Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1409-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1409-2024
Development and technical paper
 | 
16 Feb 2024
Development and technical paper |  | 16 Feb 2024

Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 2: A semi-discrete error analysis framework for assessing coupling schemes

Christopher J. Vogl, Hui Wan, Carol S. Woodward, and Quan M. Bui

Related authors

Numerical coupling of aerosol emissions, dry removal, and turbulent mixing in the E3SM Atmosphere Model version 1 (EAMv1) – Part 1: Dust budget analyses and the impacts of a revised coupling scheme
Hui Wan, Kai Zhang, Christopher J. Vogl, Carol S. Woodward, Richard C. Easter, Philip J. Rasch, Yan Feng, and Hailong Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1387–1407, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1387-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Numerical methods
VISIR-2: ship weather routing in Python
Gianandrea Mannarini, Mario Leonardo Salinas, Lorenzo Carelli, Nicola Petacco, and Josip Orović
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4355–4382, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (MPAS–JEDI 2.0.0)
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Decision-making strategies implemented in SolFinder 1.0 to identify eco-efficient aircraft trajectories: application study in AirTraf 3.0
Federica Castino, Feijia Yin, Volker Grewe, Hiroshi Yamashita, Sigrun Matthes, Simone Dietmüller, Sabine Baumann, Manuel Soler, Abolfazl Simorgh, Maximilian Mendiguchia Meuser, Florian Linke, and Benjamin Lührs
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4031–4052, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4031-2024, 2024
Short summary
Developing meshing workflows in Gmsh v4.11 for the geologic uncertainty assessment of high-temperature aquifer thermal energy storage
Ali Dashti, Jens C. Grimmer, Christophe Geuzaine, Florian Bauer, and Thomas Kohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3467–3485, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3467-2024, 2024
Short summary
Development and preliminary validation of a land surface image assimilation system based on the Common Land Model
Wangbin Shen, Zhaohui Lin, Zhengkun Qin, and Juan Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3447–3465, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3447-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3447-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Barrett, A. I., Wellmann, C., Seifert, A., Hoose, C., Vogel, B., and Kunz, M.: One Step at a Time: How Model Time Step Significantly Affects Convection-Permitting Simulations, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 11, 641–658, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001418, 2019. a
Caya, A., Laprise, R., and Zwack, P.: Consequences of Using the Splitting Method for Implementing Physical Forcings in a Semi-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian Model, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1707–1713, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1707:COUTSM>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a
Donahue, A. S. and Caldwell, P. M.: Performance and Accuracy Implications of Parallel Split Physics-Dynamics Coupling in the Energy Exascale Earth System Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002080, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002080, 2020. a
Dubal, M., Wood, N., and Staniforth, A.: Analysis of Parallel versus Sequential Splittings for Time-Stepping Physical Parameterizations, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 121–132, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)131<0121:AOPVSS>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Dubal, M., Wood, N., and Staniforth, A.: Mixed Parallel-Sequential-Split Schemes for Time-Stepping Multiple Physical Parameterizations, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 989–1002, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2893.1, 2005. a
Short summary
Generally speaking, accurate climate simulation requires an accurate evolution of the underlying mathematical equations on large computers. The equations are typically formulated and evolved in process groups. Process coupling refers to how the evolution of each group is combined with that of other groups to evolve the full set of equations for the whole atmosphere. This work presents a mathematical framework to evaluate methods without the need to first implement the methods.