Articles | Volume 13, issue 6
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2663–2670, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2663-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2663–2670, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2663-2020

Development and technical paper 17 Jun 2020

Development and technical paper | 17 Jun 2020

H2SO4–H2O binary and H2SO4–H2O–NH3 ternary homogeneous and ion-mediated nucleation: lookup tables version 1.0 for 3-D modeling application

Fangqun Yu et al.

Related authors

Influence of atmospheric conditions on the role of trifluoroacetic acid in atmospheric sulfuric acid-dimethylamine nucleation
Ling Liu, Fangqun Yu, Kaipeng Tu, Zhi Yang, and Xiuhui Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1186,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1186, 2020
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Using machine learning to derive cloud condensation nuclei number concentrations from commonly available measurements
Arshad Arjunan Nair and Fangqun Yu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12853–12869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12853-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12853-2020, 2020
Short summary
Enhancement of nanoparticle formation and growth during the COVID-19 lockdown period in urban Beijing
Xiaojing Shen, Junying Sun, Fangqun Yu, Xiaoye Zhang, Junting Zhong, Yangmei Zhang, Xinyao Hu, Can Xia, and Sinan Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1064,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1064, 2020
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Global-regional nested simulation of particle number concentration by combing microphysical processes with an evolving organic aerosol module
Xueshun Chen, Fangqun Yu, Wenyi Yang, Yele Sun, Huansheng Chen, Wei Du, Jian Zhao, Ying Wei, Lianfang Wei, Huiyun Du, Zhe Wang, Qizhong Wu, Jie Li, Junling An, and Zifa Wang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-759,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-759, 2020
Revised manuscript under review for ACP
Short summary
Constraining remote oxidation capacity with ATom observations
Katherine R. Travis, Colette L. Heald, Hannah M. Allen, Eric C. Apel, Stephen R. Arnold, Donald R. Blake, William H. Brune, Xin Chen, Róisín Commane, John D. Crounse, Bruce C. Daube, Glenn S. Diskin, James W. Elkins, Mathew J. Evans, Samuel R. Hall, Eric J. Hintsa, Rebecca S. Hornbrook, Prasad S. Kasibhatla, Michelle J. Kim, Gan Luo, Kathryn McKain, Dylan B. Millet, Fred L. Moore, Jeffrey Peischl, Thomas B. Ryerson, Tomás Sherwen, Alexander B. Thames, Kirk Ullmann, Xuan Wang, Paul O. Wennberg, Glenn M. Wolfe, and Fangqun Yu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7753–7781, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7753-2020, 2020
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric Sciences
Implementation of a synthetic inflow turbulence generator in idealised WRF v3.6.1 large eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric conditions
Jian Zhong, Xiaoming Cai, and Zheng-Tong Xie
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 323–336, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-323-2021, 2021
Short summary
Numerical study of the effects of initial conditions and emissions on PM2.5 concentration simulations with CAMx v6.1: a Xi'an case study
Han Xiao, Qizhong Wu, Xiaochun Yang, Lanning Wang, and Huaqiong Cheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 223–238, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-223-2021, 2021
Short summary
A multi-year short-range hindcast experiment with CESM1 for evaluating climate model moist processes from diurnal to interannual timescales
Hsi-Yen Ma, Chen Zhou, Yunyan Zhang, Stephen A. Klein, Mark D. Zelinka, Xue Zheng, Shaocheng Xie, Wei-Ting Chen, and Chien-Ming Wu
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 73–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-73-2021, 2021
Short summary
Ground-based lidar processing and simulator framework for comparing models and observations (ALCF 1.0)
Peter Kuma, Adrian J. McDonald, Olaf Morgenstern, Richard Querel, Israel Silber, and Connor J. Flynn
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 43–72, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-43-2021, 2021
Development of an Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aerosol index (AI) data assimilation scheme for aerosol modeling over bright surfaces – a step toward direct radiance assimilation in the UV spectrum
Jianglong Zhang, Robert J. D. Spurr, Jeffrey S. Reid, Peng Xian, Peter R. Colarco, James R. Campbell, Edward J. Hyer, and Nancy L. Baker
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 27–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-27-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Coffman, D. J. and Hegg, D. A.: A preliminary study of the effect of ammonia on particle nucleation in the marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 7147–7160, 1995. 
Doyle, G. J.: Self-nucleation in the sulfuric acid-water system, J. Chem. Phys., 35, 795–799, 1961. 
Kazil, J. and Lovejoy, E. R.: A semi-analytical method for calculating rates of new sulfate aerosol formation from the gas phase, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3447–3459, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3447-2007, 2007. 
Kazil, J., Stier, P., Zhang, K., Quaas, J., Kinne, S., O'Donnell, D., Rast, S., Esch, M., Ferrachat, S., Lohmann, U., and Feichter, J.: Aerosol nucleation and its role for clouds and Earth's radiative forcing in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10733–10752, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10733-2010, 2010. 
Download
Short summary
Secondary particles formed via nucleation have important implications for air quality and climate. Here we describe nucleation rate lookup tables for four different nucleation mechanisms that can be readily used in chemistry transport and climate models. The nucleation rates predicted have been assessed against state-of-the-art laboratory measurements. The lookup tables cover a wide range of key parameters controlling binary, ternary, and ion-mediated nucleation in the Earth's atmosphere.