Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2949-2022
Model evaluation paper
 | 
07 Apr 2022
Model evaluation paper |  | 07 Apr 2022

Evaluation of a quasi-steady-state approximation of the cloud droplet growth equation (QDGE) scheme for aerosol activation in global models using multiple aircraft data over both continental and marine environments

Hengqi Wang, Yiran Peng, Knut von Salzen, Yan Yang, Wei Zhou, and Delong Zhao

Related authors

A new lightning scheme in the Canadian Atmospheric Model (CanAM5.1): implementation, evaluation, and projections of lightning and fire in future climates
Cynthia Whaley, Montana Etten-Bohm, Courtney Schumacher, Ayodeji Akingunola, Vivek Arora, Jason Cole, Michael Lazare, David Plummer, Knut von Salzen, and Barbara Winter
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7141–7155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of uncertainty in black carbon's refractive index on simulated optical depth and radiative forcing
Ruth A. R. Digby, Knut von Salzen, Adam H. Monahan, Nathan P. Gillett, and Jiangnan Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1796,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1796, 2024
Short summary
iPyCLES v1.0: A New Isotope-Enabled Large-Eddy Simulator for Mixed-Phase Clouds
Zizhan Hu, Yiran Peng, Mengke Zhu, and Jonathon S. Wright
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-828,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-828, 2024
Short summary
Microphysical view of development and ice production of mid-latitude stratocumulus during an extratropical cyclone
Yuanmou Du, Dantong Liu, Delong Zhao, Mengyu Huang, Ping Tian, Dian Wen, Wei Xiao, Wei Zhou, Baiwan Pan, Dongfei Zuo, Xiange Liu, Yingying Jing, Rong Zhang, Jiujiang Sheng, Fei Wang, Yu Huang, Yunbo Chen, and Deping Ding
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-314,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-314, 2024
Short summary
How well do Earth system models reproduce the observed aerosol response to rapid emission reductions? A COVID-19 case study
Ruth A. R. Digby, Nathan P. Gillett, Adam H. Monahan, Knut von Salzen, Antonis Gkikas, Qianqian Song, and Zhibo Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2077–2097, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024, 2024
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
Bridging the gap: a new module for human water use in the Community Earth System Model version 2.2.1
Sabin I. Taranu, David M. Lawrence, Yoshihide Wada, Ting Tang, Erik Kluzek, Sam Rabin, Yi Yao, Steven J. De Hertog, Inne Vanderkelen, and Wim Thiery
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7365–7399, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7365-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7365-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new lightning scheme in the Canadian Atmospheric Model (CanAM5.1): implementation, evaluation, and projections of lightning and fire in future climates
Cynthia Whaley, Montana Etten-Bohm, Courtney Schumacher, Ayodeji Akingunola, Vivek Arora, Jason Cole, Michael Lazare, David Plummer, Knut von Salzen, and Barbara Winter
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7141–7155, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Methane dynamics in the Baltic Sea: investigating concentration, flux, and isotopic composition patterns using the coupled physical–biogeochemical model BALTSEM-CH4 v1.0
Erik Gustafsson, Bo G. Gustafsson, Martijn Hermans, Christoph Humborg, and Christian Stranne
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7157–7179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7157-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7157-2024, 2024
Short summary
Split-explicit external mode solver in the finite volume sea ice–ocean model FESOM2
Tridib Banerjee, Patrick Scholz, Sergey Danilov, Knut Klingbeil, and Dmitry Sidorenko
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7051–7065, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7051-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Applying double cropping and interactive irrigation in the North China Plain using WRF4.5
Yuwen Fan, Zhao Yang, Min-Hui Lo, Jina Hur, and Eun-Soon Im
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6929–6947, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6929-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6929-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 6837–6844, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901161, 2000. 
Abdul-Razzak, H., Ghan, S. J., and Rivera-Carpio, C.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 1. Single aerosol type, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 6123–6131, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03735, 1998. 
Albanese, D., Riccadonna, S., Donati, C., and Franceschi, P.: A practical tool for maximal information coefficient analysis, Gigascience, 7, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy032, 2018. 
Albrecht, B.: 2011 CIRPAS Twin Otter Navigation and State Parameters. Version 1.0, UCAR/NCAR – Earth Observing Laboratory [data set], https://doi.org/10.26023/36PD-HZKW-RJ03, 2008. 
ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) user facility: Ambient Winds – AIMMS, updated hourly, 2014-02-15 to 2014-10-15, ARM Mobile Facility (MAO) Manacapuru, Amazonas, Brazil, compiled by: Hobbe, J., ARM Data Center [data set], https://adc.arm.gov/discovery/#/results/site_code::mao (last access: 26 October 2020), 2014a. 
Download
Short summary
The aerosol activation scheme is an important part of the general circulation model, but evaluations using observed data are mostly regional. This research introduced a numerically efficient aerosol activation scheme and evaluated it by using stratus and stratocumulus cloud data sampled during multiple aircraft campaigns in Canada, Chile, Brazil, and China. The decent performance indicates that the scheme is suitable for simulations of cloud droplet number concentrations over wide conditions.