Articles | Volume 13, issue 3
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1373–1397, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020
Model description paper
23 Mar 2020
Model description paper | 23 Mar 2020

Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model

Benjamin N. O. Kuffour et al.

Related authors

Causal deep learning models for studying the Earth system: soil moisture-precipitation coupling in ERA5 data across Europe
Tobias Tesch, Stefan Kollet, and Jochen Garcke
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-105,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-105, 2022
Short summary
Climate warming-driven changes in the cryosphere and their impact on groundwater-surface water interactions in the Heihe River Basin
Amanda Triplett and Laura E. Condon
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-160,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2022-160, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
How uncertain are precipitation and peakflow estimates for the July 2021 flooding event?
Mohamed Saadi, Carina Furusho-Percot, Alexandre Belleflamme, Ju-Yu Chen, Silke Trömel, and Stefan Kollet
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2022-111,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2022-111, 2022
Preprint under review for NHESS
Short summary
Impact of distributed meteorological forcing on snow dynamic and induced water fluxes over a mid-elevation alpine micro-scale catchment
Aniket Gupta, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Martial Cohard, Didier Voisin, Basile Hector, Marc Descloitres, Jean-Pierre Vandervaere, Catherine Coulaud, Romain Biron, Lucie Liger, Jean-Gabriel Valay, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-639,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-639, 2022
Preprint under review for HESS
Short summary
GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models
Tom Gleeson, Thorsten Wagener, Petra Döll, Samuel C. Zipper, Charles West, Yoshihide Wada, Richard Taylor, Bridget Scanlon, Rafael Rosolem, Shams Rahman, Nurudeen Oshinlaja, Reed Maxwell, Min-Hui Lo, Hyungjun Kim, Mary Hill, Andreas Hartmann, Graham Fogg, James S. Famiglietti, Agnès Ducharne, Inge de Graaf, Mark Cuthbert, Laura Condon, Etienne Bresciani, and Marc F. P. Bierkens
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7545–7571, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021, 2021
Short summary

Related subject area

Climate and Earth system modeling
loopUI-0.1: indicators to support needs and practices in 3D geological modelling uncertainty quantification
Guillaume Pirot, Ranee Joshi, Jérémie Giraud, Mark Douglas Lindsay, and Mark Walter Jessell
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4689–4708, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4689-2022, 2022
Short summary
Transient climate simulations of the Holocene (version 1) – experimental design and boundary conditions
Zhiping Tian, Dabang Jiang, Ran Zhang, and Baohuang Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4469–4487, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4469-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4469-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ocean biogeochemistry in the Canadian Earth System Model version 5.0.3: CanESM5 and CanESM5-CanOE
James R. Christian, Kenneth L. Denman, Hakase Hayashida, Amber M. Holdsworth, Warren G. Lee, Olivier G. J. Riche, Andrew E. Shao, Nadja Steiner, and Neil C. Swart
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4393–4424, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4393-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4393-2022, 2022
Short summary
Climate projections over the Great Lakes Region: using two-way coupling of a regional climate model with a 3-D lake model
Pengfei Xue, Xinyu Ye, Jeremy S. Pal, Philip Y. Chu, Miraj B. Kayastha, and Chenfu Huang
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4425–4446, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4425-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4425-2022, 2022
Short summary
Formulation of a new explicit tidal scheme in revised LICOM2.0
Jiangbo Jin, Run Guo, Minghua Zhang, Guangqing Zhou, and Qingcun Zeng
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4259–4273, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4259-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4259-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Abu-El-Sha'r, W. Y. and Rihani, J. F.: Application of the high performance computing techniques of parflow simulator to model groundwater flow at Azraq basin, Water Resour. Manage., 21, 409–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9023-5, 2007. 
Ajami, H., McCabe, H. M., Evans, J. P., and Stisen, S.: Assessing the impact of model spin-up on surface water-groundwater interactions using an integrated hydrologic model, Water Resour. Res., 50, 2636–2656, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014258, 2014. 
Ajami, H., McCabe, M. F., and Evans, J. P.: Impacts of model initialization on an integrated surface water-groundwater model, Hydrol. Process., 29, 3790–3801, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10478, 2015. 
Allievi, A. and Calisal, S. M.: Application of Bubnov-Galerkin formulation to orthogonal grid generation, J. Comput. Phys., 98, 163–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(92)90181-W, 1992. 
Amdahl, G. M.: Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities, in spring joint computer conference, Vol. 37, 256–259, 1967. 
Download
Short summary
Integrated hydrologic models (IHMs) were developed in order to allow for more accurate simulations of real-world ecohydrologic conditions. Many IHMs exist, and the literature can be dense, so it is often difficult to understand what a specific model can and cannot do. We provide a review of the current core capabilities, solution techniques, communication structure with other models, some limitations, and potential future improvements of one such open-source integrated model called ParFlow.