Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2525-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2525-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and technical paper
| 
06 May 2021
Development and technical paper |
| 06 May 2021
| 06 May 2021
The Environment and Climate Change Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS v1.0): demonstration with simulated CO observations
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
Saroja M. Polavarapu
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
Michael Neish
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3H 5T4, Canada
Pieter L. Houtekamer
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2121 route Transcanadienne, Dorval, Quebec, H9P 1J3, Canada
Dylan B. A. Jones
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
Seung-Jong Baek
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2121 route Transcanadienne, Dorval, Quebec, H9P 1J3, Canada
Tai-Long He
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7, Canada
Sylvie Gravel
Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2121 route Transcanadienne, Dorval, Quebec, H9P 1J3, Canada
Related authors
No articles found.
Zhaojun Tang, Panpan Yang, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, John Worden, Helen Worden, Daven K. Henze, Dylan B. A. Jones, and Zhe Jiang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5432, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5432, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a quantitative analysis of global CO emissions and drivers of atmospheric CO trends in 2003–2022, using GEOS-Chem adjoint model constrained by MOPITT satellite observations. Our results indicate a substantial decline in global anthropogenic CO emissions of 14–17 % over the two-decade period, as well as an important offsetting effect (by 37 % globally) from rising wildfire emissions on atmospheric CO decline driven by anthropogenic reductions.
Sina Voshtani, Dylan B. A. Jones, Debra Wunch, Drew C. Pendergrass, Paul O. Wennberg, David F. Pollard, Isamu Morino, Hirofumi Ohyama, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Frank Hase, Ralf Sussmann, Damien Weidmann, Rigel Kivi, Omaira García, Yao Té, Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Robin Stevens, Shobha Kondragunta, Aihua Zhu, Douglas Worthy, Senen Racki, Kathryn McKain, Maria V. Makarova, Nicholas Jones, Emmanuel Mahieu, Andrea Cadena-Caicedo, Paolo Cristofanelli, Casper Labuschagne, Elena Kozlova, Thomas Seitz, Martin Steinbacher, Reza Mahdi, and Isao Murata
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 15527–15565, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15527-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15527-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We assess the complementarity of the greater temporal coverage provided by ground-based remote sensing data with the spatial coverage of satellite observations when these data are used together to quantify CO emissions from extreme wildfires in 2023. Our results reveal that the commonly used biomass burning emission inventories significantly underestimate the fire emissions and emphasize the importance of the ground-based remote sensing data in reducing uncertainties in the estimated emissions.
Nikhil Dadheech, Tai-Long He, and Alexander J. Turner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5159–5174, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5159-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an efficient GHG (greenhouse gas) flux inversion framework using a machine-learning emulator (FootNet) as a surrogate for an atmospheric transport model, resulting in a 650 × speedup. Paradoxically, the flux inversion using the ML (machine-learning) model outperforms the full-physics model in our case study. We attribute this to the ML model mitigating transport errors in the GHG flux inversion.
Tai-Long He, Nikhil Dadheech, Tammy M. Thompson, and Alexander J. Turner
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 1661–1671, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-1661-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
It is computationally expensive to infer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using atmospheric observations. This is partly due to the detailed model used to represent atmospheric transport. We demonstrate how a machine learning (ML) model can be used to simulate high-resolution atmospheric transport. This type of ML model will help estimate GHG emissions using dense observations, which are becoming increasingly common with the proliferation of urban monitoring networks and geostationary satellites.
Dylan Jones, Lucas Prates, Zhen Qu, William Cheng, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Takashi Sekiya, Antje Inness, Rajesh Kumar, Xiao Tang, Helen Worden, Gerbrand Koren, and Vincent Huijen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3759, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3759, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate five chemical reanalysis products to assess their potential to provide useful information on tropospheric ozone variability. We find that the reanalyses produce consistent information on ozone variations in the free troposphere, but have large discrepancies at the surface. The results suggests that improvements in the reanalyses are needed to better exploit the assimilated observations to enhance the utility of the reanalysis products at the surface.
Brendan Byrne, David F. Baker, Sourish Basu, Michael Bertolacci, Kevin W. Bowman, Dustin Carroll, Abhishek Chatterjee, Frédéric Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Noel Cressie, David Crisp, Sean Crowell, Feng Deng, Zhu Deng, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sha Feng, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Benedikt Herkommer, Lei Hu, Andrew R. Jacobson, Rajesh Janardanan, Sujong Jeong, Matthew S. Johnson, Dylan B. A. Jones, Rigel Kivi, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Shamil Maksyutov, John B. Miller, Scot M. Miller, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Tomohiro Oda, Christopher W. O'Dell, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, Prabir K. Patra, Hélène Peiro, Christof Petri, Sajeev Philip, David F. Pollard, Benjamin Poulter, Marine Remaud, Andrew Schuh, Mahesh K. Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Colm Sweeney, Yao Té, Hanqin Tian, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Thorsten Warneke, John R. Worden, Debra Wunch, Yuanzhi Yao, Jeongmin Yun, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, and Ning Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 963–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in the carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems result in emissions and removals of CO2. These can be driven by anthropogenic activities (e.g., deforestation), natural processes (e.g., fires) or in response to rising CO2 (e.g., CO2 fertilization). This paper describes a dataset of CO2 emissions and removals derived from atmospheric CO2 observations. This pilot dataset informs current capabilities and future developments towards top-down monitoring and verification systems.
Tai-Long He, Dylan B. A. Jones, Kazuyuki Miyazaki, Kevin W. Bowman, Zhe Jiang, Xiaokang Chen, Rui Li, Yuxiang Zhang, and Kunna Li
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14059–14074, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14059-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14059-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use a deep-learning (DL) model to estimate Chinese NOx emissions by combining satellite analysis and in situ measurements. Our results are consistent with conventional analyses of Chinese NOx emissions. Comparison with mobility data shows that the DL model has a better capability to capture changes in NOx. We analyse Chinese NOx emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown period. Our results illustrate the potential use of DL as a complementary tool for conventional air quality studies.
Weichao Han, Tai-Long He, Zhaojun Tang, Min Wang, Dylan Jones, and Zhe Jiang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4225–4237, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4225-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4225-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present an application of a hybrid deep learning (DL) model on prediction of surface CO in China from 2015 to 2020, which utilizes both convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory neural networks. The DL model performance is better than a Kalman filter (KF) system in the training period (2005–2018). Furthermore, the DL model demonstrates good temporal extensibility: the mean bias and correlation coefficients are 95.7 ppb and 0.93 in the test period (2019–2020) over eastern China.
Heba S. Marey, James R. Drummond, Dylan B. A. Jones, Helen Worden, Merritt N. Deeter, John Gille, and Debbie Mao
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 701–719, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-701-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, an analysis has been performed to understand the improvements in observational coverage over Canada in the new MOPITT V9 product. Temporal and spatial analysis of V9 indicates a general coverage gain of 15–20 % relative to V8, which varies regionally and seasonally; e.g., the number of successful MOPITT retrievals in V9 was doubled over Canada in winter. Also, comparison with the corresponding IASI instrument indicated generally good agreement, with about a 5–10 % positive bias.
Sabour Baray, Daniel J. Jacob, Joannes D. Maasakkers, Jian-Xiong Sheng, Melissa P. Sulprizio, Dylan B. A. Jones, A. Anthony Bloom, and Robert McLaren
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18101–18121, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use 2010–2015 surface and satellite observations to disentangle methane from anthropogenic and natural sources in Canada. Using a chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem), the mismatch between modelled and observed methane concentrations can be used to infer emissions according to Bayesian statistics. Compared to prior knowledge, we show higher anthropogenic emissions attributed to energy and/or agriculture in Western Canada and lower natural emissions from Boreal wetlands.
Beata Bukosa, Jenny Fisher, Nicholas Deutscher, and Dylan Jones
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-173, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2021-173, 2021
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Human activities led to rising levels of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO)) in the atmosphere, threatening our future. We use models and measurements to predict and understand the climatological impact of these gases. Here, we describe a new simulation in the GEOS-Chem model that uses a more accurate method to simulate CO2, CH4 and CO, through their chemical dependence. Relative to the original simulations our results agree better with measurements.
Ilya Stanevich, Dylan B. A. Jones, Kimberly Strong, Martin Keller, Daven K. Henze, Robert J. Parker, Hartmut Boesch, Debra Wunch, Justus Notholt, Christof Petri, Thorsten Warneke, Ralf Sussmann, Matthias Schneider, Frank Hase, Rigel Kivi, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Voltaire A. Velazco, Kaley A. Walker, and Feng Deng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 9545–9572, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the utility of a weak-constraint (WC) four-dimensional variational (4D-Var) data assimilation scheme for mitigating systematic errors in methane simulation in the GEOS-Chem model. We use data from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) and show that, compared to the traditional 4D-Var approach, the WC scheme improves the agreement between the model and independent observations. We find that the WC corrections to the model provide insight into the source of the errors.
Shoma Yamanouchi, Camille Viatte, Kimberly Strong, Erik Lutsch, Dylan B. A. Jones, Cathy Clerbaux, Martin Van Damme, Lieven Clarisse, and Pierre-Francois Coheur
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 905–921, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-905-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-905-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Ammonia (NH3) is a major source of pollution in the air. As such, there have been increasing efforts to measure the atmospheric abundance of NH3 and its spatial and temporal variability. In this study, long-term measurements of NH3 over Toronto, Canada, derived from multiscale datasets are examined. These NH3 datasets were compared to each other and to a model to better understand NH3 variability and to assess model performance.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T. and Williams, A. P.: Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfires across western
US forests, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113,
11770–11775, 2016. a
Anderson, J. L.: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2884–2903, 2001. a
Anselmo, D., Moran, M. D., Menard, S., Bouchet, V., Makar, P., Gong, W., Kallaur, A., Beaulieu, P.-A., Landry, H., Stroud, C., Huang, P., Gong, S., and Talbot, D.: A new Canadian air quality forecast model: GEM-MACH15, Proc. 12th AMS Conf. on Atmos. Chem., 17–21 January, Atlanta, GA, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 6 pp., available at: http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/165388.pdf (last access: 28 April 2021), 2010. a
Arellano, A. F. and Hess, P. G.: Sensitivity of top-down estimates of CO sources to GCTM transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L21807, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027371, 2006. a
Bannister, R. N.: A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational data assimilation. I : characteristics and
measurements of forecast error covariances, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 1951–1970, 2008. a
Barré, J., Gaubert, B., Arellano, A. J., Worden, H. M., Edwards, D. P., Deeter, M. N., Anderson, J. L., Raeder, K., Collins, N., Tilmes, S., Clerbaux, C., Emmons, L. K., Pfister, G., Coheur, P.-F., and Hurtmans, D.: Assessing the impacts of assimilating IASI and MOPITT CO retrievals using CESM-CAM-chem and DART, J. Geophy. Res.-Atmos., 120, 10501–10529, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023467, 2015. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Bloom, S., Takacs, L., DaSilva, A., and Ledvina, D.: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1256–1271, 1996. a
Bocquet, M.: Localization and the iterative ensemble Kalman smoother, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 1075–1089, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2711, 2016. a
Bruhwiler, L., Dlugokencky, E., Masarie, K., Ishizawa, M., Andrews, A., Miller, J., Sweeney, C., Tans, P., and Worthy, D.: CarbonTracker-CH4: an assimilation system for estimating emissions of atmospheric methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8269–8293, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8269-2014, 2014. a
Côté, J., Gravel, S., Methot, A., Patoine, A., Roch, M., and Staniforth, A.: The operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model. Part I: Design considerations and formulation, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1373–1395, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1373:TOCMGE>2.0.CO;2, 1998a. a
Côté, J., Desmarais, J.-G.,
Gravel, S., Methot, A., Patoine, A., Roch, M., and Staniforth, A.: The operational CMC-MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) model. Part II: Results, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 1397–1418, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1397:TOCMGE>2.0.CO;2, 1998b. a
Crowell, S., Baker, D., Schuh, A., Basu, S., Jacobson, A. R., Chevallier, F., Liu, J., Deng, F., Feng, L., McKain, K., Chatterjee, A., Miller, J. B., Stephens, B. B., Eldering, A., Crisp, D., Schimel, D., Nassar, R., O'Dell, C. W., Oda, T., Sweeney, C., Palmer, P. I., and Jones, D. B. A.: The 2015–2016 carbon cycle as seen from OCO-2 and the global in situ network, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9797–9831, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9797-2019, 2019. a
Deeter, M., Worden, H., Edwards, D., Gille, J., and Andrews, A.:
Evaluation of MOPITT retrievals of lower-tropospheric carbon monoxide over the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D13306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017553,2012. a
Deeter, M. N., Edwards, D. P., Francis, G. L., Gille, J. C., Martínez-Alonso, S., Worden, H. M., and Sweeney, C.: A climate-scale satellite record for carbon monoxide: the MOPITT Version 7 product, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 2533–2555, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-2533-2017, 2017. a
Flannigan, M. D., Krawchuk, M. A., de Groot, W. J., and Growman, L. M : Implications of changing climate
for global wildland fire, Int. J. Wildfire, 18, 483–507, 2009. a
Fortems-Cheiney, A., Chevallier, F., Pison, I., Bousquet, P., Szopa, S., Deeter, M. N., and Clerbaux, C.: Ten years of CO emissions as seen from Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT), J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014416, 2011. a, b, c
Gaspari, G. and Cohn, S. E.: Construction of correlation functions in two and three dimensions, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 723–757, 1999. a
Gaubert, B., Arellano Jr., A., Barre, J., Worden, H., Emmons, L., Tilmes, S., Buchholz, R., Vitt, F.,
Raeder, K., Collins, N., Anderson, J., Wiedinmyer, C., Martinez Alonso, S., Edwards, D., Andreae, M., Hannigan, J.,
Petri, C., Strong, K., and Jones, N.: Toward a chemical reanalysis in a coupled chemistry-climate model: An evaluation
of MOPITT CO assimilation and its impact on tropospheric compostion, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 7310–7343, 2016. a, b, c, d
Gaubert, B., Emmons, L. K., Raeder, K., Tilmes, S., Miyazaki, K., Arellano Jr., A. F., Elguindi, N., Granier, C., Tang, W., Barré, J., Worden, H. M., Buchholz, R. R., Edwards, D. P., Franke, P., Anderson, J. L., Saunois, M., Schroeder, J., Woo, J.-H., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Meinardi, S., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J., Teng, A., Kim, M., Dickerson, R. R., He, H., Ren, X., Pusede, S. E., and Diskin, G. S.: Correcting model biases of CO in East Asia: impact on oxidant distributions during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14617–14647, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14617-2020, 2020. a
Ghil, M., Cohn, S., Tavantzis, J., Bube, K., and Isaacson, E.: Applications of estimation
theory to numerical
weather prediction, Dynamic meteorology – data assimilation methods, edited by: Bengtsson, L.,
Ghil, M., and Kallen, E., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 134–224, 1981. a
Girard, C., Plante, A., Desgagne, M., McTaggart-Cowan, R., Cote, J., Charron, M., Gravel, S., Lee, V., Patoine, A., Qaddouri, A., Roch, M., Spacek, L., Tanguay, M., Vaillancourt, P. A., and Zadra, A.: Staggered Vertical Discretization of the Canadian Environmental Multiscale (GEM) Model Using a Coordinate of the Log-Hydrostatic-Pressure Type, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 1183–1196, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00255.1, 2014. a, b
Gong, W., Makar, P. A., Zhang, J., Milbrandt, J., Gravel, S., Hayden, K. L., Macdonald, A. M., and Leaitch, W. R.: Modelling aerosol-cloud-meteorology interaction: A case study with a fully coupled air quality model (GEM-MACH), Atmos. Environ., 115, 695–715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.062, 2015. a
Hamill, T. M., Whitaker, J. S., and Snyder, C.: Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 2776–2790, 2001. a
Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L.: Data assimilation using an Ensemble Kalman Filter technique, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 796–811, 1998. a
Houtekamer, P. L. and Mitchell, H. L.: Ensemble Kalman filtering, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3269–3289, 2005. a
Houtekamer, P. L., Lefaivre, L., Derome, J., Richie, H., and Michell, H. L.: A system simulation approach to ensemble predictions, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1225–1242, 1996. a
Inness, A., Baier, F., Benedetti, A., Bouarar, I., Chabrillat, S., Clark, H., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Engelen, R. J., Errera, Q., Flemming, J., George, M., Granier, C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Huijnen, V., Hurtmans, D., Jones, L., Kaiser, J. W., Kapsomenakis, J., Lefever, K., Leitão, J., Razinger, M., Richter, A., Schultz, M. G., Simmons, A. J., Suttie, M., Stein, O., Thépaut, J.-N., Thouret, V., Vrekoussis, M., Zerefos, C., and the MACC team: The MACC reanalysis: an 8 yr data set of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4073–4109, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4073-2013, 2013. a
Inness, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Bouarar, I., Chabrillat, S., Crepulja, M., Engelen, R. J., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Gaudel, A., Hendrick, F., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kapsomenakis, J., Katragkou, E., Keppens, A., Langerock, B., de Mazière, M., Melas, D., Parrington, M., Peuch, V. H., Razinger, M., Richter, A., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., Thouret, V., Vrekoussis, M., Wagner, A., and Zerefos, C.: Data assimilation of satellite-retrieved ozone, carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide with ECMWF's Composition-IFS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5275–5303, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5275-2015, 2015. a, b
Inness, A., Ades, M., Agustí-Panareda, A., Barré, J., Benedictow, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Dominguez, J. J., Engelen, R., Eskes, H., Flemming, J., Huijnen, V., Jones, L., Kipling, Z., Massart, S., Parrington, M., Peuch, V.-H., Razinger, M., Remy, S., Schulz, M., and Suttie, M.: The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3515–3556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3515-2019, 2019. a, b
Janssens-Maenhout, G., Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Dentener, F., Muntean, M., Pouliot, G., Keating, T., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J., Wankmüller, R., Denier van der Gon, H., Kuenen, J. J. P., Klimont, Z., Frost, G., Darras, S., Koffi, B., and Li, M.: HTAP_v2.2: a mosaic of regional and global emission grid maps for 2008 and 2010 to study hemispheric transport of air pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11411–11432, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11411-2015, 2015. a
Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Kopacz, M., Liu, J., Henze, D. K., and Heald, C.: Quantifying the impact of model errors on top-down estimates of carbon monoxide emissions using satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D15306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015282, 2011. a, b, c
Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Worden, H. M., Deeter, M. N., Henze, D. K., Worden, J., Bowman, K. W., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., and Schuck, T. J.: Impact of model errors in convective transport on CO source estimates inferred from MOPITT CO retrievals, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118, 2073–2083, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50216, 2013. a, b
Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Worden, H. M., and Henze, D. K.: Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1521–1537, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1521-2015, 2015a. a, b, c, d
Jiang, Z., Jones, D. B. A., Worden, J., Worden, H. M., Henze, D. K., and Wang, Y. X.: Regional data assimilation of multi-spectral MOPITT observations of CO over North America, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6801–6814, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6801-2015, 2015b. a, b
ang, Z., Worden, J. R., Worden, H., Deeter, M., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., and Henze, D. K.: A 15-year record of CO emissions constrained by MOPITT CO observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4565–4583, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4565-2017, 2017. a, b, c
Khade, V. and Neish, M.: Model output of The Environment and Climate Change Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS v1.0): demonstration with simulated CO observations, available at: http://crd-data-donnees-rdc.ec.gc.ca/CCMR/pub/2020_Khade_ECCAS_all_data/ (last access: 5 May 2021), 2020. a
Kain, J. S.: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update, J. Appl. Meteorol. 43, 170–181, 2004. a
Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in
convective parameterizations, J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 2784–2802, 1990. a
Kang, J.-S., Kalnay, E., Liu, J., Fung, I., Miyoshi, T., and Ide, K.: “Variable localization” in an ensemble Kalman filter: Application to the carbon cycle data assimilation, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D09110, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014673, 2011. a, b
Kim, J., Polavarapu, S. M., Chan, D., and Neish, M.: The Canadian atmospheric transport model for simulating greenhouse gas evolution on regional scales: GEM–MACH–GHG v.137-reg, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 269–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-269-2020, 2020. a
Khade, V., Neish, M., Houtekamer, P. L., Polavarapu, S., Baek, S.-J., and Jones, D. B. A.: The Environment and Climate Change Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS v1.0) : demonstration with simulated CO observations, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3908545, 2020. a, b
Kopacz, M., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Logan, J. A., Zhang, L., Megretskaia, I. A., Yantosca, R. M., Singh, K., Henze, D. K., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Khlystova, I., McMillan, W. W., Gille, J. C., Edwards, D. P., Eldering, A., Thouret, V., and Nedelec, P.: Global estimates of CO sources with high resolution by adjoint inversion of multiple satellite datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 855–876, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-855-2010, 2010. a
Liebelt, P. B.: An introduction to optimal estimation, Addison-Wesley publishing company, Reading, USA, 1967. a
Mitchell, H. L. and Houtekamer, P. L.: An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 416–433, 2000. a
Miyazaki, K., Maki, T., Patra, P., and Nakazawa, T.: Assessing the impact of satellite, aircraft and surface
observations on CO2 flux estimation using an ensemble based 4-D data assimilation system, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, D16306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015366, 2011. a
Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H. J., Sudo, K., Takigawa, M., van Weele, M., and Boersma, K. F.: Simultaneous assimilation of satellite NO2, O3, CO, and HNO3 data for the analysis of tropospheric chemical composition and emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9545–9579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9545-2012, 2012. a, b, c
Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H. J., and Sudo, K.: A tropospheric chemistry reanalysis for the years 2005–2012 based on an assimilation of OMI, MLS, TES, and MOPITT satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 8315–8348, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8315-2015, 2015. a, b, c
Miyazaki, K., Bowman, K. W., Yumimoto, K., Walker, T., and Sudo, K.: Evaluation of a multi-model, multi-constituent assimilation framework for tropospheric chemical reanalysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 931–967, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-931-2020, 2020. a
Mizzi, A. P., Arellano Jr., A. F., Edwards, D. P., Anderson, J. L., and Pfister, G. G.: Assimilating compact phase space retrievals of atmospheric composition with WRF-Chem/DART: a regional chemical transport/ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation system, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 965–978, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-965-2016, 2016. a
McTaggart-Cowan, R., and Zadra, A.: Representing Richardson Number Hysteresis in the NWP Boundary Layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 1232–1258, 2015. a
Neish, M., Tanguay, M., Semeniuk, K., Polavarapu, S., DeGrandpre, J., Girard, C., Qaddouri, A., Gravel, S., Chan, D., and Ren, S.: GEM-MACH development team, GEM-MACH-GHG revision 137 (Version 137), Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3246556, 2019. a
Palmer, P. I., Jacob, D. J., D Jones, B. A., Heald, C. L., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Sachse, G. W., and Streets, D. G.:
Inverting for emissions of carbon monoxide from Asia using aircraft observations over the western Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8828, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003397, 2003. a
Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C.: The National Meteorological Center's spectral statistical interpolation analysis system., Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747–1763, 1992. a
Pavlovic, R., Chen, J., Anderson, K., Moran, M. D., Beaulieu, P.-A., Davignon, D., and Cousineau, S.: The FireWork air quality forecast system with near-real-time biomass burning emissions: Recent developments and evaluation of performance for the 2015 North American wildfire season, J. Air Waste Manage., 66, 819–841, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1158214, 2016. a
Polavarapu, S. M., Neish, M., Tanguay, M., Girard, C., de Grandpré, J., Semeniuk, K., Gravel, S., Ren, S., Roche, S., Chan, D., and Strong, K.: Greenhouse gas simulations with a coupled meteorological and transport model: the predictability of CO2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12005–12038, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12005-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e
Polavarapu, S. M., Deng, F., Byrne, B., Jones, D. B. A., and Neish, M.: A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO2 adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12011–12044, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018, 2018. a
Prive, N., Errico, R. M., and Carvalho, D.: Performance and evaluation of the Global Modeling
and Assimilation Office observing system simulation experiment, 98th AMS annual Meeting, Austin, TX,
2018. a
Spivakovsky, C. M., Logan, J. A., Montzka, S. A., Balkanski, Y. J., Foreman-Fowler, M., Jones, D. B. A., Horowitz, L. W., Fusco, A. C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Prather, M. J., Wofsy, S. C., and McElroy, M. B.: Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 8931–8980, 2000. a
van der Laan‐Luijkx I. T., van der Velde, I. R., Krol, M. C., Gatti, L. V., Domingues, L. G., Correia, C. S. C., Miller, J. B., Gloor, M., van Leeuwen, T. T., Kaiser, J. W., Wiedinmyer, C., Basu, S., Clerbaux, C., and Peters, W.: Response of the Amazon carbon balance to the 2010 drought derived with CarbonTracker South America, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1092–1108, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GB005082, 2015.
a
Voigt, C., Marushchak, M.E., Mastepanov, M., Lamprecht, R. E., Christensen, T. R., Dorodnikov, M., Jackowicz-Korczynski, M., Lindgren, A., Lohila, A., Nykanen, H., Oinonen, M., Oksanen, T., Palonen, V., Treat, C. C., Martikainen, P. J., and Biasi, C.: Ecosystem carbon response of an Arctic peatland to simulated permafrost thaw, Glob. Change Biol., 25, 1746–1764, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14574, 2019. a
Wang, H., Jacob, D. J., Kopacz, M., Jones, D. B. A., Suntharalingam, P., Fisher, J. A., Nassar, R., Pawson, S., and Nielsen, J. E.: Error correlation between CO2 and CO as constraint for CO2 flux inversions using satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7313–7323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7313-2009, 2009. a
Worthy, D. E., Platt, J. A., Kessler, R., Ernst, M., Audette, C., and Racki, S.: An update on the Canadian GHG measurement program, in: Report of the 12th WMO/IAEA Meeting of Experts on Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Related Tracer Measurement Techniques, Toronto, Canada, September 2003, edited by: Worthy, D. and Huang, L., World Meteorological Organization Global Atmosphere Watch, Report 162, 220–231, 2005. a
Yin, Y., Chevallier, F., Ciais, P., Broquet, G., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Pison, I., and Saunois, M.: Decadal trends in global CO emissions as seen by MOPITT, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13433–13451, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13433-2015, 2015. a, b
Short summary
A new modeling system has been developed at Environment and Climate Change Canada to ingest observations of carbon monoxide (CO) into a coupled weather and constituent transport model. We show that accounting for the uncertainty in surface flux leads to a better estimate of CO distributions. The benefit of assimilating observations from different simulated networks varies with region. This is the first step towards developing a state and flux estimation system for greenhouse gases.
A new modeling system has been developed at Environment and Climate Change Canada to ingest...
