Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
Model evaluation paper
08 Feb 2024
Model evaluation paper |  | 08 Feb 2024

Constraining the carbon cycle in JULES-ES-1.0

Douglas McNeall, Eddy Robertson, and Andy Wiltshire


Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-280', Michel Crucifix, 08 Mar 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2022-280', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Mar 2023
  • AC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-280', Douglas McNeall, 20 Sep 2023

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Douglas McNeall on behalf of the Authors (20 Sep 2023)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (03 Oct 2023) by Hans Verbeeck
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (12 Oct 2023)
RR by Michel Crucifix (08 Nov 2023)
ED: Publish as is (20 Nov 2023) by Hans Verbeeck
AR by Douglas McNeall on behalf of the Authors (01 Dec 2023)
Short summary
We can run simulations of the land surface and carbon cycle, using computer models to help us understand and predict climate change and its impacts. These simulations are not perfect reproductions of the real land surface, and that can make them less effective tools. We use new statistical and computational techniques to help us understand how different our models are from the real land surface, how to make them more realistic, and how well we can simulate past and future climate.