Articles | Volume 16, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6609-2023
Methods for assessment of models
 | 
16 Nov 2023
Methods for assessment of models |  | 16 Nov 2023

A diffusion-based kernel density estimator (diffKDE, version 1) with optimal bandwidth approximation for the analysis of data in geoscience and ecological research

Maria-Theresia Pelz, Markus Schartau, Christopher J. Somes, Vanessa Lampe, and Thomas Slawig

Related authors

Description of a global marine particulate organic carbon-13 isotope data set
Maria-Theresia Verwega, Christopher J. Somes, Markus Schartau, Robyn Elizabeth Tuerena, Anne Lorrain, Andreas Oschlies, and Thomas Slawig
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4861–4880, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4861-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4861-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Machine learning parameterization of the multi-scale Kain–Fritsch (MSKF) convection scheme and stable simulation coupled in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using WRF–ML v1.0
Xiaohui Zhong, Xing Yu, and Hao Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3667–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3667-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impacts of spatial heterogeneity of anthropogenic aerosol emissions in a regionally refined global aerosol–climate model
Taufiq Hassan, Kai Zhang, Jianfeng Li, Balwinder Singh, Shixuan Zhang, Hailong Wang, and Po-Lun Ma
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3507-2024, 2024
Short summary
cfr (v2024.1.26): a Python package for climate field reconstruction
Feng Zhu, Julien Emile-Geay, Gregory J. Hakim, Dominique Guillot, Deborah Khider, Robert Tardif, and Walter A. Perkins
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3409–3431, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3409-2024, 2024
Short summary
NEWTS1.0: Numerical model of coastal Erosion by Waves and Transgressive Scarps
Rose V. Palermo, J. Taylor Perron, Jason M. Soderblom, Samuel P. D. Birch, Alexander G. Hayes, and Andrew D. Ashton
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3433–3445, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3433-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluation of isoprene emissions from the coupled model SURFEX–MEGANv2.1
Safae Oumami, Joaquim Arteta, Vincent Guidard, Pierre Tulet, and Paul David Hamer
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3385–3408, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3385-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramson, I. S.: On bandwidth variation in kernel estimates-a square root law, Ann. Stat., pp. 1217–1223, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345986, 1982. a, b, c
Berlinet, A.: Hierarchies of higher order kernels, Prob. Theory Rel., 94, 489–504, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01192560, 1993. a
Bernacchia, A. and Pigolotti, S.: Self-Consistent Method for Density Estimation, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 73, 407–422, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00772.x, 2011. a
Boccara, N.: Functional Analysis – An Introduction for Physicists, Academic Press, Inc., ISBN 0121088103, 1990. a
Botev, Z. I., Grotowski, J. F., and Kroese, D. P.: Kernel density estimation via diffusion, Ann. Stat., 38, 2916–2957, https://doi.org/10.1214/10-AOS799, 2010. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n
Download
Short summary
Kernel density estimators (KDE) approximate the probability density of a data set without the assumption of an underlying distribution. We used the solution of the diffusion equation, and a new approximation of the optimal smoothing parameter build on two pilot estimation steps, to construct such a KDE best suited for typical characteristics of geoscientific data. The resulting KDE is insensitive to noise and well resolves multimodal data structures as well as boundary-close data.