Articles | Volume 16, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-813-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-813-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
02 Feb 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 02 Feb 2023

ForamEcoGEnIE 2.0: incorporating symbiosis and spine traits into a trait-based global planktic foraminiferal model

Rui Ying, Fanny M. Monteiro, Jamie D. Wilson, and Daniela N. Schmidt

Related authors

A critical trade-off between nitrogen quota and growth allows Coccolithus braarudii life cycle phases to exploit varying environment
Joost de Vries, Fanny Monteiro, Gerald Langer, Colin Brownlee, and Glen Wheeler
Biogeosciences, 21, 1707–1727, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1707-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1707-2024, 2024
Short summary
A diatom extension to the cGEnIE Earth system model – EcoGEnIE 1.1
Aaron A. Naidoo-Bagwell, Fanny M. Monteiro, Katharine R. Hendry, Scott Burgan, Jamie D. Wilson, Ben A. Ward, Andy Ridgwell, and Daniel J. Conley
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1729–1748, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1729-2024, 2024
Short summary
Reviews and syntheses: The clam before the storm – a meta-analysis showing the effect of combined climate change stressors on bivalves
Rachel A. Kruft Welton, George Hoppit, Daniela N. Schmidt, James D. Witts, and Benjamin C. Moon
Biogeosciences, 21, 223–239, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-223-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-223-2024, 2024
Short summary
Inclusion of a suite of weathering tracers in the cGENIE Earth system model – muffin release v.0.9.23
Markus Adloff, Andy Ridgwell, Fanny M. Monteiro, Ian J. Parkinson, Alexander J. Dickson, Philip A. E. Pogge von Strandmann, Matthew S. Fantle, and Sarah E. Greene
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 4187–4223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4187-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4187-2021, 2021
Short summary
Haplo-diplontic life cycle expands coccolithophore niche
Joost de Vries, Fanny Monteiro, Glen Wheeler, Alex Poulton, Jelena Godrijan, Federica Cerino, Elisa Malinverno, Gerald Langer, and Colin Brownlee
Biogeosciences, 18, 1161–1184, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1161-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1161-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences
Optimising CH4 simulations from the LPJ-GUESS model v4.1 using an adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm
Jalisha T. Kallingal, Johan Lindström, Paul A. Miller, Janne Rinne, Maarit Raivonen, and Marko Scholze
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2299–2324, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2299-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2299-2024, 2024
Short summary
The XSO framework (v0.1) and Phydra library (v0.1) for a flexible, reproducible, and integrated plankton community modeling environment in Python
Benjamin Post, Esteban Acevedo-Trejos, Andrew D. Barton, and Agostino Merico
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1175–1195, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1175-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1175-2024, 2024
Short summary
AgriCarbon-EO v1.0.1: large-scale and high-resolution simulation of carbon fluxes by assimilation of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 reflectances using a Bayesian approach
Taeken Wijmer, Ahmad Al Bitar, Ludovic Arnaud, Remy Fieuzal, and Eric Ceschia
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 997–1021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-997-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-997-2024, 2024
Short summary
SAMM version 1.0: a numerical model for microbial- mediated soil aggregate formation
Moritz Laub, Sergey Blagodatsky, Marijn Van de Broek, Samuel Schlichenmaier, Benjapon Kunlanit, Johan Six, Patma Vityakon, and Georg Cadisch
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 931–956, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-931-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-931-2024, 2024
Short summary
A model of the within-population variability of budburst in forest trees
Jianhong Lin, Daniel Berveiller, Christophe François, Heikki Hänninen, Alexandre Morfin, Gaëlle Vincent, Rui Zhang, Cyrille Rathgeber, and Nicolas Delpierre
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 865–879, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-865-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-865-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, O. R. and Bé, A. W. H.: The ultrastructure of a planktonic foraminifer, Globigerinoides sacculifer (Brady), and its symbiotic dinoflagellates, J. Foramin. Res., 6, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.6.1.1, 1976. 
Anderson, O. R., Spindler, M., Bé, A. W. H., and Hemleben, Ch.: Trophic activity of planktonic foraminifera, J. Mar. Biol. Ass., 59, 791–799, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002531540004577X, 1979. 
Anderson, R. P.: When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?, J. Biogeogr., 44, 8–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12825, 2017. 
Anderson, T. R.: Plankton functional type modelling: running before we can walk?, J. Plankton Res., 27, 1073–1081, https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi076, 2005. 
Download
Short summary
Planktic foraminifera are marine-calcifying zooplankton; their shells are widely used to measure past temperature and productivity. We developed ForamEcoGEnIE 2.0 to simulate the four subgroups of this organism. We found that the relative abundance distribution agrees with marine sediment core-top data and that carbon export and biomass are close to sediment trap and plankton net observations respectively. This model provides the opportunity to study foraminiferal ecology in any geological era.