Articles | Volume 13, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-269-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-269-2020
Development and technical paper
 | 
29 Jan 2020
Development and technical paper |  | 29 Jan 2020

The Canadian atmospheric transport model for simulating greenhouse gas evolution on regional scales: GEM–MACH–GHG v.137-reg

Jinwoong Kim, Saroja M. Polavarapu, Douglas Chan, and Michael Neish

Related authors

The Environment and Climate Change Canada Carbon Assimilation System (EC-CAS v1.0): demonstration with simulated CO observations
Vikram Khade, Saroja M. Polavarapu, Michael Neish, Pieter L. Houtekamer, Dylan B. A. Jones, Seung-Jong Baek, Tai-Long He, and Sylvie Gravel
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 2525–2544, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2525-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-2525-2021, 2021
Short summary
On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems?
Brendan Byrne, Dylan B. A. Jones, Kimberly Strong, Saroja M. Polavarapu, Anna B. Harper, David F. Baker, and Shamil Maksyutov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13017–13035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019, 2019
Short summary
Analysis of atmospheric CH4 in Canadian Arctic and estimation of the regional CH4 fluxes
Misa Ishizawa, Douglas Chan, Doug Worthy, Elton Chan, Felix Vogel, and Shamil Maksyutov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4637–4658, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4637-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4637-2019, 2019
Short summary
A comparison of posterior atmospheric CO2 adjustments obtained from in situ and GOSAT constrained flux inversions
Saroja M. Polavarapu, Feng Deng, Brendan Byrne, Dylan B. A. Jones, and Michael Neish
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12011–12044, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12011-2018, 2018
Short summary
Coupling the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v. 2.0) to Environment and Climate Change Canada's greenhouse gas forecast model (v.107-glb)
Bakr Badawy, Saroja Polavarapu, Dylan B. A. Jones, Feng Deng, Michael Neish, Joe R. Melton, Ray Nassar, and Vivek K. Arora
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 631–663, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-631-2018, 2018
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric sciences
Improving trajectory calculations by FLEXPART 10.4+ using single-image super-resolution
Rüdiger Brecht, Lucie Bakels, Alex Bihlo, and Andreas Stohl
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2181–2192, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2181-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Data fusion uncertainty-enabled methods to map street-scale hourly NO2 in Barcelona: a case study with CALIOPE-Urban v1.0
Alvaro Criado, Jan Mateu Armengol, Hervé Petetin, Daniel Rodriguez-Rey, Jaime Benavides, Marc Guevara, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Albert Soret, and Oriol Jorba
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2193–2213, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023, 2023
Short summary
Forecasting tropical cyclone tracks in the northwestern Pacific based on a deep-learning model
Liang Wang, Bingcheng Wan, Shaohui Zhou, Haofei Sun, and Zhiqiu Gao
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2167–2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2167-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2167-2023, 2023
Short summary
Accelerating models for multiphase chemical kinetics through machine learning with polynomial chaos expansion and neural networks
Thomas Berkemeier, Matteo Krüger, Aryeh Feinberg, Marcel Müller, Ulrich Pöschl, and Ulrich K. Krieger
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2037–2054, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2037-2023, 2023
Short summary
A machine learning emulator for Lagrangian particle dispersion model footprints: a case study using NAME
Elena Fillola, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Alistair Manning, Simon O'Doherty, and Matt Rigby
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1997–2009, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1997-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahmadov R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Koerner, S., Neininger, B., Dolman, A. J., and Sarrat, C.: Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO2 fluxes: Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF-VPRM coupled atmosphere-biosphere model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D22107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008552, 2007. 
Ahmadov, R., Gerbig, C., Kretschmer, R., Körner, S., Rödenbeck, C., Bousquet, P., and Ramonet, M.: Comparing high resolution WRF-VPRM simulations and two global CO2 transport models with coastal tower measurements of CO2, Biogeosciences, 6, 807–817, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-807-2009, 2009. 
Andrews, A. E., Kofler, J. D., Trudeau, M. E., Williams, J. C., Neff, D. H., Masarie, K. A., Chao, D. Y., Kitzis, D. R., Novelli, P. C., Zhao, C. L., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lang, P. M., Crotwell, M. J., Fischer, M. L., Parker, M. J., Lee, J. T., Baumann, D. D., Desai, A. R., Stanier, C. O., De Wekker, S. F. J., Wolfe, D. E., Munger, J. W., and Tans, P. P.: CO2, CO, and CH4 measurements from tall towers in the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory's Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network: instrumentation, uncertainty analysis, and recommendations for future high-accuracy greenhouse gas monitoring efforts, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 647–687, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-647-2014, 2014. 
Download
Short summary
GEM–MACH–GHG is a coupled weather and greenhouse gas transport model at Environment and Climate Change Canada. We have developed the regional version of GEM–MACH–GHG, mainly focusing on Canada and the United States, as a follow-up to the global version of GEM–MACH–GHG. The regional model is superior to our global model in terms of weather forecasts and CO2 simulation.