Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Geoscientific Model Development
Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5863–5889, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5863–5889, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5863-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
Review and perspective paper
27 Sep 2021
Review and perspective paper | 27 Sep 2021

Validation of terrestrial biogeochemistry in CMIP6 Earth system models: a review

Lynsay Spafford and Andrew H. MacDougall

Viewed

Total article views: 1,577 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,062 471 44 1,577 13 13
  • HTML: 1,062
  • PDF: 471
  • XML: 44
  • Total: 1,577
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 May 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 May 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,510 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,510 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Jun 2022
Download
Short summary
Land biogeochemical cycles influence global climate change. Their influence is examined through complex computer models that account for the interaction of the land, ocean, and atmosphere. Improved models used in the recent round of model intercomparison used inconsistent validation methods to compare simulated land biogeochemistry to datasets. For the next round of model intercomparisons we recommend a validation protocol with explicit reference datasets and informative performance metrics.
Read more