Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2235-2021
Model evaluation paper
 | 
30 Apr 2021
Model evaluation paper |  | 30 Apr 2021

Comparison of three aerosol representations of NHM-Chem (v1.0) for the simulations of air quality and climate-relevant variables

Mizuo Kajino, Makoto Deushi, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Naga Oshima, Keiya Yumimoto, Taichu Yasumichi Tanaka, Joseph Ching, Akihiro Hashimoto, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masaaki Ikegami, Akane Kamada, Makoto Miyashita, Yayoi Inomata, Shin-ichiro Shima, Pradeep Khatri, Atsushi Shimizu, Hitoshi Irie, Kouji Adachi, Yuji Zaizen, Yasuhito Igarashi, Hiromasa Ueda, Takashi Maki, and Masao Mikami

Viewed

Total article views: 2,390 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,669 664 57 2,390 304 64 61
  • HTML: 1,669
  • PDF: 664
  • XML: 57
  • Total: 2,390
  • Supplement: 304
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 61
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,390 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,203 with geography defined and 187 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
This study compares performance of aerosol representation methods of the Japan Meteorological Agency's regional-scale nonhydrostatic meteorology–chemistry model (NHM-Chem). It indicates separate treatment of sea salt and dust in coarse mode and that of light-absorptive and non-absorptive particles in fine mode could provide accurate assessments on aerosol feedback processes.