Articles | Volume 16, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7123-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-7123-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
08 Dec 2023
Development and technical paper |
| 08 Dec 2023
| 08 Dec 2023
Data assimilation for the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI-MPAS 2.0.0-beta): ensemble of 3D ensemble-variational (En-3DEnVar) assimilations
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: Tomorrow.io, Golden, CO 80401, USA
Zhiquan Liu
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Chris Snyder
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Byoung-Joo Jung
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Craig S. Schwartz
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Junmei Ban
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Steven Vahl
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Yali Wu
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: Shenzhen Institute of Meteorological Innovation, Shenzhen, China
Ivette Hernández Baños
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Yonggang G. Yu
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: Science Applications International Corporation, Reston, VA 20190, USA
Soyoung Ha
Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Yannick Trémolet
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Thomas Auligné
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Clementine Gas
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Benjamin Ménétrier
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Anna Shlyaeva
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Mark Miesch
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: CIRES, University of Colorado, NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Stephen Herbener
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Emily Liu
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: National Centers for Environmental Prediction, NOAA, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Daniel Holdaway
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
now at: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Benjamin T. Johnson
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation, University Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
Related authors
Tao Sun, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Zhiquan Liu, Junmei Ban, Byoung-Joo Jung, Ivette Hernández Baños, and Chris Snyder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2079, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2079, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated a new ensemble data assimilation system that uses satellite observations in all weather conditions for global weather forecasts. The results show that including cloud- and precipitation-affected satellite data improves forecasts of moisture, wind, and clouds, especially in the tropics. This work highlights the potential of this new ensemble data assimilation system to enhance global weather forecasts.
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To mitigate the imbalances in the initial conditions, this study introduces our recent implementation of the incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmospheric (MPAS-A) component coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) through the cycling system. A month-long cycling run demonstrates the successful implementation of the IAU capability in the MPAS–JEDI cycling system.
Byoung-Joo Jung, Benjamin Ménétrier, Chris Snyder, Zhiquan Liu, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Junmei Ban, Ivette Hernández Baños, Yonggang G. Yu, and William C. Skamarock
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3879–3895, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the multivariate static background error covariance (B) for the JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var data assimilation system. With tuned B parameters, the multivariate B gives physically balanced analysis increment fields in the single-observation test framework. In the month-long cycling experiment with a global 60 km mesh, 3D-Var with static B performs stably. Due to its simple workflow and minimal computational requirements, JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var can be useful for the research community.
Zhiquan Liu, Chris Snyder, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Byoung-Joo Jung, Junmei Ban, Steven Vahl, Yali Wu, Yannick Trémolet, Thomas Auligné, Benjamin Ménétrier, Anna Shlyaeva, Stephen Herbener, Emily Liu, Daniel Holdaway, and Benjamin T. Johnson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7859–7878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
JEDI-MPAS 1.0.0, a new data assimilation (DA) system for the MPAS model, was publicly released for community use. This article describes JEDI-MPAS's implementation of the ensemble–variational DA technique and demonstrates its robustness and credible performance by incrementally adding three types of microwave radiances (clear-sky AMSU-A, all-sky AMSU-A, clear-sky MHS) to a non-radiance DA experiment. We intend to periodically release new and improved versions of JEDI-MPAS in upcoming years.
Tao Sun, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Zhiquan Liu, Junmei Ban, Byoung-Joo Jung, Ivette Hernández Baños, and Chris Snyder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2079, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2079, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluated a new ensemble data assimilation system that uses satellite observations in all weather conditions for global weather forecasts. The results show that including cloud- and precipitation-affected satellite data improves forecasts of moisture, wind, and clouds, especially in the tropics. This work highlights the potential of this new ensemble data assimilation system to enhance global weather forecasts.
Qing Zheng, Wei Sun, Zhiquan Liu, Jiajia Mao, Jieying He, Jian Li, and Xingwen Jiang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-12, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-12, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Ground-based microwave radiometers (MWRs) offer high temporal resolution observations with strong sensitivity to the lower atmosphere, making them valuable for data assimilation. However, their assimilation has traditionally focused on retrieved profiles. This study implemented the direct assimilation of brightness temperatures from MWRs with a machine learning-based bias correction scheme. The results show improvements in the low-level atmospheric structure and precipitation predictions.
Soyoung Ha, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Ivette Hernández Baños, William C. Skamarock, and Michael G. Duda
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4199–4211, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4199-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
To mitigate the imbalances in the initial conditions, this study introduces our recent implementation of the incremental analysis update (IAU) in the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmospheric (MPAS-A) component coupled with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) through the cycling system. A month-long cycling run demonstrates the successful implementation of the IAU capability in the MPAS–JEDI cycling system.
Byoung-Joo Jung, Benjamin Ménétrier, Chris Snyder, Zhiquan Liu, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Junmei Ban, Ivette Hernández Baños, Yonggang G. Yu, and William C. Skamarock
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3879–3895, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3879-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We describe the multivariate static background error covariance (B) for the JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var data assimilation system. With tuned B parameters, the multivariate B gives physically balanced analysis increment fields in the single-observation test framework. In the month-long cycling experiment with a global 60 km mesh, 3D-Var with static B performs stably. Due to its simple workflow and minimal computational requirements, JEDI-MPAS 3D-Var can be useful for the research community.
Zhiquan Liu, Chris Snyder, Jonathan J. Guerrette, Byoung-Joo Jung, Junmei Ban, Steven Vahl, Yali Wu, Yannick Trémolet, Thomas Auligné, Benjamin Ménétrier, Anna Shlyaeva, Stephen Herbener, Emily Liu, Daniel Holdaway, and Benjamin T. Johnson
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7859–7878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7859-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7859-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
JEDI-MPAS 1.0.0, a new data assimilation (DA) system for the MPAS model, was publicly released for community use. This article describes JEDI-MPAS's implementation of the ensemble–variational DA technique and demonstrates its robustness and credible performance by incrementally adding three types of microwave radiances (clear-sky AMSU-A, all-sky AMSU-A, clear-sky MHS) to a non-radiance DA experiment. We intend to periodically release new and improved versions of JEDI-MPAS in upcoming years.
Soyoung Ha
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-371, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-371, 2022
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Heavy pollution events often occur in cloudy conditions, which is hard to observe. This study introduces a new 3D-Var analysis that can facilitate aerosol-cloud interactions through weakly coupled data assimilation using WRF-Chem/WRFDA.
Pascal Marquet, Pauline Martinet, Jean-François Mahfouf, Alina Lavinia Barbu, and Benjamin Ménétrier
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2021–2035, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2021-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2021-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Two conservative thermodynamic variables (moist-air entropy potential temperature and total water content) are introduced into a one-dimensional EnVar data assimilation system to demonstrate their benefit for future operational assimilation schemes, with the use of microwave brightness temperatures from a ground-based radiometer installed during the field campaign SOFGO3D. Results show that the brightness temperatures analysed with the new variables are improved, including the liquid water.
Soyoung Ha
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1769–1788, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1769-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1769-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In an effort to improve air quality forecasting, the WRFDA 3D-Var system is newly extended for the assimilation of surface PM2.5 and PM10 using the RACM/MADE-VBS chemistry in the WRF-Chem model. Through a case study during the Korea–United States Air Quality (KORUS-AQ) period, it is demonstrated that the analysis can lead to improving the prediction of surface PM concentrations up to 26 % for 24 h, diminishing most bias errors.
Cheng-Hsuan Lu, Quanhua Liu, Shih-Wei Wei, Benjamin T. Johnson, Cheng Dang, Patrick G. Stegmann, Dustin Grogan, Guoqing Ge, Ming Hu, and Michael Lueken
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1317–1329, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1317-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1317-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This article is a technical note on the aerosol absorption and scattering calculations of the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) v2.2 and v2.3. It also provides guidance for prospective users of the CRTM aerosol option and Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) aerosol-aware radiance assimilation. Scientific aspects of aerosol-affected BT in atmospheric data assimilation are also briefly discussed.
Xinghong Cheng, Zilong Hao, Zengliang Zang, Zhiquan Liu, Xiangde Xu, Shuisheng Wang, Yuelin Liu, Yiwen Hu, and Xiaodan Ma
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13747–13761, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13747-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13747-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We develop a new inversion method of emission sources based on sensitivity analysis and the three-dimension variational technique. The novel explicit observation operator matrix between emission sources and the receptor’s concentrations is established. Then this method is applied to a typical heavy haze episode in North China, and spatiotemporal variations of SO2, NO2, and O3 concentrations simulated using a posterior emission sources are compared with results using an a priori inventory.
Cited articles
Anderson, J., Hoar, T., Raeder, K., Liu, H., Collins, N., Torn, R., and Avellano, A.: The Data Assimilation Research Testbed: A Community Facility, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1283–1296, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009bams2618.1, 2009. a, b
Anderson, J. L.: An Ensemble Adjustment Kalman Filter for Data Assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2884–2903, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2884:aeakff>2.0.co;2, 2001. a, b
Anderson, J. L.: A Local Least Squares Framework for Ensemble Filtering, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 634–642, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0634:allsff>2.0.co;2, 2003. a
Anderson, J. L.: A Non-Gaussian Ensemble Filter Update for Data Assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 4186–4198, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010mwr3253.1, 2010. a
Anderson, J. L.: A Marginal Adjustment Rank Histogram Filter for Non-Gaussian Ensemble Data Assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 3361–3378, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-19-0307.1, 2020. a
Anderson, J. L. and Collins, N.: Scalable Implementations of Ensemble Filter Algorithms for Data Assimilation, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 24, 1452–1463, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech2049.1, 2007. a
Andersson, E., Bouttier, F., Cardinali, C., Isaksen, L., and Saarinen, S.: Modelling of innovation statistics, in: Workshop on recent developments in data assimilation for atmosphere and ocean, ECMWF Annual Seminar 2003, ECMWF, Reading, UK, 8–12 September 2003, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/15973-modelling-innovation-statistics (last access: 30 November 2022), 2003. a
Arbogast, É., Desroziers, G., and Berre, L.: A parallel implementation of a 4DEnVar ensemble, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2073–2083, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3061, 2017. a, b
Berre, L. and Desroziers, G.: Filtering of Background Error Variances and Correlations by Local Spatial Averaging: A Review, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 3693–3720, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010mwr3111.1, 2010. a
Berre, L., Ştefănescu, S. E., and Pereira, M. B.: The representation of the analysis effect in three error simulation techniques, Tellus A, 58, 196, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.2006.00165.x, 2006. a
Berre, L., Pannekoucke, O., Desroziers, G., Stefanescu, S. E., Chapnik, B., and Raynaud, L.: A variational assimilation ensemble and the spatial filtering of its error covariances: increase of sample size by local spatial averaging, in: Workshop on Flow-dependent aspects of data assimilation, 11–13 June 2007, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/8172-variational-assimilation-ensemble-and-spatial-filtering-its-error-covariances (last access: 28 October 2022), 2007. a
Bishop, C. H., Whitaker, J. S., and Lei, L.: Gain Form of the Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter and Its Relevance to Satellite Data Assimilation with Model Space Ensemble Covariance Localization, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 4575–4592, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-17-0102.1, 2017. a
Bonavita, M., Hamrud, M., and Isaksen, L.: EnKF and Hybrid Gain Ensemble Data Assimilation. Part II: EnKF and Hybrid Gain Results, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 4865–4882, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-15-0071.1, 2015. a
Bowler, N. E., Flowerdew, J., and Pring, S. R.: Tests of different flavours of EnKF on a simple model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1505–1519, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2055, 2012. a
Bowler, N. E., Clayton, A. M., Jardak, M., Jermey, P. M., Lorenc, A. C., Wlasak, M. A., Barker, D. M., Inverarity, G. W., and Swinbank, R.: The effect of improved ensemble covariances on hybrid variational data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 785–797, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2964, 2017a. a, b, c
Bowler, N. E., Clayton, A. M., Jardak, M., Lee, E., Lorenc, A. C., Piccolo, C., Pring, S. R., Wlasak, M. A., Barker, D. M., Inverarity, G. W., and Swinbank, R.: Inflation and localization tests in the development of an ensemble of 4D-ensemble variational assimilations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1280–1302, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3004, 2017b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Buehner, M.: Ensemble-derived stationary and flow-dependent background-error covariances: Evaluation in a quasi-operational NWP setting, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1013–1043, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.15, 2005. a
Buehner, M.: Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter with Cross Validation, Mon. Weather Rev., 148, 2265–2282, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-19-0402.1, 2020. a, b, c
Buehner, M., McTaggart-Cowan, R., and Heilliette, S.: An ensemble Kalman filter for numerical weather prediction based on variational data assimilation: VarEnKF, Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 617–635, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0106.1, 2017. a, b, c
Burgers, G., van Leeuwen, P. J., and Evensen, G.: Analysis Scheme in the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1719–1724, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1719:asitek>2.0.co;2, 1998. a
Campbell, W. F., Bishop, C. H., and Hodyss, D.: Vertical Covariance Localization for Satellite Radiances in Ensemble Kalman Filters, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 282–290, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009mwr3017.1, 2010. a
Computational and Information Systems Laboratory: Cheyenne: HPE/SGI ICE XA System (NCAR Community Computing), Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX, 2019. a
Derber, J. and Bouttier, F.: A reformulation of the background error covariance in the ECMWF global data assimilation system, Tellus A, 51, 195–221, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v51i2.12316, 1999. a
Desroziers, G., Berre, L., Chapnik, B., and Poli, P.: Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3385–3396, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.108, 2005. a, b, c
Desroziers, G., Berre, L., and Pannekoucke, O.: Flow-dependent error covariances from variational assimilation ensembles on global and regional domains, Météo-France, Toulouse, France, HIRLAM Technical Report No. 68, https://www.umr-cnrm.fr/recyf/IMG/pdf/HIRLAM_TR68_Paper1_Desroziers.pdf (last access: 28 October 2022), 2008. a
Evensen, G.: The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation, Ocean Dynam., 53, 343–367, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-003-0036-9, 2003. a
Fisher, M.: Background Error Covariance Modeling, in: Seminar on Recent developments in data assimilation for atmosphere and ocean, ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, 8–12 September 2003, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/elibrary/9404-background-error-covariance-modelling (last access: 28 October 2022), 2003. a
Gas, C.: Block Method Minimizer for Solving Ensemble of Data Assimilation, 18th JCSDA Technical Review Meeting and Science Workshop, Held Virtually, 7–11 June 2021, http://data.jcsda.org/Workshops/JCSDA-18th-Workshop/Tuesday/8.Gas.pdf (last access: 28 October 2022), 2021. a
Gilleland, E., Hering, A. S., Fowler, T. L., and Brown, B. G.: Testing the Tests: What Are the Impacts of Incorrect Assumptions When Applying Confidence Intervals or Hypothesis Tests to Compare Competing Forecasts?, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 1685–1703, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-17-0295.1, 2018. a
Greybush, S. J., Kalnay, E., Miyoshi, T., Ide, K., and Hunt, B. R.: Balance and Ensemble Kalman Filter Localization Techniques, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 511–522, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010mwr3328.1, 2011. a
Ha, S., Snyder, C., Skamarock, W. C., Anderson, J., and Collins, N.: Ensemble Kalman Filter Data Assimilation for the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS), Mon. Weather Rev., 145, 4673–4692, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-17-0145.1, 2017. a, b
Hamill, T. M., Snyder, C., and Morss, R. E.: A comparison of probabilistic forecasts from bred, singular-vector, and perturbed observation ensembles, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1835–1851, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1835:ACOPFF>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Hamrud, M., Bonavita, M., and Isaksen, L.: EnKF and Hybrid Gain Ensemble Data Assimilation. Part I: EnKF Implementation, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 4847–4864, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-14-00333.1, 2015. a
Honeyager, R., Herbener, S., Zhang, X., Shlyaeva, A., and Trémolet, Y.: Observations in the Joint Effort for Data Assimilation Integration (JEDI) – Unified Forward Operator (UFO) and Interface for Observation Data Access (IODA), JCSDA Quarterly Newsletter, 66, 24–34, https://doi.org/10.25923/RB19-0Q26, 2020. a, b
Houtekamer, P. L. and Derome, J.: Methods for ensemble prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 2181–2196, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<2181:MFEP>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a
Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L.: Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 796–811, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0796:dauaek>2.0.co;2, 1998. a, b
Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L., Derome, J., Ritchie, H., and Mitchell, H. L.: A system simulation approach to ensemble prediction, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1225–1242, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<1225:ASSATE>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Ingleby, B.: Global assimilation of air temperature, humidity, wind and pressure from surface stations: practice and performance, Met Office, Exeter, UK, Forecasting Research Technical Report 582, https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/digitalFile_e12ba2af-84e9-45f2-8f30-146ae421f45c/ (last access: 28 October 2022), 2013. a
Isaksen, L., Bonavita, M., Buizza, R., Fisher, M., Haseler, J., Leutbecher, M., and Raynaud, L.: Ensemble of data assimilations at ECMWF, Technical Memoranda 636, https://doi.org/10.21957/OBKE4K60, 2010. a
Joint Center For Satellite Data Assimilation and National Center For Atmospheric Research: JEDI-MPAS Data Assimilation System v2.0.0-beta, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7630054, 2022. a
Jung, B.-J., Ménétrier, B., Snyder, C., Liu, Z., Guerrette, J. J., Ban, J., Baños, I. H., Yu, Y. G., and Skamarock, W. C.: Three-dimensional variational assimilation with a multivariate background error covariance for the Model for Prediction Across Scales–Atmosphere with the Joint Effort for data Assimilation Integration (JEDI-MPAS 2.0.0-beta), Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-131, in review, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2, 1996. a
Kleist, D. T. and Ide, K.: An OSSE-Based Evaluation of Hybrid Variational–Ensemble Data Assimilation for the NCEP GFS. Part II: 4DEnVar and Hybrid Variants, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 452–470, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-13-00350.1, 2015. a
Kotsuki, S., Ota, Y., and Miyoshi, T.: Adaptive covariance relaxation methods for ensemble data assimilation: experiments in the real atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 2001–2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3060, 2017. a
Krishnamurti, T. N., Rajendran, K., Kumar, T. S. V. V., Lord, S., Toth, Z., Zou, X., Cocke, S., Ahlquist, J. E., and Navon, I. M.: Improved Skill for the Anomaly Correlation of Geopotential Heights at 500 hPa, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 1082–1102, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<1082:isftac>2.0.co;2, 2003. a
Lawless, A. S., Gratton, S., and Nichols, N. K.: Approximate iterative methods for variational data assimilation, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 47, 1129–1135, https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.851, 2005. a
Lawson, W. G. and Hansen, J. A.: Implications of Stochastic and Deterministic Filters as Ensemble-Based Data Assimilation Methods in Varying Regimes of Error Growth, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1966–1981, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1966:IOSADF>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a
Lei, J., Bickel, P., and Snyder, C.: Comparison of Ensemble Kalman Filters under Non-Gaussianity, Mon. Weather Rev., 138, 1293–1306, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009mwr3133.1, 2010. a
Lei, L., Whitaker, J. S., and Bishop, C.: Improving Assimilation of Radiance Observations by Implementing Model Space Localization in an Ensemble Kalman Filter, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 10, 3221–3232, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001468, 2018. a, b
Liu, Z., Snyder, C., Guerrette, J. J., Jung, B.-J., Ban, J., Vahl, S., Wu, Y., Trémolet, Y., Auligné, T., Ménétrier, B., Shlyaeva, A., Herbener, S., Liu, E., Holdaway, D., and Johnson, B. T.: Data assimilation for the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere with the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI-MPAS 1.0.0): EnVar implementation and evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7859–7878, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7859-2022, 2022. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o
Lorenc, A. C.: The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP–a comparison with 4D-Var, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 3183–3203, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.132, 2003. a
Lorenc, A. C.: Improving ensemble covariances in hybrid variational data assimilation without increasing ensemble size, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143, 1062–1072, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2990, 2017. a, b
Ménétrier, B.: Normalized Interpolated Convolution from an Adaptive Subgrid documentation, https://github.com/benjaminmenetrier/nicas_doc/blob/master/nicas_doc.pdf (last access: 28 October 2022), 2020. a
Mercier, F., Gürol, S., Jolivet, P., Michel, Y., and Montmerle, T.: Block Krylov methods for accelerating ensembles of variational data assimilations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 144, 2463–2480, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3329, 2018. a, b
Mitchell, H. L. and Houtekamer, P. L.: Ensemble Kalman Filter Configurations and Their Performance with the Logistic Map, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 4325–4343, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009mwr2823.1, 2009. a
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: updated daily, NCEP ADP Global Upper Air and Surface Weather Observations (PREPBUFR format), Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/Z83F-N512, 2008. a
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: updated daily, NCEP GDAS Satellite Data 2004-continuing, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/DWYZ-Q852, 2009. a
National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: updated daily, NCEP GFS 0.25 Degree Global Forecast Grids Historical Archive, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.5065/D65D8PWK, 2015. a
Oliver, H., Shin, M., Matthews, D., Sanders, O., Bartholomew, S., Clark, A., Fitzpatrick, B., van Haren, R., Hut, R., and Drost, N.: Workflow Automation for Cycling Systems, Comput. Sci. Eng., 21, 7–21, https://doi.org/10.1109/mcse.2019.2906593, 2019. a
Park, S.-H., Klemp, J. B., and Skamarock, W. C.: A Comparison of Mesh Refinement in the Global MPAS-A and WRF Models Using an Idealized Normal-Mode Baroclinic Wave Simulation, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 3614–3634, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-14-00004.1, 2014. a
Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C.: The National Meteorological Center's Spectral Statistical-Interpolation Analysis System, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747–1763, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1992)120<1747:tnmcss>2.0.co;2, 1992. a
Sacher, W. and Bartello, P.: Sampling Errors in Ensemble Kalman Filtering. Part I: Theory, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 3035–3049, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007mwr2323.1, 2008. a
Satellite Services Division/Office of Satellite Data Processing and Distribution/NESDIS/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce, and National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Weather Service/NOAA/U.S. Department of Commerce: NCEP ADP Global Upper Air Observational Weather Data, October 1999–continuing, Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, updated daily, https://doi.org/10.5065/39C5-Z211, 2004. a
Shao, H., Derber, J., Huang, X.-Y., Hu, M., Newman, K., Stark, D., Lueken, M., Zhou, C., Nance, L., Kuo, Y.-H., and Brown, B.: Bridging Research to Operations Transitions: Status and Plans of Community GSI, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 97, 1427–1440, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-13-00245.1, 2016. a
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J. B., Duda, M. G., Fowler, L. D., Park, S.-H., and Ringler, T. D.: A Multiscale Nonhydrostatic Atmospheric Model Using Centroidal Voronoi Tesselations and C-Grid Staggering, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3090–3105, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-11-00215.1, 2012. a, b
Skamarock, W. C., Duda, M. G., Ha, S., and Park, S.-H.: Limited-Area Atmospheric Modeling Using an Unstructured Mesh, Mon. Weather Rev., 146, 3445–3460, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-18-0155.1, 2018. a
Trémolet, Y. and Auligné, T.: The Joint Effort for Data Assimilation Integration (JEDI), JCSDA Quarterly Newsletter, 66, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.25923/RB19-0Q26, 2020. a
Whitaker, J. S. and Hamill, T. M.: Ensemble Data Assimilation without Perturbed Observations, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 1913–1924, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1913:EDAWPO>2.0.CO;2, 2002. a
Whitaker, J. S. and Hamill, T. M.: Evaluating Methods to Account for System Errors in Ensemble Data Assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 3078–3089, https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-11-00276.1, 2012. a
Zagar, N., Andersson, E., and Fisher, M.: Balanced tropical data assimilation based on a study of equatorial waves in ECMWF short-range forecast errors, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 987–1011, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.54, 2005. a
Zhang, F., Snyder, C., and Sun, J.: Impacts of Initial Estimate and Observation Availability on Convective-Scale Data Assimilation with an Ensemble Kalman Filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1238–1253, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<1238:ioieao>2.0.co;2, 2004. a
Zhou, X., Zhu, Y., Hou, D., Luo, Y., Peng, J., and Wobus, R.: Performance of the new NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System in a parallel experiment, Weather Forecast., 32, 1989–2004, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0023.1, 2017. a, b
Zhou, X., Zhu, Y., Hou, D., Fu, B., Li, W., Guan, H., Sinsky, E., Kolczynski, W., Xue, X., Luo, Y., Peng, J., Yang, B., Tallapragada, V., and Pegion, P.: The Development of the NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System Version 12, Weather Forecast., 37, 1069–1084, https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-21-0112.1, 2022. a
Short summary
We demonstrate an ensemble of variational data assimilations (EDA) with the Model for Prediction Across Scales and the Joint Effort for Data assimilation Integration (JEDI) software framework. When compared to 20-member ensemble forecasts from operational initial conditions, those from 80-member EDA-generated initial conditions improve flow-dependent error covariances and subsequent 10 d forecasts. These experiments are repeatable for any atmospheric model with a JEDI interface.
We demonstrate an ensemble of variational data assimilations (EDA) with the Model for Prediction...
