Articles | Volume 16, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5069-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5069-2023
Development and technical paper
 | 
05 Sep 2023
Development and technical paper |  | 05 Sep 2023

Passive-tracer modelling at super-resolution with Weather Research and Forecasting – Advanced Research WRF (WRF-ARW) to assess mass-balance schemes

Sepehr Fathi, Mark Gordon, and Yongsheng Chen

Related authors

Evaluating the impact of storage-and-release on aircraft-based mass-balance methodology using a regional air-quality model
Sepehr Fathi, Mark Gordon, Paul A. Makar, Ayodeji Akingunola, Andrea Darlington, John Liggio, Katherine Hayden, and Shao-Meng Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15461–15491, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15461-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15461-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Description and evaluation of the new UM–UKCA (vn11.0) Double Extended Stratospheric–Tropospheric (DEST vn1.0) scheme for comprehensive modelling of halogen chemistry in the stratosphere
Ewa M. Bednarz, Ryan Hossaini, N. Luke Abraham, and Martyn P. Chipperfield
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6187–6209, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6187-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6187-2023, 2023
Short summary
Description and performance of a sectional aerosol microphysical model in the Community Earth System Model (CESM2)
Simone Tilmes, Michael J. Mills, Yunqian Zhu, Charles G. Bardeen, Francis Vitt, Pengfei Yu, David Fillmore, Xiaohong Liu, Brian Toon, and Terry Deshler
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6087–6125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6087-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6087-2023, 2023
Short summary
A simplified non-linear chemistry transport model for analyzing NO2 column observations: STILT–NOx
Dien Wu, Joshua L. Laughner, Junjie Liu, Paul I. Palmer, John C. Lin, and Paul O. Wennberg
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6161–6185, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6161-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6161-2023, 2023
Short summary
The Hydro-ABC model (Version 2.0): a simplified convective-scale model with moist dynamics
Jiangshan Zhu and Ross Noel Bannister
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6067–6085, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6067-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6067-2023, 2023
Short summary
Rapid Adaptive Optimization Model for Atmospheric Chemistry (ROMAC) v1.0
Jiangyong Li, Chunlin Zhang, Wenlong Zhao, Shijie Han, Yu Wang, Hao Wang, and Boguang Wang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 6049–6066, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6049-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6049-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmadov, R., McKeen, S., Trainer, M., Banta, R., Brewer, A., Brown, S., Edwards, P. M., de Gouw, J. A., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J., Helmig, D., Johnson, B., Karion, A., Koss, A., Langford, A., Lerner, B., Olson, J., Oltmans, S., Peischl, J., Pétron, G., Pichugina, Y., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T., Schnell, R., Senff, C., Sweeney, C., Thompson, C., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Wild, R., Williams, E. J., Yuan, B., and Zamora, R.: Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 411–429, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-411-2015, 2015. a
Alfieri, S., Amato, U., Carfora, M., Esposito, M., and Magliulo, V.: Quantifying trace gas emissions from composite landscapes: A mass-budget approach with aircraft measurements, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1866–1876, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.026, 2010. a
American Meteorological Society,: Gradient Richardson number, Glossary of Meteorology, http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/Gradient_richardson_number (last access: 4 July 2023), 2022. a
Angevine, W. M., Peischl, J., Crawford, A., Loughner, C. P., Pollack, I. B., and Thompson, C. R.: Errors in top-down estimates of emissions using a known source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11855–11868, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11855-2020, 2020. a
Barkley, Z. R., Lauvaux, T., Davis, K. J., Deng, A., Miles, N. L., Richardson, S. J., Cao, Y., Sweeney, C., Karion, A., Smith, M., Kort, E. A., Schwietzke, S., Murphy, T., Cervone, G., Martins, D., and Maasakkers, J. D.: Quantifying methane emissions from natural gas production in north-eastern Pennsylvania, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13941–13966, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13941-2017, 2017. a
Download
Short summary
We have combined various capabilities within a WRF model to generate simulations of atmospheric pollutant dispersion at 50 m resolution. The study objective was to resolve transport processes at the scale of measurements to assess and optimize aircraft-based emission rate retrievals. Model performance evaluation resulted in agreement within 5 % of observed meteorological and within 1–2 standard deviations of observed wind fields. Mass was conserved in the model within 5 % of input emissions.