Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2235–2264, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2235–2264, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021

Model evaluation paper 30 Apr 2021

Model evaluation paper | 30 Apr 2021

Comparison of three aerosol representations of NHM-Chem (v1.0) for the simulations of air quality and climate-relevant variables

Mizuo Kajino et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Mizuo Kajino on behalf of the Authors (22 Feb 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Mar 2021) by Holger Tost
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (19 Mar 2021)
ED: Publish as is (19 Mar 2021) by Holger Tost
Download
Short summary
This study compares performance of aerosol representation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency's regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology–chemistry model (NHM-Chem). It indicates separate treatment of sea salt and dust in coarse mode and that of light-absorptive and non-absorptive particles in fine mode could provide accurate assessments on aerosol feedback processes.