-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce an open-source software, the PCMDI Metrics Package (PMP), developed for a comprehensive comparison of Earth system models (ESMs) with real-world observations. Using diverse metrics evaluating climatology, variability, and extremes simulated in thousands of simulations from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), PMP aids in benchmarking model improvements across generations. PMP also enables efficient tracking of performance evolutions during ESM developments.
Min-Seop Ahn, Paul A. Ullrich, Peter J. Gleckler, Jiwoo Lee, Ana C. Ordonez, and Angeline G. Pendergrass
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3927–3951, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a framework for regional-scale evaluation of simulated precipitation distributions with 62 climate reference regions and 10 metrics and apply it to evaluate CMIP5 and CMIP6 models against multiple satellite-based precipitation products. The common model biases identified in this study are mainly associated with the overestimated light precipitation and underestimated heavy precipitation. These biases persist from earlier-generation models and have been slightly improved in CMIP6.
Iris Elisabeth de Vries, Sebastian Sippel, Angeline Greene Pendergrass, and Reto Knutti
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 81–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-81-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-81-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Precipitation change is an important consequence of climate change, but it is hard to detect and quantify. Our intuitive method yields robust and interpretable detection of forced precipitation change in three observational datasets for global mean and extreme precipitation, but the different observational datasets show different magnitudes of forced change. Assessment and reduction of uncertainties surrounding forced precipitation change are important for future projections and adaptation.
Penelope Maher and Paul Earnshaw
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1177–1194, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models do a pretty good job. But they are far from perfect. Fixing these imperfections is really hard because the models are complicated. One way to make progress is to create simpler models: think impressionism rather than realism in the art world. We changed the Met Office model to be intentionally simple and it still does a pretty good job. This will help to identify sources of model imperfections, develop new methods and improve our understanding of how the climate works.
Benjamin M. Sanderson, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Charles D. Koven, Florent Brient, Ben B. B. Booth, Rosie A. Fisher, and Reto Knutti
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 899–918, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-899-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-899-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Emergent constraints promise a pathway to the reduction in climate projection uncertainties by exploiting ensemble relationships between observable quantities and unknown climate response parameters. This study considers the robustness of these relationships in light of biases and common simplifications that may be present in the original ensemble of climate simulations. We propose a classification scheme for constraints and a number of practical case studies.
Christina Heinze-Deml, Sebastian Sippel, Angeline G. Pendergrass, Flavio Lehner, and Nicolai Meinshausen
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4977–4999, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4977-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4977-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Quantifying dynamical and thermodynamical components of regional precipitation change is a key challenge in climate science. We introduce a novel statistical model (Latent Linear Adjustment Autoencoder) that combines the flexibility of deep neural networks with the robustness advantages of linear regression. The method enables estimation of the contribution of a coarse-scale atmospheric circulation proxy to daily precipitation at high resolution and in a spatially coherent manner.
Qun Liu, Matthew Collins, Penelope Maher, Stephen I. Thomson, and Geoffrey K. Vallis
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2801–2826, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2801-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2801-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Clouds play an vital role in Earth's energy budget, and even a small change in cloud fields can have a large impact on the climate system. They also bring lots of uncertainties to climate models. Here we implement a simple diagnostic cloud scheme in order to reproduce the general radiative properties of clouds. The scheme can capture some key features of the cloud fraction and cloud radiative properties and thus provide a useful tool to explore unsolved problems relating to clouds.
Cited articles
Barsugli, J., Shin, S.-I., and Sardeshmukh, P. D.: Tropical climate regimes and global climate sensitivity in a simple setting, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1226–1240, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3404.1, 2005. a
Brayshaw, D. J., Hoskins, B., and Blackburn, M.: The Storm-Track Response to Idealized SST Perturbations in an Aquaplanet GCM, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 2842–2860, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jas2657.1, 2008. a
Byrne, M. P. and Schneider, T.: Narrowing of the ITCZ in a warming climate: Physical mechanisms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11350–11357, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070396, 2016a. a
Byrne, M. P. and Schneider, T.: Energetic constraints on the width of the intertropical convergence zone, J. Climate, 29, 4709–4721, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0767.1, 2016b. a
Byrne, M. P. and Thomas, R.: Dynamics of ITCZ Width: Ekman Processes, Non-Ekman Processes, and Links to Sea Surface Temperature, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 2869–2884, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-19-0013.1, 2019. a
Danabasoglu, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Bacmeister, J., Bailey, D. A., DuVivier, A. K., Edwards, J., Emmons, L. K., Fasullo, J., Garcia, R., Gettelman, A., Hannay, C., Holland, M. M., Large, W. G., Lauritzen, P. H., Lawrence, D. M., Lenaerts, J. T. M., Lindsay, K., Lipscomb, W. H., Mills, M. J., Neale, R., Oleson, K. W., Otto-Bliesner, B., Phillips, A. S., Sacks, W., Tilmes, S., van Kampenhout, L., Vertenstein, M., Bertini, A., Dennis, J., Deser, C., Fischer, C., Fox-Kemper, B., Kay, J. E., Kinnison, D., Kushner, P. J., Larson, V. E., Long, M. C., Mickelson, S., Moore, J. K., Nienhouse, E., Polvani, L., Rasch, P. J., and Strand, W. G.: The community earth system model version 2 (CESM2), J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001,916, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916, 2020. a
Delworth, T. L., Broccoli, A. J., Rosati, A., Stouffer, R. J., Balaji, V., Beesley, J. A., Cooke, W. F., Dixon, K. W., Dunne, J., Dunne, K. A., Durachta, J. W., Findell, K. L., Ginoux, P., Gnanadesikan, A., Gordon, C. T., Griffies, S. M., Gudgel, R., Harrison, M. J., Held, I. M., Hemler, R. S., Horowitz, L. W., Klein, S. A., Knutson, T. R., Kushner, P. J., Langenhorst, A. R., Lee, H.-C., Lin, S.-J., Lu, J., Malyshev, S. L., Milly, P. C. D., Ramaswamy, V., Russell, J., Schwarzkopf, M. D., Shevliakova, E., Sirutis, J. J., Spelman, M. J., Stern, W. F., Winton, M., Wittenberg, A. T., Wyman, B., Zeng, F., and Zhang, R.: GFDL's CM2 global coupled climate models. Part I: Formulation and simulation characteristics, J. Climate, 19, 643–674, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3629.1, 2006. a
Dixit, V., Geoffroy, O., and Sherwood, S. C.: Control of ITCZ Width by Low-Level Radiative Heating From Upper-Level Clouds in Aquaplanet Simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 5788–5797, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078292, 2018. a
Donohoe, A., Frierson, D. M. W., and Battisti, D. S.: The effect of ocean mixed layer depth on climate in slab ocean aquaplanet experiments, Clim. Dynam., 43, 1041–1055, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1843-4, 2014. a
Donohoe, A., Atwood, A. R., and Byrne, M. P.: Controls on the Width of Tropical Precipitation and Its Contraction Under Global Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 2019GL082969, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082969, 2019. a, b
Harrop, B. E. and Hartmann, D. L.: The Role of Cloud Radiative Heating in Determining the Location of the ITCZ in Aquaplanet Simulations, J. Climate, 29, 2741–2763, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0521.1, 2016. a
Kang, S. M. and Xie, S. P.: Dependence of climate response on meridional structure of external thermal forcing, J. Climate, 27, 5593–5600, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00622.1, 2014. a, b, c, d
Lee, S. and Kim, H.-K.: The Dynamical Relationship between Subtropical and Eddy-Driven Jets, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1490–1503, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1490:tdrbsa>2.0.co;2, 2003. a
Maher, P., Gerber, E. P., Medeiros, B., Merlis, T. M., Sherwood, S., Sheshadri, A., Sobel, A. H., Vallis, G. K., Voigt, A., and Zurita-Gotor, P.: Model hierarchies for understanding atmospheric circulation, Rev. Geophys., 57, 250–280, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000607, 2019. a
Medeiros, B., Stevens, B., Held, I. M., Zhao, M., Williamson, D. L., Olson, J. G., and Bretherton, C. S.: Aquaplanets, Climate Sensitivity, and Low Clouds, J. Climate, 21, 4974–4991, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI1995.1, 2008. a
Medeiros, B., Stevens, B., and Bony, S.: Using aquaplanets to understand the robust responses of comprehensive climate models to forcing, Clim. Dynam., 44, 1957–1977, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2138-0, 2015. a
Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M., Arblaster, J. M., Hu, A., Teng, H., Kay, J. E., Gettelman, A., Lawrence, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., and Strand, W. G.: Climate change projections in CESM1 (CAM5) compared to CCSM4, J. Climate, 26, 6287–6308, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00572.1, 2013. a
NCAR: HPE SGI ICE XA – Cheyenne, Computational and Information Systems Lab, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX, 2024. a
Neale, R. B. and Hoskins, B. J.: A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parameterizations: I: The proposal, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 1, 101–107, https://doi.org/10.1006/asle.2000.0022, 2000. a, b
Neale, R. B., Gettelman, A., Park, S., Chen, C.-C., Lauritzen, P. H., Williamson, D. L., Conley, A. J., Kinnison, D., Marsh, D., Smith, A. K., Vitt, F. M., Garcia, R., Lamarque, J.-F., Mills, M. J., Tilmes, S., Morrison, H., Cameron-Smith, P., Collins, W. D., Iacono, M. J., Easter, R. C., Liu, Ghan, X. S. J., Rasch, P. J., and Taylor, M. A.: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 5.0), NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-486+ STR, https://doi.org/10.5065/wgtk-4g06, 2012. a
Pendergrass, A. G. and Watt-Meyer, O.: apendergrass/width-itcz-mip: resubmission (Version v1), Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10558340, 2024. a
Pendergrass, A. G. and Deser, C.: Climatological characteristics of typical daily precipitation, J. Climate, 30, 5985–6003, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0684.1, 2017. a
Pierrehumbert, R. T.: Thermostats, radiator fins, and the local runaway greenhouse, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1784–1806, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<1784:TRFATL>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a, b
Popke, D., Stevens, B., and Voigt, A.: Climate and climate change in a radiative-convective equilibrium version of ECHAM6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 5, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012MS000191, 2013. a
Popp, M. and Bony, S.: Stronger zonal convective clustering associated with a wider tropical rain belt, Nat. Commun., 10, 4261, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12167-9, 2019. a
Rajendran, K., Kitoh, A., and Srinivasan, J.: Effect of SST variation on ITCZ in APE simulations, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 91, 195–215, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2013-A06, 2013. a
Ringer, M. A., Andrews, T., and Webb, M. J.: Global-mean radiative feedbacks and forcing in atmosphere-only and coupled atmosphere-ocean climate change experiments, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4035–4042, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060347, 2014. a
Rose, B. E. J., Armour, K. C., Battisti, D. S., Feldl, N., and Koll, D. D. B.: The dependence of transient climate sensitivity and radiative feedbacks on the spatial pattern of ocean heat uptake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1071–1078, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058955, 2014. a
Shaw, T. A., Voigt, A., Kang, S. M., and Seo, J.: Response of the intertropical convergence zone to zonally asymmetric subtropical surface forcings, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 9961–9969, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066027, 2015. a
Shin, Y., Kang, S. M., and Watanabe, M.: Dependence of Arctic climate on the latitudinal position of stationary waves and to high-latitudes surface warming, Clim. Dynam., 49, 3753–3763, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3543-y, 2017. a
Song, F. and Zhang, G. J.: The impacts of horizontal resolution on the seasonally-dependent biases of the northeastern Pacific ITCZ in coupled climate models, J. Climate, 33, 941–957, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0399.1, 2019. a
Song, X., Zhang, G. J., Song, X., and Zhang, G. J.: Culprit of the Eastern Pacific Double-ITCZ Bias in the NCAR CESM1.2, J. Climate, 32, 6349–6364, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0580.1, 2019. a
Stevens, B. and Bony, S.: What are climate models missing?, Science, 340, 1053–1054, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237554, 2013. a, b
Stouffer, R. J. and Manabe, S.: Response of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide: Sensitivity to the rate of increase, J. Climate, 12, 2224–2237, 1999. a
Su, H., Jiang, J. H., Neelin, J. D., Shen, T. J., Zhai, C., Yue, Q., Wang, Z., Huang, L., Choi, Y.-S., Stephens, G. L., and Yung, Y. L.: Tightening of tropical ascent and high clouds key to precipitation change in a warmer climate, Nat. Commun., 8, 15771, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15771, 2017. a
Tian, B.: Spread of model climate sensitivity linked to double-Intertropical Convergence Zone bias, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4133–4141, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064119, 2015. a
Vallis, G. K., Colyer, G., Geen, R., Gerber, E., Jucker, M., Maher, P., Paterson, A., Pietschnig, M., Penn, J., and Thomson, S. I.: Isca, v1.0: a framework for the global modelling of the atmospheres of Earth and other planets at varying levels of complexity, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 843–859, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-843-2018, 2018. a
Voigt, A., Biasutti, M., Scheff, J., Bader, J., Bordoni, S., Codron, F., Dixon, R. D., Jonas, J., Kang, S. M., Klingaman, N. P., Leung, R., Lu, J., Mapes, B., Maroon, E. A., McDermid, S., Park, J.-y., Roehrig, R., Rose, B. E. J., Russell, G. L., Seo, J., Toniazzo, T., Wei, H.-H., Yoshimori, M., and Vargas Zeppetello, L. R.: The tropical rain belts with an annual cycle and a continent model intercomparison project: TRACMIP, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8, 1868–1891, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000748, 2016. a, b
Watt-Meyer, O. and Frierson, D. M.: ITCZ width controls on Hadley cell extent and eddy-driven jet position and their response to warming, J. Climate, 32, 1151–1166, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0434.1, 2019. a, b, c
Webb, M. J. and Lock, A. P.: Testing a Physical Hypothesis for the Relationship Between Climate Sensitivity and Double-ITCZ Bias in Climate Models, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS001999, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001999, 2020. a, b, c
Webb, M. J., Andrews, T., Bodas-Salcedo, A., Bony, S., Bretherton, C. S., Chadwick, R., Chepfer, H., Douville, H., Good, P., Kay, J. E., Klein, S. A., Marchand, R., Medeiros, B., Siebesma, A. P., Skinner, C. B., Stevens, B., Tselioudis, G., Tsushima, Y., and Watanabe, M.: The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) contribution to CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 359–384, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-359-2017, 2017. a
Williamson, D. L., Blackburn, M., Hoskins, B. J., Nakajima, K., Ohfuchi, W. Takahashi, Y. O., Hayashi, Y.-Y., Nakamura, H., Ishiwatari, M., McGregor, J. L., Borth, H., Wirth, V., Frank, H. Bechtold, P. Wedi, N. P., Tomita, H., Satoh, M., Zhao, M., Held, I. M., Suarez, M. J., Lee, M.-I., Watanabe, M., Kimoto, M., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Molod, A., Rajendran, K., Kitoh, A., and Stratton, R.: The APE Atlas, Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric Research, 2012. a, b
Wodzicki, K. and Rapp, A.: Long-term characterization of the Pacific ITCZ using TRMM, GPCP, and ERA-Interim, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3153–3170, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024458, 2016. a
Zhou, W., Xie, S.-P., and Yang, D.: Enhanced equatorial warming causes deep-tropical contraction and subtropical monsoon shift, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 834–839, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0603-9, 2019. a
Zhou, W., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Yang, D., and Song, F.: Contrasting Recent and Future ITCZ Changes From Distinct Tropical Warming Patterns, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089846, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089846, 2020. a
Short summary
The width of the tropical rain belt affects many aspects of our climate, yet we do not understand what controls it. To better understand it, we present a method to change it in numerical model experiments. We show that the method works well in four different models. The behavior of the width is unexpectedly simple in some ways, such as how strong the winds are as it changes, but in other ways, it is more complicated, especially how temperature increases with carbon dioxide.
The width of the tropical rain belt affects many aspects of our climate, yet we do not...
