Articles | Volume 15, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8181-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Importance of different parameterization changes for the updated dust cycle modeling in the Community Atmosphere Model (version 6.1)
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 16 Nov 2022)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 25 Feb 2022)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
CEC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-31', Juan Antonio Añel, 01 Mar 2022
- AC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Longlei Li, 15 Aug 2022
-
RC1: 'Comment on gmd-2022-31', Anonymous Referee #1, 31 Mar 2022
- AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Longlei Li, 15 Aug 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on gmd-2022-31', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Apr 2022
- AC3: 'Reply on RC2', Longlei Li, 15 Aug 2022
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Longlei Li on behalf of the Authors (01 Sep 2022)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (16 Sep 2022) by Samuel Remy
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (03 Oct 2022)
ED: Publish as is (14 Oct 2022) by Samuel Remy
AR by Longlei Li on behalf of the Authors (17 Oct 2022)
Dear authors,
After checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our Code and Data Policy.
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
You have archived your code in GitHub. However, GitHub is not a suitable repository. GitHub itself instructs authors to use other alternatives for long-term archival and publishing, such as Zenodo. Therefore, please, publish your code in one of the appropriate repositories, and include the relevant primary input/output data.
Also, we can not accept embargoes such as publication only after acceptance, registration or previous contact with the authors. You must publish the assets used during the review process too.
In this way, you must reply to this comment with the link to the suitable repository used in your manuscript and containing all the materials used (code and data) with its DOI. Moreover, you must include in a potential reviewed version of your manuscript the modified 'Code and Data Availability' section and the DOI of the code.
Please, reply as soon as possible to this comment with the link for it to continue with the peer-review process for your manuscript.
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Exec. Editor