Articles | Volume 17, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2165-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
15 Mar 2024
Development and technical paper |
| 15 Mar 2024
| 15 Mar 2024
CSDMS Data Components: data–model integration tools for Earth surface processes modeling
Tian Gan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Gregory E. Tucker
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Eric W. H. Hutton
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Mark D. Piper
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Irina Overeem
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Albert J. Kettner
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Benjamin Campforts
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Julia M. Moriarty
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Brianna Undzis
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Ethan Pierce
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Lynn McCready
Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Andrew J. Moodie, Eric Barefoot, Eric Hutton, Charles Nguyen, Andrew D. Wickert, and Jeffrey Marr
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4770, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4770, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).
Short summary
Short summary
Geomorphologists have more data and computational resources available than ever before, but lack tools to facilitate collaborations needed to integrate data from different modes of study (e.g., field, experimental, modeling). In this article, we discuss challenges to collaboration in geomorphology, and report a new schema for sharing data. The schema is designed to accommodate most kinds of rasterized geomorphology data, and makes it easy to package, publish, and share those data.
Laurent O. Roberge, Nicole M. Gasparini, Benjamin Campforts, and Gregory E. Tucker
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2445, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2445, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Landscape evolution models compute the movement of sediment across landscapes. However, few account for the storage, fate, and transport of sediment properties, such as lithology or geochemistry. We present new Landlab model components that track such properties. Our unit-agnostic approach allows users to define the sediment properties for a wide range of applications (for example, mass of magnetite, volume of quartz, number of zircons, number of 10Be atoms, "equivalent dose" of luminescence).
Coline Ariagno, Philippe Steer, Pierre Valla, and Benjamin Campforts
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2088, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explored the impact of landslides on their topography using a landscape evolution model called ‘Hyland’, which enables long-term topographical analysis. Our finding reveal that landslides are concentrated at two specific elevations over time and predominantly affect the highest and steepest slopes, particularly along ridges and crests. This study is part of the large question about the origin of the erosion acceleration during the Quaternary.
Jeffrey Keck, Erkan Istanbulluoglu, Benjamin Campforts, Gregory Tucker, and Alexander Horner-Devine
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 1165–1191, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1165-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-1165-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
MassWastingRunout (MWR) is a new landslide runout model designed for sediment transport, landscape evolution, and hazard assessment applications. MWR is written in Python and includes a calibration utility that automatically determines best-fit parameters for a site and empirical probability density functions of each parameter for probabilistic model implementation. MWR and Jupyter Notebook tutorials are available as part of the Landlab package at https://github.com/landlab/landlab.
Daniel O'Hara, Liran Goren, Roos M. J. van Wees, Benjamin Campforts, Pablo Grosse, Pierre Lahitte, Gabor Kereszturi, and Matthieu Kervyn
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 709–726, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-709-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-709-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how volcanic edifices develop drainage basins remains unexplored in landscape evolution. Using digital evolution models of volcanoes with varying ages, we quantify the geometries of their edifices and associated drainage basins through time. We find that these metrics correlate with edifice age and are thus useful indicators of a volcano’s history. We then develop a generalized model for how volcano basins develop and compare our results to basin evolution in other settings.
Matthew C. Morriss, Benjamin Lehmann, Benjamin Campforts, George Brencher, Brianna Rick, Leif S. Anderson, Alexander L. Handwerger, Irina Overeem, and Jeffrey Moore
Earth Surf. Dynam., 11, 1251–1274, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1251-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-11-1251-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we investigate the 28 June 2022 collapse of the Chaos Canyon landslide in Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. We find that the landslide was moving prior to its collapse and took place at peak spring snowmelt; temperature modeling indicates the potential presence of permafrost. We hypothesize that this landslide could be part of the broader landscape evolution changes to alpine terrain caused by a warming climate, leading to thawing alpine permafrost.
Vao Fenotiana Razanamahandry, Marjolein Dewaele, Gerard Govers, Liesa Brosens, Benjamin Campforts, Liesbet Jacobs, Tantely Razafimbelo, Tovonarivo Rafolisy, and Steven Bouillon
Biogeosciences, 19, 3825–3841, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3825-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3825-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In order to shed light on possible past vegetation shifts in the Central Highlands of Madagascar, we measured stable isotope ratios of organic carbon in soil profiles along both forested and grassland hillslope transects in the Lake Alaotra region. Our results show that the landscape of this region was more forested in the past: soils in the C4-dominated grasslands contained a substantial fraction of C3-derived carbon, increasing with depth.
Rolf Hut, Niels Drost, Nick van de Giesen, Ben van Werkhoven, Banafsheh Abdollahi, Jerom Aerts, Thomas Albers, Fakhereh Alidoost, Bouwe Andela, Jaro Camphuijsen, Yifat Dzigan, Ronald van Haren, Eric Hutton, Peter Kalverla, Maarten van Meersbergen, Gijs van den Oord, Inti Pelupessy, Stef Smeets, Stefan Verhoeven, Martine de Vos, and Berend Weel
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5371–5390, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
With the eWaterCycle platform, we are providing the hydrological community with a platform to conduct their research that is fully compatible with the principles of both open science and FAIR science. The eWatercyle platform gives easy access to well-known hydrological models, big datasets and example experiments. Using eWaterCycle hydrologists can easily compare the results from different models, couple models and do more complex hydrological computational research.
Liesa Brosens, Benjamin Campforts, Gerard Govers, Emilien Aldana-Jague, Vao Fenotiana Razanamahandry, Tantely Razafimbelo, Tovonarivo Rafolisy, and Liesbet Jacobs
Earth Surf. Dynam., 10, 209–227, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-209-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-10-209-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Obtaining accurate information on the volume of geomorphic features typically requires high-resolution topographic data, which are often not available. Here, we show that the globally available 12 m TanDEM-X DEM can be used to accurately estimate gully volumes and establish an area–volume relationship after applying a correction. This allowed us to get a first estimate of the amount of sediment that has been mobilized by large gullies (lavaka) in central Madagascar over the past 70 years.
Gregory E. Tucker, Eric W. H. Hutton, Mark D. Piper, Benjamin Campforts, Tian Gan, Katherine R. Barnhart, Albert J. Kettner, Irina Overeem, Scott D. Peckham, Lynn McCready, and Jaia Syvitski
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1413–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Scientists use computer simulation models to understand how Earth surface processes work, including floods, landslides, soil erosion, river channel migration, ocean sedimentation, and coastal change. Research benefits when the software for simulation modeling is open, shared, and coordinated. The Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System (CSDMS) is a US-based facility that supports research by providing community support, computing tools and guidelines, and educational resources.
Kelly Kochanski, Gregory Tucker, and Robert Anderson
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-205, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-205, 2021
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Falling snow does not life flat. When blown by the wind, it forms elaborate structures, like dunes. Where these dunes form, they change the way heat flows through the snow. This can accelerate sea ice melt and climate change. Here, we use both field observations obtained during blizzards in Colorado and simulations performed with a state-of-the-art model, to quantify the impact of snow dunes on Arctic heat flows.
Arthur Depicker, Gerard Govers, Liesbet Jacobs, Benjamin Campforts, Judith Uwihirwe, and Olivier Dewitte
Earth Surf. Dynam., 9, 445–462, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-445-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-9-445-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how shallow landslide occurrence is impacted by deforestation and rifting in the North Tanganyika–Kivu rift region (Africa). We developed a new approach to calculate landslide erosion rates based on an inventory compiled in biased © Google Earth imagery. We find that deforestation increases landslide erosion by a factor of 2–8 and for a period of roughly 15 years. However, the exact impact of deforestation depends on the geomorphic context of the landscape (rejuvenated/relict).
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T., Battisti, D. S., Williams, A. P., Hansen, W. D., Harvey, B. J., and Kolden, C. A.: Projected increases in western US forest fire despite growing fuel constraints, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 227, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00299-0, 2021.
Adams, J. M., Gasparini, N. M., Hobley, D. E. J., Tucker, G. E., Hutton, E. W. H., Nudurupati, S. S., and Istanbulluoglu, E.: The Landlab v1.0 OverlandFlow component: a Python tool for computing shallow-water flow across watersheds, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1645–1663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1645-2017, 2017.
Anisimov, O. A., Shiklomanov, N. I., and Nelson, F. E.: Global warming and active-layer thickness: results from transient general circulation models, Glob. Planet. Change, 15, 61–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(97)00009-X, 1997.
Barnhart, K. R., Hutton, E. W. H., Tucker, G. E., Gasparini, N. M., Istanbulluoglu, E., Hobley, D. E. J., Lyons, N. J., Mouchene, M., Nudurupati, S. S., Adams, J. M., and Bandaragoda, C.: Short communication: Landlab v2.0: a software package for Earth surface dynamics, Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 379–397, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-379-2020, 2020.
Barton, C. M., Lee, A., Janssen, M. A., van der Leeuw, S., Tucker, G. E., Porter, C., Greenberg, J., Swantek, L., Frank, K., Chen, M., and Jagers, H. R. A.: How to make models more useful, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2202112119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202112119, 2022.
Beeson, P. C., Martens, S. N., and Breshears, D. D.: Simulating overland flow following wildfire: mapping vulnerability to landscape disturbance, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2917–2930, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.382, 2001.
Benda, L. and Dunne, T.: Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow, Water Resour. Res., 33, 2849–2863, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR02388, 1997.
Bessette-Kirton, E. K., Cerovski-Darriau, C., Schulz, W. H., Coe, J. A., Kean, J. W., Godt, J. W., Thomas, M. A., and Stephen Hughes, K.: Landslides triggered by Hurricane Maria: Assessment of an extreme event in Puerto Rico, GSA Today, 29, 4–10, https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG383A.1, 2019.
Booij, N., Ris, R. C., and Holthuijsen, L. H.: A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 7649–7666, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC02622, 1999.
Broeckx, J., Rossi, M., Lijnen, K., Campforts, B., Poesen, J., and Vanmaercke, M.: Landslide mobilization rates: A global analysis and model, Earth-Sci. Rev., 201, 102972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102972, 2020.
Cannon, S. H., Powers, P. S., and Savage, W. Z.: Fire-related hyperconcentrated and debris flows on Storm King Mountain, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, USA, Environ. Geol., 35, 210–218, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002540050307, 1998.
Chen, M., Voinov, A., Ames, D. P., Kettner, A. J., Goodall, J. L., Jakeman, A. J., Barton, M. C., Harpham, Q., Cuddy, S. M., DeLuca, C., Yue, S., Wang, J., Zhang, F., Wen, Y., and Lü, G.: Position paper: Open web-distributed integrated geographic modelling and simulation to enable broader participation and applications, Earth-Sci. Rev., 207, 103223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103223, 2020.
Chen, R., Luna, D., Cao, Y., Liang, Y., and Liang, X.: Open data and model integration through generic model agent toolkit in CyberWater framework, Environ. Modell. Softw., 152, 105384, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105384, 2022.
Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Jael Castro, L., Gruenpeter, M., Andrea Martinez, P., Honeyman, T., Struck, A., Lee, A., Loewe, A., van Werkhoven, B., Jones, C., Garijo, D., Plomp, E., Genova, F., Shanahan, H., Leng, J., Hellström, M., Sandström, M., Sinha, M., Kuzak, M., Herterich, P., Zhang, Q., Islam, S., Sansone, S.-A., Pollard, T., Dwi Atmojo, U., Williams, A., Czerniak, A., Niehues, A., Claire Fouilloux, A., Desinghu, B., Goble, C., Richard, C., Gray, C., Erdmann, C., Nüst, D., Tartarini, D., Ranguelova, E., Anzt, H., Todorov, I., McNally, J., Moldon, J., Burnett, J., Garrido-Sánchez, J., Belhajjame, K., Sesink, L., Hwang, L., Roberto Tovani-Palone, M., Wilkinson, M. D., Servillat, M., Liffers, M., Fox, M., Miljković, N., Lynch, N., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Gesing, S., Stevens, S., Martinez Cuesta, S., Peroni, S., Soiland-Reyes, S., Bakker, T., Rabemanantsoa, T., Sochat, V., and Yehudi, Y.: FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles), Research Data Alliance, https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068, 2022.
Costa, J. E. and Schuster, R. L.: The formation and failure of natural dams, GSA Bulletin, 100, 1054–1068, https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<1054:TFAFON>2.3.CO;2, 1988.
Davidson, M. A., Splinter, K. D., and Turner, I. L.: A simple equilibrium model for predicting shoreline change, Coast. Eng., 73, 191–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.11.002, 2013.
Donges, J. F., Heitzig, J., Barfuss, W., Wiedermann, M., Kassel, J. A., Kittel, T., Kolb, J. J., Kolster, T., Müller-Hansen, F., Otto, I. M., Zimmerer, K. B., and Lucht, W.: Earth system modeling with endogenous and dynamic human societies: the copan:CORE open World–Earth modeling framework, Earth Syst. Dynam., 11, 395–413, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-395-2020, 2020.
Epperly, T. G. W., Kumfert, G., Dahlgren, T., Ebner, D., Leek, J., Prantl, A., and Kohn, S.: High-performance language interoperability for scientific computing through Babel, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., 26, 260–274, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342011414036, 2011.
ESMF Joint Specification Team: ESMF Reference Manual for Fortran, https://earthsystemmodeling.org/docs/release/latest/ESMF_refdoc/, last access: 20 February 2023.
Fan, X., Scaringi, G., Korup, O., West, A. J., van Westen, C. J., Tanyas, H., Hovius, N., Hales, T. C., Jibson, R. W., Allstadt, K. E., Zhang, L., Evans, S. G., Xu, C., Li, G., Pei, X., Xu, Q., and Huang, R.: Earthquake-Induced Chains of Geologic Hazards: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 421–503, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000626, 2019.
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdorf, D.: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG2004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183, 2007.
Gan, T.: CSDMS Data Components Use Cases, HydroShare [data set], https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.28af99c09ee4423dbffef28bf32837e0, 2023a.
Gan, T.: CSDMS ERA5 Data Component (v0.1.4), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368879, 2023b.
Gan, T.: CSDMS NWIS Data Component (v0.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368806, 2023c.
Gan, T.: CSDMS SoilGrids Data Component (v0.1.4), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368883, 2023d.
Gan, T.: PyMT plugin for CSDMS NWIS Data Component (v0.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368876, 2023e.
Gan, T.: PyMT plugin for CSDMS SoilGrids Data Component (v0.1.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368885, 2023f.
Gan, T.: PyMT plugin for CSDMS ERA5 Data Component (v0.1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10368881, 2023g.
Gan, T., Tarboton, D. G., Horsburgh, J. S., Dash, P., Idaszak, R., and Yi, H.: Collaborative sharing of multidimensional space-time data in a next generation hydrologic information system, Environ. Modell. Softw., 129, 104706, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104706, 2020a.
Gan, T., Tarboton, D. G., Dash, P., Gichamo, T. Z., and Horsburgh, J. S.: Integrating hydrologic modeling web services with online data sharing to prepare, store, and execute hydrologic models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 130, 104731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104731, 2020b.
Garnello, A., Marchenko, S., Nicolsky, D., Romanovsky, V., Ledman, J., Celis, G., Schädel, C., Luo, Y., and Schuur, E. A. G.: Projecting Permafrost Thaw of Sub-Arctic Tundra With a Thermodynamic Model Calibrated to Site Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 126, e2020JG006218, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG006218, 2021.
Haidvogel, D. B., Arango, H., Budgell, W. P., Cornuelle, B. D., Curchitser, E., Di Lorenzo, E., Fennel, K., Geyer, W. R., Hermann, A. J., Lanerolle, L., Levin, J., McWilliams, J. C., Miller, A. J., Moore, A. M., Powell, T. M., Shchepetkin, A. F., Sherwood, C. R., Signell, R. P., Warner, J. C., and Wilkin, J.: Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3595–3624, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.06.016, 2008.
Hall, C. A., Saia, S. M., Popp, A. L., Dogulu, N., Schymanski, S. J., Drost, N., van Emmerik, T., and Hut, R.: A hydrologist's guide to open science, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-647-2022, 2022.
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L., and Harvey, B. J.: Changing wildfire, changing forests: the effects of climate change on fire regimes and vegetation in the Pacific Northwest, USA, Fire Ecol., 16, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-019-0062-8, 2020.
Hansen, J. E. and Barnard, P. L.: Sub-weekly to interannual variability of a high-energy shoreline, Coast. Eng., 57, 959–972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.05.011, 2010.
Haque, U., Blum, P., da Silva, P. F., Andersen, P., Pilz, J., Chalov, S. R., Malet, J.-P., Auflič, M. J., Andres, N., Poyiadji, E., Lamas, P. C., Zhang, W., Peshevski, I., Pétursson, H. G., Kurt, T., Dobrev, N., García-Davalillo, J. C., Halkia, M., Ferri, S., Gaprindashvili, G., Engström, J., and Keellings, D.: Fatal landslides in Europe, Landslides, 13, 1545–1554, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0689-3, 2016.
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning, PLoS One, 12, e0169748, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017.
Hill, C., DeLuca, C., Balaji, Suarez, M., and da Silva, A.: The architecture of the Earth system modeling framework, Comput. Sci. Eng., 6, 18–28, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCISE.2004.1255817, 2004.
Hobley, D. E. J., Adams, J. M., Nudurupati, S. S., Hutton, E. W. H., Gasparini, N. M., Istanbulluoglu, E., and Tucker, G. E.: Creative computing with Landlab: an open-source toolkit for building, coupling, and exploring two-dimensional numerical models of Earth-surface dynamics, Earth Surf. Dynam., 5, 21–46, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-21-2017, 2017.
Hoch, J. M., Eilander, D., Ikeuchi, H., Baart, F., and Winsemius, H. C.: Evaluating the impact of model complexity on flood wave propagation and inundation extent with a hydrologic–hydrodynamic model coupling framework, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1723–1735, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-1723-2019, 2019.
Hodson, T. O., Hariharan, J. A., Black, S., and Horsburgh, J. S.: dataretrieval (Python): a Python package for discovering and retrieving water data available from U.S. federal hydrologic web services, https://pypi.org/project/dataretrieval/ (last access: 1 March 2024), 2023.
Horsburgh, J. S., Morsy, M. M., Castronova, A. M., Goodall, J. L., Gan, T., Yi, H., Stealey, M. J., and Tarboton, D. G.: HydroShare: Sharing diverse environmental data types and models as social objects with application to the hydrology domain, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 52, 873–889, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12363, 2016.
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in Python, J. Open Res. Softw., 5, 10, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148, 2017.
Hut, R., Drost, N., van de Giesen, N., van Werkhoven, B., Abdollahi, B., Aerts, J., Albers, T., Alidoost, F., Andela, B., Camphuijsen, J., Dzigan, Y., van Haren, R., Hutton, E., Kalverla, P., van Meersbergen, M., van den Oord, G., Pelupessy, I., Smeets, S., Verhoeven, S., de Vos, M., and Weel, B.: The eWaterCycle platform for open and FAIR hydrological collaboration, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5371–5390, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5371-2022, 2022.
Hutton, E.: csdms/bmi-wavewatch3: Admirable Angelfish (v0.2.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8326599, 2023.
Hutton, E., Piper, M., and Tucker, G.: The Basic Model Interface 2.0: A standard interface for coupling numerical models in the geosciences, J. Open Source Softw., 5, 2317, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02317, 2020.
Hutton, E. W. H., Piper, M. D., and Tucker, G. E.: The Babelizer: language interoperability for model coupling in the geosciences, J. Open Source Softw., 7, 3344, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03344, 2022.
Janssen, M. A., Na'ia Alessa, L., Barton, M., Bergin, S., and Lee, A.: Towards a Community Framework for Agent-Based Modelling, JASSS, 11, https://www.jasss.org/11/2/6.html (last access: 7 March 2024), 2008.
Knuth, D. E.: Literate programming, The Comput. J., 27, 97–111, 1984.
Kralisch, S., Krause, P., and David, O.: Using the object modeling system for hydrological model development and application, Adv. Geosci., 4, 75–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-4-75-2005, 2005.
Kudryavtsev, V., Garagulya, L., Kondrat Yeva, V., and Melamed, K. A. nad: Fundamentals of frost forecasting in geological engineering investigations, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA039677.pdf (last access: 1 March 2024), 1977.
Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Martin Del Pico, E., Dominguez Del Angel, V., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J. Ll., Chue Hong, N., Goble, C., and Capella-Gutierrez, S.: Towards FAIR principles for research software, Data Science, 3, 37–59, https://doi.org/10.3233/ds-190026, 2019.
Lawrence, D. M. and Slater, A. G.: A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L24401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025080, 2005.
Leonardi, N., Ganju, N. K., and Fagherazzi, S.: A linear relationship between wave power and erosion determines salt-marsh resilience to violent storms and hurricanes, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 64–68, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510095112, 2016.
Malvar, M. C., Prats, S. A., Nunes, J. P., and Keizer, J. J.: Post-fire overland flow generation and inter-rill erosion under simulated rainfall in two eucalypt stands in north-central Portugal, Environ. Res., 111, 222–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.003, 2011.
May, C. L., Pryor, B., Lisle, T. E., and Lang, M.: Coupling hydrodynamic modeling and empirical measures of bed mobility to predict the risk of scour and fill of salmon redds in a large regulated river, Water Resour. Res., 45, W05402, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006498, 2009.
Mentaschi, L., Vousdoukas, M. I., Pekel, J.-F., Voukouvalas, E., and Feyen, L.: Global long-term observations of coastal erosion and accretion, Sci. Rep., 8, 12876, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30904-w, 2018.
Moore, R. V. and Tindall, C. I.: An overview of the open modelling interface and environment (the OpenMI), Environ. Sci. Policy, 8, 279–286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.03.009, 2005.
Mwasilu, F. and Jung, J.-W.: Potential for power generation from ocean wave renewable energy source: a comprehensive review on state-of-the-art technology and future prospects, IET Renew. Power Gen., 13, 363–375, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2018.5456, 2019.
Nelson, F. E., Anisimov, O. A., and Shiklomanov, N. I.: Subsidence risk from thawing permafrost, Nature, 410, 889–890, https://doi.org/10.1038/35073746, 2001.
NOAA: EMC Operational Wave Product Table, https://polar.ncep.noaa.gov/waves/product_table.shtml, last access: 1 March 2024.
Ozkan, C. and Mayo, T.: The renewable wave energy resource in coastal regions of the Florida peninsula, Renew. Energy, 139, 530–537, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.090, 2019.
Patton, A. I., Rathburn, S. L., and Capps, D. M.: Landslide response to climate change in permafrost regions, Geomorphology, 340, 116–128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.029, 2019.
Peckham, S. D., Hutton, E. W. H., and Norris, B.: A component-based approach to integrated modeling in the geosciences: The design of CSDMS, Comput. Geosci., 53, 3–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.04.002, 2013.
Petley, D.: Global patterns of loss of life from landslides, Geology, 40, 927–930, https://doi.org/10.1130/G33217.1, 2012.
Piper, M.: CSDMS Topography data component (v0.8.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8327417, 2023a.
Piper, M.: pymt-lab/pymt_topography: PyMT plugin for CSDMS Topography data component (v0.1.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10308417, 2023b.
Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Shakesby, R. A. and Doerr, S. H.: Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent, Earth Sci. Rev., 74, 269–307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006, 2006.
Strauch, R., Istanbulluoglu, E., Nudurupati, S. S., Bandaragoda, C., Gasparini, N. M., and Tucker, G. E.: A hydroclimatological approach to predicting regional landslide probability using Landlab, Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 49–75, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-49-2018, 2018.
Tadono, T., Ishida, H., Oda, F., Naito, S., Minakawa, K., and Iwamoto, H.: Precise Global DEM Generation by ALOS PRISM, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., II-4, 71–76, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-4-71-2014, 2014.
Thorpe, T. W.: A Brief Review of Wave Energy A report produced for The UK Department of Trade and Industry, http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2011/ph240/yan1/docs/thorpe.pdf (last access: 1 March 2024), 1999.
Tucker, G. E., Hutton, E. W. H., Piper, M. D., Campforts, B., Gan, T., Barnhart, K. R., Kettner, A. J., Overeem, I., Peckham, S. D., McCready, L., and Syvitski, J.: CSDMS: a community platform for numerical modeling of Earth surface processes, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1413–1439, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1413-2022, 2022.
Verburg, P. H., Dearing, J. A., Dyke, J. G., Leeuw, S. van der, Seitzinger, S., Steffen, W., and Syvitski, J.: Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene, Global Environ. Chang., 39, 328–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.007, 2016.
Vousdoukas, M. I., Ranasinghe, R., Mentaschi, L., Plomaritis, T. A., Athanasiou, P., Luijendijk, A., and Feyen, L.: Sandy coastlines under threat of erosion, Nat. Clim. Change, 10, 260–263, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0697-0, 2020.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J. W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gray, A. J. G., Groth, P., Goble, C., Grethe, J. S., Heringa, J., t Hoen, P. A. C., Hooft, R., Kuhn, T., Kok, R., Kok, J., Lusher, S. J., Martone, M. E., Mons, A., Packer, A. L., Persson, B., Rocca-Serra, P., Roos, M., van Schaik, R., Sansone, S. A., Schultes, E., Sengstag, T., Slater, T., Strawn, G., Swertz, M. A., Thompson, M., van der Lei, J., van Mulligen, E., Velterop, J., Waagmeester, A., Wittenburg, P., Wolstencroft, K., Zhao, J., and Mons, B.: Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci. Data, 3, 160018, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18, 2016.
Zhang, T.: Influence of the seasonal snow cover on the ground thermal regime: An overview, Rev. Geophys., 43, RG4002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004RG000157, 2005.
Zhang, T., Barry, R. G., Knowles, K., Heginbottom, J. A., and Brown, J.: Statistics and characteristics of permafrost and ground-ice distribution in the Northern Hemisphere, Polar Geography, 31, 47–68, https://doi.org/10.1080/10889370802175895, 2008.
Short summary
This study presents the design, implementation, and application of the CSDMS Data Components. The case studies demonstrate that the Data Components provide a consistent way to access heterogeneous datasets from multiple sources, and to seamlessly integrate them with various models for Earth surface process modeling. The Data Components support the creation of open data–model integration workflows to improve the research transparency and reproducibility.
This study presents the design, implementation, and application of the CSDMS Data Components....
